Biological Psychology Flashcards
1/10/19 (70 cards)
Biological psychology
- The study of behaviour
- Anything that an organism does that involves action and response to a stimulus
- Are the result of a number of internal process (e.g. learning, memory, emotion)
- Types: Biopsychology, Behavioural Biology, Psychobiology, Behavioural Neuroscience
- ‘The scientific study of the biology of behaviour e.g., what physiological, evolutionary and developmental mechanisms influence our behaviour’
- Biological psychology is an integrative subject that draws on knowledge from several sub-disciplines
The ‘classic’ divisions of biological psychology - 1) Physiological Psychology
Study of the neural mechanisms of behaviour usually by direct manipulation of the brains of non-human in controlled experiments
The ‘classic’ divisions of biological psychology - 2) Psychopharmacology
The manipulation of neural mechanisms using drugs and observing their effects on behaviours
The ‘classic’ divisions of biological psychology - 3) Neuropsychology
Study of the psychological effects of (non-experimental) brain damage in human subjects
The ‘classic’ divisions of biological psychology - 4) Psychophysiology
Study of the relationship between physiological / biological activity and psychological processes
The ‘classic’ divisions of biological psychology - 5) Cognitive Neuroscience
Study of the neural mechanisms involved in higher cognitive functions such as memory and perception
The ‘classic’ divisions of biological psychology - 6) Comparative Psychology
Study of behaviours across different species to understand the role of evolution, genetics and adaptiveness
Integrating disciplines: Psych-neuro-endocrinology (PNE), Psycho-neuro-immunology (PNI)
- Exploring the nervous, hormonal and immune pathways that link psychological factors (e.g., stress) to ill-health
- Endocrine system ⟷ Nervous system ⟷ Immune system ⟷ Endocrine system
Approaches to Biological Psychology
- Behaviour is caused by identifiable events within biological systems
-This demonstrates a causal approach of the form ‘if X then Y‘ For example:
∙ Does stress make you ill?
∙ Does nicotine affect cognitive performance?
∙ Does the hippocampus affect memory and learning?
1) Somatic Intervention - The investigator can manipulate a biological system to see how it affects behaviour
Somatic intervention: 1. Administer a stress hormone → Behaviour change: ...increase feeling of stress S.I.: 2. Block nicotine receptors in brain → B.C.: ...decrease smoking cravings S.I. 3. Lesion brain area (e.g., hippocampus) → B.C.: ...disrupt memory process
2) Behavioural Intervention - The investigator can manipulate experiences to see if this affects biological systems
Somatic effects: 1. ...changes in hormone levels ← Behavioural Intervention: Expose individual to a stressful situation S.E.: 2. ...changes in nicotine receptors activity ← B.I.: Implement a smoking cessation programme S.E.: 3. ...changes in hippocampal connections ← B.I.: Implement a memory training programme
3) Correlational Approach - Observing whether biological measures covary with behavioural measures
- The previous approaches pose ethical problems for psychologists e.g., the investigator is interfering in some way
Somatic measures: 1. Changes in hormone levels ⟷ Behavioural measures: Self-reported stress S.M.: 2. Nicotine receptor activity ⟷ B.M.: Smoking frequency S.M.: 3. Hippocampal size ⟷ B.M.: Memory performance
Problems with correlation
1) Correlation is NOT proof of causality
2) The same behaviours might occur for different reasons
3) Physiological systems do not work in isolation
∙ They receive input from external world and other physiological systems making simple correlation tricky
✳︎ You need to know the underlying cause to understand the behaviour
The Comparative Approach - cross-species comparisons of biology & behaviour
Different species have the same basic structures (qualitative) ► But they vary in size (quantitative)
Why use non-human subjects?
1) Animal & human brains similar in structure & function
2) Simpler brains make brain-behaviour interactions easier to observe
3) Knowledge of animal behaviour can aid animal welfare
4) Studying similar species (e.g., chimps) helps to understand evolution
5) Fewer ethical & legal restrictions
- BUT
1) Animal research also subject to strict ethical legislation
2) Animal research cannot answer all questions about human behaviour
- (most) Humans are more complex!
Brain, Mind & Behaviour
- Most animal behaviours can be easily understood in terms of: genes, neural activity, hormones etc
- ‘Hardcore’ biological psychologists apply the same concept to humans
Deterministic
‘We can identify physical causes for ALL observed behaviours’
The extreme form of determinism is
Reductionism
‘All behaviours can be reduced to physical activity’
- Problems: What about complex human behaviour? e.g. consciousness, love, religious experience, morality…
The Mind/Body problem - 2 different schools of thought - 1) DUALISM
- e.g., René Descartes (1596 – 1650)
- ‘Mind (soul) & body are separate but communicate in the Pineal Gland’
- Dualism makes ‘intuitive sense’
∙ Many people consider their ‘mind’ separate to their ‘brain’
∙ Many believe that the soul will continue beyond existence of the body - BUT: How can ‘something’ with no physical properties, location or mass produce physical changes in the brain and then body
The Mind/Body problem - 2 different schools of thought - 2) MONISM
- Modern (Western) view of singularity of ‘Mind’ & ‘Body’
- Human thoughts, feelings, experiences, etc are simply the product of complex
neurological / neurochemical / neuroelectrical / neurohormonal activity - Many human behaviours can be explained by ‘Monism’
- BUT: Other, more complex behaviours cannot be explained in terms of simple physiological actions
✳︎ The Whole is greater than the sum of the parts (it cannot easily be reduced)
GENETICS AND BEHAVIOUR: Early thoughts of genetics
- Acquired characteristics can be inherited..BUT, how are they passed on? Darwin - Pangenesis: the body produces ‘Gemmules’ which travel to sex organs and pass on characteristics to the next generation
- BUT - Children are not an exact copy of their parents…some features are identifiable as coming from one parent and others appear to be blends of both parents
GENETICS AND BEHAVIOUR: The Daddy of Genetics: Gregor Mendel (1822 – 1884)
✳︎ Augustinian monk
✳︎ Series of experiments (1856-1863)
✳︎ But only really acknowledged in 1900s
GENETICS AND BEHAVIOUR: Dichotomous Traits
Traits that occur in one form or another NOT BOTH
GENETICS AND BEHAVIOUR: True-Breeding Lines
Pure Inter-breeding always produces same trait