Attachment P1 Flashcards

(56 cards)

1
Q

What do caregivers infant interactions do?

A

. Help build and strengthen the attachment between parents and children, more sensitive to signals, stronger the attachments become

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is reciprocity?

A

. Involve both parties producing a response from each other turns are taken like in a conversation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is interactional synchrony?

A

. Takes place when caregiver an infant interact in a way that their actions and emotions mirror each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who studied interactional synchrony?

A

. Isabella (1989) observed 30 mothers in infants and found increased levels interactional synchrony were associated with better quality attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is supporting evidence of caregiver infant interactions?

A

. Evans and Porter (2009) studied reciprocity, synchrony and attachment quality in 101 infants and Mums in first year. Babys judged to be securely attached tended to have more reciprocal interactions and synchrony
. Meltzoff and moore (1977) found babies between 2 to 3 weeks mimicked adults facial expressions in hand movements-suggests innate and used to form attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the weaknesses of caregiver infant interactions?

A

. Caregiver interaction is not found in all cultures E.g. le vine et al (1994) reported kenyan mothers have a little interaction or contact with infants, but a high proportion of secure attachments
. research is likely ethnocentric and ignores differences in formation in other culture types

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are stages of attachment

A

different infant behaviours have been linked to specific ages. all babies go through these stages in the same order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are multiple attachments

A

attachments to two or more people, formed after child has formed strong bond to one of their caregivers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was schaffers and Emersons procedure?

A

. 60 babies from working-class Glasgow studied
. Babies visited every month for first year and again 18 months
. Mothers ask about baby separation and stranger anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was Schaffer and Emerson‘s findings?

A

. Between 25 to 32 weeks of age, 50% showed separation anxiety towards Mum (specific attachment)
. By 40 weeks 80% of babies showed specific attachment and 30% displayed multiple attachments
. Led to proposal of four stages of attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the stages of attachment?

A

. Asocial: birth-three months, infants become attracted to faces after six weeks, smile at faces more than objects
. Indiscriminate: at 3-7 months, infants recognise faces but accept comfort from any adult and treat them all the same
. Specific: 7-8 months, infants develop anxiety around strangers and distressed if away from a particular adult – primary attachment figure
. Multiple: 9+ months, form more attachments – secondary attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the weaknesses of multiple attachments?

A

. Many researchers believe primary attachment must be made before multiple but different cultures find babies developing multiple from Birth-collectivist cultures so non clear evidence for when multiple attachments are formed
. Very difficult to measure babies you don’t judo in a social as they’re not mobile on their behaviour is difficult to interpret, behaviour due to something else and potentially. esp diff in asocial stage as very little movement to observe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the methodological strengths of shcaffer and emmersons study of multiple attachments?

A

. Study carried out in own home so most observations done by parents so babies behaviour not affected by observers so increased validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a fathers traditional role?

A

. Traditionally fathers believed to play more minor real roles in parenting
. bowlby beleievs infants form specific bond (mother)
. however shcaffer + emm found 75% infants had attachment with father by 18 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Karen Grossman do?

A

. 2002
. Carried out longitudinal study
. Found quality of adolescent attachment to father is related to fathers play with infants
. Suggests a fathers role is more to do with being a playmate than being nurturing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain fathers as primary carers?

A

. When father takes on the role of main carer, adopt behaviour typical of mothers
. Field (1978) filmed four-month babies interactions with their fathers and found differences in interactions when father was primary care rather than secondary spent more time smiling, imitating and holding babies
. Key attachment based on level of response not gender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are the weaknesses of role of the father?

A

. Studies find fatherless kids don’t turn out significantly different suggesting fathers impact isnt significant
. Evolutionary psychologists argue females more predisposed to nurture due to presence of oestrogen that leads to caring behaviours than fathers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What was Lorenz‘s aim.?

A

. To investigate imprinting on attachment formation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What was Lorenz’s procedure?

