ATTACHMENT Flashcards
complete --> reciprocity, interactional synchrony, Schaffer and Emerson, animal studies of attachment, learning theory of attachment, institutionalisation, influence of early attachment, Bowlby's monotropic theory, strange situation, maternal deprivation (180 cards)
attachment definition
strong emotional bond between a caregiver and infant, in which each seeks closeness and feels more secure when in the presence of the attachment figure
reciprocal and enduring
Maccoby’s characteristics
proximity seeking
separation anxiety
pleasure when reunited
general orientation of behaviour
proximity seeking
desire to be close to the person to whom you are attached
separation anxiety
distress that results from being separated from attachment figure
pleasure when reunited
relief and observable joy when reunited
general orientation of behaviour
child’s awareness of where that person is and the reassurance they feel from being close
caregiver-infant interactions
mother-infant bond develops in the first year of life
non-verbal communication lays foundation for attachment development
more responsive or sensitive, the deeper the attachment
reciprocity
develops at 3 months
two-way mutual process, respond to each other’s signals to sustain interactions (turn-taking)
increases in frequency and amount of attention paid to verbal and facial communication (3 months +)
elicits a response from the other
show sensitive responsiveness
Tronick et al ‘Still Face Study’
research into reciprocity
mother and baby would interact normally and get reactions out of each other
mother stares motionless at the baby and didn’t respond
baby tries to regain mother’s attention and becomes distressed and cries
interactional synchrony
caregiver and infant reflect actions and emotions of each other in a synchronised way
mirror facial and body movements
sustains communication and helps develop an attachment
Isabella et al
research into interactional synchrony
observed 30 mothers and infants together and assessed degree of synchrony
correlation established between stongly attached infants and greater interactional synchrony
reciprocity vs interactional synchrony
RECIPROCITY - turn taking in speech, respond to each other, elicit responses
INTERACTIONAL SYNCHRONY - mirroring behaviour, coordinating movement
Meltzoff and Moore
research into interactional synchrony
procedure
observed 2-week old infants
adult would display 1/3 expressions or gestures
infant’s response was filmed and identified
observers didn’t know what the infants had seen
Meltzoff and Moore
research into interactional synchrony
conclusions
found an association between adults and babies’ expressions and gestures
suggests this behaviour is innate rather than learnt
imitations were intentional and began to acquire understanding of others’ feelings and thoughts –> fundamental for social relationships
Meltzoff and Moore
research into interactional synchrony
strengths
controlled, overt, non-participant observation
used independent observer
could not see adults so did not know what the adults had seen
not influenced by each other
decreases bias (less inclined to be incorrectly convinced of what the baby is doing)
good replicability - standardised procedures, filmed for consistency
more ethical than experiment - not unreasonable interaction, no harm
Meltzoff and Moore
research into interactional synchrony
weaknesses
controlled experiment - unnatural behaviour
demand characteristics - would not affect babies who would understand or know how to act
caregiver-infant interactions evaluation
strengths
well controlled research studies
- interactions filmed from multiple angles –> fine details recorded and analysed
- conclusions more valid –> inter-rater reliability established from independent researchers who re-watched and compared results
practical applications
- understanding impact on attachment bond is useful to wider society
- can encourage closer attachments –> leads to better future relationships, less likely to develop mental health issues
- help implement programmes for parents
caregiver-infant interactions evaluation
weaknesses
interpretation issues
- Meltzoff and Moore - difficult to interpret facial expressions
- may be some differences in how far facial expressions are replicated
- assuming that babies are imitating what they see, but do not know why (could just be due to chance)
- other studies (Koepke) failed to replicate findings –> lacks replicability and consistency
purpose is unclear
- findings do not tell us why such behaviours occur
- some research suggests that interactions are helpful in development but some don’t
—— Le Vine reported that Kenyan mothers have little physical contact or interaction with infants, but they still develop secure attachments
- lacks population validity and generalisability
- not necessary for development
pseudo-imitation
- child only responding to expressions rather than interacting
- casts doubt on purpose of attachments and role in social development
social sensitivity
- interactions affect quality of attachment
- indicate that low interaction leads to insecure attachment which may lead into adulthood
- places blame of poor development on mother
cause and effect issues
- Isabella found association between strongly attached infants and caregivers and greater interactional synchrony
- can’t conclude why interactions or imitations occur
- only a correlation, no cause and effect established
stages of attachment
asocial
indiscriminate attachments
specific attachments
multiple attachments
Schaffer and Emerson aims
to investigate whether attachments develops through a series of stages
to see whether any stages found were common in all infants
Schaffer and Emerson procedure
longitudinal study
sample of 60 babies from working class in Glasgow
data collected through observations in homes every 4 weeks until the age of one and again at 18 months
interviews conducted with families
mothers asked to record evidence
Schaffer and Emerson
what 3 measures were mothers asked to record evidence for?
STRANGER ANXIETY - response to arrival of stranger
SEPARATION ANXIETY - distress level when separated from carer (e.g. full-blown cry or whimper)
SOCIAL REFERENCING - degree to which child used mother as a secure base
Schaffer and Emerson
results
mother was main attachment figure for half of the 18-month-olds (other half was the father)
at 8 months old, 50 had more than one attachment
20 either had no attachment with their mother or had a stronger attachment with someone else even though the mother was the main carer
Schaffer and Emerson
conclusions
infants do form attachments in stages and can attach to many people
suggests that attachment is innate (same trend at same age)
quality of care is important - may not attach to mother if others are more sensitive or caring (sensitive responsiveness)