Health Psychology Flashcards

30/9/19 (41 cards)

1
Q

People think about health in six different ways…

A
  1. Being free of illness symptoms (e.g., I have no lumps, or breaks, I’m not bleeding, coughing or wheezing, have no spots, rashes or blemishes, and therefore I’m healthy)
  2. Having physical reserves (e.g., if I get ill, and I might, I am strong enough to get well again)
  3. Leading a healthy lifestyle (e.g., equates health will health behaviours, like eating healthily, not drinking or smoking, and regularly exercising)
  4. Being physically fit (e.g., having a normal BMI, weight)
  5. Psychological well-being (e.g., more than being free from diagnosed mental health problems)
  6. Being able to function (e.g., being able to work, socialise, and to fulfil your obligations)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Health domain: BIOLOGICAL

A
  • Derived from biomedical model
  • Equates health with having a sound and disease free body, and attributes illness to dysregulation of bodily systems (e.g., infected cells, hormonal imbalances, broken bones)
  • We restore health by treating the ailing body
  • Views us like biological machines
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Health domain: PSYCHOLOGICAL

A
  • Equates health with a general sense of emotional well-being
  • Health thought of as being able to think clearly, problem solve, and to think positively, and maintain self-esteem
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Health domain: SOCIAL

A
  • Equates health with maintaining strong social networks and friendship groups, and having foo interpersonal skills
  • Health thought of in terms of being able to lead a social life, and contribute to society
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Integrated, Bio-Psycho-Social Model (BPSM)

A
  • Systems approach
  • Biological (virus, bacteria, lesions, hormones), Psychological (cognitions, emotions, stress, behaviours) & Social (friends, social class, social norms) systems interact to affect health
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

WHO (1948)

A

Rather utopian, assuming people can be in a state of ‘complete’ social, psychological and physical well-being, but good it acknowledges multiple systems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Wellness Continuum

A

Not strictly ‘healthy’ vs. ‘unhealthy’, but existing on a spectrum, in which health and illness can improve and worsen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

ILLNESS THROUGH THE AGES: Prehistoric period

A

Illness caused by evil spirits and treated by trephination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

ILLNESS THROUGH THE AGES: Ancient Egypt

A

Demons and punishment by the gods caused illness. Sorcery and primitive forms of surgery and hygiene were treatments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

ILLNESS THROUGH THE AGES: Ancient Greece

A

Illness caused by an imbalance of bodily humors; good diet and moderation in living world would cure it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

ILLNESS THROUGH THE AGES: Ancient China (1100-200 B.C.)

A

Unbalanced forces of nature caused illness. Treated with herbal medicine and acupuncture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ILLNESS THROUGH THE AGES: Ancient Rome (200 B.C.)

A

“Pathogens” such as bad air and body humors caused illness. Treated by bloodletting, enemas and baths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ILLNESS THROUGH THE AGES: Middle Ages (476-1450)

A

Disease was divine punishment for sins, cured by miraculous intervention, invoking of saints, as well as bloodletting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

ILLNESS THROUGH THE AGES: Renaissance

A

Disease was a physical condition of the body, which was separate from the mind. Surgical techniques first used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ILLNESS THROUGH THE AGES: 1800s

A

Disease caused by microscopic organisms. Treatment was surgery and immunisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

ILLNESS THROUGH THE AGES: 1920s

A

Disease influenced by mind and emotions and treated by psychoanalysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

ILLNESS THROUGH THE AGES: 21st C

A

Biopsychosocial causes of disease. Modern flexible methods of treatment

18
Q

Prehistoric (Paleolithic/Neolithic) Causes

A
  • Mystical/Supernatural/Magico-Religious causes of illness, as inferred from anthropological evidence
  • CAUSES:
    ∙ Bodily invasion by evil spirits
    ∙ Supernatural possession
    ∙ Sorcery
  • TREATMENTS:
    ∙ Trephination
    ∙ Geophagy
    ∙ Exorcism
19
Q

Ancient Greece

A
  • Science x Religion - illness still clearly has religious connotations = linked with Gods but also the first group to start emphasising the role of body in health and disease
  • Various Gods = in charge of different aspects of health e.g. Aesculapius (Greek God of healing and medicine)…..had 5 daughters, who represented different facets of medicine and health: Hygeia (hygiene), Panacea (universal remedy), Iaso (recuperation), Aceso (healing) and Aglaea (healthy glow)
  • His staff with twisted serpent = still symbol of modern medicine today. Snake symbolises shedding of skin = rejuvenation/healing
  • Hippocrates:
    ∙ Rejected ancient focus on mysticism & supernatural causes of disease
    ∙ First to identify the role of BODILY FUNCTION in disease
    ∙ HUMORAL THEORY (Hippocrates, and later developed by Galen)
    ∙ Illness: caused by an imbalance between bodily humours (i.e., fluids) - Blood, Black & Yellow Bile, & Phlegm
    ∙ First to emphasise the role of the body in illness
    ✳︎ Phlegm - cold, headaches - phlegmatic (detached) - hot baths, warm food
    ✳︎ Blood - angina, epilepsy - sanguine
    (impulsive) - blood letting
    ✳︎ Black bile - hepatitis, ulcers - melancholic
    (serious) - hot baths
    ✳︎ Yellow bile - stomach, jaundice - choleric
    (irritable) - blood letting, liquid diet
    = Greeks understood the way to restore health is to treat the ailing body
    = first to implicate dysregulated bodily systems in disease processes and first to acknowledge the interaction between mind and body (1st ‘systems approach’) = suggested that imbalance between humours not only affected health, but the temperament, or personality, of the individual
  • Hippocratic Corpus (collection of around 70 early medical works) → Hippocratic Oath
20
Q

