Bandung Era Flashcards

(64 cards)

1
Q

overview of Bandung Conference

A

29 newly independent countries meeting to promote non-alignment, self-determination, and South-South unity.

Post World War II, state-led, builit on decades of earlier activism (Asian Underground)

way to forge allies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does Naoko Shimazu talk about?

A

performative diplomacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does Shimazu call the Bandung Conference?

A

“a highly choreographed performance”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Shimazu main points

A

symbolic meanings produced through the conferences staging. “Freedom Walk” performative diplomacy.

designed to convey unity, and was “as significant as the political discussions”

Collective identity, messgae of equality through the posing.

media amplified this (New York Times)

nations could collectively assert their presence on the world stage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Africa state

A

of the 29, only 6 from Africa: Egypt, Ethiopia, Gold Coast, Liberia, Libya, and Sudan.

3-man delegation for Ghana

connected African experiences with Asian

Pan-African solidarity and its future saped by Bandung despite partial independence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

African-American

A

inspired later Black Liberation movements in the US

Parallel between decolonisation and civil rights movements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what came out of Bandung?

A

Final Communique

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the Final Communique?

A

10 principles for guiding relations for South-South solidarity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were some of the principles of the Final Communique

A
  1. economic cooperation
  2. cultural exchange
  3. human rights (comdemning racism)
  4. solidarity in national liberation movements
  5. peace (UN reform, nuclear disarmament & sovereignty)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

G.H. Jansen on Non-Alignment

A

it was a strategic policy adopted by Afro-Asian countries.

asserted independence and resistance to neocolonial pressures, fostering solidarity

deliberate choice to pursue independent foreign policy.

to avoid conflict and focus on domestic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

G.H. Jansen on failure of Non-Alignment

A

economic dependency and political instability undermined cohesion of the movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Christopher J. Lee

A

Bandung as World Making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does Lee mean by World Making?

A

created shared political imagination among decolonised nations

all visions not communist or capitalist.

not under developmed, but a conscious political force.

“Collective ambition”

creating alliances across borders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Lee about Bandung’s legacy

A

although ideas faded politically, endured symbolic and intellectually through Non-Alignment, Pan-Africanism, Global South solidarity at the UN.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Vijay Prashad key idea

A

Third World as a “project”

“The Third World was not a place. it was a project”.

but failed due to conflicting ideologies, neoliberalism, debt crises, and western institutions. (IMF)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Mark T. Berger on the failings of Bandung

A

Reliance on nation state led to its decline

offered alternative to western and soviet alliances, but often promoted national interests.

despite this, continued to influence contemporary debates on global inequality and development.

needs to be studied to analyse current global dynamics and possibility for alternative politiacl projects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Kumal Jumblatt

A

Lebanese intelelctual 1971

“the struggle against imperialism in order to prove their existence and the force of their personality”

to colonial, “Africa and Asia are on ething, and the Western countries another”

thats why they dropped the atomic bomb on Asian soil and not their European enemies at the concluding moments of World War II.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what was the non-alignment movement?

A

a coalition of newly independent countries (Asia, Africa, Latin America) who refused to align with either the US or the USSR during the Cold War.

sought to protect sovereignty, promote economic justice, and oppose imperialism, both Western and Soviet.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

key figures present at Bandung

A

Sukarno (indonesia)
Kwame Nkrumah (Ghana)
Nehru (India)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

core principles of Non-Alignment

A
  1. respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity
  2. rejection of military alliances (NATO or Warsaw Pact)
  3. Opposition to colonialism and neocolonialism
  4. Peaceful coexistence and mutual respect.
  5. Commitment to economic development and independence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

when was the establishment of Non-Alignment>

A

Belgrade 1961, Bandung laid the ideological groundwork

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Odd Arne Westad on NAM

A

argues that NAM globalised the Cold War by creating a third force.

highlights NAM’s role in shifting Cold War diplomacy away from Europe

Sees Bandung as an expression of postcolonial agency and anti-imperial vision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Westad key quote:

