A1 Audit Report Flashcards
(207 cards)
M1 Professional Standards:
An audit engagement requires the auditor to performed the audit in accrodanace with generally accepted auditing stanadards (GASS). Statement of Audit Standards (SAS) AU-C the standard body is the AICPA for nonissuers or private co. : audits of historical f/s, special reports, interim f/s(where the annual f/s has been audited. Public co.accounting oversight bd.(PCAOb); audiing standards PCAOB AS are for issurers or public co.: audits of historical f/s, special reports, interim f/s. Generally Accepted Gov. Auditing standards (GAGAS) for Governmental Accountability Office: for government agency, organizations, programs and entities that recieve governemtn funds.: financial of performance audits of gov. organization, programs and agency that recieved govt. fundng. Statement of Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) AT-c governed by the AICPA to provide guidnance for attestation enegaements : examination, review, or agreed-upon procedures report on a subject matter or an assertation about a subject matter that is the responsibilty of another party. Statement of Standards for accounting and review services (SSARS) ar-c VIA aicap to provide guidance on unaudited f/s and financial information for nonissurers (private): prepation, compilation,and review of historical financial statements,information and proforma, and forecast. Code of professional conduct: ET, AICPA provide members (AICPA) with guidelines for behavior in the conduct on the professional affairs. Statement of QC standards QC AICPA: Guidance on CPA firms qc systems consisting of policies and procedures designs in compiling with standards and legal and regulatory requirement reporting. for CPA firms providing audits, attestation, accounting and review services.
What are the audit guidance for the GAAS hierarchy
- Most Authoritative: Apply professional judgement based on SAS nonissurers (private) and PCOAB issurers (public) and be prepared to justify any departure from presume mandatory requirements. Specific language that used within standards to clarify the auditors level of responsibility: Must or is required: Unconditional requirements that must be followed which requirements are relevant. Should: Indicate a presumed mandatory requirement must be followed except in rare circumstanances when departure from standard is permitted if there is appropriate justification, alternative and documentation. May, might, and could: indicate explanatory material that DOES NOT impose a professional requirement for performance. 2. Interpretive Publications: (Right in the middle most authoritative and least authoritative): are publication on how SAS should be applied. They are not considered standards. they are considered guidance for auditors. auditors must be able to explain and justify how achievement done without uses standards. Examples include: Auditing interpretation of GAAS, exhibits to GAAS, auditing guidance in AICPA Audit an dAccounting Guides, and AIPCA Audinging Statement of Positions (SOP). 3. Other Auditing Publications: (Least Authoritative) /these publications are helpful to auditors: Condiered proving guidance Be able to expain when doing procedure with out publications. Publication references: Auditing articale : Journaly of accounting or other a=professional accoutning journal, aditing articles, AICPA CPA lettes textbooks,.
A defition of the term GAAS
Is a measure of the quality of an auditors performance and guide the auditor in a properly planned audit.
In the hierarchy of authoritative language, could means
Could, May, and mght, indicate explanatory material that DOES NOT impose a professional requirment for perfomance.
auditor must have a attention and understanding of subject matter. must used his professional judgement.
the term GAAP is an accounting term that
GAAP changes over time so: GAAP : encompassed the convention, rules, and procedures necessary to define U.S. accepted accounting practices at a particular time.
Most authoritative guidance for issuser and nonissurers are
PCOAB and AS issuer public. AICPA SAS non issurer private.
Which term is used within standard as presumed mandatory
Should: all case must follow
M2: Audit Engagement.
