Quiz 4 Flashcards

1
Q

Epistemology

A

theory of knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Knowledge- claims

A

assert that we know something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Empiricism

A

view that knowledge is gained through sense experience
A posterior
Mind is a tabula rasa- blank slate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A posteriori

A

adjective for knowledge is gained through senses

“After”, “dependent upon”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Rationalism

A

view that knowledge is gained through reasoning
-Knowledge is eternal, unchanging, universal
A priori
Innate concepts exists in the mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A priori

A

“before”, “prior to”, independent of sense experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Transcendental Idealism

A

view that all we can ever know are things as they appear to us, and never as they are in themselves (like the mind has lenses
1. Knowledge requires data from the senses
2. Innate (a priori) concepts that give shape/ organization to the sense data
Attempt to combine empiricism and rationalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Common sense skepticism

A
  • we all doubt the reliability of certain knowledge-claims
  • Do not doubt the very possibility of gaining knowledge and that evidence exists for debates to be settled
  • Claim could be decided at least in principle
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Philosophical skepticism

A
  • position that some of all knowledge claims are doubtful or unreliable
  • Doubt the very possibility of establishing reliable knowledge about some things (limited skepticism) or about anything at all (total or absolute skepticism)
  • Doubts that there could be any method/ evidence that would allow us to reliably establish the truth or falsity of knowledge-claims
    Traditional arguments:
    We can always find some reason to doubt the truth of a claim
    We can give equally forceful arguments for and against a claim
    The sense organs of different animal species are considerably varied
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Descartes

A

France, 1596-1650

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Modernism

A

everyone is capable of discovering truth

There is no need to consult external authorities (radical for his time)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Descartes’ Aims in the Meditations

A
  1. To convert readers from empiricism to rationalism
  2. To “establish a firm foundation for the sciences” (any serious research or form of inquiry)
    - A reliable method for gaining knowledge (“certain and -indubitable beliefs” - cannot be rationally doubted)
    - Establish some axiomatic beliefs (fundamental, certain, and indubitable beliefs)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Descartes’ preliminary method: Skeptics (doubt)

A

he is going to try to out-doubt the skeptics
Doubt so deeply that he will find something that he cannot doubt
Use doubt to discover something indubitable
“Method of doubt”; “Radical doubt”; “Methodological doubt”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Epistemic Principle

A

A belief about what counts as a reliable source of knowledge

This belief functions as a policy/ guide for accepting beliefs as true or rejecting beliefs as false or possibly false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Perceptual Belief

A

a belief that is formed on the basis of sense perception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Meditation I

A

Descartes wants to dismantle his entire system of beliefs and then rebuild from the foundation
He has to reject ALL beliefs because all connected
Doesn’t need to find that all beliefs are false; just needs to realize that they have some degree of unreliability/ doubtfulness
Doesn’t look at each belief individually (endless task)
Its enough to look at foundation (ep) upon which beliefs rest

17
Q

Method of doubt

A

asking if there are rational grounds for doubting the reliability of a belief
The doubt cuts in 2 ways:
1. To get rid of unreliable principles
2. To find a principle that cannot be doubted

18
Q

Principle I and objection

A

whatever is sensed exits as it appears to the senses (all sense perceptions and all perceptual beliefs based upon them are reliable)
Objection: the senses are deceptive at times, notably when external, physical conditions for sensing are not idea (ex: when the object is too small or far away)
Being deceived by the senses even once casts doubt on the reliability of P1

19
Q

Principle II and objection

A

whatever is sensed under ideal external physical conditions for sensing exists as it appears to the senses
Objection: it is possible for the perceiver to be in an unreliable state of consciousness for having sense perceptions (ex: dreaming)
He thinks that if he has been wrong even once about his state of consciousness (ex: thinking he’s awake when he’s really asleep), P2 is unreliable)