Federal Judicial System Flashcards

Learn about: - Article III, Section 2 jurisdiction - 11th Amendment & Sovereign Immunity - Justiciability (standing, ripeness, mootness, political question doctrine) - Abstention Doctrine (35 cards)

1
Q

Under Article III, Section 2, federal courts have the jurisdiction to hear which types of cases and controversies?

A
  1. Arising under the Constitution, laws, and treaties of the United States;
  2. Affecting foreign countries’ ambassadors, public ministers, and consuls;
  3. Involving admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;
  4. When the U.S. is a party;
  5. Between two or more states, or between a state and citizens of another state;
  6. Between citizens of different states or between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states; or
  7. Between a state, or its citizens, and foreign states, citizens, or subjects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The Supreme Court has what two types of jurisdiction?

A
  1. Original jurisdiction; and
  2. Appellate jurisdiction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Over what type of cases does the Supreme Court have original jurisdiction?

From where is this power derived?

A

The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over cases…

  1. Involving ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls; and
  2. Those in which a state is a party

The source of the power: Article III, section 2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can Congress modify the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction?

A

No, but it can grant concurrent original jurisdiction to the lower federal courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the 2 ways for Supreme Court to hear an appellate case?

A
  1. Writ of Certiorari (discretionary review): Court will grant review if at least 4 justices vote to accept
  2. Mandatory appeal: appeals for injunctive decisions issued by three-judge district court panels
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define

adequate and independent state grounds doctrine

A

Supreme Court will not hear an appeal from a state court decision that is supported by adequate and independent state grounds.

Adequate and independent means that the state law grounds fully resolve the matter (adequate) and must not incorporate a federal standard by reference (independent).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What can the Supreme Court do if it is unclear whether a decision rests on independent and adequate state grounds?

A

Hear the federal issue and remand the state issue to state courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the exception to the adequate and independent state grounds doctrine?

A

SCOTUS will review a state court’s decision if the state law tracks federal law and the state court has a practice of following the federal interpretations of the particular law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

True or False: SCOTUS will only correct a state court judgment if the state court incorrectly applied federal rights

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define

sovereign immunity

A

doctrine that holds the government cannot be sued for damages without its consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does the 11th Amendment prohibit?

A

An individual suing any state in federal court without that state’s consent.

Also known as state sovereign immunity.

See more: 11th Amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the exceptions to the 11th Amendment?

A

Lawsuits against states are allowed if:

  1. State has consented;
  2. Suit is for prospective relief (injunctive) against a state officer;
  3. United States or another State is the plaintiff;
  4. Suit involves enforcement of laws under ​the violations of 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments and Congress has expressly removed immunity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Does the 11th Amendment prohibit claims against a state official personally for money damages?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Does the 11th Amendment prohibit recovery of retroactive money damages by citizens against a state agency?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Does the 11th Amendment prohibit lawsuits against local governments?

A

No, only against states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Does the 11th Amendment prohibit bankruptcy proceedings?

17
Q

Does the 11th Amendment prohibit the federal government from suing a state?

A

No, only private individuals

18
Q

Requirements for a case to be justiciable (i.e. can be heard by the federal courts)

A
  1. Standing;
  2. Ripeness;
  3. Mootness; and
  4. Not a political question
19
Q

Elements required for standing

A
  1. Injury-in-fact: P must show a concrete and particularized injury, actual or imminent, caused by alleged action;
  2. Causation: D’s conduct must have caused the claimant’s injury;
  3. Redressibility: Harm must be one the Court can remedy through their resolution of the case;
20
Q

Where can I find key Brainscape advice on passing the bar exam and overcoming common challenges?

21
Q

Does a taxpayer have standing to bring a lawsuit to challenge general government spending?

A

No, unless lawsuit is to challenge government expenditures violative of the Establishment Clause

22
Q

When may a litigant have standing to assert the rights of a third party not before the court?

A

A third party may have standing to assert the rights of the aggrieved party if the Court finds…

  1. There is a special relationship between P and the injured party (e.g. doctor-patient, lawyer-client, parent-child), and the injured party finds it difficult to bring suit themselves; or
  2. Associational standing: an association may have standing to bring suit if any one of its members would have standing, and the issue is germane to the association’s purpose.
  3. First Amendment overbreadth: third party may bring a facial challenge, as long as Article III standing still exists.
23
Q

Do organizations have standing to sue?

A

Only if:

  1. At least one member of the organization would have standing to sue;
  2. Interest asserted is germane to purpose of the organization; and
  3. Neither claim nor relief requires individual participation of members
24
Q

Define

ripeness

A

A claim is “ripe,” when the facts of the case have matured into an existing substantial controversy warranting judicial intervention.

Source: Ripeness

25
Why are courts required to hear only ripe claims?
Because federal courts are **not allowed to issue** **advisory opinions**; must be faced with a real or imminent harm ## Footnote ⚠️ Watch out for questions on declaratory judgments (allowed) vs. advisory opinions (not allowed)
26
# Define mootness
A case is moot when the controversy is resolved and there is no longer a live issue.
27
What are the **exceptions** to the mootness requirement?
1. **Capable of repetition yet evading review:** although P's particular injury will likely become moot before litigation is complete, it is highly likely injury will be repeated in the future (ex. Roe v. Wade and abortions); 2. **Voluntary cessation:** D voluntarily ceases behavior once litigation starts, but could resume at any time; or 3. **Class action**: As long as one member of class has a ripe claim, resolution of one P's injury will not defeat mootness
28
# Define political questions
Issues that either: 1. **Other branches have the power to decide** per the Constitution; or 2. Are **inherently incapable** of judicial decision ## Footnote ⭐️ Federal courts will not hear cases involving political questions
29
Examples of non-justiciable **political questions?**
1. Impeachment procedure; 2. Gerrymandering; 3. Foreign policy & war; 4. Guaranty clause; 5. Amendment ratification procedure.
30
# Define abstention doctrine
When federal courts temporarily **abstain from hearing a case** when there is an **unsettled question of state law**
31
What are two scenarios in which federal courts will **abstain** from hearing a case?
1. Case involves **unsettled state law better left to state courts** (*Pullman* abstention); or 2. Federal courts typically decline family law cases (e.g. child custody, divorce), known as the **Family Law** Exception.
32
# Define Younger Abstention Doctrine
Court will not enjoin a pending state criminal prosecution in the absence of **extraordinary circumstances** unless the **danger of irreparable loss** is both great and immediate. ## Footnote *See:* [Younger v. Harris](https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/401/37)
33
Who has the power to decide whether a state decision was made on **state grounds** or **federal grounds**?
SCOTUS may review the decision and make the determination
34
What are judges **immune/not immune** from?
Immune: civil liability for **judicial acts** (including grave procedural errors) Not immune: lawsuits involving **non-judicial acts.**
35
Where can I **watch a video** or **listen to a podcast** of these bar prep questions?
[Brainscape's "Hands-free" Bar Prep YouTube playlist](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16iLSk4leLM&list=PLnnMeFOl2XiVey4fhTQYcxA8yQB8W0Ohp) [Brainscape's "Hands-free" Bar Prep Podcast](https://www.brainscape.com/academy/best-podcast-law-students/) | Rate this card a five if you don't need to see it again.