A

. Randomly split batch of grey goose eggs into two groups
. One group were hatched in an incubator and one by their mother
. First moving object they saw was Lorenz in the incubator group
. Behaviour of goslings carefully observed
. Also observed effect of imprinting on adult mating preferences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What were Lorenz‘s findings?

A

. Experimental group in printed on the leorenz
. Control group hatched in imprinted on mother
. Two group mixed, control group continued with mother, experimental group went back to Laurens
. Imprinting only occurred in a critical period
. Geese who imprinted on humans later showed courtship behaviour towards humans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are the evaluations of Lorenz?

A

. Weakness: critical period questions, sluckin (1966) recreated with ducklings and got them to imprint on him but kept one duck isolated well beyond critical period, duck still imprinted on him after this
. Weakness: imprinting is reversible, Guiton (1966) found chicken to imprinted on a yellow glove would try to mate with them as adults but with experience learnt instead to meet with other chickens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What was the aim of Harlow study?

A

. Wether contact comfort was more important in attachment than food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What procedure was used in harlow study?

A

. 16 baby rhesus monkeys with two surrogate mothers, one of wire with milk, another was cloth and didn’t give milk
. Amount of time spent with each mother was recorded
. Monkeys deliberately frightened with loud noises to understand preference under stress
. Long-term effects recorded

24
Q

What were the findings of harlows study?

A

. Spend more time with cloth mother as provide a contact comfort
. As adults monkeys would be abusive to offspring and were less sociable
. When frightened would go to cloth mother

