Social Infleunce Flashcards
(156 cards)
Name the different types of conformity
Internalisation
Identification
Compliance
Explain internalisation
(True conformity)
• Public and private acceptance of majority influence, through adoption of the majority group’s belief system.
• Stronger, permanent form of conformity, as it is maintained outside of the group’s presence.
Explain Identification
• Public and private acceptance of majority influence in order to gain group acceptance.
• Stronger form of conformity, but still temporary- don’t always agree with the group.
Explain compliance
• Publicly, but not privately going along with majority influence to gain approval/avoid ridicule
• Weak/temporary and only shown in presence of group
Explain the explanations for conformity (ISI)
ISI is a cognitive process because it is to do with what you think.
ISI is an explanation of conformity that says we agree with the opinion of the majority because we believe it is correct
We accept it because we want to be correct as well.
We change both our private and public behaviour/views to be consistent with the majority.
Explain the explanations of conformity (NSI)
NSI is an emotional process rather than a cognitive one.
NSI is an explanation of conformity that says we agree with the opinion of the majority because we want to be accepted, gain social approval and be liked. People do not like to appear foolish. We want to gain social approval.
The person may publicly change their behaviour/view but will privately disagree.
Examples of compliance
A pupil who is asked to straighten their tie by a teacher but later loosens it
A child cleaning up their room because their parent asked them although they despise doing it.
Listening to a friends music and saying it’s good despite not liking it.
Examples of internalisation
A students returns from their first term at university as a vegetarian like his flatmates.
A student becomes to enjoy a sport due to influence from their classmates . He then plays it during their free time.
Examples of identification
A student returning from their first time at university is desperate for roast beef, having been a vegetarian along with his flatmates all term
Choosing a sneaker brand because it is popular among your friends , although you want an alternative one
Explain conformity
Yielding to group pressure
Why would people conform (ISI)
• Uncertain
• Agree with majority and believe that it is right
• Want to be right
• Cognitive process (think about it)
• Public & private agreement ->Internalisation Situations that are new to a person
Some ambiguity
In crisis situations
One person (or group) is regarded as being more of an expert.
Why would people conform (NSI)
• Agree with the opinion of majority
• Need for acceptance
• Gain social approval/be liked
• Emotional process
• Public & private views differ -> Compliance
Situations with strangers
Occur with people you know
Pronounced in stressful situations
What factors can influence conformity
Group size
Difficulty of task
Experience of peers
Experience of participant
Number of conformers / non-conformers
Unanimity
What/when was the experiment that Sherif conducted
conformity and the autokinetic effect
Sherif (1935)
Method of Sherif’s experiment
Experiment with a repeated measure design . Sherif used a visual illusion (auto kinetic effect) where a stationary stop of light, viewed in dark room appears to move
Participants were falsely told that the dot would move and had to estimate the distance it moved.
During the first phase individuals made repeat estimates. They were then put into groups of 3 where they each made their estimate. Finally, they were retested individually.
Result of Sherif’s experiment
When they were alone, participants developed their own stables estimates (personal norms) which varied widely between participants.
However, once in a group estimates converged.
When participants were retested their estimates were more like the group estimates than their own individual estimates.
Conclusion of Sherif’s experiment
Participants were influenced by the estimates of other people, and a group normally developed.
Estimates converged as they were influenced by the group when retested. They were influenced by ISI
Evaluation of Sherif’s experiment
Strict control variables. Results are unlikely to to have been affected by a third variable , so it should be possible to establish cause and effect
Method can be replicated
Repeated measure design meant that participant variables that could have affected the results were kept constant. However, the method was flawed as participants were asked to judge the movement of the light. (Lacks ecological validity- unnatural situation)
The sample was limited- all participants were all male , so the results cannot be generalised by anyone.
Ethical problem - deceptive study as the participants were told the light was not moving.
What/when was the study that Asch conducted
Conformity on an unambiguous task
Asch (1951)
Methods of Asch’s study
Asch experiment was with an independent group design. In groups of 8 participants judged line lengths by saying out loud which comparison line (1, 2 or 3) matched the standard line.
Each group had one real participant- other were confederates . The participant went last or before last.
Each participant did 18 trials.
12 of these participants were critical trials (confederate all gave the wrong answer)
Control group where the participants judged the line lengths in isolation.
Results of Asch’s study
In control trials, participants gave the wrong answer 0.7% of the time.
In critical trails, participants conformed to the majority 37% of the time. (75% at least once)
Some participants didn’t believe their answer but didn’t want to look different
Conclusion of Asch’s study
Control condition showed that the task was easy to get right. However, 37% were wrong on critical trials.- they conformed to the majority due to NSI
Evaluation of Asch’s study
Good control variables. This minimizes the effects of extraneous variables.
Strict control of the variables also means that you could easily repeat the study to see if you get the same result.
Study lacks ecological validity. Participants didn’t care about the results. They may have been likely to conform if there were consequences for their answer.
The participants were deceived and might have been embarrassed when they found the true nature of the study.
Explain the results of variation of Asch’s study (Group size)
Group size:
Range of confederate from 1-15 and the level of conformity varied drastically.
1 confederate, the real participants conformed 3% of the critical trials.
3 confederates , the real participants conformed on 32% of critical trials. (Same percentage of Asch’s experiment with 7)