Approaches In Pyschology Flashcards
(229 cards)
What are the four goals of psychology as a science
psychology has four goals as a science:
Description -tells us “what” occurred
Explanation -tells us “why” a behavior or a mental process occurred
Prediction - identifies conditions under which a future behavior or mental process is likely to occur
change - applies psychological knowledge to prevent unwanted behavior and to bring about desired change
Explain why psychology is a science
Objectivity : scientific observation should be recorded without bias and not influenced by other factors or other people
Control: should take place under controlled conditions
Predictability: results should be able to predict future behaviors
Hypothesis testing: theories should be tested to support or disprove a theory
Replication : if something is replicated and they find the same results- this should confidence in the study
Explain why there are different approaches to psychology
Each approach looks at human behavior from a different perspective. They all contribute to our understanding in different ways.
E.g: the biological approach shows us how genetic factors might contribute to some mental disorders, whereas the learning approach helps us to understand how we learn behaviors through experience.
Explain the usefulness of approaches in psychology
No approach is right and the other wrong, but some are more useful than others depending on what we try to explain.
Explain the story of Psychology as a science
Psychology had its roots in 17-19th century philosophy and was known as experimental philosophy
Rene Descartes, and his influence of Cartesian dualism (mind and body are separate entities, the brain is separated from the mind) was a starting point for psychology
The work of John Locke and his work on empiricism, the belief that all knowledge is derived from sensory experience and can be studied using the scientific method had influenced the emergence of psychology as science.
Finally, Charles Darwin’s evolutionary theories set the stage for the emergence of psychology (biological approach)
Explain what Wilhelm Wundt has achieved
Wilhelm Wundt published the first psychology book ‘Principles of Physiological psychology’ to establish the subject as an independent branch of science
He had opened the first psychology laboratory- the institute of experimental psychology. This lab was designated to the scientific study of psychological enquiry under controlled conditions.This was used to understand psychological processes of perception and sensations, rather than biological processes
Explain the theory of structuralism
Structuralism is a theory of consciousness that seeks to analyse the elements of mental experiences, such as sensation, mental images, and feelings, and how these elements combine to form more complex experiences
How is introspection used in order to investigate structuralism
Using controlled methods, such as introspection, to break down consciousness to its basic elements without sacrificing any of the properties of the whole.
This is done through the use of an highly trained assistant who would be given a stimulus ( ticking metronome) and would reflect on the experience.
They would report how the stimulus made them think and feel. The same stimulus, physical surroundings and instructions were given to each person.
How did introspection continue through Wundt
Wundt later recognised high mental processes were difficult to study using introspection and encouraged other to look for more appropriate methods, paving the way for other approaches such as scanning
This led to the development of the field of cultural psychology, based on general trends in behavior of groups of people
Explain the problem behind introspection
Introspection relies primarily on non-observable responses and although participants can report conscious experiences, they are unable to comment on unconscious factors relating to their behavior.
Introspection produced data that was subjective, so it became very difficult to establish general principles. This means that introspective experimental results are not reliably reproduced by other researchers.
Explain the subjectivity behind Wundt’s methods
It is difficult for modern psychologists to objectively study unobservable matter
This is contrast to the scientific methods
These methods are therefore difficult to replicate
Questions the methods validity- many aspects of our minds are outside of our conscious awareness (Nisbett and Wilson, 1977)
However, these methods are still used by modern scientific psychological research (Csikzentmihalyi and Hunter, 2003)
Explain the method of the contrasting research against the subjectivity of Wundt’s method (Nisbett and Wilson)
Nisbett and Wilson (1977)- staged two different interviews with the same individual- a lecturer who spoke English with a European accent - one condition was warm and friendly, the other cold and distant.
118 undergraduates were asked to evaluate him
Explain the results of the contrasting research against the subjectivity of Wundt’s method (Nisbett and Wilson)
Those who heard the warm interview rated his appearance, mannerism and accent as appealing .However, they rated the ‘other’ instructor with dislike
Explain the conclusion of the contrasting research against the subjectivity of Wundt’s method (Nisbett and Wilson)
Results indicated that global evaluations of a person can be induced altered evaluations of the persons attributes, even when there is sufficient information to allow for independent assessments of them.
Furthermore, ptps were unaware of this influence of global evaluation on ratings of attributes. Ptps who saw the cold instructor believed that the direction of influence was opposite to the true direction. They reported that their dislike of the instructor had no effect on their rating of attributes but that their dislike of his attributes had lowered their global evaluation of him
Explain the method of the supporting research against the subjectivity of Wundt’s method (Csikszentmihalyi and Hunter 2003)
American youths were asked to rate environmental factors and personal happiness; reported happiness varied significantly both by day of the week and time of day
Explain the results of the supporting research against the subjectivity of Wundt’s method (Csikszentmihalyi and Hunter 2003)
schools was rated below average and social, active and passive leisure activities were associated with varying degrees of happiness
Happiness was low when alone and high with friends
Explain the conclusion of the supporting research against the subjectivity of Wundt’s method (Csikszentmihalyi and Hunter 2003)
Higher SES and age correlated with lower levels of happiness but did not gender or sex- younger people who spent more time at school and social activities were the happiest
Explain the learning approach of Behaviorism
The behaviorist approach rejects the vagueness of introspection and instead focuses on how we are a product of our learning experience and environment.
who was involved in the development in research of the behaviorist approach and how were they involved
Founder- JB Watson
Theory of classic conditioning- Ivan Pavlov
Operant conditioning- b.F. Skinner
Explain the method in Little Albert leaned fear experiment ( Watson and Rainer- 1920)
The participant was an 11-month-old boy called ‘little Albert’. He showed no fear of white fluffy objects such as rats or rabbits.
The researchers tried to create a conditioned response to these objects.
A white rat was placed in front of little Albert. As he reached out for it, a metal bar was struck loudly behind his head.
This was repeated twice at first, then five more times a week later.
Explain the results in Little Albert leaned fear experiment ( Watson and Rainer- 1920)
When little Albert was shown a rat, he would start to cry.
This also extended to other white fluffy objects, such as a white Santa Claus beard.
Explain the conclusion in Little Albert leaned fear experiment ( Watson and Rainer- 1920)
A fear response to white fluffy objects had been conditioned in little Albert, showing that abnormal behaviour can be learned.
Explain the evaluation in Little Albert leaned fear experiment ( Watson and Rainer- 1920)
The experiment was very unethical- such an experiment could not be repeated today.
Not everyone goes on to develop a fear or phobia after a negative situation, so learning theory cannot be the full story.
It was a laboratory study, so it lacks ecological validity as the situation was artificial.
However, the results support Pavlov’s idea of classical conditioning.
Explain the assumption behind the behaviorism approach
Behaviorism is primarily concerned with observable behavior , as opposed to internal events like thinking and emotion. Observable (external) behavior can be objectively and scientifically measured
Psychology is a science so behavior must be measured in highly controlled environments to establish cause and effect
When born our mind is blank
There is little difference between the learning that takes place in humans and that in other animals. Research can be done on animal and humans .
Behavior is a result of stimulus - response (all behavior, no matter how complex, can be reduced to a simple stimulus- response association)
All behavior is learnt from the environment. We learn new behavior through classical or operant conditioning