Case Law Flashcards

1
Q

Blyth vs Birmingham Waterworks 1856

A

Water main freezing
Flood Blyths home
Blyth awarded damages for negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

British railway Board v Herrington 1972

A
Herring trespassing 
Child on railway line
Gap in fence 
Occupiers aware of trespassers 
OLA 84 extended to duty of care to trespassers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Donoghue vs Stevenson 1932

A

Snail in bottle
Manufacturer owed duty of care to consumer
Neighbour principle
Reasonably foreseen that an act or omission could harm neighbour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Edwards vs National Coal board

A
Miner killed 
Section of road fell
Other sections supported
Risk vs cost (time, cost, trouble)
Reasonably practicable 

Risk small vs cost high then unreasonable to incur cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Latimer v AEC ltd 53

A

Factory flooded

Unforeseeable heavy storm
Employee slipped after sawdust ran out
Employer had taken reasonable steps to keep floor safe

Safe place of work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Marshall vs Gotham an co Ltd 54

A

Batman in a collapsed mine
Practicable duty

Rare geological fault
Precautions taken were practicable and were all that were technically possible
Cost,time, trouble NOT taken into account

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R vs Associated OCTEL co ltd 96

A

Safety of 3rd party
Provisions of SSOW

Contractors repairing tank
Fire caused by contractor using inappropriate tools but site also unsafe
Contractor liable under section 2
Hiring company liable under section 3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R V Porter 08

A

Three year old jump down steps
Section 3 protect persons not in employment
Headmaster has done everything RP to avoid risk
not liable as deciced at COA that no incident before was a factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R Vs Swan Shipbuilding

A
Fire on ship
Oxygen from hose left by subcontractors
Swan had given safety info to employees but not subcontractors 
Liable under section 2(2) A 
2(2)C 
And 3(1)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Stark Vs Post office

A

Brake fail on bike
Reasonable care of bike and inspection and maintanence.
Found breach of statutory duty to maintain the bicycle in efficient state and working order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Wilson’s and Clyde coal ltd vs English 1938

A
Man crushed by machinery turned on in pit couldn’t escape 
Employer has duty of care 
Safe place of work
Safe system of work 
Competent employee
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Crushed in pit couldn’t escape

SSOW - SPOW

A

Wilson’s vs Clyde Coal 38

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Absolute Duty

Maintain equipment in working state

A

Stark vs post office 00

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Adsett vs steel founders ltd 1953

A

ill from silica dust
Installed extractor as soon as though of
Not liable as practicable duty met

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Practicable duty

Installed as soon as thought of

A

Adsett vs Steelfounders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Occupiers liability

Trespass

A

British railway board vs Herrington 72

17
Q

Duty of Care

Neighbour

A

Donoghue vs Stevenson 32

18
Q

Reasonably practicable

Balance of risk

A

Edwards vs National coal board 49

19
Q

Foreseeable

Safe place of work

A

Latimer vs AEC ltd 53

20
Q

Practicable duty

Technically possible

A

Marshall vs Gotham and Co 54

21
Q

Safety of third parties

Safe systems of work

A

R Vs Associated OCTEL ltd 96

22
Q

Duty of Care

Section 3

A

R V Porter 08

23
Q

Third parties

Provision of information

A

R v Swan Shipbuilders 82