Altruism Flashcards

1
Q

Discuss how evolutionary theory accounts for helping behavior.

A

.If a behavior led to survival benefits in the past, people who exhibited those behaviors more likely to survive and reproduce.over time these behaviors become part of common human inheritance.so helping behaviors, if evolutionarily useful, might be part of this inheritance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain kin selection and reciprocal altruism. Why would it be adaptive to help in these contexts?

A

.kin selection: tendency to help genetic relatives (preserves genes close to us).reciprocal altruism: helping someone in your best interest as increases likelihood they will return the behavior when you need it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What evidence do we have that supports the evolutionary perspective (hint: animal research)?

A

.chimps that share food with other chimps will have food shared at later feedings.greedy chimps are often violently rebuffed at later feedings!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why do we help in situations that go beyond those explained by kin selection and reciprocal altruism?

A

.indirect reciprocity: i help you and somebody else helps me (pay it forward).group selection: groups that have altruistic members may be more likely to survive than groups with only selfish members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How is empathy involved in helping behavior? What are the cognitive and affective components of empathy? Are humans the only animals to demonstrate empathy?

A

.empathy-altruism model, if we feel empathy for the individual, we are much more likely to help altruistically. otherwise, we act according to cost-reward model (selfish altruism).empathy: understanding or vicariously experiencing another’s individual perspective and feeling sympathy and compassion for that individual.cognitive component: perspective taking.affective component: empathic concern.APES! Binti Jua, most intriguing person of the year voted… little boy fell 20ft onto concrete, went over and picked up boy, petted him, rocked him, then took him over to a gate.extraordinary, people thought would treat like a toy.BUT she had been trained to retrieve objects and bring over to gate… so was it the training or was she altruistic?.chimps are capable of rudimentary perspective taking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Discuss the various rewards people receive through helping others, including helping others to help ourselves, helping in order to feel good, and helping in order to “be” (or appear to be) good.

A

.reciprocal altruism….people are more likely to help when the potential rewards of helping seem high relative to the potential costs.helping to feel good: rl between helping and feeling better, esp if self-esteem has been threatened by failure, or feeling guilty about something. negative state relief model: proposes that people help to counter their own feelings of sadness. helping others after trauma helps ourselves recover.helping to be good: may help b/c motivated to behave in ways that are consistent with moral principles, makes you look good and feel good for obeying them and acting in accordance with them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Discuss the arousal: cost-reward model of helping. What predictions does this model make about when we will and will not help?

A

.Arousal: Cost-Reward Theory. The arousal: cost-reward theory suggests that people feel upset when they see a person in need and are motivated to do something to reduce the unpleasant arousal. People then weigh the costs of helping versus not helping. The clearer the need for help, the more likely people are to help. The presence of others inhibits helping behavior due to diffusion of responsibility, a belief that someone else will help. Environmental and personality characteristics also influence helping.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Discuss the costs associated with helping, or of not helping.

A

.charles brightly, busy street to rescue suicidal woman, was killed himself trying to rescue her.helping can have negative health effects if involves constant and exhausting demands (taking care of the terminally ill).good samaritan laws to reduce potential costs (doctors can aid in a crisis without fear of getting sued later)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Compare and contrast egoistic and altruistic motives for helping.

A

.altruistic: motivated by the desire to increase another’s welfare.egoistic: motivated by the desire to increase one’s OWN welfare.Batson: The motivation behind some helpful actions is truly altruistic.many theories assume an egoistic bottom line… helping the disadvantaged, it looks good on your resume dude

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain the empathy-altruism hypothesis and identify why a distinction between these two types of motives is important.

A

.perception that someone needs help—>two paths.either you adopt the other person’s perspective or don’t (cog component of empathy).if yes, you feel empathic concern, your motive is altruistic, and reduces other’s distress.if no, you feel personal distress, the motive is egoistic, it results in the reduction of one’s own distress.lincoln had argument about whether altruism is truly altruistic.passed some ducks in danger in a stagecoach, lept out and saved them.his friend said, THERE, proof.and lincoln said “dear boy, i only helped them to give me peace of mind for the rest of the day”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How can we tell the difference between egoistic and altruistic motives?

A

.how easy is it to escape from a helping situation?.if egoistic motive, helping should decline when escape from the situation is easy.if altruistic motive, help is given regardless of ease of escape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Batson and his colleagues (2007) demonstrated the role of both perspective taking and having warm emotional reactions to the other person in predicting helping.

A

.perspective taking: paired with a confed then “randomly” assigned to watching a confederate receive unpleasant shocks.confed relays unpleasant memory of falling into an electric fence beforehand.research asks, because the confed had this experience, would you switch with him?.manupulated ease of escape: hard, had to watch all ten trials. easy: could leave after four trials.when empathic concern high, most people helped, offered to take their place.when lo, usually only helped if escape was difficult.”omg have to stand here and watch this?? i guess i’ll do it”.warm emotional reactions: first read fictitious story about a student named Brian Banks hit by a car on way to class, seriously injured.manipulated perspective by changing instructions, either asked: be objective about the situation, or, imagine how this student feels and how it’s affected their life.manipulated emotional reactions to Brian.either told a story of him being rude to an old woman crossing the street or being nice??.after ppl led to believe study was done, they were asked if they would take notes for brian.those induced with perspective taking and a positive emotion were 65% willing to offer help, as opposed to every other condition which was below 30% (four conditions, obbjective/perspective vs negative/positive emotion).more empathic concern, more likely to help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the limitations of the empathy-altruism hypothesis?

