#6 Contracts Flashcards

(48 cards)

1
Q

Can a seller avoid liability for personal injury by including a disclaimer in a product sale under the UCC?

A

No. Under UCC § 2-719, a seller cannot disclaim liability for personal injuries caused by a defective product.
Even if a disclaimer is written into the sale, it is ineffective if the product causes bodily harm.

Key Notes:

Privity is not required — injury victims don’t have to be the buyer

Disclaimers like “as is” are allowed for warranties, but not for physical injury

Seller will still be held liable for damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a novation, and how does it apply when a corporation is formed?

A

A novation is when a new party (like a newly formed corporation) takes over a contract and fully replaces the original party (the promoter), with consent from all parties. This releases the promoter from liability.

A promoter is someone who signs contracts on behalf of a corporation before it’s legally formed. Until a novation occurs, the promoter is personally liable.

Example: You sign a lease for a future gym before forming the corporation. Once the corporation is created, all parties agree to swap you out and put the corporation in. Now the corporation owes the rent, and you’re no longer liable — that’s a novation.

Only a novation can remove a promoter’s liability. Assignment or delegation does not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When does the warranty of merchantability arise under the UCC?

A

It arises automatically by law when a merchant sells goods of the kind they normally sell. The goods must be fit for their ordinary purpose and match any packaging or descriptions.

You do not need a written or spoken warranty — it’s implied by the sale itself.

Bonus tip:
Don’t confuse this with the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, which only applies when the buyer relies on the seller’s advice for a specific need.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In a contract where Egan agrees to buy Barton’s business and pay off Barton’s debt to Ness (including a life insurance policy to ensure payment if Egan dies), what is Ness’s status under both the contract and insurance policy?

A

Ness is a creditor beneficiary under both the contract and the insurance policy.

Why:

A creditor beneficiary receives a benefit because a debt is owed and the contract is meant to satisfy that debt.

A donee beneficiary receives a benefit as a gift — no debt is owed.

In this case:

Egan is assuming Barton’s obligation to pay off Ness, a creditor.

The insurance policy ensures that Ness is still paid if Egan dies.

✅ Creditor beneficiary = Enforcing payment of a debt.
🚫 No donee beneficiary = No one is receiving a gift.

Key rule to remember:
A creditor beneficiary can sue to enforce payment. A donee beneficiary can only sue the promisor (not the promisee) if the promised gift is not delivered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can a minor disaffirm a contract after reaching the age of majority?

A

Yes, a minor can disaffirm (cancel) a contract at any time while still a minor, and also within a reasonable time after reaching the age of majority.

Key Rules:

Contracts with minors are voidable, not void.

A contract becomes binding only if the minor ratifies it after turning 18.

Continued use or acceptance of benefits after turning 18 may be seen as ratification.

If the minor disaffirms within a reasonable time after turning 18, the contract is not binding.

Example:
Rail bought a computer at age 16. After turning 18, he quickly returned it, demanding a refund. This disaffirmance was timely and valid. Elco cannot deny the refund if no ratification occurred.

Thing to Remember:
Voidable = valid but can be canceled by one party. Minors get this protection to avoid exploitation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Gold agreed in writing to sell Hatch a used computer for $150. Hatch brought the money, but Gold refused to deliver the computer. What remedy is Hatch entitled to?

A

Compensatory damages only.

📚 Explanation:
When a contract is breached, the standard remedy is compensatory damages—money that puts the non-breaching party in the position they would’ve been in if the contract had been fulfilled.

In this case, Hatch can recover the difference between what he was supposed to pay ($150) and what he actually had to pay to replace the computer (say, $350). That $200 difference is Hatch’s actual financial loss.

Specific performance (forcing Gold to hand over the computer) isn’t available because the computer isn’t unique or irreplaceable.

Consequential damages apply only when special harm was foreseeable to the breaching party—which it wasn’t here.

Punitive damages are not awarded in contract cases (only in torts like fraud or injury).

🧠 Key Takeaway:

Contract law aims to compensate, not punish. If the item can be replaced and no unique harm occurred, the remedy is compensatory damages only.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Under UCC rules, when does risk of loss transfer in an FOB shipping point contract?

