Memory Flashcards

1
Q

Outline the difference between the capacity of short-term memory and the capacity of long-term memory. (2 marks)

A

Short term memory’s capacity is 7+- 2 (millers magic number)
Long term memory’s capacity is potentially unlimited.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How is STM encoded?

A

Acoustically - refers to the sound of the word

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How is LTM encoded?

A

Semantically - refers to meaning of the word

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What were the 4 groups in Baddley’s research?

A

Group1 - acoustically similar
Group 2 - acoustically dissimilar
Group 3 - semantically similar
Group 4 - semantically dissimilar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the findings of Baddley’s research for LTM? +explanation.

A

LTM: When asked to remember words after a longer period of time, they did worse with semantically similar words this indicates we code semantically.

Explanation: This is because the words that have similar meanings are competing for space in the LTM and may have become distorted or confused as they all have the same meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the findings of Baddley’s research for STM? + explanation.

A

STM: When participants were asked to recall words directly after they heard them they had poorer recall or words which were acoustically similar compared to words which were acoustically dissimilar.

Explanation : We are more likely to become confused with similar sounding words because they sound similar. Words become distorted in the STM .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Give one strength of research into duration (Bahrick et al)

A

-Use of meaningful stimuli
-Real life memories were studied as ppts were asked to recall names which is something we do in everyday life and is a real representation of how our LTM works
-These findings have high ecological validity because they can be generalised to real life.
-Strengthens our acceptance of the research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

One weakness of Peterson and Peterson’s research into duration

A

-Research is artificial
-Ppts were asked to recall consonant symbol triagrams.
-This is a weakness because the stimuli is artificial
-This doesn’t represent how our memory works in real life scenarios
-In everyday life we dont use our memories to learn random syllables
-Therefore we should accept the findings from Peterson and Peterson with some caution and more meaningful stimuli should be used to to test STM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were Baddley’s conclusions?

A

Information is coded acoustically in the STM and semantically in the LTM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe Peterson and Peterson’s research

A

-Lab experiment
-24 participants
- triagrams were presented 1 at a time to the participants and had to be recalled after intervals of 3,6,9,12,15,18 seconds in each trial
- after hearing the triagram they were asked to count backwards in 3s out loud from a specified random digit number until they saw a red paper
- This is known as the Peterson technique which is aimed TO PREVENT REHEARSAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain semantic memory

A

-Contains our knowledge of the world, includes facts about everything
-Memories are not time stamped
-Not as personal
e.g. meaning of words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain procedural memory

A

-Muscle memory
-Recall these memories without conscious awareness
-Almost automatic
-These memories are taught
-Not time stamped
e.g. how to ride a bike

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain episodic memory

A

-Events/stuff that happened in our lives
-Time stamped (you know when they happened)
-You make a conscious effort to remember them (declarative memory)
-You remember specific details, context and emotion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a declarative and non-declarative memory?

A

-Declarative = The recall requires conscious effort to retrieve information
-Non-declarative = The recall doesn’t require conscious effort to retrieve information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain primacy effect (MSM)

A

Occurs because this information was the first to be rehearsed and transferred to LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain recency effect (MSM)

A

Recency effect occurs because this information is the last information to be presented therefore these are the words that are remembered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Give a strength of MSM

A

-Supported by case study of CW
-It appears that the rehearsal mechanism which transfers information from STM to LTM is not working with CW
- This suggests that there are two different stores and also a process that transfers information from one store to another
-These assumptions are in line with what the MSM suggests about memory processing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Give a weakness of MSM

A

-CW had problems with his LTM but has procedural memory
-He cant retain any memories of his own lifetime but he can still play the piano with great skill
-This evidence undermines the MSM explanation as it appears that there must be more types of LTM which the MSM doesn’t talk about

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How do brain scans provide evidence for different types of LTM?