Auditor comply to applicable framework: GAAP, IFRS, Special Purpose: contractual or regulation procedure. Management responsibility is with: F/S and I/C in accrodance with their framework. Auditor responsibility is to Attest (examin) functions and give an opinion on f/s based on 1. professional skepticism: : -judgement, make assessment yourself each year and DO NOT RELY ON OTHER AUDITORS OPINION WHO CONDUCTED AUDIT PROEVIOS YEAR. - audit evident that contradicts other auditors evidence. - rely on documentation and respond to inquiries that may be used as audit evidence -indicate possible fraud - in some case suggest the need for audit procedures in addition to GAAS. - auditors should never assume that mangment is dishonest nor assume unquestioned honesty. -use third party confirmations 2. comply with relevant eithical requirements: - comply with egagement and be independent in both fact and apperance. - AICPA Code of Professional Conduct. -State Board -applicable regulatory agencies -comply with GAAS 3. excercising professional judgement throught the audit: - in planning and performing audit -make decision on 1 materiality 2. audit risk 3. NET: Nature: (a) control test on segration of dututies, approval by management on certain dollar thresholds and reconciling accounts and (b) substance test: proving intangible asset, cash, a/r and inventory balance; Extent based on I/c is more work need or less work based on strength of I/c; and timing: strong accounting system review interim f/s or weak review y- bal. 4. evaluate whether sufficient appropriate evidence ( to support audit opinion and not f/s) has been obtain. 5. Drawing conclusion based on the audit evidence obtained. 4. obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence: must have reasonable assurance based on obtaining evidence to reduce risk to an acceptable low level on audit opinion. EXAM TRICK; WEAK I/C DOES NOT EQUAL ADVERSE OPINION. SOME TIMES MORE WORK NEEDS TO BE CONDUCTED ON WEAK SYSTEM AND LESS ON STRONG SYSTEMS. 5. comply with GAAS: via audit standards of PCOAB ( public issurers; Interational standards on Auditing ISA for IFRS; Gov. auding standards:GAGAS; audit standards for specific jurisdication or countries. Reasonable Assurance and inherent (can happen any way) limitation of an audit; Must have reasonable assurance that audit is free from material misstatements whether due to error or fraud. high but not absolute level of assurance.in or to obtain reasonable assurance auditor must : 1. plan the work and supervise 2. determine and apply materiality levels 3. identify and assess risk of material misstatement,whether fraud or error. 4. obtain sufficient appropriate evidence. Nature of Financial reporting: some f/s are subject to inherent levels of variability must test a/r and bad debt, inventory and obsolete, PPE, life and salvage; Intangible cash and cash equiv, invest balances, impairments, and warranties; contingencies and lawsuits. Nature of audit procedures; there must be practical and legal limits on an auditors ability to obtain evidence including : managment may not have given auditors all the information, fraud concealed that it is difficult to detemine. An audit is neither an investigation into wrong doing nor does the auditor have specific legal powers. Fraud are intentional and errors are unintentional. Timeliness of financial reporting and the balance between cost and benefit; - plan audit so that it is performed effectively -direct audit to the most expected risk area of materaial misstatement -using testing and other means of examining population of missistatements. Determine nature and scope of the engagment by auditors, aucdit committee and management: -some audits are single periods ( 1 FY) or multi periods -may be on complete f/s, single f/s or specific elemnent (A/r), account, programs, or items of a f/s. Overall objective of audit engagement: 1 of 2 objective of F/s audit: to obtain reason assuarnce that they are free from material misstatements due to fraud or errors.which enable an auditor to form an opinion required by GAAS. non issure+ 20f 2 objective of f/s and i/c: issurer: Express an opinion on the effectiveness of company’s i/c of f/s -Plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assuarnce that they are free from material misstatements due to fraud or errors.which enable an auditor to form an opinion required by GAAS. non issure+
A term that identifies a requirement of audit evidence is
Getting the APPROPRIATE information to determine the audit evidendence to obtain a reasonable opinion. Non get resonable. resonable is based on audit opinon.
An auditor is exercising professional skepticism if he does not rely on information given to him by client or authenticate
does not rely and not authenitcate.
To obtain reasonable assurance should an auditor that an audit is free from material misstatement he should paan and supervise assistant work or examin all evidnence
plan and supervise assistant. No reviewing all evidence not a effiecient or effective way to conduct an audit.