A

A: When the goods are delivered to the carrier (e.g. UPS, FedEx). Risk of loss shifts to the buyer at that moment.

Key Rule:
In FOB shipping point contracts, title and risk pass to the buyer when the carrier takes possession—not when goods are placed on the seller’s dock.

Example:
If a seller ships goods FOB New York and the buyer is in LA, the buyer bears the risk once the items are handed to the carrier in NY.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does the mirror image rule say about contract acceptance under common law?

A

A: The offeree must accept all terms exactly as stated in the offer. Any change, even to price, creates a counteroffer—not a contract.

Key Rule:
Under the mirror image rule, a contract is only formed when the acceptance is a mirror of the original offer. A counteroffer kills the original offer.

Example:
If an offer is made to sell a home for $150,000 and the response says, “I’ll pay $145,000,” no contract is formed. The $145,000 is a counteroffer, and the seller is not bound unless they agree.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the Statute of Frauds, and which types of contracts does it require to be in writing?

A

The Statute of Frauds is a legal rule that requires certain types of contracts to be in writing to be enforceable. Its purpose is to prevent fraud and misunderstandings in significant agreements.

Use the mnemonic GROSSE to remember which contracts must be in writing:

G – Sale of Goods $500 or more

R – Real estate sales

O – Contracts that take Over one year to perform

S – Surety (guarantee to pay someone else’s debt)

S – Promises made in consideration of marriage

E – Executor promises to pay estate debts from their own funds

💡 Key Rule: These contracts must include essential terms (like price and subject), and be signed by the party being sued. They do not need to be in one document.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the implied warranty of merchantability, when does it apply, and how can a seller cancel it?

A

🟩 Implied Warranty of Merchantability (UCC)

  • This warranty means the item will work for its normal use (e.g., a toaster toasts, a tire drives safely).
  • It applies automatically when a merchant sells goods — even if they don’t mention it.
  • The buyer doesn’t have to be a merchant, and doesn’t need to ask for the warranty.

How can the seller cancel it?
* By clearly saying “as is,” “with all faults,” or using the word “merchantability” in the disclaimer.

Example:
A tire shop (merchant) sells a tire. Unless they say otherwise, the tire must be safe for driving. If sold “as is,” no warranty applies.

Key Rule:
This warranty protects buyers by default — but merchants can cancel it if they do so clearly and correctly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Under the Statute of Frauds (SOF), Carson orally agreed to repair Ives’s rare book for $450. Later, they agreed orally to increase the price to $650 for additional work. Ives refused to pay, and Carson sued. What is the total amount Carson can recover?

A

The Statute of Frauds (SOF) only applies to certain types of contracts — if a contract falls under SOF and is not in writing, it can be unenforceable.

SOF does not apply here because:

This was a contract for services (book repair), not the sale of goods.

The work could be completed within one year.

The price increase (from $450 to $650) does not trigger the SOF, since the $500+ rule only applies to sales of goods, not services.

Therefore, the oral contract is valid, and Carson can recover the full $650.

🧠 Statute of Frauds Basics:
Certain contracts must be in writing to be enforceable. Use the acronym GROSSE to remember when SOF applies:

Goods $500+

Real estate sales

Over 1 year to perform

Suretyship (guarantee someone else’s debt)

Statement in consideration of marriage

Executor promises to pay estate debt from personal funds

If a contract fits any one of these, it must be in writing — otherwise, SOF is a defense to avoid performance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Under the parol evidence rule, which types of agreements can be admitted as evidence even after a final written contract is signed?

A. Prior written agreements
B. Subsequent oral agreements
C. Both A and B
D. Neither A nor B

A

Correct Answer: B. Subsequent oral agreements

The parol evidence rule (PER) blocks parties from introducing prior or contemporaneous oral or written agreements that contradict a finalized written contract. The idea is to protect the integrity of written contracts once they’re signed as the full and final agreement.

However, subsequent modifications (oral or written) made after the contract are not blocked by the PER. Courts will allow these to show that the parties agreed to change the deal after signing.

