Attachment Flashcards

1
Q

What is the definition of attachment?

A

An emotional bond between 2 people in which each seeks closeness and feels more secure when in the presence of an attachment figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the definition of a caregiver?

A

Any person who is providing care for a child, such as a parent, grandparent, sibling…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a caregiver infant interaction?

A

The way in which an infant engages with and responds to the person who is providing them care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define proximity seeking
Define stranger anxiety
Separation anxiety

A
  1. Wanting to be close to the attachment figure
  2. Distress caused when in the company of unknown people
  3. Distress caused when being apart from the attachment figure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain reciprocity

A

A two way/mutual process whereby each party responds to the other’s signals to sustain interaction (turn taking). The behaviour of each party elicits a response from the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain interactional synchrony

A

A caregiver infant interaction whereby the caregiver and infant mirror or match each others behaviours, expression, facial movements, body movements and emotions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Key features of reciprocity

A

Caregiver responds to the action of the infant with an action, infant responds to the action of the caregiver

Caregiver and infant respond to each other’s signals to sustain the interaction

Turn taking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Key features of interactional synchrony

A

When the infant and the caregiver are said to be synchronised as they engage in same action in unison

Mirroring what the other is doing, harmonious and responsive interaction

Includes imitation of emotion as well as behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Aim and sample of Meltzoff and Moore

A

Aim: To investigate how new born infants interact with their caregivers and whether imitation is intentional

Sample: 60 new born babies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Procedure of Meltzoff and Moore

A

Exposed infants to 4 different conditions:
- Mouth opening
- Mouth closing
- Sticking tongue out
- Tongue termination
Infants responses were observed and recorded during the experiment. Observers examined videotapes of the infants behaviour in real time, slow motion and frame by frame to determine whether gestures were imitated. The videos were then assessed by independent observers to eliminate biases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Results/findings and conclusion of Meltzoff and Moore

A

Results/findings: There was evidence to suggest that infants as young as 12 days could imitate facial and manual gestures. Imitation was considered intentional and not merely a reflexive response. Intra rater reliability scored greater than .92 (Anything above .7 is good)

Conclusion: Infants intentionally respond to their caregivers actions even at a young age.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

AO3
Outline one strength of research into caregiver infant interactions
(Controlled observations capture fine detail)

A

Controlled observations capture fine detail
These procedures are well controlled procedures. This ensures that very fine details of behaviour can be recorded and later analysed. Furthermore, babies dont know or care that they are being observed so their behaviour doesn’t change in response to controlled observations - which is generally a problem for observational research.
This strengthens our acceptance of Meltzoff and Moore’s research as this means the research is high in validity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

AO3
Outline one weakness of research into caregiver infant interactions
(Developmental importance)

+COUNTER

A

One weakness of research into caregiver infant interactions is that observing behaviour does not tell us its developmental importance.
Feldman et al suggested that ideas like synchrony and reciprocity simply give names to patterns of observable caregiver and baby behaviours. These are robust phenomena in the sense that they can be reliably observed, but they still may not be particularly useful in understanding child development as it does not tell us the purpose of these behaviours. This means we cannot be certain from observational research alone that reciprocity and synchrony are important for a child’s development.

HOWEVER, there is evidence from other lines of research to suggest that early interactions are important. For example, Isabella et al found that achievement of interactional synchrony predicted the development of a good quality attachment. This means that, on balance, caregiver-infant interactions is probably important in this development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

AO3
Outline one weakness of research into caregiver infant interactions
(Problems with testing infant behaviour)

A

There is reason to have doubt about the findings of the research due to difficulties in reliability testing infant behaviour
Infant’s mouths are in fairly constant motion and the expressions that are tested occur frequently (yawning, sticking out tongue, smiling). This makes it difficult to distinguish between general activity and specific imitated behaviours. To overcome these problems Meltzoff and Moore measured infant responses by filming infants and then asking an observer (who had no idea what behaviour was being imitated) to judge the infants’ behaviour from the video
Therefore, this highlights the difficulties in testing infant behaviour, weaking our acceptance of the research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Outline the sample and aim of Schaffer and Emerson’s study (1964)

A

Aim: To identify stages of attachment/find a pattern in the development of an attachment between infants and parents

Sample: 60 new born babies from Glasgow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Findings of Schaffer and Emerson

A

-Attachment followed 4 main stages
-Babies formed multiple attachments
-Attachment figure isn’t always main caregiver
-Strength of attachment was related to amount of sensitive responsiveness displayed by the caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Procedure of Schaffer and Emerson (1964)

A
  • They analysed the interactions between the infants and carers
  • They interviewed the carers
  • The mother had to keep a diary to track the infant’s behaviours based on the following measures: separation anxiety and social anxiety
    -Mothers were visited every 4 weeks for the first year then again at 18 months. (Longitudinal study)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Schaffer and Emerson’s findings

A

-Evidence for 4 stages of attachment
-87% of babies formed attachment with 2 or more caregivers
-Babies main attachment figure wasn’t always main caregiver
-Babies with strongest attachments had caregivers who displayed the most sensitive responsiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the 4 stages proposed by Schaffer and Emerson?