A

.there is strong evidence for the empathy altrism hypothesis. but, some limits:.not all helping is altruistically motivated (egoists act very pro-socially when repuatation at stake, altruists help regardless).motives do not guarantee behavior (might be motivated to help but cost is too high).is the assumption that there is a clear divide between the self and the other a valide one?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain the bystander effect.

A

.The finding that the greater the number of bystanders who witness an emergency, the less likely it is that any one of them will help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who was Kitty Genovese? How did her story inspire the work on the bystander effect?

A

.Kitty was a bar manager in NYC, walking home after late shift @ 3:20am, attacked by stranger with a knife, stabbed and sexually assaulted her 35 yards from apartment building.yelled please stop me, he’s killing me, 38 neighbors watched it happen, someone called only 45 minutes after it happened, story shocked the nation.WHY did nobody step in and help her?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How did Latané & Darley’s classic seizure study demonstrate the bystander effect?

A

.Put ppl in a cubicle with an intercom, told study on social interactions & daily student stressors.group discussion, only one person talking at a time on the intercom for several minutes, no interruptions, the participants were really just listening to recorded messages.intro conversation, one recording said daily stress is having epilepsy.second time to talk, starts mumbling words and slurring and having a seizure.so how many people would leave their cubicle and run down hallway to get experimenter.if alone with seizure guy, left 30 seconds into it.3 person group, most left within 4 minutes.6 person, only 38% left in first six minutes.more bystanders, less likely that each individual will help victim.DIFFUSION OF RESPONSIBILITY

17
Q

Identify and explain the five steps in the helping process, discussing obstacles to each step.

A
  1. Noticing (overcome distraction, self-concern)2. Interpreting (overcome pluralistic ignorance, ambiguity, rl between attacker and victim).reminder pluralistic ignorance: phenomenon where bystanders assume nothing is wrong in an emergency because no one else looks concerned3. Taking Responsibility (overcoming diffusion of responsibility, roles)4. Deciding How to Help (lack of competence)5. Providing Help (overcome audience inhibition, reward-cost calc, will i get sued?)
18
Q

Consider how each of these obstacles contributes to the bystander effect.

A

.pluralistic ignorance: look at everyone, nobody seems worried, more people not worried, more strong the effect.diffusion of responsibility: the more people, the less each feels obligated to step in… a group paralysis of sorts.audience inhibition: it’s scary to go and be the one that does all the acting in front of an audience of people.lack of competence: what do i do??.ambiguity: is this really an emergency?.distraction: might not even notice it.reward-cost calc: will i get sued if i try to help and fail? (also flip side: i’ll look like a terrible person if i DON’T help).rl between attacker and victim: man and woman having argument, see it as a relationship and personal, better not step in. assume this without any info to indicate so. think that it will be unwelcomed by victim

19
Q

What does this research suggest about what you should do to get help in a crowd?

A

.make sure you make your need for help very clear by singling out individuals in a crowd via.eye contact.pointing.direct requests

20
Q

Describe the influence of other situational factors on helping behavior, such as time pressure, location, culture, mood, role models, and social norms.

A

.in a rush, much less likely to help, distracted.DID NOT GO PAST THIS

21
Q

How did the Good Samaritan study demonstrate the effects of time pressure? How did time pressure influence helping?

A

.either told you’re late for the study, on time, or we’re ahead of schedule, so take your time going to the next building.if late, barely any helped the man lying over on the floor in sever pain

22
Q

Why would pleasant scents make people more likely to help?

A

.skipped

23
Q

Why do good moods lead to helping?

A

.skipped

24
Q

Do bad moods lead to less helping? If so, when? When might they lead to more helping? What is predicted by the negative state-relief model? How do attributions of responsibility for our mood and self-awareness influence the relationship between mood and helping?

A

.skipped

25
Q

How, in general, do children learn about helping?

A

.skipped

26
Q

How do role models inspire helping?

A

.skipped

27
Q

What social norms are related to helping?

A

.skipped

28
Q

How can culture interact with social norms to influence helping? What research demonstrates these effects?

A

.skipped

29
Q

Explain how individual differences such as personality and moral reasoning may affect a person’s likelihood of helping others

A

.skipped

30
Q

What is the altruistic personality?

A

.skipped

31
Q

What does it mean to say that helping appears to be situation-specific?

A

.skipped

32
Q

Describe how characteristics of people in need (e.g., attractiveness, perceived responsibility, gender) influence the likelihood that others will help them.

A

.skipped

33
Q

Consider the role of fit between the characteristics of the help giver and receiver (i.e., similarity and closeness).

A

.skipped

34
Q

What does the self-evaluation maintenance model predict about our willingness to help friends vs. strangers on low vs. highly ego-relevant tasks?

A

.skipped

35
Q

Describe the classic male and female helper scenarios? Are there gender differences in helping in contexts that do not fall into one of these scenarios?

A

.skipped

36
Q

Identify the factors that influence people’s different reactions to receiving help.

A

.skipped

37
Q

How does culture influence who receives help?

A

.skipped

38
Q

Discuss the research by Warneken & Tomasello with infants and chimpanzees that demonstrated helping others who are struggling to achieve some goal without any benefit to the self.

A

.had 18mo infants come into study, set up situations where experimenter needed help and not needed help.both conditions very similar.need help: dropped pen by accident, reached for it.not needed help: throw pen and not reach for it.the infants could detect the difference!.tested 3 young chimps using similar procedures.ALSO helped experimenters, although not as reliably.authors reported this is first experimental evidence of altruism with no benefit to the self