Key takeaways:

❌ Evidence of prior agreements contradicting the written deal = Not allowed

✅ Evidence of later changes = Allowed

✅ Evidence to clarify ambiguous terms or prove fraud/mistake = Allowed

Tip to remember:
Parol Evidence Rule = “What’s done before is barred. What’s changed after is fair game.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When can a verbal agreement to modify a sales contract be legally binding under the UCC?
Does a change to delivery date need to be in writing?

A

🟦 Under UCC § 2-209, a verbal modification to a contract for the sale of goods is binding as long as the overall contract does not fall under the Statute of Frauds.

The Statute of Frauds only requires a writing when the contract is for $500 or more.

In this case, because the contract was for $480, a verbal agreement to change the delivery date is valid and enforceable.

Acme agreed to deliver on June 2, so failure to deliver on that date is a breach.

📝 Key Rule:

Verbal modifications to contracts under $500 are enforceable under the UCC.

A delivery date change is valid even without a new writing if the underlying contract doesn’t require it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When can a buyer sue a seller for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability under the UCC?

A

🟦A buyer can sue for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability only if:

The seller is a merchant who ordinarily sells goods of that kind,

The goods were not fit for ordinary use,

The seller did not disclaim the warranty using clear language like “as is” or “with all faults.”

📝 Key rule:

The buyer does not need to prove negligence, privity of contract, or strict liability.

The seller must be a merchant, and the defect must make the product unfit for normal use.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Under the UCC, which oral contracts for goods over $500 must be in writing to be enforceable?

A

Most oral contracts for goods priced over $500 are unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds—unless an exception applies.

🔑 Use the acronym SPAM for exceptions:

  1. Specially manufactured goods (made uniquely for the buyer)
  2. Performance occurred (goods were received/accepted or payment was made)
  3. Admitted in court (by the defendant)
  4. Merchant fails to object to confirmation in 10 days

📌 A contract to sell a work of art for over $500, without writing, usually does not qualify for any SPAM exception → unenforceable.

📝 Key Rule:

Writing is required for goods ≥ $500

Unless SPAM applies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When a contract includes a daily penalty for late completion, what type of damages does that represent

A

This represents liquidated damages, not compensatory damages.

Liquidated damages are:

A pre-agreed dollar amount set in the contract

Intended to represent a reasonable estimate of the loss if one party breaches

Enforceable as long as they’re not excessive or punitive in nature

📌 Key Rule:
If the contract says the breaching party will forfeit $X per day for being late, and both parties agreed to that amount in advance, that clause governs—even if the work is eventually completed.

🔑 In this case:

Mullin finished the project 30 days late

Contract said: $100 forfeiture per day late
➡️ The town gets $3,000 in liquidated damages, not compensatory damages

Let me know if you want a diagram too.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What must a plaintiff prove to recover under strict product liability?

A

Under strict product liability, the plaintiff does not need to prove negligence.

To win, the plaintiff must prove all 3:

1 The product was sold in a defective condition

2 The product was being used as intended

3 The defect caused injury

📌 Key points:

No need to prove who was at fault

No need for privity of contract

Recovery is still allowed even if the injured person can’t show negligence

Strict liability focuses on the dangerous defect, not on whether the seller or manufacturer was careless.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

If someone assigns their rights under a contract to another person, when are they no longer liable under that contract?

A

The original party (called the assignor) remains legally responsible for the contract unless the person receiving the rights (the assignee) explicitly releases them from liability. Assigning the contract does not remove the assignor’s responsibility by default.

Example:
West, Inc. enters into a contract with Barton to deliver 1,000 custom chairs by December. Later, West assigns the contract to Egan, who pays West for the assignment. Barton then fails to deliver the chairs. Egan sues West for breach of contract.

West is still liable because Egan never released West from responsibility. Even though West is no longer directly involved, the law assumes West is still on the hook unless Egan clearly agrees otherwise.

Key Rule:
Assigning contract rights does not cancel the assignor’s liability. The assignor is only released if the assignee formally and explicitly agrees to release them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Under the UCC, what limits apply to liquidated damages in a sales contract?

A

🟦Liquidated damages must be a reasonable estimate of actual losses and cannot be punitive. A seller can’t just write any amount into the contract — if it’s excessive, it won’t be enforced.

Even if the contract doesn’t mention liquidated damages, the UCC allows the seller to keep up to $500 of the buyer’s deposit when the buyer breaches — as long as it’s fair.

