5 Psychopathology Flashcards
(62 cards)
Definitions of abnormality: What is deviation from social norms?
Concerns behaviour that is different from the accepted standards of behaviour in a community or society
Outline the deviation from social norms definition of abnormality.
*According to the DSN definition, any behaviour that violates the social norms of any given society is psychologically abnormal. *
Social norms are collective judgements about what constitutes normal behaviour. They can be explicit (in law) or implicit (unwritten conventions).
Social norms are specific to cultural context and can vary over** time. **
For example, homosexuality was once regarded as a mental illness in the UK, and although it was removed from the DSM classification manual in 1973, it is still regarded as an abnormality and criminalised in some countries.
Strengths of deviation from social norms
(DSN definition for abnormality)
It has real life application
* Eg, antisocial personality disorder has key diagnostic criteria of failing to comply with ethical behaviour which includes being deceitful, reckless or aggressive
* Also in diagnosis of other mental health disorders, such as schizotypal personality disorder: individuals who have a diagnosis display ‘strange’ or eccentric behaviours and hold peculiar beliefs
Weakness of deviation from social norms
(DSN definition for abnormality)
Cultural relativism
* 1 cultural group may believe a behaviour to be against social norms but another may think it is socially acceptable
* Eg, hearing voices (from dead) in the UK = abnormal, signs of psychosis disorders of schizophrenia, but in non-Western culture= normal and a gift
* Not generaliseable to all cultures
Human rights abuse
* Historically DSN is used as a form of social control over minority groups as a means to exclude those who do not conform to society and if you challenge the norm you are labled as ‘insane’
* Eg, slaves were said to have drapetomania if they tried to run away from plantations. Then they were whipped to ‘cure’/punish them
* So, categories of mental disorder are really abuses of people’s rights to be different
Definitions of abnormality: What is failure to function adequately?
Occurs when someone is unable to cope with the normal demands of every day living
Who created the criteria and what are the criteria that determine whether a person is failing to function adequately?
Psychologists Rosenhan and Seligman [1989] proposed seven major criteria that determine whether a person is failing to function adequately.
Personal distress- The person is upset or depressed.
Maladaptive behaviour- Not adapting appropriately to the environment or situation. Engaging in harmful behaviour or behaviour that prevents you from achieving life goals.
Irrationality- There appears to be no good reason why the person should choose to behave that way.
Unpredictability- Behaviour is often unexpected and characterised by a lack of control.
Observer discomfort- Behaviour that makes other people feel uncomfortable.
Violation of moral standards- Breaking moral standards, taboos, unwritten social rules, etc.
Unconventionality- Displaying highly unconventional/unusual behaviours.
Strengths of failing to function adequately definition for abnormality
A sensible threshold for seeking psychiatric help
* People struggly with mental health throughout life but they seek support/encouraged to seek support when they fail to function adequately
* MIND states 25% people in the UK will struggle with mental health in a year. Many people push on despite faily severe symptoms
* Allows those who need the support most to access the necessary support
Weaknesses of failing to function adequately definition for abnormality
Are alternative lifestyles abnormal?
* hard to identify if someone is failing to function or choosing a lifestyle that deviates from social norms
* Eg, a person without a job who does not have a permanent residence and lives ‘off-grid’ may be classed as maladaptive behaviour
* Alternative lifestyles could be labled as abnormal which is discriminatory and could restrict their freedom of choice.
Is failure to function always psychologically abnormal?
* Sometimes people may be unable to cope due to life events eg bereavement so their behaviour might not be abnormal if it is an appropriate response to an event
* However, a reason for their failure to function doesn’t change the fact their failing to function so might still need help
* So, failing to function might not always be abnormal but it can be used as a guideline to acess if help is required
Definitions of abnormality: What is deviation from ideal mental health?
Occurs when someone does not meet a set of criteria for good mental health
Outline the deviation from ideal mental health definition for abnormality
This definition attempts to define a state of ideal mental health. It looks at positives rather than negatives – the notion of mental health rather than mental illness.
Maria Jahoda (1958) identified six characteristics that individuals should exhibit in order to be ‘normal’
All six criteria need to be met in order to be normal. The more characteristics an individual fails to meet and the further they are away from realising individual characteristics, the more abnormal they are.
What are the criteria set out in order to be deemed as normal in the ideal mental health definition of abnormality?
The criteria Mary Jahoda (1958) identified are:
Positive attitude towards self- having high self-esteem and a strong sense of identity
Self-actualization- the extent to which an individual develops their full capabilities, being the best they can be
Resistance to stress- The ability to cope with stressful situations competently
Personal autonomy- Being self-reliant and independent. Not dependent on others
Accurate perception of reality- Being able to see the world realistically (not in an overly negative light or in an overly positive light). Similarly to how others see it
Environmental mastery- Being able to adapt to changes in the environment and new environments to be at ease. Being flexible not rigid.
Strengths of deviation from ideal mental health as a definition for abnormality
Positively focused and a comprehensive list
* It covers the majority of reasons people access help regarding mental health and allows people to distinguish good mental health from mental health issues
* So, a person with issues can access a range of support from professionals with varying beliefs eg, focusing on self-actualization in a humanistic approach or focusing on symptoms in a medically-focused approach
* So, there is a checklist people can use to assess mental health so that the right support can be found
Weaknesses of deviation from ideal mental health as a definition for abnormality
Criteria are not relevant to all cultures
* Based on values in individualist cultures so not all criteria align with collectivist cultures where focus is on community not individuals
* Eg, collectivist cultures see self-actualization as self-indulgence not good mental health.
