Attachment Flashcards
What is the definition of attachment?
An emotional bond between 2 people in which each seeks closeness and feels more secure when in the presence of an attachment figure
What is the definition of a caregiver?
Any person who is providing care for a child, such as a parent, grandparent, sibling…
What is a caregiver infant interaction?
The way in which an infant engages with and responds to the person who is providing them care
Define proximity seeking
Define stranger anxiety
Separation anxiety
- Wanting to be close to the attachment figure
- Distress caused when in the company of unknown people
- Distress caused when being apart from the attachment figure
Explain reciprocity
A two way/mutual process whereby each party responds to the other’s signals to sustain interaction (turn taking). The behaviour of each party elicits a response from the other
Explain interactional synchrony
A caregiver infant interaction whereby the caregiver and infant mirror or match each others behaviours, expression, facial movements, body movements and emotions
Key features of reciprocity
Caregiver responds to the action of the infant with an action, infant responds to the action of the caregiver
Caregiver and infant respond to each other’s signals to sustain the interaction
Turn taking
Key features of interactional synchrony
When the infant and the caregiver are said to be synchronised as they engage in same action in unison
Mirroring what the other is doing, harmonious and responsive interaction
Includes imitation of emotion as well as behaviour
Aim and sample of Meltzoff and Moore
Aim: To investigate how new born infants interact with their caregivers and whether imitation is intentional
Sample: 60 new born babies
Procedure of Meltzoff and Moore
Exposed infants to 4 different conditions:
- Mouth opening
- Mouth closing
- Sticking tongue out
- Tongue termination
Infants responses were observed and recorded during the experiment. Observers examined videotapes of the infants behaviour in real time, slow motion and frame by frame to determine whether gestures were imitated. The videos were then assessed by independent observers to eliminate biases.
Results/findings and conclusion of Meltzoff and Moore
Results/findings: There was evidence to suggest that infants as young as 12 days could imitate facial and manual gestures. Imitation was considered intentional and not merely a reflexive response. Intra rater reliability scored greater than .92 (Anything above .7 is good)
Conclusion: Infants intentionally respond to their caregivers actions even at a young age.
AO3
Outline one strength of research into caregiver infant interactions
(Controlled observations capture fine detail)
Controlled observations capture fine detail
These procedures are well controlled procedures. This ensures that very fine details of behaviour can be recorded and later analysed. Furthermore, babies dont know or care that they are being observed so their behaviour doesn’t change in response to controlled observations - which is generally a problem for observational research.
This strengthens our acceptance of Meltzoff and Moore’s research as this means the research is high in validity.
AO3
Outline one weakness of research into caregiver infant interactions
(Developmental importance)
+COUNTER
One weakness of research into caregiver infant interactions is that observing behaviour does not tell us its developmental importance.
Feldman et al suggested that ideas like synchrony and reciprocity simply give names to patterns of observable caregiver and baby behaviours. These are robust phenomena in the sense that they can be reliably observed, but they still may not be particularly useful in understanding child development as it does not tell us the purpose of these behaviours. This means we cannot be certain from observational research alone that reciprocity and synchrony are important for a child’s development.
HOWEVER, there is evidence from other lines of research to suggest that early interactions are important. For example, Isabella et al found that achievement of interactional synchrony predicted the development of a good quality attachment. This means that, on balance, caregiver-infant interactions is probably important in this development
AO3
Outline one weakness of research into caregiver infant interactions
(Problems with testing infant behaviour)
There is reason to have doubt about the findings of the research due to difficulties in reliability testing infant behaviour
Infant’s mouths are in fairly constant motion and the expressions that are tested occur frequently (yawning, sticking out tongue, smiling). This makes it difficult to distinguish between general activity and specific imitated behaviours. To overcome these problems Meltzoff and Moore measured infant responses by filming infants and then asking an observer (who had no idea what behaviour was being imitated) to judge the infants’ behaviour from the video
Therefore, this highlights the difficulties in testing infant behaviour, weaking our acceptance of the research
Outline the sample and aim of Schaffer and Emerson’s study (1964)
Aim: To identify stages of attachment/find a pattern in the development of an attachment between infants and parents
Sample: 60 new born babies from Glasgow
Findings of Schaffer and Emerson
-Attachment followed 4 main stages
-Babies formed multiple attachments
-Attachment figure isn’t always main caregiver
-Strength of attachment was related to amount of sensitive responsiveness displayed by the caregiver
Procedure of Schaffer and Emerson (1964)
- They analysed the interactions between the infants and carers
- They interviewed the carers
- The mother had to keep a diary to track the infant’s behaviours based on the following measures: separation anxiety and social anxiety
-Mothers were visited every 4 weeks for the first year then again at 18 months. (Longitudinal study)
Schaffer and Emerson’s findings
-Evidence for 4 stages of attachment
-87% of babies formed attachment with 2 or more caregivers
-Babies main attachment figure wasn’t always main caregiver
-Babies with strongest attachments had caregivers who displayed the most sensitive responsiveness
What are the 4 stages proposed by Schaffer and Emerson?
- Asocial/pre attachment
- Indiscriminate attachment
- Specific/discriminate attachment
- Multiple attachments
Features of Asocial stage
-Babies produce similar responses to all objects whether they are animate or inanimate
-They show greater preference to social stimuli and they are more content being round people
-Reciprocity and interactional synchrony play key roles in establishing an infants relationship with others
-In this stage, babies show no preference for any adult.
-The pre-attachment stage is the first 6 weeks of a baby’s life.
Features of indiscriminate attachment stage
-The indiscriminate attachment stage begins at around 6 weeks of age.
-Infants become more social, enjoy being around people
-Prefer human company to inanimate objects
-Babies begin to prefer familiar people.
-Accepts comfort from anyone - no signs of stranger anxiety or separation anxiety
-In the indiscriminate attachment stage, babies don’t yet form a strong attachment to one particular person.
Features of discriminate attachment stage
-7-9 months
-Separation anxiety and stranger anxiety
-They show special joy at reunion
-Form specific attachment to one person
-Quality of relationship matters more than quantity/time spent with child
Features of multiple attachment stage
-9 months onwards
-Infants develop a wider circle of multiple attachments with individuals whom they regularly spend time with —-> secondary relationships
-Depends on how many consistent relationships the infant has
-Within the first month of forming an attachment with the primary caregiver, 29% of infants formed multiple attachments
-86% formed multiple attachments after 18 months
AO3
Outline one strength of Schaffer and Emerson’s study
(Good external validity)
+COUNTER
One strength of Schaffer and Emerson’s research is that it has good external validity. Most of the observations (though not stranger anxiety) were made by parents during ordinary activities and reported to the researchers. The alternative would be to have the researchers present to record observations, which might have distracted the babies or made them feel more anxious. This means it is highly likely that the babies behaved naturally while being observed, and low chances they were impacted by investigator effects, increasing the ecological validity of the findings.
HOWEVER, on the other hand there are issues with asking the mothers to be the ‘observers’. The were unlikely to be objective observers as they might behave been biased in terms of what they noticed and what they reported, for example, they might not have noticed their baby was showing signs of anxiety as they may have been busy or they may not remembered it. This means that even if babies behaved naturally ,their behaviours may not have been accurately recorded