A
  1. Asocial/pre attachment
  2. Indiscriminate attachment
  3. Specific/discriminate attachment
  4. Multiple attachments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Features of Asocial stage

A

-Babies produce similar responses to all objects whether they are animate or inanimate
-They show greater preference to social stimuli and they are more content being round people
-Reciprocity and interactional synchrony play key roles in establishing an infants relationship with others
-In this stage, babies show no preference for any adult.
-The pre-attachment stage is the first 6 weeks of a baby’s life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Features of indiscriminate attachment stage

A

-The indiscriminate attachment stage begins at around 6 weeks of age.
-Infants become more social, enjoy being around people
-Prefer human company to inanimate objects
-Babies begin to prefer familiar people.
-Accepts comfort from anyone - no signs of stranger anxiety or separation anxiety
-In the indiscriminate attachment stage, babies don’t yet form a strong attachment to one particular person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Features of discriminate attachment stage

A

-7-9 months
-Separation anxiety and stranger anxiety
-They show special joy at reunion
-Form specific attachment to one person
-Quality of relationship matters more than quantity/time spent with child

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Features of multiple attachment stage

A

-9 months onwards
-Infants develop a wider circle of multiple attachments with individuals whom they regularly spend time with —-> secondary relationships
-Depends on how many consistent relationships the infant has
-Within the first month of forming an attachment with the primary caregiver, 29% of infants formed multiple attachments
-86% formed multiple attachments after 18 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

AO3
Outline one strength of Schaffer and Emerson’s study
(Good external validity)

+COUNTER

A

One strength of Schaffer and Emerson’s research is that it has good external validity. Most of the observations (though not stranger anxiety) were made by parents during ordinary activities and reported to the researchers. The alternative would be to have the researchers present to record observations, which might have distracted the babies or made them feel more anxious. This means it is highly likely that the babies behaved naturally while being observed, and low chances they were impacted by investigator effects, increasing the ecological validity of the findings.