25
What was the conclusion of harlows experiment?
. Contact comfort is more important than monkeys than food in attachment
26
What is the evaluations of Harlow?
. Strengths: allowed greater understanding on infant attachment are showed it doesn’t develop as a result of food and showed importance of early relationships for later social development . Strengths: had important practical applications E.G.allow social workers to understand risks of child abuse and neglect to intervene and prevent . Weakness: monkeys suffered greatly due to these procedures and monkeys are a very intelligent species swords of them are great even other animals, however the research is so important that it may have been worth it for the results
27
What is classical conditioning?
. Infant learns to associate primary caregiver with food
28
What is learning theory?
. Before: unconditioned stimulus (food) = unconditioned response (happy) . During: neutral stimulus (Mum) plus unconditioned stimulus (food) = unconditioned response (happy) . After: condition stimulus (Mum) = condition response (happy)
29
Explain operant conditioning?
. Reinforcement produces attachment e.g. if caregiver gives positive response to crying, crying is positively reinforced, at the same time caregiver receives negative reinforcement as crying stops .both increase liklihood of behaviour being repeated
30
Explain attachment as a secondary drive?
. Hunger is a primary drive, it’s innote, we are motivated to eat to reduce hunger drive. As caregivers give food, primary driver hunger becomes generalised and attachment is a secondary drive learnt through Association
31
What are the evaluations of learning theory?
. Strengths: provides insight into infant attachment and role of the food in this so can help people make attachment with infants . Weakness: infants often form attachment with those who don’t feed them so food can’t be key to attachment . Weakness: criticised by Harlows research . Weakness: criticised by Bowlby’s research
32
What is Bowlbys mono Tropic theory
. States that attachment is an evolutionary explanation and is an innate thing that increases our chances of survival
33
What is the mono Tropic bond
. An attachment for one specific caregiver usually the mother and his more important than any other attachments
34
What is the internal working model
. States the mono Tropic bond act as a template for all the relationships and has a powerful effect on future relationships and most importantly affect a child’s later ability to be a parent them selves
35
What is Bowlbys critical period
. The first two years of life of a critical period for attachment, if attachment doesn’t development it will seriously damage child social and emotional development
36
What are the evolutionary principles of the monoTropic theory
. Argues humans develop biological need to attach . Done to increase survival chances . Infant show innate behaviours called social releases that bring out care from adults
37
What are the strengths and weaknesses of Bowlbys mono Tropic theory
. S internal working model supported by Bailey at all (2007) which assessed attachment of 99 mothers to babies and their own mothers, found majority had same attachment type to both . W critical period not supported by evidence, psychologist suggest sensitive period wear attachment more likely but could be found at other times and children can form attachments after critical period . Counterargument – Lauren supports idea of critical period were imprinting hard to happen in first hours or not at all . W multiple attachments form rather than one monotropic bond however could be argued that monotropic bond is the stronger bond
38
What is the strange situation
. Develop by Mary Ainsworth to study attachment behaviours . Took place in unfamiliar room with a view was observed covertly . Infants age between 12 and 18 months made up of 100 Americans . Judged on seven different episodes involving different variables including proximity seeking, exploration, separation anxiety, stranger anxiety, reunion response . 25% insecure avoidant, 65% secure, 10% insecure resistant
39
Describe the behaviour types studied in a strange situation
. Insecure avoidant-exploration, child does not seek contact from mother, separation anxiety: child is unconcerned without mother, stranger anxiety: child is not distressed or wary of stranger, reunion behaviour: a child ignores mother on return .Secure-exploration: mother seenas secure base, separation anxiety: trial cries after mother leaves, stranger anxiety child is wary of stranger, reunion behaviour: child seats contact for mother and is easy to comfort . Insecure resistant-exploration: child is wary of mother doesn’t explore, separation anxiety: child intensely distressed without mother, stranger anxiety: child very distressed of stranger, reunion behaviour: child is ambivalent towards mother
40
What are the strengths and weaknesses of Ainsworth strange situation
. S reliable-takes place in lab condition so it’s easy to control . S uses behavioural categories so easy to observe, Bich (2012) looked at in a inter-rather-reliability and found agreement on attachment type in 94% of babies . W lacks ecological validity done in an unfamiliar environment which limits its applicability to real life . W culturally biased study only on American babies so doesn’t account for all the rearing practices in other cultures
41
What did van ljzendoorn study
. Conducted meta analysis of 32 studies using strange situation across different cultures . Studies from eight countries with total sample of 1990 infants . Found wide variation between attachment types in different cultures . Secure attachment always the most common however highest in Britain with 75% to 50% in China . Insecure resistant was overall least common 3% in Britain to around 30% in Israel . Insecure avoidant was most common in Germany and we is common in Japan . Also massive variation between results within the same country with up to 150% greater than those between countries
42
What did simonella do
. Conducted study in Italy to see whether proportion of babies of diff attach,ent types still matches those previously found . Assess 76 12 months old using strange situation . Find 50% secure 36% insecure avoidant which is lower rate of secure than in many studies . Suggested because increasing numbers of mothers of very young children work long hours and use professional childcare
43
