6 - Presence of Others Flashcards

1
Q

define group polarisation

A

group interaction with those who have similar attitudes strengthens indiv’s atts so they become more extreme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define risky shift

A

groups tending to make more risky decisions than indivs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how can attitudes become more reinforced by verbalising opinions

A

anticipating someone w an opposite view and assoc w those w a similar view means we prepare arguments and express view more strongly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how is normative influence a cause for group polarisation

A

express stronger att so like-minded like us or change att to avoid disapproval when comparing attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

define pluralistic ignorance

A

majority of group members privately rejecting a norm but mistakenly thinking the group accepts it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how can we get rid of pluralistic ignorance

A

through group discussion so we slowly see others’ attitudes and express if similar or conceal it or jump on the bandwagon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how is informational influence a cause of group polarisation

A

when unsure, majority will support dominant opinion when in group discussion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how can opinions become more extreme in group discussion

A

adding familiar arguments and new persuasive ideas can sway attitude

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

with conformity, what processes are involved in forming a representation of the group norm from opinions expressed in the ig vs og

A

identification means conforming to group norm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

in identification what happens if the group norm is or isn’t polarised

A
is = group polarisation occurs
isn't = take the mean group attitude
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

in Triplett’s social facilitation study, what were the findings

A

when in competition, half were facilitated, some were inhibited but practice effect was confounding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what did Zajonc’s social facilitation theory state

A

presence of observers leads to general drive state through physiological arousal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Zajonc said what happens if the responses are well learned

A

facilitation, enhanced performance, usually w easy tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Zajonc said what happens when the responses aren’t well learned

A

inhibition, worsened performance, usually w difficult tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what did Cottrell’s findings contradict about Zajonc’s theory

A

indiv must think the audience are watching and it’s not just mere presence affecting performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

describe evaluation apprehension

A

individuals become worried about how the audience will evaluate their performance on a task as self-presentation is important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what do performing well and badly lead to

A

well means praise and recognition

badly means embarrassment and shame

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what different arousal types are there when we think we’ll do well or badly

A
challenge = good so facilitation
threat = bad so inhibition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

after evaluation apprehension what do we think about

A

whether we have enough resources for a sufficient performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

with evaluation apprehension, do we need observers

A

no bc we just worry about others’ evaluation whether they’re there or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

describe distraction theory

A

cog load taken up by attention split w distractor stimulus so have fewer resources for task at hand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

in distraction theory, what will happen depending on whether the task is easy or not

A

well-learned = dominant means unaffected performance

hard/not well learned = non-dominant so worse performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

describe the self-awareness explanation

A

we compare actual and ideal performances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what do small and large discrepancies with performances cause

A
small = motivation = better performance
large = give up as ideal performance hard to match
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
how does being self-conscious affect performance
worsens it even if well-learnt as worry about self-presentation so hindered performance is failure anticipated
26
define the overloaded explanation
feeling overloaded in presence of an audience distracts us from cues we need to attend to
27
how does the influence of others depend on the nature of the task
process loss can occur where group performance is worse than sum of indivs' performance distractors and dominant group members lead to performance loss
28
define social loafing
expending less effort when doing a task as a group relative to alone as we think others will put more effort in
29
define free ride effect
individuals taking advantage of shared resources without making an appropriate contribution
30
define the Ringelmann effect
collective sum of efforts for a group is less than the sum of potential indiv efforts summed up
31
what did a study of the Ringelmann effect find
mean total exertion force went up as group size did but individual mean total force decreased
32
what is the equation for the Ringelmann effect
total capacity - (coordination loss + motivation loss)
33
what did a study find out about noise level and presence of others
noise level decreased as group size increased but directional coordination loss through microphone placement
34
how is evaluation apprehension related to social loafing
tasks related to social loafing decrease it as people don't think they're being watched so not accountable for behaviour and less identifiability
35
what is effort matching in terms of social loafing
thinking others are putting in less effort so we put in less effort so we don't experience the sucker effect
36
define dispensability of effort related to social loafing
we think our effort is less valuable and impactful if there're more people
37
what is expectancy in terms of social loafing
think about if own effort will enhance group performance and if group's high quality performance will reach an outcome
38
describe valence of outcome in terms of social loafing
how valuable the end-goal is
39
how do values matter with social loading
we loaf less if we think our interaction w the group is worthy
40
how does liking matter in terms of social loafing
we group members are friendly or we can identify with them, we loaf less
41
what type of personality loafs less
conscientious, responsible, narcissists
42
define groupthink
group making bad decisions through poor critical evaluation as group cohesion is seen as more important than decisions
43
groupthink keychain to a bad outcome
group cohesiveness, structural faults, and sit context = groupthink = symptoms of gt = symp of defective decision making = outcome
44
real-world example of groupthink?
challenger disaster: concerns at low levels not told to high authority levels despite group having access to info preventing launch
45
what did an analysis of the presidential commission report find
>50% statements supported groupthink | all statements ab faulty components were groupthink
46
criticisms of the challenger disaster being groupthink?
limited, retrospective evidence good decision-making = bad decisions norms of cohesive groups can mean good decisions whole groupthink model studied in few experimental tests which reported mixed findings
47
what are some factors of good decision making
``` impartiality allow outside criticisms discuss issues before final decision have a critical evaluator members open to criticise ```
48
define deindividuation
being unable to differentiate between different people
49
define contagion
ideas spreading quickly, unpredictably, can't resist passing on ideas
50
what happens when we become anonymous
disinhibition occurs, freed from normative constraints, become irrational and animalistic
51
what do attentional cues mean for self-awareness
respond less to norms, more to immediate situation, act imoulsively
52
what are accountability cues
factors determining whether one'll be held responsible for their actions or not
53
how does it feel when we're less accountable for things
more likely to do gratifying but inhibiting behaviours
54
what did the Halloween study find about deindividuation
most transgressed when anonymous but being unaccountable/unidentifiable leads to prosocial behaviour
55
in the emergent norms theory, when are suggestions more influential
if they're similar to predispositions of the crowd
56
in the emergent norms theory, what does the crowd understand
consensual understanding of what's right and wrong
57
in the emergent norms theory, how does the crowd conform
through normative social influence
58
in the emergent norms theory, what are 3 criticisms related to not being specific/descriptive
norms not constructed from scratch, general norms used describes but doesn't explain principles for adopted roles unspecific about crowd formation/organisation
59
in the emergent norms theory, what are 2 criticisms related to differentiatoin
collective behaviour not that different from aggregated indiv behaviour keynoter defined as someone influential but model says they aren't influential
60
in the social identity model of crowd action, what do people have increased awareness of
norms awareness are group conscious
61
in the social identity model of crowd action, what effect does anonymity have
enhances social identity so conform to group than general social norms more
62
in the social identity model of crowd action, what identity is derived from what other identity
context-specific derived from superordinate
63
in the social identity model of crowd action, the emergent norms are appropriate for who
members of this category in this context