HOWEVER, on the other hand there are issues with asking the mothers to be the ‘observers’. The were unlikely to be objective observers as they might behave been biased in terms of what they noticed and what they reported, for example, they might not have noticed their baby was showing signs of anxiety as they may have been busy or they may not remembered it. This means that even if babies behaved naturally ,their behaviours may not have been accurately recorded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
AO3 Strength of Schaffer and Emerson's study (Longitudinal study)
-One strength of research into the development of attachments s the use of longitudinal studies -For example, Schaffer and Emerson conducted a longitudinal study with 60 infant pairs over 18 month, whereby researchers visited the same pairs every moth and then again at 18 months -This means researchers were able to study these infant pair over a period of time focusing on patterns and changes within the specific pair over a period of time, reducing individual differences
26
AO3 Outline on strength of Schaffer and Emerson's study (Naturalistic observation)
-One strength of Schaffer and Emerson's study is that it was a naturalistic observation -Infants were observed in natural settings e.g. at home, in shops... -This means the results are higher in ecological validity and can be better generalised to everyday life -Therefore this strengthens our acceptance of the theory
27
AO3 Outline one weakness of Schaffer and Emerson's study (Observer bias)
-One weakness of Schaffer and Emerson's study is observer bias -In Schaffer and Emerson's study, observers may have had a preconceived bias that more sensitive responses leads to stronger attachments -When the researchers measured the attachment between mother and baby, they might have expected the mothers who displayed more sensitive responsiveness, to have stronger attachments with their babies and so the researchers may have incorrectly rated the sensitive mothers as having stronger attachments to their babies than they really did.
28
What is the definition of a primary attachment figure
The person who has formed the closest bond with the child, demonstrated by the intensity of the relationship
29
AO1 Role of the father
-Fathers are more playful, physically active and better at providing challenging situations for their children -Mothers form a more conventional role and fathers are seen as a playmate (Geiger 1996) -Schaffer and Emerson showed that babies form multiple attachments and do form attachments with their father -Gender stereotypes that affect male behaviour. This may discourage males from becoming the primary attachment figure E.g. Thought as feminine to be sensitive. -Men have less oestrogen which underlies caring behaviour, so women generally have better interpersonal skills. E.g. listening, understanding Counter: Research shows that men's Test levels decrease. Oxytocin increases suggesting men are biologically capable -Schaffer and Emerson found that 3% of babies form their first attachment with their father
30
AO3 Weakness for fathers as primary caregivers (Fathers are not caregivers, they are playmates)
- Research evidence provides support for the role of the father as a playmate -Research by Geiger et al found that a fathers play interactions were more exciting in comparison to a mother's. However, the mothers play interactions are more affectionate and nurturing -This suggests that the role of the father is in fact as a play mate and not as a sensitive parent who responds to the needs of their children.
31
AO3 Outline one weakness of the role of the father (Fathers are not equipped)
Research evidence suggests that fathers are not able to primary caregivers are not biologically equipped to be primary caregivers. For example, Hrdy (1999) found that fathers were less able to detect low levels of infant distress, in comparison to mothers. This could be due to different hormone levels such as oxytocin and lack oestrogen to detect the child's needs. This coincides with the theory which suggests fathers cant be the primary caregiver, thus strengthening acceptance of the theory.
32
AO3 Outline one strength of the role of the father (Supporting research: Grossman et al) +Counterpoint
One strength is that there is supporting research from Grossman et al. For example, Grossman found that children’s internal working model was associated with the play sensitivity of their dad and were associated with the strength of their attachment to their mum but not their dad. This supports the notion that fathers function as a playmate for their children, mothers and fathers have different roles in the child’ development. This validates the key principles of the theory, thus strengthening acceptance of the role of fathers as playmates. HOWEVER, these lines of research may not in fact be in conflict. It could be that fathers typically take on distinctive roles in two parent, heterosexual families, but that parents in single-mother and lesbian parent families simply adapt to accommodate the role played by fathers
33
AO3 Outline one strength of the role of the father (Can demonstrate sensitive responsiveness)
Research suggests that fathers are able to demonstrate sensitive responsiveness to their infant Belsky (2009) found that males who reported higher levels of marital intimacy also displayed a secure father-infant attachment, whereas males with lower levels of marital intimacy displayed insecure father-infant attachments. This suggests that fathers can form secure attachments with their infant depending on levels of marital intimacy
34
Explain imprinting
An innate readiness to develop a strong bond with the mother figure which takes place during a specific time in development probably the first few hours after birth/hatching
35
Lorenz's procedure
12 gosling eggs and divided them into 2 groups Group 1: Eggs left with their own mother Group 2: Eggs placed in an incubator and when they hatched the first thing they saw was Lorenz
36
Lorenz's findings
-Goslings who saw Lorenz first followed Lorenz first -Goslings who saw their mother first followed their mother
37
Outline Harlow's procedure (Harlow's monkeys)
-Created two wire monkeys each with a different head -One wire mother - wrapped in soft cloth, the other was a plain wire monkey -Milk bottle was on plain wire
38
Findings of Harlow's study (Harlow's monkeys)
-All 8 months spent most of the time with the soft covered mother regardless of where the milk bottle was -Those who were fed by the wire monkey , fed and then returned to the cloth mother when they were scared
39
Conclusion from Harlow's monkeys
Monkeys don't form attachments with the person who feeds them but rather the person offering contact comfort
40
AO3 Ethical issues with Harlow (Harlow's monkeys)
-Monkeys developed abnormally -Socially abnormal - fled when approached by other monkeys -Sexually abnormal - Didn't show normal mating behaviour or cradle their own babies. Sometimes they neglected their young and even killed them in some cases
41
AO3 Weakness of Harlow's study (Confounding variables)
One weakness of Harlow's research is that there was confounding variables which may have affected outcome of the study. For example, the monkey's head shape was a lot more 'monkey like' than the wire monkey. This suggests the monkey may have chosen the cloth monkey more due to the head shape being more realistic, rather than the cloth comfort. Therefore this may result in inaccurate data meaning we cant establish cause and effect, thus weakening our acceptance of Harlow's research.
42
AO3 Outline one strength of Lorenz's research (Research support from chicks)