What are the strengths and weaknesses of cultural variations in attachment in the strange situation
. S large sample 1990 used in sample so reduces impact of poor methodology and makes more generalisable . S indigenous researchers so many problems in cross-cultural research avoided such as misunderstanding so they are more valid . W limited number of studies in some countries E.G.only one in China where is 18 in USA so maybe unable to fully generalise . W imposes test design for one culture on another which is an example of imposed etic
44
What is Bowlby‘s theory of maternal deprivation
. Caused by prolonged separation from attachment figure during the critical period which results in long-term negative consequences include effects on intellectual development and effects on emotional development . Manifests as cognitive delays low IQ and affection less psychopathy
45
What was Bowlbys 44 thieves study
. Aim to examine the links between affectionless psychopathic and maternal deprivation . Sample consist of a 44 criminal teenagers accused of stealing . Interviewed thieves for signs of affection of psychopathic and families interviewed to establish whether feed suffered a long early separation from mothers . Control group of 44 noncriminal emotionally disturbed teens with set up social how often maternal deprivation occurred in children who are not delinquent . 17 out of 44 had experienced prolonged separation from attachment figure in first 5 years, 15/17 of these where classed as affectionless psychopaths . In the control 2 out of 44 had suffered maternal deprivation of zero affectionless psychopaths . Concluded that prolonged separation from attachment figures caused affectionless psychopath
46
What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory of maternal deprivation
. S supporting evidence hallow can be used because monkey suffered maternal deprivation and were abusive to their offspring and were also less sociable showing detrimental effects on development . W contradictory evidence cross-cultural research contradicts maternal deprivation, Guatemalan Indians found the children experience deprivation due to being kept in a windowless hut with little contact with their primary caregiver but didn’t experience impairment . W sensitive rather than critical effects of deprivation can be reversed so period may be a sensitive one but cannot be critical . W deprivation or privation deprivation means attachment already formed and then lost where is privation is failure to form any which reduces validity as study may not actually study what it claims to
47
Explain Rutter at all
. Came to investigate a good care could make up the poor early experiences in institutions . Followed group of 165 Romanian orphans adopted in Britain . Cognitive physical and emotional development assessed for six 1115 . Control of 52 British children adopted at same time . Found on initial arrival in UK adopters were behind on all three measures and at age 11 recovery depending on child’s age adoption . Those adopted after six months showed disinhibited attachment . Adopted before six months with me like he was 102 between six months into years is 86 in after two years of 77 
48
What is the bucharest early intervention project
. Zeanah et al (2005) assessed 95 children age 12 to 31 months who has spent 90% of lives in Romanian orphanages . Compare to the control group of 50 children never in institution . You strange situation to measure attachment site and ask her give us to describe unusual behaviours . Find 75% of control group identified as securely attached compared to only 19% of institutionalise group . 65% had disinhibited attachment type
49
What is disinhibited attachment
. One child shows equal affection to strangers as people they know well, attention seeking and clingy
50
What are the strengths and weaknesses of Romanian orphan studies
. S Real life applications care homes and children’s homes now avoid having large numbers of caregivers to ensure each child is assigned a key worker . S fewer extraneous variables all the children suffer in the same way so not as many confounding variables given higher internal validity . W Romanian orphanages had such bad conditions that it can’t be applied to the children in all the types of institutional care limits applicability . W lack of adult data only studied at the age of 15 so long-term affects unknown
51
How to childhood attachment types results of adult behaviours
. Insecure avoidant-somewhat uncomfortable with proximity to others nervous when people get too close not intimate with romantic partners . Secure-relatively easy to get close to others and comfortable depending on them . Insecure resistant-others reluctant to get as close as liked very clingy and anxious and insecure
52
What did youngBlade and Belsky study
. Found 3 to 5-year-old securely attached children more self-confident and more sociable with other children so more likely to form close friendships
53
What did Myron Wilson and Smith asses
. Bullying using questionnaires, 196 children ages 7 to 11 from London . Secure children unlikely to be involved bullying, insecure avoidant more likely to be victims, insecure resistant more likely to be bullies
54
What did Kern study
. Securely attached babies tend to form best quality childhood friendships where is insecure babies had friendship difficulties
55
What did hazen and shaver study
. Aims to find if attachment type in infancy it affects romantic relationships in future . Analyse 620 replies to love quiz in American newspaper with three sections assessment of current almost significant relationship, assessment of love life, assessment of attachment type . Found secure it was 56%, and happy friendly and trusting relationships the average on 10 years . Avoidant 25%, jealousy environment and say uncomfortable depending on others average life of six years . Resistant 19% obsessive in romantic relationships desires for intense closeness, five years on average
56
What are the strengths and weaknesses of affects of early life on a Adult relationship
. W link decreases with age attachment type can change overtime due to participation in multiple relationships which alter internal working model . W methodological issues often based on self-report measures which retrospective saw allow memory which can be unreliable and social desirability basis can also affect results . W free will versus determinism set in stone the children with poor early relationships always a poor relationship switch is unfair