Attachment Flashcards
What is Bowlby’s key study involving maternal deprivation?
44 Thieves Study (1944)
What was the aim of the 44 thieves study?
Provide evidence to support the maternal deprivation hypothesis in a sample of children attending Tavistock child-guidance clinic.
What type of study was the 44 thieves study?
A retrospective study which compared experiences of prolonged separation from the mother (under the age of 5) between a group of 44 thieves and a group of 44 emotionally disturned children who had committed no crimes.
What was the procedure of Bowlby’s 44 thieves study?
- Unstructured interviews to provide detailed qualititative data about childhood.
- Boys completed IQ tests and had psychiatric assessments with a social worker.
- Bowlby interviewed the boys and their mothers to find out about childhood experiences etc.
- Checklist to diagnose affectionless psychopathy.
How many of Bowlby’s 44 thieves were affectionless psychopaths?
32% whereas 0% of the control group were diagnosed with this.
How many of Bowlby’s affectionless psychopaths had experienced early separation?
86%
What is the main conclusion of Bowlby’s 44 thieves study?
Maternal deprivation can have severe and potentially long term effects on emotional development including affectionless psychopathy.
Did Bowlby’s 44 thieves study have any real life application?
Research could be used to inform on issues concerning parents such as mothers going out to work.
Was the 44 thieves study generalisable?
No
- The study was not representative as Bowlby’s groups were accused of gender bias (more males than females).
- Bowlby’s research was primarily case studies and so the findings are unique to the case being studied.
Was Bowlby’s 44 thieves study valid?
No
- The data was collected retrospectively and so data may not be accurately remembered.
- Social desirability bias as the parents may not have wanted to share negative things about their parenting.
- Research bias may be an issues as Bowlby made the diagnoses of affectionless psychopathy.
Could causality be established in Bowlby’s 44 thieves study?
The research was correlational and so causation could not be established.
What did Rutter (1981) say about Bowlby’s 44 thieves study?
Some of the children never had chance to form an attachment relationship and so the issues may have been privation not deprivation.
What did Goldfarb (1943) find in terms of maternal deprivation?
He studied two groups of 15 children (aged 6 months- 3 years), one group was raised in an instituation and the other in foster care.
The instituation group lagged behind the foster group in terms of IQ, abstract thinking, social maturity and rule following.
What did Spitz (1945) find in terms of maternal deprivation?
1/3 of institutionalised children died before the age of 1.
The rest showed signs of ‘anaclitic depression’ howevere the symptoms were reversed if the period of maternal deprivation was less than three months.
What is a critisizm of Spitz (1945)?
The studies were carried out in poor quality instituations and so the findings are not representable of all instituations, and so cannot be generalised.
What was the Czech Twins (1972) study?
JM and PM were looked after by a Czechoslovakian social agency for a year and then fostered by their aunt (who abused them).
They showed no signs of psychological abnormality and had stable relationships later on in life.
Mary Ainsworth (1970)
Strange Situation
Where did the strange situation take place?
In a room with controlled condititions with a two way mirror and/or cameras so a psychologist can observe the baby’s behaviour.
What behaviours were used to judge attachment in the strange situation?
- Proximity-seeking
- Exploration and secure-base behaviour
- Stranger anxiety
- Separation anxiety
- Response to reunion
How long did each of the stages of the strange situation last?
Three minutes
What was the procedure for the strange situation and what did each of the stages test?
- Baby is encouraged to explore (Exploration and secure base)
- A stranger comes in, talks to the caregiver and approaches the baby (stranger anxiety)
- Caregiver leaves the baby and stranger together (separation and stranger anxiety)
- Caregiver returns and stranger leaves (reunion behaviour and exploration/secure base)
- Caregiver leaves the baby alone (separation anxiety)
- Stranger returns (stranger anxiety)
- Caregiver returns and is reunited with the baby (reunion behaviour)
What is type B of attachment?
Secure attachment
What are the behaviours of secure attachment?
They explore happily but regularly go back to their caregiver (proximity-seeking and secure-base behaviour).
Show moderate stranger and separation anxiety.
Require and accept comfort from the caregiver in the reunion stage.
How many british babies show type B attachment?
60-75%