Attachment Flashcards
(109 cards)
AO1- caregiver interactions
what is attachment
a two way close emotional bond between two individuals, each individual sees the other as essential for their own security
AO1- caregiver interactions
what is care-giver infant interactions
-social interactions babies have with their careres
-two examples include reciprocity and interactional synchrony
AO1- caregiver interactions
what is reciprocity in care-giver interactions
-they respond to each other’s signals in a turn-taking style
AO1- caregiver interactions
what are alert phases within reciprocity
babies signal when they are ready for interaction
AO1- caregiver interactions
what is active involvement within reciprocity
both sides (baby and adult) initiate interactions
AO3- caregiver interactions
how does the research of Tronick support reciprocity
found that when mothers stopped reciprocating (still-face) during the interaction, babies became very frustrates and distressed.
suggests that infants expect their actions to be reciprocated
AO3- caregiver interactions
how does the research of Brazelton support care-giver interactions
described interaction as a ‘dance’ because each partner responds to the other’s moves.
if mothers froze their faces and ignored their babies’ interactions, the babies became extremely distressed
AO1- caregiver interactions (interactional synchrony)
what is interactional synchrony
two people are said to be synchronised when they carry out the same action simultaneously
AO1- caregiver interactions (interactional synchrony)
what is temporal coordination
when the caregiver and baby essentially mirror each other
AO3- caregiver interactions (interactonal synchrony)
how does the research of Isabella et al support interactional synchrony
observed 30 mothers and their infants and found that higher levels of interactional synchrony were associated with better quality mother-infant attachment
AO3- caregiver interactios (interational synchrony)
how does the research of Meltzoff and Moore support interactional synchrony
observed interactional synchrony as young as 2 weeks old
the child’s response was filmeed and they found an association between the expression of the adult and the infant
AO3- research into caregiver interactions
strength of research into caregiver infant interactions
GRAVE
R
-make use of controlled observations
-studies like Tronick’s and Brazelton’s take place in artificial lab based settings with high control over extraneous variables and conditions
-increases internal validity within the study and findings gathered
AO3- caregiver interactions
how is it hard to know what is happening when observing infants and the purpose of their interactions
-we can only observe and watch behaviours and actions front infants. we are unable to discover whether their actions are deliberate or intenational and the purpose of them.
-due to its descriptive rather than explanatory nature, makes it very difficult for researchers to establish general laws and theories regarding care giver infant interactions and communications
AO3- research into caregiver infant interactions
how is demand charcteristics present in research investigating caregiver infant interactions a weakness
-putting babies in an unusual artificial environment might alter their behaviour, meaning their behaviour and communication might not be natural
-this would question the validity of results gathered from these studies as findings might not represent natural behaviour from infants
AO3- research into caregiver interactions
how might there be concerns regarding the reliability of observations with research investigating caregiver interactions
-studies on this concept tend to involve several researchers observing the interaction between an infant and their caregiver, this in itself is quite subjective and could result in inconsistent findings gathered from researchers
-due to the potential inconsistency that could occur across researchers this would question the reliability of findings gathered from studies investigating caregiver infant interactions
AO1- schaffer and emersons study
outline the study of schaffer and emerson into attachment
DFS
D
- investigated the early developments of attachments
- followed 60 infants from working class area in Glasgow
- infants were observed every month at home until they were 1 year old and then again at 18 months, mothers questioned and asked to keep a diary
- attachment measured through separation anxiety in everyday situations and stranger anxiety measure the infants’ response to unfamiliar adults
F
-identified 4 distinct staged in the development of infant attachment by 18 months few were attached to only one person
-65% of the children first specific attachment was to the mother
-39% the person who usually fed, bathed and changed the children was not their primary attachment figure, many mothers were primary attachment figure despite spending less time with them
S
primary attachment figure of children is normally their mother despite the amount of time spent with them
AO3- schaffer and emersons study
evaluate the study of schaffer and emerson
+GRAVE
V
-took place in a natural environment
-high external validity
-natural environment= real life setting
-results more accurate
-true reflection of attachment formation in everyday scenarios and settings
G
-sample consisted of 60 babies from working class families in Glasgow
-lacks generalisability
-sample is niche
-difficult to argue schaffer and emersons stages of attachment and the formation of attachments would work in the same process for children from other nationalities, upbringing and social classes
AO3- schaffer and emersons study
how is schaffer and emersons study being longitudinal a strength
-collect more data
-more accurate conclusion, can make clear comparisons from beginning and end
-increases validity
-suggets there is accuracy regarding schaffer and emersons stages of attachment
AO3- schaffer and emersons study
how is schaffer and emersons study being subjective to bias a weakness
-demand characteristics may be present
-mothers may change results to make their relationship seem a certain way
-stages of attachment are based on research which has had bias in data collection and flawed methodology, accuracy and validity of their suggestions can be questioned
AO1- schaffer and emersons stages of attachment
state the stages of attachment and their time periods
asocial stage 0-8 weeks
indiscriminate attachment stage 2-7 months
specific attachment stage 7-12 months
multiple attachment stage 1 year onwards
AO1- schaffer and emersons stages of attachment
what is the asocial stage
0-8 weeks
-preference for familiar individuals
-behaviour between humans and non-human objects quite similar
-recognise specific faces
-happier in presence of humans than when alone
-prefer faces to non-faces
-smile at anyone
AO1- schaffer and emersons stages of attachment
what is the indiscriminate attachment stage
2-7 months
-preference for peorple rather than inaminate objects
-recognise and prefer familiar people
–smile more at familiar than unfamiliar faces
-accept confort from any adult
AO1- schaffer and emersons role of the father
what is the specific attachment stage
7-12 months
-primary attachment to one particular individual ( the person who shows most sensitive their signals)
-show stranger anxiety
-show seperation anxiety
-use familiar adults as secure base
AO1-schaffer and emersons stages of attachment
what is the multiple attachment stage
1 year onward
-form secondary attachments with familiar adults with whom they spend time
(grandparents)