One strength of Lorenz's research is that there is support from Regolin et al. Chicks were exposed to simple shape combinations that moved, such as a triangle with a rectangle in front . A range of shape combinations were then moved in front of them and they followed the original most closely. This supports the view that young animals are born with an innate mechanism to imprint on a moving object present in the critical window of development, as predicted by Lorenz, thus strengthening acceptance of Lorenz's theory.
43
AO3 Outline one strength of Harlow's research (Real world value)
One strength of Harlow's research is that it has provided real world value. For example, it has helped social workers and clinical psychologists understand that a lack of bonding experience may be a risk factor in child development allowing them to intervene to prevent poor outcomes. We also now understand the importance of attachment figures for baby monkeys in zoos and breeding programmes in the wild. This means that the value of Harlow's research is not just theoretical but also practical, thus strengthening acceptance of the research as it has led to real life interventions
44
Melissa’s baby Holly is fed four times a day. Initially, Holly used to laugh and smile only when Melissa was feeding her. After a few weeks, Holly soon started to laugh and smile at just the presence of Melissa. Now Holly is starting to crawl around and explore. At first, she used to crawl away and play with her toys, while Melissa was in a different room. When this happened though, Holly didn’t get fed as much as when Melissa happened to be in the same room as her. Now Holly follows Melissa around wherever she goes. Explain how this scenario demonstrates the two different types of conditioning that occur when attachments are formed, according to learning theory.
Holly has formed an attachment to Melissa through classical conditioning, through the feeding process. Holly has formed an association between the pleasure of food with Melissa, prompting a conditioned response of laughing and smiling whenever she is with Melissa. Holly has also formed an attachment with Melissa through operant conditioning. Holly’s behaviour of being around Melissa has been reinforced, by the fact that she gets fed more, and so rewarded more, when she is with Melissa.
45
AO1 Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation
-When a child never has an attachment figure or is removed from their care during the CP -Bowlby suggested there would be long term irreversible negative consequences of maternal deprivation -Child will suffer impaired intellectual, behavioural and emotional consequences -Can lead to the children becoming affectionless psychopaths -Bowlby found that 32% of 44 thieves were affectionless psychopaths, of AP, 86% had experienced maternal deprivation Critical period - If a young child is denied emotional care due to frequent or prolonged separations may become disturbed If its within the critical period of attachment or there is no substitute mother person available Value of maternal care - infants need a warm, intimate and continuous relationship with a mother or permanent substitute to ensure normal mental health
46
AO3 One weakness of Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation (Confounding variables)
One weakness of Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation is that there were confounding variables. For example, many other factors can affect a child's development, not just being deprived, however, this isnt taken into account in Bowlby's theory. Poverty, abuse and malnourishment are all likely to contribute to emotional distress, therefore they are confounding variables which influence the relationship between deprivation and psychological distress. This suggests we cant establish a causal relationship between maternal deprivation and these negative consequences as there are many other factors which can influence a child's development, which are not accounted for in the theory of MD. Therefore this weakens our acceptance of Bowlby's theory as it doesn't take confounding variables such as environmental upbringing into consideration.
47
AO3 One weakness of Bowlby's maternal deprivation theory (Koluchova’s case study)
One weakness of Bowlby's theory is that there is contradicting evidence from Koluchova. A twin study found that the effects of deprivation can be reversed. Two twins were abused and neglected till the age of 7 when they were put into foster care and developed loving relationships with foster parents and caught up with their peers in school, they both went on to have happy relationships and good jobs later on in life. This research contradicts Bowlby's theory, because Bowlby states children will have life long effects of maternal deprivation. This real world research weakens acceptance of Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation.
48
AO3 Outline one weakness of Bowlby's theory of Maternal deprivation (Privation not deprivation)
One weakness of Bowlby's theory is that it may be lacking in detail. For example, Rutter argued that the effects of privation would be worse than the effects of deprivation. Privation is when a child never experiences an attachment figure. This is a weakness as it isnt taken into account by the theory, thus indicating the theory of MD is incomplete, thus weakening acceptance of the theory of MD as it doesn't fully account for privation
49
Aim of Bowlby's juvenile thieves study
To investigate long term effects of maternal deprivation
50
The procedure of Bowlby's Juvenile Thieves Study
-Analysed the case histories of a number of patients in a child guidance clinic -Natural experiment -88 children - 44 were the control group and the other 44 were thieves (caught stealing) -Bowlby described some thieves as affectionless psychopaths - who lacked signs of affection, shame or a sense of responsibility -He felt this affectionless psychopathy enabled them to steal
51
AO3 Outline one weakness of Bowlby's 44 Thieves study (Reconstructive memory)
-One weakness of Bowlby's theory of 44 thieves study was data was collected retrospectively -For example, data was from 14 years ago -This means that the information may be inaccurate, reducing the validity of the data and its findings -Therefore this weakens our acceptance of the research s results may not be compleely accurate
52
Findings of Bowlby's Juvenile Thieves Study
-32% were affectionless psychopaths - Of affectionless psychopaths, 86% had experienced early separation from mother -Only 17% if thieves without affectionless psychopathy experienced maternal deprivation and just 4% had experienced separations during critical period
53
AO3 Outline one weakness of Bowlby's 44 thieves study (Social desirability)
One weakness of Bowlby's 44 thieves study is that it has been criticised for social desirability For example, not all parents would have been completely honest about how they treated their children as they don't want to look bad. This means the data could have been skewed and not accurate which affects the validity of the study Therefore, this weakens our acceptance of Bowlby's findings as they may not be genuine
54
What were the 8 countries involved in the strange situations experiment?
China Japan Germany Israel UK America Holland Sweden
55
Findings of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg
Most secure attachment type = UK Most avoidant attachment type = Germany Most resistant attachment type = Japan Results showed that individualistic countries that support independence such as Germany had high levels of avoidant attachment type, whereas countries that are more culturally close (collectivist), such as Japan, had quite high levels of resistance.
56