A

“non-alignment was not neutrality, but resistance - a refusal to be subsumed by the superpower rivalry”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

critiques of NAM

A

argues it eventually became fragmented with internal contradictions

some members leaned towards either the US or USSR in practice

national interests overrode collective solidarity

however, still view it as a critical early model of South-South diplomacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
date and roots of the New International Economic Order
1974 major postcolonial initiative by Global South to reshape the global economy after political decolonisation. deeply tied to the legacies of colonialism, the Non-Aligned Movement, and the Bandung spirit.
26
What was the New International Economic Order 1974?
set of proposals adopted by the UN General Assembly in May 1974 aimed to restructure global economic relations to be fairer to developing postcolonial nations driven by members of NAM and G77(Group of 77) many of whom were recently decolonised countries about economic decolonisation - undoing the global economic structures that colonialism had left behind.
27
Key goald of NIEO
1. greater control over natural resources by formerly colonised countries 2. fairer terms of trade between South and Globalised North 3. increased development aid and technology transfers from North to South 4. regulation of multinational corporations 5. a voice in international economic institutions (IMF, World Bank, WTO)
28
Bandung and NAM Legacy
economic continuation of the political principles set at Bandung emphasised self-determination, solidarity, and South-South cooperation.
29
NIEO failure
IMF and World Bank remained controlled by the North US and UK especially rejected NIEO principles many historians argue that the NIEO's failure entrenched economic dependency, leading to the rise of neoliberal globalisation in the 1980s.
30
Japanese Occupation overview
moving into previous colonial spheres: Philippines 1941 1942 Singapore 1942 land in Indochina Shattered mystique of western colonialism and white greatness
31
Mark Bradley on Vietnam
many wars, anti-colonialism with France, Cold turned Hot war with the US, civil war between North and South, and revolutionary war of ideas.
32
Japanese in Vietnam brief overview
September 1940, invaded northern French Indochina wanted control over strategic ports and resources (rice and rubber) for its imperual ambitions in Southeast Asia. March 1945 stages a coup and removed the French, setting up the Empire of Vietnam, Japanese puppet state.
33
1941Vietnam
Ho Chi Minh returns to Vietnam, founds the Viet Minh to ressit both French and Japanese
34
1944-45 Vietnam
Vietnamese suffer under brutal Japanese rule and rixe requisitioning, causes the 1945 famine, killing 1-2 million
35
August 1945 Vietnam
Japan surrenders, power vacuum allows Viet Minh to seize Hanoi, leading to the Declaration of Indepence of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam
36
Ideological impact of the Vietnam case:
exposed contradictions in western claims to civilising missions and democracy proved that European colonialism could be replaced, sparking broader anti-colonial visions across asia
37
Ho Chi Minh at Bandung
his strategy of combining Marxism, nationalism, and guerrilla resistance inspired many Global South leaders.
38
David Marr on Vietnam
argues that the Japanese occupation unintentionally advanced the cause of Vietnamese naitonalism, despite its brutality. Japan's destruction of French authority in March 1945 created a vacuum that allowed the Viet Minh to step in and seize power.
39
Vietnam and Bandung wider context
the idea that asian people could defeat colonial powers was born in WWII and validated at Bandung, with Vietnam's early declaration of independence in 1945, often referenced symbolically.
40
Benedict Anderson on Indonesia
not just nationalist, social transformation (pemuda) (power vacuum) about destroying the colonial social order. Japanese created a new political consciousness and practical tools for revolution nation-building from below
41
Anderson Indonesia quote
"the pemuda, not the politicians, seized the revolution's initiative" nation-building from below.
42
Indonesia under Japanese Rule overview and date
1942-45 japan invaded the Dutch East Indiees in early 1942, quickly defeating the Dutch colonial forces the occupation lasted until Japan's surrender in August 1945 days later Sukarno and Mohammad Hatta declared Indonesian independence, turnign point in decolonisation.
43
rickels M.C on Indonesia
Japan was brutal and extractive but also accelerated the nationalist movement. forced labour, and rural suffering as deeply scarring, but politically galvanising "the Japanese period was paradoxical, an era of suffering, yet also of profound awakening".
44
Japan political awakening in Indonesia