Key rule: Liquidated damages must be fair, not arbitrary. And sellers may keep up to $500 automatically if the buyer defaults.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Under UCC § 2-403, what happens when an owner entrusts goods to a merchant who sells that kind of goods, and the merchant mistakenly sells them?

A

If you entrust goods to a merchant who deals in that type of goods, and the merchant sells them to someone buying in the ordinary course of business, the buyer gets good title — even if the sale was a mistake.

The original owner cannot get the goods back from the buyer. Their only remedy is to sue the merchant.

Example:
West gives a clock to Grill (a clock seller) for repair. A clerk mistakenly sells the clock to Hone, a regular customer. Hone doesn’t know it’s a mistake and buys it in good faith.
➡️ Hone gets good title. West cannot recover the clock from Hone — only from Grill.

Key Rule:
Good faith buyers in the ordinary course of business are protected. The merchant is liable, not the buyer.

21
Q

Under the UCC, what can a party do if they prove the other side committed fraud in the formation of a contract?

A

They can rescind the contract (cancel it) and sue for damages caused by the fraud.

This means the injured party can walk away from the contract as if it never existed and recover any financial harm they suffered because of the fraud.

But they must return any goods or money they received — unless some of it counts as damages.

They cannot claim punitive damages under the UCC. And they must have actually relied on the fraud for it to count.

Example:
A seller lies about a product’s condition to get the buyer to agree. The buyer discovers the fraud. Under the UCC, the buyer can rescind the contract and sue for losses — but not for extra punishment.

Let me know if you want this turned into a visual chart or made more compact.

22
Q

When is a merchant’s offer to sell goods binding under the UCC even if the buyer gives no consideration?

A

Under the UCC, a firm offer by a merchant is enforceable without consideration if three conditions are met (remember SUM):

  • Signed: The offer is in writing and signed by the merchant
  • Up to 3 months: If no time is stated, it stays open for a reasonable time — but never longer than 3 months
  • Merchant: The offeror is a merchant who regularly deals in those goods

Example:
A store runs out of a sale item and gives a customer a signed rain check with no expiration date. The customer returns a month later, and the store refuses to honor it.
➡️ Under UCC firm offer rules, the customer can enforce the offer — because the rain check meets all SUM conditions.

Key Rule:
A merchant’s signed written offer is binding without consideration, for up to 3 months, even if no end date is listed.

23
Q

When is a verbal contract for goods over $500 enforceable under the UCC even though it wasn’t in writing?

A

A verbal sales contract over $500 is enforceable if it meets an exception to the UCC Statute of Frauds. Use SPAM to remember the four exceptions:

  • Specially manufactured goods made just for the buyer
  • Performance of the contract has already begun
  • Admission in court by the defendant
  • Merchant fails to object to written confirmation within 10 days

Example:
A buyer asks a manufacturer to build a custom $2,000 door. The seller builds it, but the buyer later tries to cancel. Even though the contract was verbal, it is enforceable because the door was specially made and can’t be resold.

Key Rule:
Custom goods that can’t be sold to others make a verbal contract enforceable, even over $500.

Let me know if you want this shortened or turned into a SPAM mnemonic diagram.

24
Q

When will a personal services contract be discharged by operation of law?

A

A personal services contract (PSC) will be discharged if:

  • The person performing the service dies or becomes incapacitated
  • The subject of the contract becomes illegal to perform
  • A court ruling discharges the contract (e.g., bankruptcy)

It will not be discharged just because the person receiving the service dies or goes bankrupt. The performer still has to perform unless the law makes it impossible or illegal.

Example:
An actress signs a contract to act in a film. If the film later becomes illegal to produce, the contract is discharged — even if no one died or defaulted.

Key Rule:
Only illegality, death of the performer, or incapacity discharges a PSC automatically.