M3: Forming an Audit Opinion
An auditor should form an opinion f/s are presented fairly in all material respect in accordance to financial reporting framework, GAAP, IFRS, Auditor should take into account the following - sufficient evidence was obtain require by GAAS - f/s are prepared in accordance with framework/ - f/s adequately disclose the significant accounting policies selected and applied and including a decription of applicable framework. - reasonable accounting estimates by management -f/s is relevant, reliable, comparable, and understandable - f/s provide adequate disclosure to enable the intended users to understand the effect of materials transactions and events the information conveyed. - termanology used on f/s including titles are appropriate - overall structure of f/s are presented fairly. f/s include related notes of underlying tranasctions and events in a manner that achieve fair presentation. DEPARTURE FROM GAAP IS PERMISSABLE IF F/S WOULD OTHERWISE BE MISLEADING { UNMODIFIED.UNQUALIFIED OPINION} MUST EXPLAING WHY DEPARTED FROM GAAP. Auditor uses GAAS guidelines to perform audit ( how inventory s/b observed). Auditor refers to GAAP for financial reporting framework. to evaluate how transaction are recorded and reported fairly presented.( land should not be depreciated.) Types of Opinions: 1. Unmodified (non issuer) or Unqualifed (issuer) = Clean opinion.f/s present fairly, in all material respect, the financial position, results of ops, and CF of the entity in conformity with applicable financial reporting frameworks. Doesn’t mean good resource for investor if company is doing bad audit f/s are presented fairly. things that are non material are considered unmodified or unqualified. 2. Modified: f/s as a whole are materially misstated or auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to conclude that the f/s as a whole are free from material missstatments. 2A. Types of modified opinions: a. Qualified opinion: GAAP or GAAS: except for the effects of the matters to which the qualifiication relates, the f/s are presented fairly in all material respect to financial position, results of ops. CF in conformity with framework. If there is a failed GAAP disclosure on one line item, it would be considered Qualified opinion due to f/s issue. If audit could not obtain vendor inform on ap and represent 20% of liab, would be considered a Qualified opinion due to audit issue b. Adverse :GAAP f/s do not present fairy the financial position…… if management refuse to correct an transaction, ie, fixed assets are not properly depreciated then f/s are not presented fairly. adverse opinion. Pervasive and GAAP problem. B/s wrong, i/s wrong, RE, wrong. c. disclaimer GAAS: auditor does not express an opinion of the f/s. don’t know and don’t say. No piece meal ( part if uqualified and part is disclaimed.) Definition of pervasive: effects on the f/s on the auditors professional judgement based on: -thing are not confined to specific elements, accounts, or items on f/s -if so confined, represent substantial proportion of the f/s ; or - are disclosures fundamental to the users understanding of the f/s GAAP GAAS Materiallity of problem f/s are material inability misstate to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence none material unmodified unqualified material problem but non pervasive qualified qualified material and pervasive adverse disclaimer very material problem withdraw: F/s: false, fraud, deceptive, missleading.
does change in estimated on f/s require an emphasis on matter of fact paragraph
no estimate do not require this writing.
A1 Sim 1: When you can not gather enough information to from an opinion is this a GAAP problem or GA;AS problem
First thing is to find out if the problem is a GAAP or GAAS problem. This is a GAAS problem not enough information. Scope limitation. This Sim was based on group audit and auditors were unable to get all financial information. in this type of problem ask; is the a gaap or gaas problem. this is a gaas problem due to scope limitation. if material = qualified if material and pervasive; disclaimer if something is non material = unmodified or unqualified. if material and pervasive yet not scope limitation than adverse. or gaap problem Scope limitation: if material but not pervasive than it is an qualified opinion.: also called MODERATE Flow on audit: opinion: modified; intro paragraph: no need to change intro; auditor responsibility paragraph: modify sentence should be for the basis of opinion; Opinion paragraph: modify; Basis of opinion: ALWAYS A CHANGE IN BASIS WHEN THERE IS QUALIFIED (insert preceeding (or before) or insert following: insert preceeding or before to explain basis of modified opinion. If problem is material and pervasive than it is disclaimer also called: HIGH Flow on audit: opinion: disclaimer; intro paragraph: modify always whether it is GAAP of GAAS” we were engaged to audit f/s and not we audited f/s; auditor responsibility paragraph: modify; Opinion paragraph: modify; Basis of opinion: (insert preceeding (or before) or insert following: insert preceeding opinion If it is non or immaterial than it is unmodified or unqualified. Flow on audit: opinion: unmodified; intro paragraph: no change; auditor responsibility paragraph: no change; Opinion paragraph: no change; Basis of opinion: (insert preceeding (or before) or insert following: not required GAAP problems are adverse problem: we have enough information but the F/s are wrong.
