Eyewitness Testimony (EWT) : Misleading Information - MEMORY Flashcards

1
Q

what is the experiment linked to this topic

A

Loftus and Palmer (1974)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what were the findings of Loftus and Palmer (1974)

A

language used in questioning/discussion after crime takes place can modify the memory of eyewitness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is an eye witness

A

someone who has seen or witnessed a crime - usually at the time of the incident

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is an eye witness testimony

A

the ability of the person who saw the crime to remember the detail

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what factors can sometimes effect an eye witness

A

misleading information from question

anxiety at time of event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

who were the participants in Loftus and Palmer (1974)

A

45 students split into 5 groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what were the groups shown (Loftus and Palmer - 1974)

A

7 clips of car accidents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what type of question were the groups asked afterwards (Loftus and Palmer - 1974)

A

A leading question where the verb changed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was the least and most extreme verb used in the leading questions (Loftus and Palmer - 1974)

A

contacted and smashed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what was the mean estimate (mph) ppts made for ‘contacted’ and ‘smashed’ (Loftus and Palmer - 1974)

A

31.8 vs 40.8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

why is the difference in mph estimates important (Loftus and Palmer - 1974)

A

31.8mph would mean no prison sentence whereas 40.8 mph would mean a prison sentence would be given

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what were ppts asked in the follow up run of Loftus and Palmer (1974)

A

if they saw broken glass (there was none)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what were the findings of the follow up run

A

with the verb ‘smashed’ more ppts said they saw broken glass compared to ‘hit’ and the control group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are our schemas

A

sensory information interpreted by the brain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what does expectations and prior knowledge sometimes do

A

information modification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what does post event discussion lead to

A

memory reconstruction

17
Q

what is memory reconstruction

A

the memory of something being altered after learning new information