Acid/Base, Fluids, & Electrolytes Flashcards
Seminal Papers from the ACVECC Top 100 Article List (238 cards)
In Sen et al. (2017), what study design was used to assess the impact of chloride content on survival during fluid resuscitation?
Retrospective observational cohort study of 1,047 adult ICU patients who received >60 mL/kg IV fluids within 24 hours.
What was the primary endpoint evaluated in Sen et al. (2017)?
30-day in-hospital mortality.
According to Sen et al. (2017), what chloride threshold defined “high-chloride” fluids?
Chloride content ≥109 mmol/L (e.g., 0.9% NaCl, colloids in saline).
What mortality difference was observed between high- and low-chloride groups in Sen et al. (2017)?
27.8% in the high-chloride group vs. 18.8% in the low-chloride group; p = 0.003.
What was the adjusted odds ratio for mortality in patients receiving high-chloride fluids in Sen et al. (2017)?
aOR = 1.73 (95% CI: 1.14–2.63); p = 0.01.
What pathophysiologic mechanisms are proposed in Sen et al. (2017) to explain increased mortality from high-chloride fluids?
1) Hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, 2) renal vasoconstriction with ↓ GFR, 3) endothelial and glycocalyx injury promoting inflammation and microvascular dysfunction.
Did Sen et al. (2017) find a significant difference in total fluid volume administered between high- and low-chloride groups?
No — mortality differences were attributed to chloride content, not fluid volume.
How did Sen et al. (2017) control for differences in illness severity between groups?
Used multivariate logistic regression adjusted for APACHE III score and other confounders.
What clinical recommendation can be drawn from Sen et al. (2017) regarding fluid selection for resuscitation?
Preferential use of balanced crystalloids (e.g., Plasma-Lyte, LRS) over high-chloride fluids to reduce mortality in high-volume resuscitation cases.
In Semler et al. (2018) (SMART trial), what type of study was conducted to compare balanced crystalloids vs saline?
A pragmatic, cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial conducted in 5 ICUs over 16 months.
What was the primary composite endpoint evaluated in the SMART trial by Semler et al. (2018)?
MAKE-30: Major Adverse Kidney Events within 30 days (composite of death, new renal replacement therapy, or persistent renal dysfunction).
What was the incidence of MAKE-30 in the balanced crystalloid group vs the saline group in Semler et al. (2018)?
14.3% in the balanced group vs 15.4% in the saline group (p = 0.04).
According to Semler et al. (2018), what fluids were considered ‘balanced crystalloids’?
Lactated Ringer’s (LR) and Plasma-Lyte A.
What subgroup of patients derived the most benefit from balanced crystalloids in Semler et al. (2018)?
Patients with sepsis, renal impairment, or those receiving larger fluid volumes.
What did Semler et al. (2018) conclude about the effect of balanced crystalloids on mortality?
No statistically significant difference in mortality alone, but a significant reduction in MAKE-30 supports preferential use of balanced fluids.
How many ICU patients were included in Semler et al. (2018) SMART trial?
15,802 patients.
What is the clinical relevance of Semler et al. (2018) for fluid resuscitation in critical illness?
Balanced crystalloids are associated with fewer kidney-related complications and should be preferred over saline for ICU fluid resuscitation.
What potential mechanism may explain the benefits of balanced crystalloids seen in Semler et al. (2018)?
Balanced fluids avoid hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, thereby reducing renal vasoconstriction and inflammation.
According to Adamantos (2021), how does pulmonary interstitial edema affect gas exchange?
It increases the diffusion distance for oxygen, impairs alveolar expansion, and contributes to ventilation-perfusion mismatch.
According to Adamantos (2021), what is the most important determinant of pulmonary fluid accumulation during resuscitation?
The integrity of the endothelial glycocalyx and capillary permeability, not just hydrostatic pressure or volume alone.
According to Bohrer-Clancy et al. (2021), can dogs with very high lactate levels still survive?
Yes. Survival was still possible even with L-lactate > 6 mmol/L, underscoring the importance of clinical context.
According to Bohrer-Clancy et al. (2021), what was the mortality rate in dogs with an L-lactate ≥ 6.0 mmol/L?
29.7%, compared to 6.4% in those with lactate < 6.0 mmol/L.
According to Boysen & Rozanski (2021), what are the risks of using large-volume bolus fluids indiscriminately?
Interstitial edema, hemodilution, worsening coagulopathy, and exacerbation of hypoxia via endothelial damage and glycocalyx disruption.
According to Boysen & Rozanski (2021), what is the primary goal of triage in emergency medicine?
To rapidly identify life-threatening conditions and initiate prompt, targeted resuscitation before full diagnostics are available.