Outline the learning theory of attachment
Attachments are learned through experiences of being fed through caregivers Attachment is learned through classical and operant conditioning Classical conditioning: Baby has association between the mother (NS) and feeling of pleasure that comes from being fed by caregiver (UCR) . Therefore, baby then feels pleasure when mother is around. Attachment occurs because the child seeks the person who can provide them a reward which is food
57
AO3 Describe two weaknesses of the learning theory explanation of attachment.
One weakness of this theory is that it isn’t supported by Harlow’s study, which shows that baby monkeys choose comfort over food. Another weakness is that the theory isn’t supported by observations that babies raised in communal environments by foster mums called metapelites don’t attach to the foster mums.
58
AO3 Outline one strength of the Learning theory of attachment (Supporting research)
One strength of the LT of attachment is that there is supporting research from Dollard and Miller. For example, in the first year of an infants life they are fed over 2000 times by their caregiver. In this time period an attachment could have formed through classical conditioning, making the learning theory of attachment believable. The baby could have formed the link between the caregiver (NS) and the feeling of pleasure from being fed (UCR) to make the caregiver the conditioned stimulus which evokes a conditioned response of pleasure from when the caregiver is seen by the infant, forming an attachment between infant and caregiver who is now the attachment figure. Therefore, the supporting research indicates that LT is a plausible explanation for how we form attachments.
59
AO3 Outline one weakness of the learning theory of attachment (Harlow) +Counter
One weakness of the learning theory of attachment is that there is contrary evidence from Harlow For example, Harlow found that when monkeys experience fear, they run to a cloth mother who offers comfort rather than a wire mother who had a milk bottle, feeding them. This indicates that monkeys form attachment through comfort rather than food. This research contradicts the core principles of learning theory thus weakening acceptance of learning theory as an explanation of attachment. However, one problem with such animal research is that it may not be generalisable to humans. Humans are way more complex than monkeys and therefore may form attachments differently to monkeys, rendering the research ineffective at providing a stance against the learning theory of attachment
60
AO3 Outline one weakness of learning theory of attachment (Metapelites)
One weakness of the learning theory of attachment is that the central predictions may not be correct. For example, the theory states that whoever feeds the baby the most, will form an attachment with the baby. However, in Israel, many babies are often fed and cared for by foster mothers called metapelites during the day. But because they are often caring for many babies, they don't spend a lot of time with the babies. At the end of they day, the babies are returned to their mothers who don't need to feed them but are able to spend quality time with the infant. According to LT, the child should form the attachment with the metapelite, but this isn't the case. This provides real world evidence which contradicts LT, thus weakening acceptance of LT as an explanation of how attachments are formed
61
Outline Bowlby's theory of Monotropy
-Babies form one very special attachment with their mother -This intense attachment is called monotropy -If the mother isn't available, the infant could bond with another ever present adult, mother substitute
62
What was Bowlby's critical period?
-First 2.5 years of a babies life -Cant form an attachment with the caregiver after this age
63
Outline the internal working model
-The schema for relationships that we develop from our attachment with our main caregiver -Acts as a template for our future relationships -Positive relationship with caregiver = Positive internal working model = Positive future relationships vice versa
64
AO3 Outline one strength of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (Validity)
One strength of Van Ijendoorn and Kroonenberg is that they used a large sample (2000 babies across 8 countries).This suggeests there is high population validity meaning findings can be generalized to other populations of people. Therefore large samples used in meta analysis increase the internal validity, thus strengthening our acceptance of the research
65
What are the 3 attachment types?
Insecure avoidant Insecure resistant Secure
66
3 evaluations of caregiver-infant interaction studies
-Strength: Enables researchers to collect highly detailed, reliable observations -Weakness: Studies are correlational making it hard to infer a cause and effect -Weakness: Observer bias
67
The procedure and findings of Hazan and Shaver 1987
Procedure: -Love quiz in Rocky Mountains newspapers -The quiz asked questions about current attachment experiences and attachment Findings: -Positive correlation between attachment type and love experiences -Securely attached adults were reported as more positive and enduring in relationships - 10 years on average -Insecure avoidant attached individuals tended to reveal jealousy and fear of intimacy
68
AO3 Outline one weakness of the influence of early attachment (IWM is unfalsifiable)
One weakness of the influence of early attachment is that there is a theoretical problem which exists in research related to internal working models This is because the internal working model is an unconscious structure so participants would not be able to discuss it through a questionnaire consciously. Furthermore the IWM is an unfalsifiable concept which cant be emprically measured through brain scans. This means the IWM is an untestable concept so it cant be measured, thus weakening our acceptance of it and its role in early attachments
69
AO3 Outline one weakness of the influence of early attachment (Determinism)
-It is deterministic -Plenty of insecure people still manage to form happy relationships. People are not always doomed to have bad relationships because they have attachment problems in childhood. They have a greater risk of encountering problems, people can still be happy if they are insecure
70
AO3 Outline one weakness of the influence of early attachment (Association doesn't mean causation)
-Association doesnt mean causation -Alternative explanations exist for the continuity between infant and later relationships. Attachment styles and love styles could be influenced by a third environmental factor such as parenting style or one's personality. This third factor might have a direct effect on the attachment the infant forms and the child's ability to form relationships with others
71
Outline Mary Ainsworth's strage situations
-A procedure to assess how securely attached a child was to its caregiver -Controlled observation 1. The caregiver enters a room, places the child on the floor and sits on a chair. 2. A stranger enters the room, talks to the caregiver and then approaches the child with a toy. 3. The caregiver exits the room. If the infant plays the stranger observes without interruption 4. The caregiver returns while the stranger then leaves. 5. Once the infant begins to play again, the caregiver may leave the room, leaving the child alone briefly. 6. The stranger enters the room again and repeats behaviour mentioned in step 3 (observing, engaging, comforting as needed) 7. The stranger leaves and the caregiver returns. The “strange situation” places the child in a mildly stressful situation in order to observe 4 different types of behaviour which are separation anxiety, stranger anxiety, willingness to explore and reunion behaviour with the caregiver.