25
Discharge of contractual duties graphic
26
Statute of Frauds – Over One Year Rule
Statute of Frauds – Over One Year Rule If a contract cannot possibly be completed within 1 year from the date it’s made, it must be in writing. 🟡 Even if the contract says "1 year of work," check the start date. ✅ Oral contract is enforceable if performance could be done within 1 year of agreement ❌ Oral contract is unenforceable if performance starts in the future and runs for a year → That’s over 1 year total from contract date → Writing required Trap example: * Contract made Dec 1 * Work starts Jan 1, ends Jan 1 next year * = 13 months total → Not enforceable unless in writing 💡 Key trigger: Ask, “Can this be done within 1 year of today?” If no, SOF applies.
27
SOF TABLE
28
On the CPA exam, what language must be used to correctly describe a seller’s obligation under an FOB destination contract?
The seller is required to tender delivery of conforming goods at the destination specified by the buyer. 📌 Even though carriers are used in real life, the UCC requires that tender occur at the destination — not just to the carrier. ❌ Saying the seller tenders to a carrier (even if it’s headed to the destination) sounds like FOB shipping point, which is wrong for this question. 💡 Trap to avoid: Answer choices that say “tender to a carrier who delivers to the destination” will be marked wrong — even though they sound right — because they don’t state that the seller tenders at the destination. Key Rule for the CPA exam: FOB destination = seller must ensure delivery at the buyer’s location, not just hand off to a delivery service.
29
When does the Parol Evidence Rule (PER) block a party from using oral agreements in court?
The Parol Evidence Rule blocks any oral or written statements made before or during signing if they contradict the final written contract. It does not block: Oral agreements made after the contract is signed Explanations of ambiguous terms Claims of fraud or mistake Example: If a signed contract says “Party A will provide all equipment,” and Party B says, “But we orally agreed I could use your computer,” that oral agreement cannot be used in court — it contradicts the written contract and was made at the same time. Key rule: If the oral agreement is contemporaneous and conflicts with the signed contract, it’s barred by the Parol Evidence Rule.
30
Under UCC Article 2, who is required to perform contract obligations in good faith?
Both merchants and nonmerchants must perform their duties in good faith under Article 2. Good faith means honesty in fact for everyone. For merchants, it also includes reasonable commercial standards (like fair dealing in the trade). 🧠 Example: * A merchant must fairly honor a rain check for an advertised item. * A nonmerchant buyer must pay on time and accept conforming goods. 📌 Key rule: UCC Article 2 covers all sales of goods (tangible, movable personal property), and both parties — not just merchants — must act in good faith when performing contract duties.
31
What must happen for an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose to apply?
Two things: The buyer tells the seller they need the product for a special purpose The buyer relies on the seller’s advice in picking the product If the product doesn’t work for that purpose, and the seller knew the buyer was relying on them, the seller may be legally responsible. * This warranty does not need to be in writing * It applies to both merchants and nonmerchants * It’s based on trusting the seller’s advice 📌 Example: Buyer says, “I need paint for an airplane wing.” Seller recommends one, and it peels off mid-flight. → Breach of warranty if buyer relied on that advice.
32
When is a liquidated damages clause unenforceable — and how can you tell if the amount is excessive?
A liquidated damages clause is unenforceable if: 1. Clearly excessive compared to the actual or anticipated harm 2. Intended to punish the breaching party (a penalty) rather than compensate To tell if it’s excessive, compare it to the harm actually suffered. Ask: Is this amount way beyond what the breach really cost? Would it feel unfair if I were charged this much for being late? Example: Rent is $400. Lease says $25 per day late fee. Paying 16 days late = $400 rent + $400 in fees. That’s like paying 100% interest in just over two weeks. The court would likely call that a penalty and throw it out. Key rule: Liquidated damages must be a fair estimate—not a threat or punishment.
33
If a business owner sends a signed letter offering to sell goods and promises not to revoke it, but then tries to cancel before the other side accepts, is the offer still valid under the UCC? When is the contract officially formed if the buyer accepts by mail?
