Equal Protection Flashcards

Seek the origins of the equal protection clause. Learn the extent of its protection and the levels of scrutiny applied when a violation is claimed.

1
Q

What is the Equal Protection Clause?

A

Holds that no state shall make or enforce any law that denies its citizens equal protection of the laws (i.e. similarly situated persons should be treated similarly under the law)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Does the Equal Protection Clause apply to the federal government?

A

Yes indirectly, via incorporation of the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How do you distinguish due process from equal protection issues?

A

Ask: does the statute contain a classification along suspect lines? If yes, it is an equal protection issue. If not, due process issue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are 4 steps to analyzing equal protection questions?

A
  1. Is there a classification by the government?
    • ​​P must prove classification was made with discriminatory intent
  2. What is the classification?
    • Suspect, quasi, or other
  3. What level of scrutiny applies?
    • Suspect = strict
    • Quasi = intermediate
    • Other = rational basis
  4. Does the government action satisfy the level of scrutiny?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the suspect classifications?

A
  1. Race;
  2. Alienage (state laws);
  3. Religion; and
  4. National origin

⭐️ Subject to strict scrutiny. Suspect classifications will almost always be fatal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are quasi-suspect classifications?

A
  1. Gender; and
  2. Legitimacy

⭐️ Intermediate scrutiny

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are non-suspect classifications?

A
  1. Alienage if:
    1. Federal alienage classification; or
    2. State restriction on alien’s participation in government functions
  2. Age
  3. Wealth
  4. Sexual orientation
  5. Disability
  6. Any other classification not governed by strict or intermediate scrutiny

⭐️ Rational basis review. Almost always survives equal protection challenge unless motivated by animus towards the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are 3 ways that P can show a classification is discriminatory?

A
  1. Classification is discriminatory on its face: text of the law itself is unconstitutional.
  2. Classification is facially neutral, but discriminatory as applied: classification is discriminatory in its application or administration. Requires proof of both discriminatory intent and discriminatory effect.
  3. Discriminatory purpose/motive: P m​ust show proof of discriminatory purpose.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define

de jure segregation

A

Intentional segregation imposed by law. Subject to strict scrutiny.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define

de facto segregation

A

Segregation that results from private action (e.g. choosing housing in certain neighborhoods). No equal protection violation because no government action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

For affirmative action to survive strict scrutiny, what must the government prove?

A

Action is necessary to remedy past discrimination by specific department or agency engaging in affirmative action. Past discrimination by private actors and/or society is not sufficient.

Must show evidence of past discrimination.

⚠️ Exception: quotas are almost never allowed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Are racial quotas constitutional?

A

No, will almost always be struck down for failure to pass strict scrutiny unless gov. can prove quota is necessary to remedy pervasive, current discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Is affirmative action in higher education admissions constitutional?

A

As of June 29, 2023, race not be used as a factor in higher education admissions decisions (other than military academies).

Prior to that date, race could be used as a factor among many if state showed action was necessary (i.e. no race-neutral alternatives) to achieve compelling interest of obtaining diversity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Alienage classifications trigger strict scrutiny unless:

A
  1. Classification is pursuant to Congress’ plenary powers to regulate immigration; or
  2. Classification is related to essential government functions and/or processes. Valid restrictions include:
    • Voting and jury membership
    • Working as public school teacher
    • Working as police officer
    • Working as probation officer

⭐️ If based on either circumstance, rational basis will apply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Are undocumented aliens a suspect class?

A

No, generally subject to rational basis review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Discrimination against the children of undocumented aliens triggers what level of scrutiny?

A

intermediate scrutiny

(ex. denying children the right to attend public schools)

17
Q

Gender classifications trigger what level of scrutiny?

A

Intermediate scrutiny (substantially related to important government interest)

AND

proof of “exceeedingly persuasive justification”

18
Q

Is affirmative action based on gender constitutional?

A

Yes, if necessary to achieve a compelling governmental interest in remedying past discrimination based on gender

19
Q

Classifications based on legitimacy trigger what level of scrutiny?

A

Intermediate scrutiny.

Laws cannot discriminate against children of nonmarried parents without substantial relation to an important government interest

20
Q

What is the “one person, one vote” requirement?

A

Each person’s vote must be equal to another person’s vote

⚠️ Exception: limited purpose elections

21
Q

Voting legislation is subject to what level of scrutiny?

A

If based on anything other than age, residency, or citizenship, strict scrutiny applies.

22
Q

List 4 examples of voting regulations that have been upheld

A
  1. Reasonable residency requirements;
  2. Reasonable registration requirements;
  3. Reasonable time and manner regulations; and
  4. Denial of voting rights to felons
23
Q

What are four examples of unconstitutional voting restrictions?

A
  1. Poll taxes;
  2. Limiting school board elections to only parents and property owners
  3. Counting votes using overly vague standards; and
  4. Requiring political party registration for a general election (can be limited for primary elections)
24
Q

Can states limit felon voting rights?

A

Yes, pursuant to Section 2 of the 14th Amendment

25
Does Congress have the power to **override state laws** concerning federal elections?
Yes, pursuant to the Elections Clause (Article I, Section IV)
26
Restrictions on **travel** trigger what level of scrutiny?
strict scrutiny ## Footnote ⚠️ Note: Only interstate travel; international travel is not a protected right
27
What is the **test** applied to **non-resident discrimination**?
There must be a **substantial** **connection** between the discrimination and a **substantial state interest**. ## Footnote *More Info:* [The Privileges and Immunities Clause](http://nationalparalegal.edu/conLawCrimProc_Public/CongressionalPowers/Privileges&ImmunitiesClause.asp)
28
What does the **Privileges or Immunities Clause** under the 14th Amendment protect?
Right to **interstate** travel (very narrowly construed) ## Footnote \*\*Be careful. Privileges or immunities is almost never the right answer on the MBE.
29
List two examples of **constitutional** non-resident discrimination
1. Charging more for **recreational** licenses (hunting or fishing); and 2. Treating non-residents differently to preserve in-state **natural resources**
30
List four examples of **unconstitutional** **non-resident discrimination**.
1. Charging higher fee for commercial licenses for non-residents 2. Commuter taxes applied only to non-residents 3. Limiting abortions to only local residents 4. Mandating that employers only hire state-residents
31
Can states exclude **non-citizens** from jobs related to state governance (e.g. police officers, government officials, public school teachers)?
Yes
32
Can a state ban all **write-in candidates** for the primary and general election?
Yes, as long as there are reasonable, alternative methods of getting on the ballot
33
Can a state refuse to put a candidate on ballot unless a minimum amount of voter support is shown? (e.g. via signatures, etc)
Yes