8 - Dynamics of Group Behaviour Flashcards
Group?
Two or more people who share a common definition and evaluation of themselves and behave in accordance with such definition
Entitativity?
The property of a group that makes it seem like a coherent, distinct and unitary entity
Common bond groups?
based upon attachment among members. prioritise personal goals over group goals, aiming to maximise individual rewards and minimise personal cost
Common identity groups?
based on direct attachment to the group. prioritise group goals, seeking to maximise group rewards and minimise its costs through individual contributions
Individualists?
view group behaviour as an extension of individual behaviour, believing that group processes are merely interpersonal interactions among multiple individuals
Collectivists?
group behaviour is shaped by distinct social processes and cognitive representations that emerge uniquely from within groups
Frank Johnson (1987): 7 major emphases. According to them, the group is:
- a collection of individuals who are interacting
- a social unit of two or more individuals who perceive themselves as belonging to a group
- a coll. of indiv. who are interdependent
- a coll of indiv who join together to achieve a goal
- a coll. of indiv. who are trying to satisfy a need through their joint association
- a coll. of indiv. whose interactions are structured by a set of roles and norms
- a coll. of indiv. who influence each other
Social Facilitation?
An improvement in the performance of well learned/easy tasks and a deterioration in the performance of poorly learned/hard tasks in the mere presence of members of the same species
Mere presence?
an entirely passive and unresponsive audience that is only physically present
Audience effects?
impact of the presence of other on individual task performance
Drive theory?
Zajonc’s theory that the physical presence of members of the same species instinctively causes arousal that motivates performance of habitual behaviour patterns. This arousan can lead to either social facilitation or social inhibition
Evaluation apprehension model?
The argument that the physical presence of members of the same species cause drive because people have learned to be apprehensive about being evaluated
Distraction conflict theory?
The physical presence of members of the same species is distracting and produces conflict between attending to the task and attending to the audience
Task taxonomy?
Categorises group tasks based on three questions:
1. is the task divisible or unitary?
2. Is it a maximising or an optimising task? (maximising: open ended, stresses quantity, optimising has a set standard, obj. i s to meet it)
3. how are individual inputs related to the group’s product? Additive, compensatory, disjunctive, conjunctive, discretionary
Process Loss?
Deterioration in group performance in comparison to individual performance due to the whole range of possible interferences among members
Coordination loss?
deterioration in group performance compared with individual performance, due to problems in coordinating behaviour
Ringelmann effect?
Individual effort on a task diminishes as a group size increases
Social Loafing?
A reduction in individual effort when working on a collective task (one which in our outputs are pooled with those of other group members) compared with working either alone or coactively (our outputs are not pooled)
Free-Rider Effect?
Gaining the benefits of group membership by avoiding costly obligations of membership and by allowing other members to incur those costs
What three reasons could explain social loafing?
- Output equity, reduction of effort to maintain perceived equity
- Evaluation apprehension, individuals might hold back when fearing evaluation
- Matching to standard, indiv. might not clearly understand group norms and standards
Social compensation?
Increased effort on a collective task to compensate for other group members’ actual , perceived or anticipated lack of effort or ability
Cohesiveness?
The property of a group that affectively binds people, as group members, to one another and to the group as a whole, giving the group a sense of solidarity and oneness.
Personal Attraction?
Liking for someone based on idiosyncratic (individual) preferences and interpersonal relationships
Social Attraction?
Liking for someone based on common group membership and determined by the person’s prototypicality of the group