Under the UCC (which governs sales of goods), if a merchant (someone who regularly sells that kind of goods) sends a signed written offer that says they won’t revoke it, that’s called a firm offer. Even if no deadline is mentioned, the law says the offer can’t be revoked for a reasonable time (up to 3 months). So even if the seller later tries to cancel the offer, the cancellation has no effect — the offer is still valid. Also, the mailbox rule says that when someone accepts an offer by mail, the contract is formed the moment the acceptance is mailed, not when it’s received. ✅ So in this case: The seller couldn’t revoke the offer The buyer mailed their acceptance before hearing about the revocation A contract was formed the day the acceptance was mailed Bottom line: If a business makes a signed promise to keep an offer open, they can’t take it back right away. And if the buyer mails an acceptance, the deal is locked in as soon as they drop it in the mailbox.
34
In a real estate deal, if the seller sends a signed written offer and the buyer accepts by phone (verbally), is a contract formed? And who can enforce it?
🟦Yes, a contract is formed — but it’s only enforceable against the party who signed something. Under the Statute of Frauds (common law rules), a contract to sell land must: 1 Be in writing, and 2 Be signed by the person being sued It does not need to be signed by both parties. Only the party you're trying to enforce the deal against must have signed. 📌 Example: Seller signs and sends a written offer to sell land. Buyer calls and says “I accept,” but sends nothing in writing. → A contract exists. → If buyer sues seller, it's enforceable (seller signed). → If seller sues buyer, it fails (buyer didn’t sign). Key rule: For land sales, a signed writing is required — but only by the person you’re holding legally accountable.
35
The 6 types of contracts that must be in writing (GROSSE):
1 Goods worth $500 or more (UCC) 2 Real estate sales 3 Contracts that **cannot** be performed within 1 year 4 Suretyship (promise to pay someone else's debt) 5 Promises made in consideration of marriage 6 Executor promises to pay estate debts personally If your contract falls under one of these, you need a signed writing to enforce it.
36
When does the Statute of Frauds not apply — meaning the contract can be enforceable even if it’s oral?
The Statute of Frauds does not apply to contracts that can be completed within one year, even if they are never completed that fast. As long as it’s possible to finish within one year, no written contract is required. Example: A verbal agreement to repaint someone’s house in 6 months is enforceable — because it can be done within a year. But if the contract cannot possibly be finished in under a year — like a 2-year lease or a 5-year payment plan — it must be in writing under the SOF. Key rule: The 1-year rule is about possibility, not probability.
37
When can a third party enforce a contract they weren’t part of?
A third party can enforce a contract if they are an intended beneficiary. There are two main types: Creditor beneficiary – the contract is meant to help pay off a debt owed to the third party. Donee beneficiary – the contract is meant to give a gift or benefit to the third party. To qualify, the contract must clearly show intent to benefit the third party. This can include: Direct payment instructions to the third party Language showing the contract is meant to satisfy an obligation owed to them An incidental beneficiary (someone who benefits indirectly or by chance) cannot enforce the contract. Key Rule: Intent matters—only intended beneficiaries have legal standing to sue under a contract.
38
What is "accord and satisfaction" in contract law?
Accord and satisfaction is a way to discharge a contract by: Accord: Agreeing to a new, alternative duty in place of the original duty. Satisfaction: Performing that new duty. Once satisfaction occurs, the original obligation is fully discharged. Example: If someone owes money but the creditor agrees to accept something else (like a product or service) instead—and it is delivered—that’s accord and satisfaction. Only works if: The new duty is accepted voluntarily The substitute is actually delivered
39
What are the 4 implied warranties under the UCC, and how do they apply to merchants vs. non-merchants?
**Title** – Applies to all sellers. The seller promises they own the goods and there are no hidden liens or claims. **Infringement** – Applies only to merchants. The goods must not violate any intellectual property rights. **Merchantability** – Applies only if the seller is a merchant (someone who regularly sells that type of product). A non-merchant (like someone selling their used lawnmower online) is not held to this warranty. **Fitness for a Particular Purpose** – Applies to both merchants and non-merchants if: – The buyer relies on the seller’s advice – The seller knows the buyer’s intended use – The seller says the goods will be suitable
40
What is rescission in contract law, and how does it differ from release, novation, and revocation?
Rescission is when both parties agree to cancel a contract and return to their original positions—as if the contract never happened. It's used when the parties realize they should undo the deal entirely. By contrast: Release ends only the remaining duties under a contract but does not restore the parties to their pre-contract positions. Novation replaces one party with a new third party, creating a new contract. Revocation is the withdrawal of an offer before it’s accepted—not the cancellation of a contract. Use rescission when the goal is to cancel the contract completely and erase its effects.