72
Aim of strange situations Sample of strage situations
-To see how a child would react when separated from their mother -100 middle class Americans
73
AO3 Outline on strength of the strange situations (Predictive reliability) +COUNTER
One strength of the SS is that its outcomes predicts a number of aspects of the baby's later development. A large body of research has indicated that babies with a secure attachment have better outcomes than others, both in later childhood and in adulthood. In childhood this includes better academic achievements and less involvement in bullying. Securely attached babies have better mental health in adulthood. Those babies assessed as having insecure avoidant and resistant attachment types go on to have worse outcomes. This suggests the SS measures something real and meaningful in a babies development, thus strengthening acceptance of the research HOWEVER, not all psychologists believe this is something important. For example Kagan et al suggested that genetically-influenced anxiety levels could account for variations in attachment behaviour in the SS and later development. This means that the SS may not actually measure attachment
74
AO3 Outline on strength of the strange situations (Good inter-rater reliability)
One strength of the SS is good inter-rater reliability. Bick et al tested inter-rater reliability for the SS for a team of trained observers and found agreement on attachment type in 94% of cases. This high level of reliability may be because the procedure takes place under controlled conditions and because behaviours such as stranger and separation anxiety involve large movements and are therefore easy to observe. For example, anxious babies cry and crawl away from strangers. This means we can be confident that attachment type as assessed by the SS does not depend on subjective judgements.
75
AO3 Outline one weakness of the strange situations (Other cultures)
One limitation of the SS is that it may not be a valid measure of attachment in different cultural contexts. The SS was developed in Britain and the US. It may be culture bound. One reason for this is that babies have different experiences in different cultures and these experiences may affect their responses to the strange situation. For example, in one Japanese study by Takahashi et al, babies displayed very high amounts of separation anxiety and so a disproportionate number were classified as insecure resistant. Takahashi suggests that this anxiety response was not due to high rates of attachment insecurity but to the unusual nature of the experience in Japan where mother-baby separation is very rare. This means that it is very difficult to know what the SS is measuring when used outside of the US and Europe, thus weakening acceptance of the research, as it may be ethnocentric
76
AO3 Outline one weakness of the Strange situations (Other attachment types)
One weakness of the SS is that there may be other attachment types which were unaccounted for. For example, Main et al identified a 4th category of attachment - a disorganised attachment, a mix of resistant and avoidant behaviours. However, babies with this attachment are unusual and have generally experienced some form of severe neglect. Most will go on to develop psychological disorders by adulthood
77
Findings of strange situations study
Secure - 70% Insecure avoidant - 15% Insecure resistant - 15%
78
AO1 Outline the Romanian orphans study, effects of institutionalisation
-Studied 163 romanian orphans who suffered effects of institutionalisation -111 were adopted before the age of 2 and another 52 were adopted before the age of 4 -Adoptees were tested at separate regular intervals (4, 6, 11 and 15) to assess physical and cognitive social development -Progress was compared to a control group of 52 British children adopted in the UK before 6 months
79
What were the 5 effects that institutionalisation had on the Romainan orphans?
-Deprivation dwarfism (Physical underdevelopment) -Mental retardation -Disinhibited attachment - Infant displays attention seeking behaviour and over friendliness to strangers - Lack of internal working model -Lack of emotional development
80
AO3 Outline one strength of Romanian orphans studies (Real world application)
One strength of the Romanian orphanage study is their application to improve conditions for growing up outside their family home. Studying the Romanian orphans has improved psychologists' understanding of the effects of early institutionalisation care and how to prevent the worst of these effects. This has led to improvements in the conditions experienced by looked-after e.g. Children's homes now avoid having large numbers of caregivers for each child, instead the children tend to have one or two 'key workers' who play a central role in their emotional care. Considerable effort is made to accommodate such children in foster care or to have them adopted instead. This means that children in institutional care have a chance to develop normal attachments and disinhibited attachments are avoided.
81
AO3 Outline one weakness of research into Romanian orphans studies (Social desirability)
A second weakness of the studies of institutionalisation is that because the studies used interviews, the results might have been prone to social desirability bias, which is when participants provide inaccurate answers in order to appear socially acceptable and avoid being judged negatively. For instance, the families of the adopted children may have wanted to appear like things were going better than they really were, so they might have said that the children had fewer psychological problems than they really did, meaning that, again, the effects of privation might have been underestimated.
82
AO3 Outline one strength of Romanian orphans studies (Fewer confounding variables) +COUNTER
Another strength of the Romanian orphans studies is the lack of confounding variables. There were many orphans studies before the Romanian orphans became available study. Many of the children studied in orphanages had experienced varying degrees of trauma, and it is difficult to disentangle the effects of neglect, physical abuse and bereavement from those of institutional care. However the children from Romanian orphanages had, in the main, been handed over by loving parents who could not afford to keep them. This means that results were much less likely to be confounded by other negative early experiences meaning there is higher internal validity HOWEVER, studying children from Romanian orphanages might have introduced different confounding variables. The quality of care in these institutions was remarkably poor, with children receiving very little intellectual stimulation or comfort. This means that the harmful effects seen in studies of Romanian orphans may represent the effects of poor institutional care rather than institutional care
83
AO3 Outline one weakness of Romanian orphans studies (Lack of adult data)
One weakness of the longitudinal design often used in research into institutionalisation is that, there’s a big risk that, across the multiple timepoints, a lot of participants will stop wanting to take part in the research, meaning the researcher loses a large proportion of their sample. This loss of participants across the course of the study is called attrition, which is a problem because it can influence the results of a study. We don’t know what the outcomes were for the children and families who refused to continue taking part in the study. It’s likely that families who refused to keep taking part were the ones who felt that their children were behaving badly and struggling psychologically, so the effects of privation might have been underestimated in the study.
