Aud notes study question Flashcards
(195 cards)
Cutoff
relief on inventoty means dr cogs and dr inventory. you must reocrd the sale when inventory is relief.
all transaction adj. are done in year of relief.
fob shipping point. do dr cogs cr inv when inventory leave cleint
fob destination when cutomer gets inventory
Sampling; control test v substance testing, a/r aged that are stastistical sampling that are fairly stated.
where are looking for stastical sampling ( Sampling is a term used in statistics. It is the process of choosing a representative sample from a target population and collecting data from that sample in order to understand something about the population as a whole.) and if the a/r was fairly stated.
All question independent from other question
for control test sampling we are looking for ; attribute sampling (Attribute sampling is defined as the method of measuring quality that consists of noting the presence (or absence) of some characteristic (attribute) in each of the units under consideration and counting how many units do (or do not) possess it.)
looking for errors
for substance test we are looking for; we are looking for varible sampling. Variables sampling is the process used to predict the invalue of a specific variable within a population. For example, a limited sample size can be used to compute the average account receivable balance, as well as a statistical derivation of the plus or minus range of the total receivables value that is under
in fairly stated , we care about fairly presented and looking for misstatement.
- how would sample size for attribute sampling (contol risk) plan change if the risk of assessing control risk too low is revised to 1% ; this is an inverse relationship so tolerence rate goes up.and increase sample size
if it is a expected relationship, that have a direct relationship.
- How wil the sample size for the variable sampling plan change if tolerable misstatement is changed to $2500. this is substance increase
the before tolerable was $2000. inverse relationship with sample size so tolerable up than sample dowm
- Schmidt is thinking about using dual purpose sample to save time. if he does this, what sample size should be used
dual purpose sampling is test of control and substantive testing
on test of control invoices was 75
on substantive 50
take highest 75
4.In evaluating the invoices for proper authorization, schmidt dtermines a sample deviation rate of 2.5% (number of error in sample). what conclusiion will shmidt draw.
sample deviation rate is the number of errors; control testing; that mean over 97% is good so control are operating effectively.
- in evaluating the confirmations associated with each invoice, schmidt does not find any errors. what impact will this have on schmidt’s evaluation of i/c ;confirmation = substantive.what does that tell about i/c . can’t tell no monetary.
- in evaluating the confirmations associated with each invoice, schmidt discovers that there is an average overstatement error of $10 per account. what will be the projected error in the population.
take number of accounts 201-212 = 212 *10 = 2120
- in evaluating the confirmation associated with each invoice, schmidt discovered that there is an average overstatement error of 1% per account. what will schmidt point estimate be for the true population value. substantive testing. what is book value of population = 500,000/.01 average of error =495,050
- Schmidt is considering using pps sampling plan (PPS sampling is used when populations of the sampling units vary to ensure that every element in the target population has an equal chance of being selected.) with a sampling interval of $3000. after ther confirmation, schmidt discovers that an account balance of $1500 is overstated by $150, and an account of $4000 is overstated by $400. based on these errors only, what will be the total projected error in a/r.
Valuating various risks;
no such things as financial statement risk
- Roy Rogers recently invested for the first time, in securities for which the accounting is highly complex; inherent risk = complex
- RR employees are aware that a large reductions in the workforce is planned ; auditor evaluates fraud risk from employees via incentive, opportunities, under pressure , rationalization/attitudes
- CPA rendered an unmod opinion on RR y-e f/s but unbeknownst to the auditors, the f/s are materially misstated due to a computer error that causes sales revenue for a patricular product to be recorded twice
wrong audit opinion issued; audit risk.
Detections risk; audit may not detect a material misstatement that exist in an assertions due to procedures
- Based on a sample of securities seclected, wilson erroneously concluded dividend income is materailly understated but f/s was present fairlly
sample two types 1. attribute for controls and 2. variable for substance testing
the two risk variable sampling are 1. incorrect rejection and 2. incorrect acceptance.
incorrect acceptance = accepting something that is not true and f/r were not presented fairly
Incorrect rejection; auditor sample results came out bad so he rejected but in reality sample was good.