41
Which condition prevents a valid requirements contract? A. Open price B. Open delivery C. Open quantity D. Open acceptance
Answer: D – Open acceptance A contract isn’t valid unless both sides clearly agree. If one side hasn’t accepted yet, there’s no contract. Why the others don’t stop a valid contract: Open price – Law fills in a fair price. Open delivery – Law assumes delivery will be in a reasonable time/place. Open quantity – In a requirements contract, “all we need” is enough. Only open acceptance means no deal was ever formed.
42
Under the UCC, what must be in writing for a contract to sell goods to be valid?
The writing must include a quantity term or something that clearly defines how much is being sold—like “all the buyer needs.” This doesn’t mean the quantity has to be a number (like “300 units”), but it must be clear or measurable from context. For example, a requirements contract saying “all the coffee we need this year” counts. Why the others are wrong: Price – Doesn’t have to be written; a fair price can be assumed. Signatures – Only the person being sued must have signed. Delivery date – Not required; a reasonable delivery time will be assumed. If quantity is completely missing and can’t be figured out, the contract is not enforceable.
43
What is substantial performance, and which of these shows it?
Answer: B – Finished a job but left a small task undone Substantial performance means the main goal of the contract is complete, even if there are small mistakes or unfinished parts. The person still gets paid The other side can ask for a small reduction or fix Minor errors don’t cancel the whole contract This concept is used in court when one side argues they did enough of the job to still get paid, even if some small parts were left incomplete.
44
Under the UCC, when does title and risk of loss pass to the buyer in a **shipment contract**? A. When goods are identified for shipment B. When goods are given to the carrier C. When goods arrive at their destination D. When goods are tendered to the buyer at destination
Answer: B – **When goods are given to the carrier** Under a shipment contract (the default under the UCC), the seller’s job is done once they hand the goods to the shipping carrier. That’s when title and risk of loss pass to the buyer—even if the goods are still in transit. Why the other choices are wrong: A – Identifying the goods isn’t enough; title doesn’t pass yet. C and D – These apply to a destination contract, where the seller keeps the risk until delivery. Note: Shipment and destination contracts are both allowed under the UCC. The key is knowing which one applies. If it says "shipment contract," assume risk passes at the shipping point unless told otherwise.
45
Under the UCC, when does risk of loss pass from a merchant seller to the buyer when **no shipping terms are stated**?
**Only when the buyer receives the goods and takes them out of the seller’s control.** Tendering the goods or loading them on the seller’s truck is not enough. Risk stays with the seller until delivery is completed. This rule only applies to merchant sellers. For non-merchants, risk passes when the seller makes the goods available (tendered).
46
Which type of mistake allows a contract to be rescinded (canceled)? A. Mutual mistake of material fact B. Unilateral mistake of material fact C. Mutual mistake of value D. Unilateral mistake of value
Correct: A – Mutual mistake of material fact **A contract can be canceled if both parties were wrong about something important**—like what the item is, whether it exists, or what’s being sold. Mistakes about value don’t count. Unilateral mistakes (only one side is wrong) usually don’t count either—unless the other side knew or took advantage of the mistake.
47
What must a plaintiff prove to win a strict liability case for a defective product?
To win a strict liability case, the plaintiff must show: **The seller was in the business of selling that product** – One-time or casual sellers (like a garage sale) are not liable – The seller doesn’t have to be the manufacturer **The product was defective when it left the seller’s control** – The defect can be in design, manufacturing, or warning – It doesn’t matter who caused the defect—the seller can be liable even if they didn’t design or create the product 🔑 Key distinction: The plaintiff does not have to prove that the seller designed the product or did anything wrong. Strict liability focuses on what was sold, not how or why it became defective. ✔️ No need to prove negligence ✔️ No need for a contract between buyer and seller (no privity required)
48
Under the UCC, when does risk of loss pass to the buyer when the seller is not a merchant?
If the seller is not a merchant and no shipping terms are stated, risk of loss passes to the buyer when the seller tenders delivery—meaning the goods are made available for pickup. 🧠 Key point: It does not matter whether the buyer has picked up the goods yet. Once the non-merchant says, “It’s ready, come get it,” the buyer takes the risk. These rules only apply when the contract does not include specific shipping terms (like FOB)