* Germany expect people to be more self-reliant than in Italy
* So, success is different across different cultures so this definition is not generalisable
Sets an unrealistically high standard for good mental health
* Unnatainable to achieve and maintain all the characteristic so a person could become upset, burnt out or have a deteriation in mental health because trying for a goal that is unachievable
* However, having a checklist to follow for good mental health makes it more practical and easier to set goals and understand what needs to be improved
* So, although they are positive, the criteria are sometimes unachievable and it needs clarifying how many criteria need to be absent for a diagnosis of abnormality
Definitions of abnormality: What is statistical infrequency?
Occurs when an individual has a less common characteristic, for example being more depressed or intelligent than the rest of the population
Outline what is meant by statitistical infrequency as a definition of abnormality?
Statistical infrequency occurs when a person has a less common characteristic.
According to this definition, abnormal behaviour is when a behaviour is statistically uncommon. The focus of this definition is quantifiable data as it measures standard deviation from the mean.
For example, IQ is normally distributed, 68% of people fall between 85 points and 115 points and 95% of people will have scores between 70 and 130 (the bell curve of normal distribution). 5% of people fall outside this normal distribution (so they are +2 or -2 standard deviation points from the mean) and these scores are psychologically abnormal. A score of less than 70 means a person has intellectual Disability Disorder (mental retardation) which is abnormal.
Strengths of statistical infrequency as a definition for abnormality
Real life application in diagnosis of disorders
* Used to diagnose individuals and assess symptom severity
* Example: A diagnosis of Intellecultual disabilty disorder = an IQ of <70 (bottom 2% of people)
* Example: Severe depression is assesed by Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Score >30 (top 5%) = severe
* Quantitative measure of abnormality in clincal practice
Weaknesses of statistical infrequency as a definition for abnormality
Some abnormalities = statistically common. Some statisticall rare behaviours = desireable
* Doesn’t take into account if trait is desireable or unwanted
* Example: Low BDI = abnormal (according to this definition) but is a positive trait
* Example: An IQ >130 = abnormal but is likely to help in life
* 1 in 6 people report a common mental health condition each week in UK. These would be failed to diagnosed as they are statistically common but they are not ‘normal’ nor desireable
* So, needs to be used along with another definition for abnormality
Not everyone with statistically rare behaviour benefits from a label
Some benefit from label as abnormal
* For example, low IQ score, label abnormal/Intellectual disability disorder allows them to access support
* For example, high BDI allows them to access treatment to manage depression
Some may not benefit from label as abnormal
* For example, a person with low IQ but able to cope and is content with their liefestyle
* Social stigma attatched so people may not want label due to judgement
* So, risk of doing more harm than good if labelling becomes a stigma
The DSM-5 recognises three categories of phobias.
What are these and what do they mean?
Specific phobias:- phobia of an object, eg an animal or body part, or situation eg flying or getting an injection.
Social phobias: - phobia of a social situation eg, public speaking or using a public toilet
Agoraphobia: - phobia of being outside or being in a public place
What are the three behavioural characteristics of phobias and what do they mean?
Panic: - A person with a phobia may panic when faced with a specific stimulus. This may include a range of behaviour such as crying, screaming or running away. Children may react slightly differently eg, by clinging to a parent, freezing or having a tantrum.
Avoidance: -Unless a person is actively trying to face their phobia, they often make a lot of effort to not come into contact with their phobia which can make it challenging to go about daily life. For example, someone with a phobia of going to a public toilet may limit the amount of time they spend outside in relation to how long they can go without going to the toilet.
Endurance: -This is when a person chooses to remain with their phobic stimulus. For example, a person with arachnophobia may choose to stay in the same room as the spider to keep an eye on it.
What are the three emotional characteristics of phobias and what do they mean?
Anxiety - Phobias are classed as an anxiety disorder. So, they involve an emotional response of anxiety, an unpleasant state of high arousal. This prevents a person from relaxing and so can stop them from experiencing positive emotion. Anxiety can be long term.
Fear - The immediate and extremely unpleasant response when a person thinks about or encounters a phobic stimulus. It is usually more intense but experienced for shorter times than anxiety.
Emotional responses are unreasonable - The anxiety and fear experienced are disproportionate and is greater than a ‘normal’ response to any threat posed.
What are the three cognitive characteristics of phobias and what do they mean?
Selective attention to the phobic stimulus - If a person can see the phobic stimulues it is hard to look away from it. This can be useful if it is dangerous so will aid survival, but not if the phobia is irrational.
Irrational beliefs - A person with a phobia my hold unjustified in relation to phobis stimulus. Eg, social phobias my think ‘I must always sound smart’
Cognitive distortion - The perception of a person with a phobia may be innacurate and unrealistic.
Behavioural approach to explaining phobias- What is the two-process model?
Mowrer argued that phobias are learned by classical conditioning and then maintained by operant conditioning.
Behavioural approach to explaining phobias- Aquisition of phobias
Phobias are aquired by classical conditioning
Classical conditioning involves association
1. UCS triggers a fear response (fear is a UCR) eg, being bitten creates anxiety
2. NS is associated with the UCS eg, being bitten by a dog (the dog previously did not cause anxiety)
3. NS becomes a CS which produces fear (the CR). Eg, the dog becomes a CS causing fear (the CR) due to the event
Example of conditioned fear
Watson and Rayner conditioned fear of rats in Little Albert
1. Loud noise behind him when he played with white rat. Noise (UCS) caused fear (UCR)
2. Rat did not create fear initially (NS). Associated bang with rat
3. Albert had fear response (CR) when shown a rat (CS)
Generalisation of fear to other stimuli- Albert got scared of any animal or object with fur eg, santa claus beard