M4: Unmodified nonissurer private (clean opinion)
- Contents for Audit report: - Title: auditors independents should be put in the title section - Addressee: GR; report should be addr ess to BOD or Audit committee etc. not Management. - Intro Paragraph: ID entity of audited f/s; state f/s have been audited; identify title of each f/s (b/s, i/s sfc, oe); and specify date(s0 of period(s) covered by each f/s. -Mgt Responsible:Mgmt responsible for f/s and the desgn, implementation and maintenance of i/c relevant to prep. and fair presentation of f/s free from material misatement due to fraud and errorwithing the framework of GAAP (IFRS) -Auditor responsibilty section: Resonsible to express and opinion of f/s om accordance with GAAS and auditor has planned and perform audit and assess risk to obain evidence for reasonable assurance that f/s are free from material misstatements due to fraud or error. Also has considered and test i/c relevent to f/s and evaluated mangement accounting estimates and accounting policies used. -Auditor Opinion: Explicit statement on f/s were presented fairly on f/s titles and ID applicable framework could also include PCAOB if required.. -Other responsibilities: report inany other legal or regulatory responsibilities -Auditor signature: manual and printed plus firms names -Auditors adrress -date of auditors report: should be dated no earlier than the date on which suditor has obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence to base f/s: such as documentation. all f/s including notes, management has state is it respnisble for f/s when there are comparative sttements, the most recent audit shoud be used for date. There can be two sets of standards: GAAS in the Audit responsibilty and PCAOB in accordance with GAAS in the opinion section.
Unqualified issuer public opinion (clean opinion)
- content of the Audit Report: - title: must include Report of independent registered public accounting firm (PCAOB compliance) -Addressee: to BOD and Shareholders. Not Mgmnt -Opinion (in the 1rs section): name ofcompany being audited; statement ID each type on f/s; date of period covered by f/s and related schedule that has been audited; Explicit statement on f/s were presented fairly on f/s titles and ID applicable framework could also include PCAOB if required. Basis of opinion: a statement that says managemt is responsible for f/sand auditor responsible to express and opinion; auditior are registered with PCAOB and required to be in conducted in accordance with PCOAB standards and apply rules and regs of SEC; auditors plan and perform audit to otain reasonable assurance of ff/s free of material and missleading statement due to error and fraud, perform procedures to assess risk,; examin and test i/c and evidence n f.s; evaluate accounting prin and estimates and overall f/s critical audit matter(CAM) this is person judgemtn section that auditors do, It does not alter opinion. CAM ID in ID CAM; decription of principal conderations that led to auditors CAM, descrip of how CAMwas addressed; refererence f/s account or disclosure and include items discussed on CAM. If CAM not ID, auditor included in letter there were no CAM after discussing CAM requirements. -Language that could be disclaiming, qualifying,restricted or minimizing auditor’s responsibility is not appropriate and not used in CAM -Auditor has the option of discussing prior CAM matters- -Based on SEC act 17a-5 (broker and dealers, ( and Invest Co. Act 1940( other than BD companies, companys such asemplyee puch, saving, and simular paln and emerging growth com are not applicaable to CAM. -Management report of IC: normally unqualified co. must have audit and IC reports A5. If not or auditor was not engage to perform ic, he must write something that saids that. -Required auditor reporting of certain audit participants: Form AP for public co for each audit must be submitted to PCAOB within 35 daysof file with SEC about the audit with the follwing: Name of audit firm, name if issurere, date of audit report; date of most recent f/s in audit report; name of engagement partner on recent audit prior ID number,; city and state, whether another firm participated (just lie staff, full name, back ground check needed, and % of number of hours worked.
M4 MCQs: should the audit report include a reference to the US for GAAP and GAAS
yes
is obtaining evidence that is sufficient and appropriate and explicit statement and consistent application of accounting principles and implicit statement
Yes. We believe that the audit evidece = explicit Consistent and examination are implied.or implicit.
Is the audit included evaluating significant est. made by mngmt and disclosure provided reasonable assurance a basic statement in the audit report
audit included evaluating significant est. made by mngmt= yes disclosure provided reasonable assurance a basic statement in the audit report = no
Where is the audit responsibilty to express and opinion on f/s for non issure under GAAS
Under the Auditors responsibility
When an auditor is asked to do an audit by his client on anther company. Who does the auditor address the audit report to
the Client
If there is an single yera audit conducted will audit review prior audit to make sure auditor gave an unmodified opinion
No. this is not relevant. he would still express unmodified.
Does the introductary paragraph speak to nature of engagemetn and specific f/s covered and dates covered.
Yes.
A veer from uS GAAP that leads to an unmodified would not included a statement on sampling risk factors
It would not include this.