A

-Different areas of the brain are active when different kinds of LTM are active
-Episodic memory is associated with frontal lobe
-Procedural memory is associated with cerebellum and motor cortex
-Semantic memory relies on Temporal lobe

Scans are objective and factual meaning this strengthens our acceptance of types of LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Give features of the Episodic buffer in WMM

A

-Acts as a general store for central executive
-Temporary store that integrates visual, spatial and verbal info from other slave systems
-Links working memory to LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How does research from brain scans make acceptance of MSM stronger?

A

Beardsly found that prefrontal cortex is active during STM tasks but not LTM tasks

Squire found that hippocampus is active during LTM task but not STM task

This provides evidence for the existence of different memory stores as suggested by MSM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

How does research from brain scans provide evidence for different types of LTM?

A

Episodic - Hippocampus and frontal lobe
Semantic - Temporal lobe
Procedural - Cerebellum and motor cortex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

(AO3)
Weakness of LTM
lack of generalisability

A

-Lack of generalisability for the supporting research
-Both HM and CW had had brain injuries that lead to amnesia, due to the uniqueness of their experiences we cant apply this to other individuals. Case studies use such a small sample that they can be said to lack external validity. This means that such findings cant be generalised to the population.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Provide a strength of LTM

A

Patient HM’s case study is clear support for the different types of LTM

HM didn’t have any memory for specific events that had occurred in his life but his semantic memory was still in tact. HM would not recall stroking a dog and hour before or owning a dog in his past. Yet he could understand the concept of a ‘dog’. HM still had procedural memory e.g. being able t tie his shoe lace

This therefore provides evidence that there are separate stores of memory as HM was capable to perform some procedural tasks involving LTM (shoelace) but didn’t have episodic memory as he couldn’t remember events.

25
Q

Weakness of research of HM and CW

A

However a weakness of this research support for different types of LTM is the issue of generalisability - HM and CW suffered from brain injuries that lead to amnesia due to uniqueness of their experiences we cant apply this to other individuals. Case studies use such small sample that they can be said to lack external validity. This means that such findings cant be generalised to wider population

26
Q

Give features of central executive (WMM)

A

-Most important component of the model
-Is an attentional process that monitors incoming information
-Makes decisions and allocates slave systems to tasks
-Makes decisions about which issues deserve attention and which should be ignored

27
Q

Give features of the Phonological loop (WMM)

A

-Deals with auditory (sound) information (coding is acoustic)
-Preserves the order in which information arrives
-Information is subdivided into phonological store - (stores words you hear) and articulatory process - (allows maintenance rehearsal)

28
Q

Give features of visuospatial sketchpad (WMM)

A

-Stores visual and spatial information (known as the inner eye)
-Limited capacity of 3-4 objects
-Used for tasks such as visualising
- Codes information visually

29
Q

What are the 2 components of the visuospatial sketchpad

A

Visual cache - Stores visual information (what things look like)
Inner scribe - Records spatial information (physical relation / arrangement of objects in visual field )

30
Q

Strength of WMM
(Dual task perfromance provides empirical evidence for WMM)

A

-Dual task performance provides empirical evidence to support WMM and its separate components

-For example; Baddeley found that Ppts had difficulty when carrying out two visual tasks simultaneously compared to a visual and verbal task, which require different processing systems

-This is clear support for the WMM as research clearly shows that our memory is processing information. The greater the difficulty when doing tasks that require the same ‘slave system’ can be explained by information competing for that store.
This means that there must be separate slave systems e.g. one that processes visual information and one that process verbal information because we can process more than one type of information at the same time in some scenarios (talking whilst playing a video game)

-This strengthens our acceptance of the model

31
Q

Criticism of WMM
(Central ecexutive lacks detail)

A

Central executive is not fully explained and lacks details. Baddeley himself said the CE is the most important but least explained component. Many researches have criticised this component, stating it is not satisfactory in terms of its role in WMM. Case study research suggests that the CE may not be a unitary store and may actually be made up of sub components

32
Q

Outline interference theory

A

An explanation for forgetting in LTM because one memory blocks another memory. This causes one or both memories to be distorted. Usually occurs when memories are similar or learned in quick succession.