84
Rutter's findings
-Romanian children adopted before 6 months old showed good emotional development -Romanian children adopted after 6 months old showed severe psychological damage -British children adopted from orphanages displayed good emotional and cognitive development -British children adopted after 6 months old did not demonstrate severe psychological damage
85
What is the definition of maternal deprivation?
Babies are separated from their attachment figure during the critical period
86
Schaffer and Emerson’s study of stages of attachment doesn’t support Bowlby’s theory, because…
They found that in the multiple attachment stage, 87% of babies formed an attachment to two or more caregivers.
87
Strength of Bowlby's monotropic theory Weakness of Bowlby's monotropic theory
Strength = Lead to positive changes in the real world such as longer waiting times for children in hospital and longer parental leave Weakness = Discouraged mothers from going out and working by making them feel bad for not taking care of their child
88
Lorenz’s study showed that baby geese immediately formed a strong attachment to another living being, showing an innate need to bond. This shows support for…
Bowlby’s monotropic theory of attachment
89
Three weaknesses of Bowlby’s 44 Thieves study are…
-Participants might have been influenced by investigator effects causing them to respond to demand characteristics - They might have pretended like there was more deprivation than what occurred. -Reconstructive memory gives inaccurate results of what happened because participants were asked to recall events from 14 years ago. -Social desirability - The mothers may not have been genuine with their answers because they wouldn't say how they treated their child if they knew they treated them badly
90
In the group of thieves, the percentage of them who suffered from affectionless psychopathy, was...
32%
91
Within the group of affectionless psychopaths, the percentage of those who had experienced separation from their mothers in early life was at…
86%
92
Of the 44 thieves, the percentage of children who had experienced separation from their mothers, for 6 months or more during childhood, was around…
50%
93
In the control group, the percentage of the 44 teenagers who had experienced deprivation was around…
5%
94
What are the consequences of maternal deprivation?
Impaired cognitive, behavioural and emotional development
95
AO3 Outline one weakness of Bowlby's 44 thieves study (Naturalistic experiment)
One limitation of natural experiments is that the researchers have little control over extraneous variables which could have influenced the results. The children who displayed criminal behaviour may have been deprived of an attachment figure. Their behaviour might have also been caused by other factors such as low socioeconomic status, a poor but not deprived attachment to their parents, or experiencing lots of family conflict. Without being able to control for these factors, we can’t be sure that it was maternal deprivation that made children more likely to turn to crime, rather than these other uncontrolled factors.
96
AO3 Outline one strength of Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation (44 thieves study)
One strength of Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation is that there s supporting research from his 44 thieves study. For example, children who were separated from their main caregiver are likely to develop delinquency and affectionless psychopathy later in life. Of the children he interviewed, 50% of those who demonstrated delinquency had been separated from their mothers, compared to around 5% of those who did not demonstrate delinquency. This suggests that there are lasting effects of MD as Bowlby's theory suggests, thus strenghtening acceptance for his theory of MD.
97
Explain how Koluchova’s twin's study does not support Bowlby’s maternal deprivation theory.
Koluchova’s case study describes a pair of twins who were severely neglected and deprived of an attachment figure, during their critical period. The twins showed the severe psychological damage that Bowlby claimed they would have, and Bowlby claimed that this psychological damage would be long-lasting and irreversible. However, after being adopted by a loving family and receiving schooling, the twins cognitive abilities improved leaving them with an above-average IQ. They also went on to form a positive attachment with their caregivers and have happy relationships in adult life. Therefore, the twins don’t support Bowlby’s idea that the consequences of deprivation are long-lasting and irreversible.
98
Using your knowledge of Rutter’s criticisms of Bowlby, explain what the term privation means.
Rutter was critical of Bowlby’s definition of deprivation. According to Rutter, deprivation is when a child has attached to a caregiver, but is then separated in early childhood. Privation is when a child has never experienced the love of a caregiver, and never forms an attachment with anyone.
99
Outline features of an insecure resistant attachment type from Ainsworth's strange situations
This was found to be the least common of the three attachment types identified by Ainsworth -Around 10-12% of infants were classified as insecure resistant -The infants did not explore the room and were reluctant to leave the PCG's side, in case they were left -separation anxiety -stranger anxiety -On reunion with the PCG, they were not able to be calmed down and protested at the PCG as comfort was offered -They resisted the PCG's attempt to calm them on return
100
Outline features of an insecure-avoidant attachment type from Ainsworth's strange situations
-18-20% of infants were found to be insecure avoidant -The infants were happy to explore the room and play but didn't use caregiver as a safe base -There was no separation anxiety -No stranger anxiety -Indifferent reunion behaviour
101
Outline features of a secure attachment type from Ainsworth strange situations
-This was found to be the most common attachment type in the Strange Situation experiment conducted by Ainsworth and is the most common attachment type globally -Between 66-70% of infants are classified as secure -The infants were happy to explore the room and play, using the Primary Care Giver (PCG) as a safe base -Demonstrated separation anxiety -Showed stranger anxiety -On reunion with the PCG, they were happy and any upset disappeared very quickly
102
Outline features of a secure attachment
The caregiver is sensitive and responsive to the needs of the infant - High stranger anxiety - High separation anxiety - Use the caregiver as a safe base, so they are happy to explore - Happy when reunited with caregiver
103
Outline features of an insecure-avoidant attachment
The caregiver is not responsive to the child. The child doesn't trust the caregiver - Low separation anxiety - Low stranger anxiety - Don't use the caregiver as a safe base - Indifferent reunion behaviour
104
Outline features of an insecure resistant attachment
The caregiver shows inconsistent care to the child, so the child is unsure if tey can depend on the caregiver or not. Become needy and attention seeking - High separation anxiety - High stranger anxiety - Angry reunion behaviour - Don't use the caregiver as a safe base
105
Outline Main's research into the continuity hypothesis
- Main conducted an interview-based study, in which participants were asked questions about their relationships with their parents and their relationships with their children - The participants' attachment styles with their parents correlated with the attachment patterns they had with their own child - She found that the percentage of adults displaying each of the three attachment types was very similar to the percentages first described by Ainsworth
