Approaches Flashcards
(53 cards)
Outline the role of Wundt in the emergence of psychology as a science
- Opened lab in Liepzig, Germany in 1870s
- Philosophy –> controlled psychology
- Aim: describe nature of human consciousness in controlled, scientific environment
- Introspection
- Standardised procedures
- E.g. ticking metronome, pps record thoughts, images and sensations
- Structualism
Define introspection
a systematic analysis of one’s own conscious experience of a stimulus
What is structuralism
Isolating the structure of consciousness
Strength of Wundt’s work
Scientific
* Introspection in controlled lab
* Standardised procedures
* Controlled EVs
* Foundation for later approaches
Limitation of Wundt’s work
Subjective
* Relied on pps reporting private mental processes
* Subjective as pps may have hidden thoughts (social desireability bias)
* Difficult to establish ‘laws of behaviour’ (1 aim of science)
* Didn’t meet criteria for scientific enquiry
Timeline of pscyhology (emergency of psychology as a science)
- 1900s behaviourists rejected introspection
- 1930s behaviourist scientific approach dominated
- 1950s cognitive approach syidoed mental processes succesfully
- 1980s bological approach introduced technological advancements
Strength of emergence of psychology as a science
Modern psychological research is scientific
* Psychology aims = natural science aims (describe, understand, predict and control behaviour)
* Learning, cognitive and biological approaches use scientific method
* E.g. lab = controlled, unbiased
Limitation of emergence of psychology as a science
Some approaches use subjective data
* Humanistic approach doesn’t formulate laws of behaviour
* Psychodynamic approach uses case studies with unreprestantive samples
* Pps in studies can respond to demand characteristics
* Scientific approach not always possible
Key features of the behaviourist approach
- Key principle: studying behaviour that can be observed and measured in a controlled setting maintaining objectivity
- Classical Conditioning
- Example: Pavlov’s dogs
- Operant conditioning
- Example: Skinner’s research
- Three types of reinforcement
Behaviourist approach- classical conditioning with example
Learning by association
Pavlov’s research
1. UCS (food) –> salivation
NS (bell) –> no response
2. NS + UCS (bell and food occur at same time during conditioning)
3. CS (bell) –> CR (salivation) after conditioning
Behaviourist approach- operant conditioning with example
Learning is an active process where humans and animals operate on environment
Behaviour mained by consequence
Skinner’s research
1. Rat in a Skinner box where it activated a lever and was rewarded a pellet
2. Desireable consequence led to behaviour being repeated (positive reinforcement)
3. If when lever pressed, it avoided an electric shock, behaviour would be repeated (negative reinforcement)
Behaviourist approach- three types of consequence of behaviour
- Positive reinforcement- recieving reward when behaviour is performed
- Negative reinforcement- avoiding something unpleasant when behaviour is performed
- Punishment- unpleasant consequence of behaviour
Positive + negative reinforcement increase liklihood of behaviour, punishment decreases it
Strengths of behaviourist approach
Well-controlled research
* Controlled lab setting
* Broken behaviour into stimulus-response units
* Studied causal relationships
* Scientific credibility
* Counterpoint
* Oversimplifies learning ignoring biological and cognitive aspect
* Learning more complex than what’s observed
Real-world application
* Principles of conditioning applied to real-world behaviour and problems
* Token economy system rewards appropriate behaviour with tokens that are exchanged for privileges (operant conditioning)
* Used in prisons and psychiatric wards
Limitations of behaviourism
Environmentally deterministic
* All behaviour determined by past conditioning
* Ignores free will
* Skinner- free will is illusion. Past conditioning determines outcome even if we think we made the desicion
* Ignores conscious desicion making
Environmentally reductionist
* Breaks behaviour into stimulus-response units
* Assumes humans are passive
* Ignores other aspects of human nature eg cognition
Ethical issues
* Skinner box allowed control but caused harsh, cramped conditions
* Deliberately underweight so always hungry
* Benefit vs cost
Generaliseability
* Are animal studies applicable to humans
Key features of the social learning theory
1.Learning occurs due to imitation
2. Vicarious Reinforcement increases liklihood of behaviour
3. Mediational process cause learning
4. Identification influence learning
Supported by Bandura’s bobo doll research
Social learning theory- imitation
Assumption: immitation of observed behaviour causes learning to take place indirectly
Learning occurs through experience
Social learning theory (vicarious reinforcement)
- People observe behaviour and it consequence
- Vicarious reinforcement- behaviour that is seen to be rewarded (reinforced) is more likely to be copied
Social Learning Theory- Mediational (cognitive) process
- Attention- whether behaviour is noticed
- Retention- whether behavioud is remembered
- Motor repoduction- being able to do it
- Motivation- the will to perform the behaviour
1+2= learning behaviour
3+4= performing behaviour
So learning + performance don’t have to occur together (unlike in behaviourism)
Social learning theory- Identification
- People are more likely to imitate the behaviour of someone they identify with
- These role models are similar to the observer, attractive and have a higher status
Bandura et al. (1961)
Adult hit bobo doll with a hammer and shouted abuse at it.
Behaviour of child observed
Children who saw aggression were more aggressive towards doll
Bandura et al (1963)
Children saw adult hitting bobo doll which was either
1. Rewarded
2. Punished
3. No consequence
Children who saw aggression rewarded were more aggressive (vicarious reinforcement)
Strengths of the SLT
Cognitive factors
* CC and OC don’t include cognitive factors so cannot explain behaviour on its own
* Humans + animals store info about behaviour of others and use it to make judgements about when actions are appropriate
* SLT more complete explanation –> recognises mediational processes
* Counterpoin:t
* Observational learning is controlled by motor neurons in the brain –> allows for empathy + imitation
* SLT doesn’t reference biological factors
Real-world application
* Shows how children learn from those around them + media
* Explains how cultural norms are transmitted
* Useful in behaviour explanation e,g, understanding gener roles by imitating models in media
Reciprocal determinism
* Reciprocal determinism- influenced by environment but exert influence upon it through our chosen behaviour
* Suggests free will in the way we behave
* More realistic and more flexible than behaviourist –> recognises role in shaping environment
Limation of SLT
Low external validity
* Bandura’s idea from observations of children in labs
* Issue of demand characteristics
* Purpose of bobo doll is to hit so children may have behaved as intended
* Little info gained about aggression
Key concepts of cognitive approach
- Cognitive mental processes should be studied through inferences
- Schemas shape experiences
- Theoretical and computer models help understand mental processes
- Emergence of cognitive neuroscience