33
Q

Outline Mcgeohs research into effects of similarity on our memories

A

-Lab study
-Ppts learned a list of words till they recalled them with 100% accuracy

Group 1: Synonyms
Group 2: Antonyms
Group 3: Unrelated words
Group 4: Consonant words
Group 5: Numbers

Findings:
-Ppts recall of the original list of words was impaired
-Ppts that learned the 2nd word list did the poorest with the synonyms
-Interference is strongest when materials are similar

34
Q

(AO3) Evaluate interference theory (Weakness)
(Use of artificial stimuli)

A

-The research used artificial stimuli and it was a lab study meaning the IV was directly manipulated

-This does not represent real life scenarios

-Learning words isn’t as realistic as learning peoples faces, their birthdays…

-Interference is more likely to be demonstrated in a lab rather than in real life, due to nature of stimuli

35
Q

What is meant by a cue?

A

A trigger for information that allows us to access a memory.

When we encode a new memory, we also store information that occurred around it.

36
Q

What are the 2 types of cues?

A

Internal (State/mood)
External (Environmental/context)

37
Q

(AO3) Evaluation of Interference theory

(evidence from lab studies
Mcgeohand Mcdonald)

A

Mcgeohs and McDonald’s research shows that both types of interference are likely to be ways we forget info in LTM

This is a strength because lab experiments control the effects of irrelevant influences and thus give us the confidence that interference is a valid explanation for some forgetting.

38
Q

(AO3) Evaluation of interference theory

(Real life studies)

A

-Baddeley and hitch wanted to find if interference was a better explanation for forgetting than the passage of time passed.

-Asked rugby players to try and recall teams they played against

-Some players had missed games so their last game could have been 2 or 3 weeks ago

-RESULTS CLEALRY SHOWED THAT ACCURATE RECALL DEPENDED ON THE NUMBER OF GAMES THEY PLAYED IN THE MEANTIME, not how long ago the game was.

-So a players recall of a game 3 weeks ago was better than if they hadn’t played a game at all

39
Q

(AO1 research)
Outline Godden and Baddeley’s research into effect of environment on recall.
(Environment dependent forgetting)

A

Divers were asked to learn lists of 36 unrelated words of two or 3 symbols
4 conditions:
-Learn on beach recall on beach
-Learn on beach recall underwater
-Learn underwater recall underwater
-Learn underwater recall on beach

Conclusion: When ppts learned and recalled in the same place, recall was better

40
Q

(AO1 research)
Outline Overton’s (1972) research
(State dependent forgetting)

A

4 conditions:
- Learn words sober and recall whilst sober
-Learn words sober and recall words drunk
-Learn words drunk and recall words sober
-Learn words drunk and recall words drunk

WHEN BOTH STATES WERE THE SAME, RECALL WAS SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER

41
Q

Strength of retrieval failure
(Supporting research from Godden and Baddeley and Overton )

A

-There is supporting research.
-Evidence for the effects of context dependent forgetting comes from research from Godden and Baddeley (divers study) and research from Overton supports state dependent forgetting.
-Both studies demonstrate the effect of state and context dependent forgetting. Results support the predictions that the theory makes. It is likely that forgetting occurs when there is a mismatch in cues at encoding and retrieval (different conditions).
-Both studies validate the theory as the research demonstrates the effects of retrieval failure both in the lab and in real life settings

42
Q

(AO3)
Weakness of retrieval failure.

(Context effects are not very strong in real life)

A

-A limitation of retrieval failure is that Baddeley argues that context effects are not very strong in real life.

-Context/environments are not so extreme as how they have been investigated in research (being on land or underwater)

-This is a weakness as the effects of context dependent forgetting have not really been tested in real life settings. Maybe learning and recalling in a different context in a real life setting would not lead to that much forgetting as generally environments are similar.

-Therefore theory lacks ecological validity.

