auditory processing part 1 Flashcards

1
Q

visual vs auditory localization

A

vision: 3D world to 2D retinal image
- retinal image = location in space
audition: 3D world to 0D accoustic signal
- location in cochlea = frequency of sound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

auditory localization

A

task of determining source of sounds in auditory space

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

azimuth localization

A

coordinate positions left to right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

elevation localization

A

coordinates position up and down

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

distance localization

A

coordinates position from observer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

interaural level difference

A

ILD:
- binaural cue requires both ears
- difference in amplitude between ears
- head acts as a barrier creating accoustic shadow
best for high frequeuncy (more trouble getting around)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

interaural time difference

A

ITD:
- binaural cue requires both ears
- difference in time (phase) between ears
- caused by difference in distance from sound source to ears
best for low frequencys (waves are bigger easier to detect difference)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

cones of confusion

A

ILD and ITD help determine azimuthal direction
not helpful for elevation and distance
any point along midline is equidistant and unshadowed for both ears
cones of confusion are smaller furthur to sides

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

spectral cue

A
  • monaural cue requires one ear

- sounds coming from different directions bounce of pinna in different ways depending on shape of pinna

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

spectral cue experiment

A

used a mold to modify pinna
- at first azimuth location was intact and elevation was impaired
- by day 19 performance was recovered
perceptual system learns new spectral cues from new ear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

jeffress neural coincidence model

A

explains ITD medial superior olive
- coincidence detectors that only fire when both inputs occur at the same time
- indicated by which neuorn fires
ex. neuron 1 is far right, 5 is middle, 9 is far left
have tuning curves: each cell tuned for a particular time difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ITD in animals

A

owls and birds have narrow ITD tuning curves
- represented by which neuron fires
- place code
gerbils and mammals have broad ITD curves
- represented by firing of many neurons
- population code

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

which cortical areas are involved in localization

A

A1 core
posterior belt
dorsal where stream

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what happens when the where/what pathways are deactivated

A

where- cant locate sounds but can identify

what- cant identify sounds but can locate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how do we seperate sound?

auditory scene analysis

A

auditory scene: array of all sound sources in environment
auditory scene analysis: seperation of sound sources within a scene
ex. applause, barking, bell, water
- organizing principles are similar to Gestalt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

onset and offset time

A

sounds that start/end at the same time are grouped

sounds that start/end at different times are seperated

17
Q

temporal proximity

A

sounds near in time tend to be perceived as a group

18
Q

location of sound

A
  • determined using ITD, ILD and spectral cues
    sounds from the same source are grouped
    sounds from different sources are seperated
19
Q

pitch

A

sounds similar in pitch tend to be perceived as a group

  • when sequences are distant, segregation occurs
  • as sequeneces pass through eachother, grouping occurs
20
Q

temporal proximity vs pitch

A

trade off based on speed and pitch

  • different pitches segregate as tempo increases
  • similar pitches tend to stay grouped as tempo increases
21
Q

timbre

A

sounds with the same timbre tend to be grouped

22
Q

auditory continuity

A

good continuation
- when noise bursts matches tones in level, we perceive tone continuing “behind noise”
picket fence effect

23
Q

experience

A

past experience and expectations influence auditory perception

24
Q

phonemic restoration

A

when a phenome is replaced by a cough nothing is perceived to be missing
when a phenome is replaced by silence missing phenome can be perceived

25
Q

multi-tone masking

A

once youve heard the beeps alone it is easier to hear beeps in a sequence of noises
experience has been changed and youre able to pick up regular sequence burried in noise

26
Q

laurel vs yanny

A

have vary similar features

ambiguous sound is a blend of both

27
Q

all auditory scene analysis factors

A

location, on/offset time, temporal proximity, pitch similarity, timbre similarity, auditory continuity, experience

28
Q

chromesthesia

A

sound to color (auditory-visual) synesthesia
- sounds create a perception of color, involuntarily and instantaneously
1/3000 people have it

29
Q

types of synesthesia

A
grapheme- color (letter--> color)
spatial sequence (number --> spatial location)
auditory- tactile (sound --> touch)
lexical gustatory (word--> taste)
flavor- color (taste--> color)
pain- color
30
Q

sound-color matches experiment

A

synaesthate had highly consistant colors across two tests

- sounds evoked very similar colors compared to control

31
Q

cross-modal stroop interference

A

participants had to name a color while hearing a tone

  • found that synthestes were slower to say the color words on incongruent trials than one congruant
  • no effect in control
32
Q

possible mechanisms of synesthesia

A
  1. direct connections between areas processing perception

2. typical feedback pathways via multimodal convergence

33
Q

fMRI evidence

A

increased activation in left inferior parietal cortex

  • area involved in multimodal integration
  • suggests long pathway through multimodal area for feedback