Bandung Era Flashcards
(64 cards)
overview of Bandung Conference
29 newly independent countries meeting to promote non-alignment, self-determination, and South-South unity.
Post World War II, state-led, builit on decades of earlier activism (Asian Underground)
way to forge allies
what does Naoko Shimazu talk about?
performative diplomacy
What does Shimazu call the Bandung Conference?
“a highly choreographed performance”
Shimazu main points
symbolic meanings produced through the conferences staging. “Freedom Walk” performative diplomacy.
designed to convey unity, and was “as significant as the political discussions”
Collective identity, messgae of equality through the posing.
media amplified this (New York Times)
nations could collectively assert their presence on the world stage.
Africa state
of the 29, only 6 from Africa: Egypt, Ethiopia, Gold Coast, Liberia, Libya, and Sudan.
3-man delegation for Ghana
connected African experiences with Asian
Pan-African solidarity and its future saped by Bandung despite partial independence
African-American
inspired later Black Liberation movements in the US
Parallel between decolonisation and civil rights movements.
what came out of Bandung?
Final Communique
What was the Final Communique?
10 principles for guiding relations for South-South solidarity
What were some of the principles of the Final Communique
- economic cooperation
- cultural exchange
- human rights (comdemning racism)
- solidarity in national liberation movements
- peace (UN reform, nuclear disarmament & sovereignty)
G.H. Jansen on Non-Alignment
it was a strategic policy adopted by Afro-Asian countries.
asserted independence and resistance to neocolonial pressures, fostering solidarity
deliberate choice to pursue independent foreign policy.
to avoid conflict and focus on domestic
G.H. Jansen on failure of Non-Alignment
economic dependency and political instability undermined cohesion of the movement
Christopher J. Lee
Bandung as World Making
What does Lee mean by World Making?
created shared political imagination among decolonised nations
all visions not communist or capitalist.
not under developmed, but a conscious political force.
“Collective ambition”
creating alliances across borders.
Lee about Bandung’s legacy
although ideas faded politically, endured symbolic and intellectually through Non-Alignment, Pan-Africanism, Global South solidarity at the UN.
Vijay Prashad key idea
Third World as a “project”
“The Third World was not a place. it was a project”.
but failed due to conflicting ideologies, neoliberalism, debt crises, and western institutions. (IMF)
Mark T. Berger on the failings of Bandung
Reliance on nation state led to its decline
offered alternative to western and soviet alliances, but often promoted national interests.
despite this, continued to influence contemporary debates on global inequality and development.
needs to be studied to analyse current global dynamics and possibility for alternative politiacl projects.
Kumal Jumblatt
Lebanese intelelctual 1971
“the struggle against imperialism in order to prove their existence and the force of their personality”
to colonial, “Africa and Asia are on ething, and the Western countries another”
thats why they dropped the atomic bomb on Asian soil and not their European enemies at the concluding moments of World War II.
what was the non-alignment movement?
a coalition of newly independent countries (Asia, Africa, Latin America) who refused to align with either the US or the USSR during the Cold War.
sought to protect sovereignty, promote economic justice, and oppose imperialism, both Western and Soviet.
key figures present at Bandung
Sukarno (indonesia)
Kwame Nkrumah (Ghana)
Nehru (India)
core principles of Non-Alignment
- respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity
- rejection of military alliances (NATO or Warsaw Pact)
- Opposition to colonialism and neocolonialism
- Peaceful coexistence and mutual respect.
- Commitment to economic development and independence.
when was the establishment of Non-Alignment>
Belgrade 1961, Bandung laid the ideological groundwork
Odd Arne Westad on NAM
argues that NAM globalised the Cold War by creating a third force.
highlights NAM’s role in shifting Cold War diplomacy away from Europe
Sees Bandung as an expression of postcolonial agency and anti-imperial vision
Westad key quote:
“non-alignment was not neutrality, but resistance - a refusal to be subsumed by the superpower rivalry”
critiques of NAM
argues it eventually became fragmented with internal contradictions
some members leaned towards either the US or USSR in practice
national interests overrode collective solidarity
however, still view it as a critical early model of South-South diplomacy