- CPA rely primarily on CR journal and the Cash disbursement journal in its audit. auditors conclude cash is fairly stated when in fact, a large withdrawal on 12/31 was not recorded , resulting in a material overstatement of y-e cash bal
- CPA selects a sample invoice and noting that the majority of the invoices are properl approved, reduces the extent of substantive testing . in fact , most of the invoices selected by cpa happen to have been processed in the 1st qtr. . On 4/1, a new accouting manager was hired who did not require approval of invoices
- top executive at RR will receive significant management bonouses if certain targets are achieved.
- CPA selects a sample of sales ordes and noting that many of the sales orders lack appropriate credit approval, decides to increase substantive testing. As it turns out, Wilson just happen to pick a nonreproesentative sample, and most of the sales orders in the population at large have in fact been properly approved.
- a lack of appropriate controls surrounding RR purcahse function may allow unintentional errors to occur and remain undetected.
EOM , OM and Eplainatory paragraph
EOM must be a material event and OM non issuer
EOM ; going concer
accounting pinciples; i.e. change in depreciation method, (when researching look for consistency if it is year to year change)
change in audit opinion ( for OM as well)
Special purpose frame : cash tax, contract (oboa)
EOM not for regulatory
no need for eom on uncertainty contigency that is disclosed.
OM;
restrict users
change in audit opinion
prior year audit by predessor and audit report is not reissued
audit f/s are peresented in comparative form with compiled or reviewed f/s for not audited f/
material inconsistencyin other iformatiion
supplementary information
restricte the use of the auditor report when special purpose f/s are prepared with contractua or reg basis of accounting (except with reg basis f/s are intened for geneneral use.
Judgemt call on reason why the auditor can not withdraw and law, reg
Explanatory = public conbo of iEOM and OM
Explanatory
Expanatory = issuer
what are the subsequent event procedures
audit report = once all audit evidence have been gathered goes through a review
and then audited f/s are issued.
12/31/ye
audit fieldwork Jan-feb 28 y3
3/15 date of report and audited f/s ( this is strange that both happen simultaneously )
Subsequent event = PRIME
Post ye transactions
Rep letter
Inquires
Minutes after ye
Examine interim f/s
Sub1. review of post balance transactions
- review management letter
- make inquiries of managment regarding any unusual adjustments that may have been made in the month of Jan and Feb. audit field work
- Review Bod or stockholders after y-e
- examine latest interim f/s
A material amount of inventory at a remote warehouse location was not counted by the client as of DEc 31, ye 2; is this a subsequent event and do we make adustment and footnotes. miss count during ye. not a subsequent event. Scope limitation yes. and a issue.
Dual date if event happen after the report and before f/s date.
mock exam 1; sim2-2; ‘Adjusting entries for year 2 for unrecorded liabilities
Ck#1337 1/10/y3 $45,601/ Trsucking services 12/4/y2-1/3/y3 , deliveries made evenly thourghout the period. recoginize 28 days in december 12-4-12/31 = 28 days. 28days/ 32 days month = 90%*45,601 = 41,187.99 0r 41,188 for dec. Dr trcuking exp 41,188 cr a/p 41,188
Ck# 1339.. 1/22/y3 $11,000 recieved new for lift on 12/29 /y2 order on 12/18/y2
Since forklift was receivec in yr 2. should record to year 2.
Dr Forklift (ppe) $11,000 Cr a/p $11,000
research question on change in method that had a material effect on f/s. auditors concurred with changed
how would you look up for appropriate modification
change in accounting principles
then look for something doing with consitency because change happen from last year.
AUC 708 08
mock test 1; sim 3-2; Ratio Analysis what is driving the change
Days sales in a/r ( ending a/r/net sales / 365) Y2 32 days YR 1 20 days: Sales managers are recording fraudulent sales to receive larger commission; either a/r up and or sales up
Inventory Turnover: Yr 2 4.01 Yr 1 6.32 ( COGS/avg inventory); COGS down and inventory up. due to economic downturn, buuyers have switched to economy car. the will evenually bring COGS down due to low sales and inventory up due to not as many luxuary cars are being purchased.
Debt to Equity ( total liab/ common shareholder equity): Yr2 3.2 Yr 1 4.3” In year 2, the company made a required principal payment of l-t debt
Return on Assets (net income / Net sales * net sales/avg total assets): Yr 2 10.5% Yr 1 12.0% NI down and totall asset up.
due to economic downturn, buuyers have switched to economy car. the will evenually bring COGS down due to low sales and inventory up due to not as many luxuary cars are being purchased.