43
Q

Outline Loftus and Palmer’s research into misleading information on eye witness testimony’s

A

-Ppts watched a film of a car crash and then gave speed estimates of the cars
-They were asked ‘How fast were the cars going when they X into each other?’
-Those exposed to the verb ‘smashed’ gave a speed estimate 8.7 mph greater than those who’d heard ‘contacted’.
-Therefore, this shows that leading questions due to their phrasing suggest there is a correct answer

44
Q

Outline Gabbert’s research into conformity effect

A

-Controlled lab experiment, independent group design

-Showed ppts a film clip of the same crime scene, but with different details for each member. After engaging in post-event discussions with the other member of each pair and individually completing a test of recall, the researchers found 71% inaccuracy rates of information gained through the discussions, compared to a 0% control group rate who had worked alone throughout.

45
Q

(AO3)
Provide a weakness of EWT
(Demand characteristics)

A

-Demand characteristics may reduce the reliability of the findings.
-Psychologists argue that that Ppts want to be as helpful as possible.
-Through social desirability bias an ‘Please-U’ effect, when in doubt over their answer to a question, they are likely to give an answer which seems most beneficial or expected for the researcher, thus biasing the results.

46
Q

(AO3)
Weakness of EWT
(Low ecological validity)

A

The artificial tasks used by Loftus and Palmer, alongside Gabbert, reduces ecological validity of the findings and the mundane realism of the methodology. For example, the film clips of the car crashes do not expose ppts to anxiety of experiencing a real life car crash. The anxiety may either have a negative or positive effect on accuracy of EWT, thus biasing the findings.

47
Q

How does anxiety effect EWT in a positive way?

A

-The stress of witnessing the crime creates anxiety through psychological arousal in the body.

-Increases alertness. We pay more attention to cues in the environment.

-Evolutionary response to aid survival

48
Q

Outline Yerkes-Dodson curve

A

-Explains the relationship between emotional arousal and performance

-Memory becomes most accurate as the level of anxiety experienced increases to an intermediate level

49
Q

Evaluate (AO3) Outline the effect of anxiety on EWT
(lack of control over extraneous variables)

A

One weakness with real life studies into the effects of anxiety on EWT arise from the lack of control over extraneous variables in field studies.

For example, when witnesses were interviewed after the event this can be an issue because the interviewer could have asked leading questions, suggesting a certain type of answer. Further more, post event discussion can occur between witnesses. This also skews the testimony as false information can be planted into a memory, making them less reliable.

Increased accuracy in such real life situations could be due to other factors which were not controlled. This means the relationship between anxiety and accuracy of EWT is very difficult to be sure of. This decreases validity of research findings.

This weakens our acceptance of the theory

50
Q

What is proactive interference?

A

Proactive interference is when an old memory interfere with a new memory

51
Q

What are the 4 factors influencing memory recall?

A

Schemas
Leading questions
Post-event discussion
Anxiety

52
Q

How do schemas affect memory accuracy?

A

They can lead to false memories if we use pre-existing schemas to fill in a memory
When we retrieve a memory we use all our pre-existing schemas to fill in the gaps

53
Q

How do leading questions affect memory accuracy?

A

Leading questions suggest a certain type of answer which can influence our memory recall e.g. ‘How was David dressed when he spoke to you?’
The question already assumes things, as a result, this can make us believe things which didn’t happen

54
Q

How does post-event discussion influence memory accuracy?

A

Discussing an event can cause us to reinterpret the memory or not remember what happened
People discuss an event after it happened

55
Q

How does anxiety affect memory accuracy?

A

From no anxiety to slight anxiety, accuracy of memory increases
From moderate anxiety to lots of anxiety, accuracy of memory decreases

56
Q

Loftus and palmer found that…

A

-When the verb used to describe the accident was more intense, the participants judged that the car was travelling faster
-The way you ask a question can influence the participants memory of how quickly the car was travelling
-A week later, when participants were asked about smashed glass, many participants had a false memory that there was some in the video

57
Q

(AO3)
Outline one weakness of Loftus and Palmer’s research
(Demand characteristics)

A

-Participants may have realised that they were being asked leading questions
-Perhaps the phrasing was too obvious and as a result they may have realised they were being asked leading questions
-E.g. Ppts were asked ‘How fast was the car going when it smashed?’
Therefore this weakens our acceptance of loftus and Palmer’s research

58
Q
A