Epistemology Flashcards

1
Q

what are descartes’ three doubts

A
  1. scepticism about the senses
  2. dreaming and reality
  3. the evil demon
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the trademark argument

A

Descartes- he has an idea in his mind of a supremely perfect god. because god is beyond the sensory perceptions, that originates from god himself who places this idea in our minds from birth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

locke’s quote on ideas

A

“Experience: in that, all our knowledge is founded; and from that it ultimately derives itself”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the historical plain method

A

all our knowledge can in theory be traced back to some experience that we had

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

leibniz on lock?

A

mind is innately determined to believe some pples over others; Eglin agreed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

WT Jones on ideas for locke?

A

Locke reduces complex ideas- surely we see an object as whole and then identify its parts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the veil of perception criticism

A

Pojman: permanent picture gallery: can’t access the objects behind the pictures, dead end to what we know; hume agreed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

objections to the trademark argument (2)

A
  1. Descartes confuses the idea of god with god himself
  2. Cottingham’s sponge cake: made of flour, eggs, etc, but the sponginess in the cake is not contained in its cause
    - -> D responds by saying that the property is contained ‘eminently in a higher form’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

discuss the idea of causality from an empirical perspective

A

Locke: we get the idea of causality by observing that some things begin because of others
Peter mark: this is circular, because it presupposes causality before we even make this observation
Hume’s idea is better: causation is the mere observation of constant conjuncture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Locke and types of ideas

A

sensation –>simple ideas

reflection –>complex ideas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Locke’s three types of knowledge

A

intuitive (most certain, immediate), demonstrative (a priori like maths and god), sensitive (sense data, uncertain)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

name four criticisms of Locke’s ideas

A

Berkley, Veil of perception, Hume’s missing shade of blue, W.T. Jones, Catherine Elgin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

name two criticisms of Locke’s tabula rasa

A

Noam Chomsky, Leibniz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rationalist scholars?

A
  • Descartes (wax) (cogito)
  • Leibniz (immaterial ideas)
  • Spinoza
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does Leibniz argue for the rationalist position?

A

Since ideas are immaterial, it is unfeasible that we get them through the physical.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cartesian substance dualism?

A

Persons have an incorporeal soul. Soul is a logical substance possessing none of the attributes of physical substance like divisibility & extension in space.

17
Q

What does Descartes’ epistemology confuse?

What fallacy does it therefore fall into?

A

His epistemology relies on a confusion over Leibniz’ Law on the Identity of Indiscernibles. It falls foul of the MASKED MAN FALLACY.

  • I can doubt that my body exists
  • I cannot doubt that I exist
  • therefore by Leibniz’ Law I’m not identical with my body

Same as:

  • I can doubt that C.Dogson wrote Alice in Wonderland
  • I cannot doubt Lewis Carroll wrote Alice & wonderland exists
  • therefore Dogson is not one & the same as Lewis Carroll.
18
Q

C.D Broad on The Problem of Induction

A

‘induction is the glory of science and the scandal of philosophy’

19
Q

What is Hume’s problem of induction?

A

The lack of justification for generalisations, or presupposing the eventuality of certain events (principle of uniformity of nature).

20
Q

Nelson Goodman’s new riddle of induction

A

Goodman proposed that some diamonds are ‘grue’ so they are green for many years (time t) until they turn blue. The “new” problem of induction is, since all emeralds we have ever seen are both green and grue, why do we suppose that after time t we will find green but not grue emeralds?

21
Q

Hume’s conclusion on inductive scepticism

A

Questioning our inductive inferences doesn’t get you anywhere. ‘If the skeptic’s were universally and steadily accepted, all human life would come to an end’ (Hume)

‘Philosophical cop-out by which we all live’ - Matthew Sweet

22
Q

antecedents of John Locke’s argument of the mind as initially tabula rasa ?

A

Aristotle
Ibn Sina (Avicenna)
Aquinas

23
Q

What two kinds of experience is there?

A

Sensation and reflection

24
Q

What does sensation tell us about?

A

The things and processes in the external world

25
Q

What does reflection tell us about?

A

The operations of our own minds

26
Q

What ideas are innate to some extent?

A

Time, space, causality, comparison, language

27
Q

What is an inductive argument?

A

The premises support the probable truth of the conclusion

28
Q

What is a deductive argument

A

The truth of a deductive argument is guaranteed by the premise

29
Q

How does Catherine Elgin criticise Locke’s idea of the tabula rasa

A

We don’t start with an empty stage, we have an initial inquiry revised with data.