Net Fixed assets to equtiy ( net FA/ Equity) : Yr 2 19% Yr 1 23.2%
FA down and Equity up or both moved. what is the fall of of net FA.
The company reclassified its international productiion facility to be held for sale = reduce FA
mock exam 1; sim 3-3; what is the appropriate inherent risk and the effect of inherent risk
ir= analyze each to understand how it impact net income and what if no i/c.
If not sure of answer, go with overstated = how co. will go for ni
- Sales orders for an internet textbook distributor have increased 100% over the last year. Additionally, the company’s asset turnover has doubled since previous years.
Inherent risk factor: volume. could be artificial inflating sales
Efffect of inherent risk n NI
- RM co. recorded its first hedging transaction for mortgage-backed securitys (MBS) in year 1. At the end of year 1, the FV of MBS had decreased significantly
Inherent risk: complexity; hedge = complexity
NI Impact: overstated
- Metal inc. suppplies copper pipes to home buildeers. During year 1, copper priced doubled. At any given time, a significant amount of inventory is in transit or located at job sites.
Inherent risk: could fraud of susessability of theft of the copper
Impact on I/s.: Overstatement
Home builder is the industry and not the copper.
Joe’s computers provides 3 year money back warranties on all laptops. During year 1, warranty claims decreased significantly and the company has not reduced the warranty reserve
Inherent risk: estimates
NI impact: understatement of ni idue to over expenses
Global co. imports most of its products from a foreign supplier. During yr 1, a new technoology made part of the Global co. inventory obsolete.
Inherent risk:instry circumstances
NI impact: inventory write offer = bad debt exp = overtatement.
FYI’ no impact is a b/s entry in the sim.
mock exam 2; sim 1-1
ratio analysis 2 year to year changes
Year 1 Year 2
A/r turnover 6.5 6.10
wrong answer; company implemented a fast collect. this would have had a increase but was a decrease in a/r yr. right answer; item shipped on consignment during the last month recorded as sales. the impact sales and are until. must have adjusted to reduce sales and a/r. because an increase in sales numerator would have a bigger increase than avg a/r the denominator. so a/r decrease year 2.
sales net/ar avg
Inventory turnover 3.2 3.54
wrong answer; COGS sold as a percentage of sales. this would r yr. right answer; item shipped on consignment during the last month recorded as sales.
COGS/avg inventory
Gross Profit Margin 40% 44%
sale-cogs/sales
Current Ratio 1,0 1.08
ca/cl
Debt to Equity 1.20 1.03
tl/te
mock exam 2; sim1 -2; Calculation of materiality
the benchmark ; would be the lower of sales 2,550,000 at interim *2 = $5,100,000 and total assets $4,900,000. lower sales= $4,900,000.
preliminary planning material; the % from table for range of total assest . even though % says 60%, you calcalc at .006. $4,900,000*0.006= $29,600
Tolerable misstatement = preliminary planning material $29,600 * either the low likelyhood of misstatement 60% or high likelyhood of misstatement 70%. this is what the call of the question is.
in this question, it is lower 60%
Tolerable misstatement = 29,600*60%= $17,600
mock exam 2; sim 2-2; identify fraud risk
the CEo would like to create two division; no effect of risk; this is for better management
management bonus is based on profits; increase fraud risk, act of this is potential fraud.
the board of directors are all independent of the entity; decrease risk; good thing when bod indenpendent
CEO. CFO and CAO have personal gauranteed debt in company; increaese risk; more pressure to perform due to debt
managment is currently creaeting an adverstising paln for contractrs; no effect. operation plan
Due to economic downturn co. is planning to issue stock to pay debt ; increase risk
Co. require employees to take mandatory vacations, even though, company is experiencing low profits; decrease risk; good things when company vacations are taken.
PCAOB integrative report
mock 2; sim 3-2 confirmation and determine action required
based on the confirmation that was sent , amount wanted to confirm was $2000. client said it was $2760. the client stated to additional invoice outstanding. auditor action; verify by examining shipping documents and subsequent cash collections.
review and verify invoice to determine if sales and invoice are after year end.
