9 - Prosocial behaviour Flashcards

1
Q

define prosocial behaviour

A

action positively valued by society which benefits one or more people other than oneself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define helping behaviour

A

action performed with the intention to aid another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define social value orientation

A

extent to which an individual is pro-self orpro-social, determining how cooperative they’ll be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

describe the bystander effect

A

fewer people intervening in an emergency because there are more people present, so we believe someone else will help and we won’t need to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what was the Kitty Genovese case

A

“38” witnesses saw a women get stalked and murdered but didn’t do anything although some did shout to leave her alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

limitations of the Kitty Genovese case

A

only 6 witnesses some of who did intervene
both attacks were on separate occasions
911 number didn’t exist
incidents at bar Kitty worked at not taken srsly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

describe diffusion of responsibility

A

the more people there are, the less likely people are to notice, interpret the problem as one, and assume responsibility to intervene as think others will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what did the seizure experiment find about diffusion of responsibility

A

as the number of bystanders increased, the longer it took for them to help and the lower the likelihood of helping was

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

define pluralistic ignorance

A

wrongly assuming that others endorse a particular norm based on their actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is an example of pluralistic ignorance

A

not intervening in an emergency and perceiving intervention isn’t needed because no one else is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

smoke in the room pluralistic ignorance experiment found what

A

people intervened most when alone, then with naive parts, then confederates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

interviews with smoke in a rooom found participants thought what

A

didn’t know what smoke was so reported it
knew there was no fire
some thought it was an experiment
no one mentioned others’ reactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what does the social identity perspective say about forming an identity

A

collective identity formed as members seen as extension of oneself and those identifying w collective more likely to help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how is identification made more likely w SI

A

through a common fate as “all in this together”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

social identity perspective states what about emergencies

A

they broaden our identity level and cause us to have a sense of solidarity with each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how does the social identity perspective explain diffusion of responsibility

A

social identities grant social norms which DoR can capture, and more bystanders makes non-intervening norm clearer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what did the london underground fire simulation study find out helping

A

crowd size didn’t predict co-operation but collective identification (shopping alone or football match) did

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

define bystander intervention

A

act of helping a person in danger/distress by those who haven’t caused it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what did the good samaritan experiment find

A

content of speech didn’t predict intervention but urgency did as less urgent stopped to help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what is the bystander intervention model’s criteria which all must be met

A

notice the event, interpret as an emergency, take responsibility, decide how to intervene, intervene

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

when does the BIM state we are more likely to intervene

A

if friends. group has drunk alcohol, bystanders are ingroup, think other bystanders will intervene

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what are some limitations of the BIM

A

kitty genovese mistold so presence of others may actually increase helping likelihood
large group size can help due to perceived norm
being friends>strangers
being w others increases empowerment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

define altruism

A

action performed to benefit another without concern for an external reward

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

modified altruism definition?

A

acting out of concern for another’s welfare as well as one’s own

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
why don't we know if altruism actually exists
helping others always helps us in some way always if people think altruism is without benefitting ourself
26
define empathic concern
emotional reaction to suffering of others resulting from taking their perspective, increasing likelihood of helping
27
what type of personality means people will have empathic concern
altruistic personality as it predisposes people to help
28
what did a study about empathic concern find
objective perspective reduces likelihood of helping and we're more likely to help if the conditions make it easy to
29
what is the empathy-altruism hypothesis
helpful actions genuinely motivated by wanting to do something good for someone else
30
what has been suggested about selfish motives
help others to help ourselves out of self-interest to pursue an internal reward
31
what was found in a study about social value orientations and altruism
SVO affected number of hours donated as cooperators donated more than individualists who donated more than competitors
32
why do we experience internal rewards with altruism even without concern for external rewards
deep moral capacities in our character as we respond emotionally to own actions and consequences
33
define moral reasoning
extent to which a person's willingness to help is a function of own needs vs overarching moral standards
34
define moral emotions
emotions experienced when something occurs which violates our moral standards
35
what families of moral emotions are there
other-condemning - disgust self-conscious other-suffering - empathy other-praising - awe
36
what types of people show more empathy and lalruism
those with higher levels of reasoning
37
define kin selection
acting differently towards members of the same species depending on the degree of genetic relatedness, encouraging altruism
38
humans prefer helping who
more closely related people but do help strangers still
39
define reciprocal altruism
acting altruistically with the hope that species member helped will act altruistically i return as a reward
40
how are prospects of mutural survival increased
preference of helping others who helped us
41
who do humans selectively make sacrifices for
ingroup members not outgroup even if ingroup can't reciprocate
42
why did altruism shape our cognitive and emotional makeup so we developed empathy
to quickly form emotional ties with offspring to be successful parents but this may have generalised to everyone
43
define social dilemma
situations where interests of an individual are at odds with group's interest
44
define cooperation in social dilemmas
decisions sacrificing person's interest for group's sake
45
define defection
pursuing decisions at the gorup's expense
46
what is a moral agent
making own decisions in social dilemmas
47
what is the prisoner's dilemma
if A and B cooperate, they get a reduced sentence if one person defects, the defector's freed if both defect, get a longer sentence
48
real-world example of the prisoner's dilemma
USA/USSR arms race
49
what is the public goods dilemma
an individual being better off if they don't contribute but the group is worse off as a whole
50
define public good
a resource one can't be stopped from using even if they don't contribute, e.g. NHS
51
define common goods dilemma
where an individual's interests are served by using a resource but collective interests are jeopardised as resources deplete, e.g. fishing
52
how can communicating with each other to establish principles and ground rules enhance cooperation
increases trust, advocates and norms a coop constructively instead of threatening to punish
53
what does it mean for cooperation if a social dilemma is easy to understand
it can be easily explained how the common interest is served by cooperating
54
how can cooperation be enhanced
people valuing the common interst, having strong sense of identification
55
how can punishment be used in a social dilemma
defectors can be punished in strategic decision making
56
what is tit for tat
reciprocity developing by starting off cooperating, retaliate if the other defects, forgive if the other cooperates
57
define altruistic punishment
self-sacrificing in order to harm someone who has defected
58
what are the possible consequences of altruistic punishment
increased norms adherence | increased average payoff received by all group members
59
what are some exceptions to altruistic punishment
depends on group size | some forms don't cost the punisher, e.g. gossip
60
define indirect reciprocity
incurring personal cost to reward someone who has cooperated with other group members, eventually being rewarded by a 3rd party
61
what do pro-self people prioritise
maximising resources for self and actively seeking for others to get less
62
what do pro-social people prioritise
maximising resources available for others and themselves
63
how can encouraging strong social identification help cooperation
people then see that helping the group is evuivalent in seriousness to helping the self
64
what did a study about SVO find out about short term individual benefits incurring a long term collective cost
despite being told trains cause no damage to envmt, greater car preference was found in those with a higher pro-self value and train in pro-social people