106
3 weaknesses of Main's research into continuity hypothesis
-Investigator effects as it was an interview -The ppts responses may not have been accurate and they may have displayed social desirability bias -Inaccurate memory as events were in childhood
107
AO3 Outline 3 weaknesses of Hazan and Shaver's love quiz
-Used a volunteer sample which means it may not have been representative of the whole population - Self report measure means results might not always be accurate or objective and may suffer from social desirability biases - The study was correlational meaning a causal relationship can't be established between attachment styles with parents and later romantic relationships
108
3 Strengths of strange situations
-Control over extraneous variables due to standardisation. All children went through same script and same 8 stages -Replicable - Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg did a meta analysis of studies which replicated strange situations and found that these studies replicated the findings from strange situations -Stable across time
109
3 weaknesses of Strange situations
-The results may lack population validity -The method may be culturally biased towards behaviours expected in Western cultures -The results may lack ecological validity
110
Two limitations of the research into institutionalisation are…
-Families might have displayed social desirability bias meaning a possible underestimation of the negative effects of privation -There is often attrition in longitudinal studies meaning a possible underestimation of the negative effects of privation.
111
AO1 Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg
-Looked at the cultural variation of attachment # -Sample size was 2000 -Meta-analysis of 32 studies in which strange situations were conducted to determine the proportions of babies with different attachment types -Conducted across 8 countries Secure attachment = UK. UK parenting often balances warmth with clear boundaries, a hallmark of the authoritative style. This promotes sensitive, responsive caregiving which is key to developing secure attachment. Insecure resistant attachment = Israel Many Israeli infants in the study were raised in kibbutzim, where children often slept separately from parents and were cared for in communal nurseries. This inconsistent caregiver access may contribute to anxious, clingy behaviour, typical of insecure-resistant attachment. Insecure avoidant attachment = Germany. Cultural factors in Germany often value independence and self-reliance from an early age. Variations between results of studies within the same country were actually 150% greater than those BETWEEN countries. In the Us for example, one study found only 46% securely attached vs one study which found 90%
112
AO3 Outline one strength of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg's research into cultural variations in attachment (Indigenous researchers) +COUNTER (Efe of Zaire)
One strength of the research is that it is carried out by indigenous researchers. Indigenous psychologists are those from the same cultural background as the ppts. For example, they included research by a German team (Grossman et al) and Takahashi who is Japanese. This kind of research means that many of the potential problems in cross-cultural research can be avoided such as the researchers misunderstandings of the language used by ppts or having difficulty communicating instructions to them. Difficulties can also include bias because of ones nation's stereotypes to another. Therefore this suggests there is high chance that the researchers and ppts communicated well, increasing the validity of the data collected. HOWEVER, this wasn't the case for all researchers. For example, Tronick et al were outsiders from America when they studied child rearing and patterns of attachment in the Efe of Zaire. Their data might have been affected by difficulties in gathering data from ppts outside their own culture. This means that the data from some countries might not have been affected by bias and difficulty in cross-cultural communication
113
AO3 Outline one weakness of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg's research into cultural variations (Confounding variables)
One weakness of the research is that there may have been an impact of confounding variables on the findings. For example, studies conducted in different countries are not usually matched for methodology when they are compared in reviews or meta-analyses. Sample characteristics such as poverty, social class and urban/rural make up can found results as can the age of ppts studied in different countries. Environmental variables might also differ between studies and confound results. For example, the size of the room and the availability of interesting toys there - babies might appear to explore more in studies conducted in small rooms with attractive toys compared to large, bare rooms. Less visible proximity seeking because of room size might make a child more likely to be classified as avoidant. This means that looking at attachment behaviour in different non-matched studies conducted in different countries may not tell us anything about cross - cultural patterns of attachment, thus weakening acceptance of the research as it is victim to confounding variables
114
AO3 Outline one weakness of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg's research into cultural variations (Imposed etic)
A further limitation of cross-cultural research is in trying to impose test designed for one cultural context to another context. Cross-cultural psychology includes ideas of emic (cultural uniqueness) and etic (cross-cultural universality). Imposed etic occurs when we assume an idea or technique that works in one cultural context will work in another. An example of this in attachment research is in the use of babies' response to reunion with the caregiver in the SS. In Britain and the US, lack of affection on reunion may indicate an avoidant attachment. But in Germany such behaviour would be more likely interpreted as independence rather than insecurity. Therefore that part of the SS may not work in Germany. This means that behaviours measured by the ss may not have the same meaning in different cultural contexts, and comparing them across cultures is meaningless
115
AO3 One strength of Bowlby's theory of attachment (Research support for IWM: Baily et al) +COUNTER
One strength of Bowlby's theory of monotropy is that there is research support for the concept of the IWM. The idea of the internal working mode predicts that the patterns of attachment will be passed from one generation to the next. Bailey at al measured the mother's attachment to their own primary attachment figures and also assessed the attachment quality of the babies. They found that mothers with poor attachment to their own caregivers were more likely to have poorly attached babies. This coincides and supports Bowlby's theory which states that the ability of the mother to form attachments to their babies is influenced by their IWM, which comes from their own attachment experience. HOWEVER, there are other significant influences on social development. For example, some psychologists believe that genetic differences in anxiety and sociability affect social behaviour in both babies and adults. These differences could also impact on their parenting ability. This means that Bowlby may have overstated the importance of the IWM in social behaviour and parenting at the expense of other factors