\
client could not confirm confirm owed of $40 without po numbers. auditor actions; verify by examing shipping documents and subsequent cash collection; we need to review and verify to determine invoice. sending out second request with po number is not as sufficient as doing alternative procedures.
mock exam 2; sim 3-3AICPA Code of Conduct Rules
independent rule: financial interest, conflicts with clients, material direct or indirect
integrity and objecitvity; must be honest and unbias
General standards rules; must be competent, techniques
must know the accounting principle rules and know if client did not follow gaap
confidental cleint information rule. unless supeona, peer review, cpa hearing, state board hearing.
act of discretable rule behave like a professional, don’t hold records hostage for payment or you don;t file taxes
advertising rules. not misleading or fraud
commission and referal. follow rules
form of organization rules; most of owners must be cpas
no rule violated
contingent fees rules; can not get contigent fee on tax returns or admendent tax returns. can on reportation of voliation from irs.
- a client continuosly demand auditor returns records. auditor refuse until fees are paid on engagement; act of discretable rule ;
- CPA hired by client to challenge irs examination of refund denial. CPA will get 10% settled refund. no rule violated, fining by irs allowed
- an accounting firm has 2 cpas and 3 non cpas with financial interest. the firms current and past engagements include reviews and audit of non-issuers ; form of organization
a cpa belongs to a social tennis club that is an attest client and was required to aquire a pro rata share of the club’s equity securities; no rule violated; a social event no direct interest.
CPA fails to timely file their personal tax returns: Act Discreditable rule
9958, when would an auditor not express an unmodified opnion on a justified
when is a justifiable inseparatable change in to accounting estiment to an accounting principle.
however you can change an inseparable change accounting estimate to accounting principle
- Using probability -proporational to size (PPS) = dollar unit or cumulative dollar amount sampling : how would you calculate sample size
PPS; Probability proportional to size (PPS) sampling is a method of sampling from a finite (Specific amount) population in which a size measure is available for each population unit before sampling and where the probability of selecting a unit is proportional to its size. PPS sampling is used when populations of the sampling units vary to ensure that every element in the target population has an equal chance of being selected.
data
tolerable misstatment( net of effect expected misstatement) $126,000
Risk of incorrect acceptance you agree with results but results were wrong; 5%
Number of misstatement allowed; 2
Recorded amount of A/R= $700,000
Number of accounts: 500
Step 1; the reliabilty factor is selected based on the number of misstatment allowed = 2 and the incorrect acceptance 5%. then corresponded to the reliability factor %= 6.30
Step 2; then take the tolerable misstatement $126,000/ 6.30= 20,000
Step 3 ; take the Recorded amout or population = $700,000/ 20,000= 35
- how would an auditor be able to detect a misstatement in a cash transfer
by reviewing the disbursment recorded in books to deposit received in books
if a payment is recorded before payment is recieved = cash misstatement.
- what would require a modification of the accountant report of review of interim f/s infor. of issurer prepared on basis of GAAP
lack of adherence to GAAP and lack of disclosure
Are negative assurance provided on compiance report
no
- An auditor is auditing many cash transactions and a few fixed assets transaction. how would strategized work
He would be effecient and focus on ending cash balances because of many transactions. and the the few fixed assets.
- If an auditor decides not to test operating efficiency of control , what is not likely a reason he did not do it
a very small MATERIAL error is noted in a/r account; he would have to do it.
Reason do it;
lack of paper audit trail, could be electronic version.
it would be easier to perform substantive testing
design of controls are inadequate
- what is improper segregation of duties
Segregation of duties= ARC= Authorization - Recording - Custody all done separate
in approriate= supervisor approve timesheet = authorization and distributes paychecks = custody
appropriate = treasurer signs checks custody - distributes custody and holds unclaim check custody
appropiate; payroll department computes and record payroll infomration and prepares check = recording process
HR department authorize new hire and approve pay rates = authorization
- how would an audit do a procedure on retain earnings
analyze re. account since last audit. should be fairly easy and effecient there should not be a lot of transactions.
do not trace to declarization off authorization of management of dividends because mangement does not do this BOD does
Standard bank confirmation = bank would not have this specific informaiton.