ATTACHMENT Flashcards
(56 cards)
What is Bowlby’s monotropic theory?
Bowlby rejected the learning theory as an explanation of attachment and came up with an evolutionary explanation that attachment was an innate system that gave a survival advantage.
Why is Bowlby’s theory described as monotropic?
Because he emphasised on a child’s attachment to one caregiver and believed that the child’s attachment to one caregiver is more important than any other attachments.
What is the law of continuity?
The more constant and predictable a child’s care, the better the quality of their attachment.
What is the law of accumulated seperation?
It’s the belief that the affects of every seperation from the mother add up
What does innate mean?
Natural
What are innate behaviours called?
Social releasers because their purpose is to activate the adult attachment system (make an adult feel love towards a baby). They are natural actions such as smiling, cooing and gripping.
What is reciprocity?
When the caregiver and infant both respond to each others signals and provokes a response from one another.
Which psychologist supported reciprocity?
Brazelton et al
What is interactional synchrony?
Interactional synchrony happens when both the caregiver and infant reflect the same actions and emotions in a synchronised matter.
What is Meltzoff and Moore’s study and what did it show and what is a disadvantage of this study?
This study observed that interactional synchrony happens as young as 2 weeks old. During the study, an adult displayed facial expressions and distinctive gestures and there was an association found between the expression/ gesture and the baby’s action.
A disadvantage of this study is that what’s being observed is simply hand gestures and facial expressions and since we can’t get the baby’s perspective there’s no way to confirm whether these behaviours are conscious or undeliberate.
What did Isabella et al find?
Isabella et al found that higher levels of interactional synchrony led to higher levels higher quality of caregiver- infant attachment.
What did Schaffer and Emerson find about attachment?
Schaffer and Emerson found that babies became attached to their mother for the first 7 months and a few weeks after formed secondary attachments with others including the father. 75% of the infants studied had an attachment with their father by the age of 18 months displayed by their protesting when the father left.
What did Grossman find about the role of the father? And what is an evaluation point for his theory?
Grossman found that the fathers attachment was less important. However, the quality of the fathers play whilst the child was an infant was related to the quality of adolescent attachment and that a father has a role that is more playful and stimulating rather than nuturing. He believes that the father plays an important role as a secondary attachment figure.
However, research shows that children raised in single parent or same-sex families don’t develop differently from those in two parent hetrosexual families which would suggest that the fathers role as a secondary attachment isn’t important.
What increases the quality of attachment?
Responsiveness
What is a strength of observing attachment?
The baby doesn’t know they’re being filmed so it’s likely that their behaviour is natural which means the research has good validity.
Why is research into caregiver-infant attachments socially sensitive?
It suggest that mothers who return to work quickly after giving birth are likely to have a lower quality attachment with their infant and may make mothers feel guilty for returning back to work.
Describe the Glasgow mothers research
60 glasweigan babies were visited every month for the first year and again at 18 months. The researchers asked questions to measure separation anxiety and stranger anxiety. The study found that between 25 and 32 weeks of age 50% of the babies showed signs of separation anxiety towards the specific attachment (normally the mother) . They found that the infant was likely to form a specific attachment with the caregiver which had the most sensitivity (reciprocity) to the infant, rather than the one who spent the most time with the baby. By 40 weeks 80% had specific attachments and 30% had multiple attachments.
What are the four stages of attachment discovered by schaffer and Emerson?
Stage 1- Asocial stage
Stage 2- Indiscriminate attachment
Stage 3- Specific attachment
Stage 4- Multiple attachments.
What is the first stage of attachment?
Called the asocial stage where babies show similar behaviour towards objects and humans however, prefers to be in the presence of humans.
What is the second stage of attachment?
Called the indiscriminate attachment from 2-7 months where babies recognise and prefer familiar adults however does not show signs of stranger or separation anxiety and accept comfort from any adult.
What is the third stage of attachment?
From around 7 months called specific attachment where majority of babies start to display separation and stranger anxiety from the specific attachment. This adult is called the primary attachment figure and is the adult which responds to the babies signals the most.
What is the fourth stage of attachment?
Shortly after the specific attachment called the multiple attachments where babies extend their attachments towards adults they regularly spend time with called secondary attachments. In Schaffer and Emersons study they discovered that 29% of infants had secondary attachments within a month of developing a specific attachment. By the age of 1 most children experienced multiple attachments.
What are some advantages and disadvantages of Schaffer and Emerson’s attachment study?
- High external validity because the study took place in the families homes and therefore are more likely to act naturally.
- It was a longitudinal study which has better internal validity than cross-sectional study because there are no confounding variables between individual differences between participants.
- However, the sample characteristics are limited because all families came from the same district and social class.
- These results are not generalisable to different social and historical(time). contexts
What is internal validity?
The extent to which the results accurately represent the population we are studying.