broke vision of European invincibility in Asia by empowering nationalist leaders, Japan inadvertently accelerated anti-colonial organisation
45
Japan militirising Indonesia effect
armed and trained thousands of young Indonesians, many of whom would fight the Dutch from 1945-1949 created discipline fighters and organisers.
46
Indonesia Bandung Legacy
Sukarno, who declared independence in 1945 and hosted the Bandung Conference in 1955 came of age politically under Japanese occupation the experience of strategic collaboration, combined with Pan-Asian rhetoric, shaped Sukarno's vision of non-alignment, anti-imperialism, and Afro-Asian solidarity.
47
Indonesia 1965
6 Indonesian army generals kidnapped and killed led by General Suharto, blamed the PKI massive coordinated purge 500,000-1 million, PKI banned, shift in foreign policy from left-leading under Sukarno to pro-western under Suharto. Sukarno did not denounce the PKI, Suharto was able to ban the PKI and dismantly Sukarno's leftist coalition and consolidate control.
48
US and Suharto
viewed PKI (third-largest communist party) as major threat supported Suharto through listing PKI members and sympathisers, financial and material support, Diplomatic cover and denial.
49
United Kingdom in Indonesia
covert propaganda campaign that linked fake stories linking PKI to atrocities. forgeries and media manipulation amplifying the narrative that the army was "restoring order" aimed at Western press, UN, and indonesian elites, helping to justify the massacre internationally.
50
Sukarno
1964 to US ambassador "Go to hell with your aid" house arrest forbidden from political activity speeches and writing censored role minimised by Suharto's regime died in 1970, in disgrace and silence.
51
R.E. Elson on Sukarno
Indonesian unity through Guided Democracy notes that decolonisation was interrupted by internal ideological fractures, especially between military, communist, and religious factions.
52
John Roosa on Indonesia
aftermath of decolonisation after the 1965 purge of the PKI argues that revolutionary independnece was undone by Cold War violence and the destruction of the left. sees 1964 as a second colonisation, this time by US aligned military authoritarianism. "the promise of the revoliutioan was betrayed by a counter-revolution in 1965".
53
Decolonisation of Malaya overview
negotiated, elite-driven transition to independence, shaped by British strategic interests, Cold War, and attempts to contain communism.
54
Malaya timeline
1942-45 Japanese occupation 1948-60 Malayan Emergency communist insurgency leads to British counterinsurgency war 1957 Independence to elite non-communist coalition 1963 creation of malaysia
55
Karl Hack on Malaysia
Britain was successful not just because of military, but population control, psychological warfare, political engineering. How counterinsurgency shaped post-colonial governance structures.
56
British strategic retreat
carefully managed Malaya's decolonisation to preserve key economic and military interests (rubber and tin, navel bases, influence during Cold War)
57
John Darwin on malaya
Malaya exemplifies "imperial adaption" not a collapse - part of Britain's strategy to maintain post-imperual influence.
58
Containing communism - the Malayan Emergency 1948-60
a guerrilla insurgency led by the Malayan Communist Party (MCP) composed largelt of ethnic Chinese fighters British wages brutal counterinsurgency war using forced resettlement (New Villages) psychological operations, collective punishment tactics. helped justify British military and political control emergency less about independence more about justifying continued British military and political control.
59
Malayan elite-driven decolonisation:
partnered with Malay aristocrats and conservative elites avoid mass nationalist mobilisation by excluding radical left-wing voices (MCP) independence came with preservation of colonial-era institutions
60
Anthony Stockwell on Malaya
British decolonisation in Malaya was a model of "top-down control" designed to prevent radical transformation
61
British manipulating ethnic divides
entrenched ethnic divisions: 1. Malays (favoured politically) 2. Chinese (dominant in commerce) 3. Indians (labourers) British manipulated communal identities to weaken leftist solidarity and maintain control after independence these divisions were institutionalised through the New Economic Policy and racialised citizenship laws
62
Benedict Anderson on Malayan ethnic divides
postcolonial Malaysia illustrates how colonial categories were reabsorbed into nationalist projects.
63
Malaya neocolonial continuity
even after 1957, britain retained economic dominance, military bases, and diplomatic influence. malaysia remained firmly within Western Bloc, joining anti-communist alliances. post-independence elites maintained colonial hierarchies limiting genuine decolonisation
64