Middle Ages (Medieval Period) - went backwards

A
  • Disease explained by quasi-religious, spiritual causes, like a punishment, by God, for misdeeds on earth
  • One of the precipitating factors was the Great Plague, or Black Death, now known to be a communicable pandemic caused by bacteria.
  • At the time, no explanation for this vast proliferation of illness and death, and must be punishment, by god, for wrongdoings on earth.
  • Treatment for illness lays with the church, who, because of their ability to drive out demons/spirits with exorcisms, and other things, like torture, could restore health.
  • These barbaric procedures were later replaced with penance through prayer.
  • Religious ideologies prevail during this time, and this is because the church, taking the view the soul still inhabited the body at the time of death, forbade the bodily dissection, or what we now know as autopsy.
21
Q

Renaissance (14-15th Century) - SCIENTIFIC ENQUIRY RE-EMERGES

A
  • Descartes: CARTESIAN DUALISM
  • Physicians: Guardians of body - amenable to scientific scrutiny
  • Theologians: Guardians of mind - not amenable to scientific scrutiny
  • Because of thinkers like Descartes (proposed that soul left body at time of death and that mind and body = separate entities = this is called mind/body dualism (mind = non-material (thoughts and feelings) and body = material (heart etc) = Church allowed scientific scrutiny of body
22
Q

Post Renaissance (14-15th Century) - SCIENTIFIC ENQUIRY GROWS

A
  • Change chronicled through Renaissance art - e.g Da Vinci: drawings exploring human anatomy such as Virtruvian Man
  • Moving away from mystico-religious views … Illness now thought of in biological terms
  • Anton Leeuwenhoek: Developed first microscope (microscopy) - For the first time, see disease located in faulty cells
23
Q

19TH Century: Foundations of Modern Medicine

A
  • Wilhelm Roentgen: X-rays - Physicians now able to see bodily organs - normal vs. dysregulated
  • Rudolf Virchow: Cellular theory - Disease caused by damaged cells, not bodily humours
  • Edward Jenner: Small pox vaccination - godfather of immunology - innoculated with cowpox, non fatal disease that is a much milder form of smallpox, means being immune to smallpox, a disease that was the major killer of the time
  • Louis Pasteur: Germ theory - bacteria & viruses colonise cells, making them malfunction, thus illness - micro-organisms cause malaria, pneumonia, leprosy, diphtheria, typhoid - development of biological treatments (e.g., penicillin)
24
Q

20TH Century: Biomedical Model

A
  • Separation of mind & body - dominated medicine for 300+ years
  • CAUSE:
    ∙ Disease has a biological origin, e.g., infected cells/hormonal imbalance etc
    ∙ Views people as biological machines
    ∙ Health restored by ‘fixing’ the biological machine
  • LIMITATION:
    ∙ Reductionist: Illness reduced to dysregulated biological processes - ignores the contribution of psychosocial factors
    ∙ Ignores psycho-social contributions
  • Illness can be explained by dysregulation of biological/physical processes, and we must treat the biological machine to restore to health. That is not to say however, we always did so humanely, and until 1967, barbaric procedures, like transorbital lobotomies, were still being used as treatment.
  • 19th C: diseases = single cause - diseases characterised by infection (communicable) - FIX THE BODY: Decline in infectious pathologies/death rates decreased owed to advances in biological treatments?
    ✳︎ Discovery of penicillin
    ✳︎ Vaccination
    ✳︎ Improved hygiene
    ✳︎ Improved nutrition
    ✳︎ Improved public health
  • 20th C: non-communicable diseases where risk factors are not only biological, but emotional (i.e., stress) and behavioural (i.e., smoking, alcohol, lack of exercise) - emphasis here more on multiple, interacting bio-psycho-social contributors to disease
25
NOW: 21st Century - Bio-Psycho-Social Model
- systems approach - BIOLOGICAL, PSYCHOLOGICAL & SOCIAL SYSTEMS INTERACT TO AFFECT HEALTH - Not reductionist, but explains health in terms of the interaction between multiple systems, bio, psycho, social (systems approach)
26
PATIENT-PRACTITIONER RELATIONSHIP: Who uses the health service and why
- Use of health care service, be it GP or hospital, predicted by age of the patient. Positive relationship between age and use of the health service – in other words, as age increases, as does use of the health care service. - Notice however comparable level of use between those in first few years of life, 0-5 years, and those aged 40-45 years, and then how use markedly increases - Young children (0-5yrs): developing immune systems, prone to infections, require more check ups and vaccinations - Older adults (45yrs+): falling immune systems, prone to infections, age-related diseases - Gender related differences in use of the health care service, with females using it more frequently, and this effect seems to be largely accounted for by differential use between late teens and 40’s. Explicable for any number of reasons, including: ∙ Women: pregnancy & childbirth, more in tune with bodily symptoms (better homeostatic mechanisms) ∙ Men: more likely to ignore symptoms, perceived invincibility (especially when young) = women more sensible than men, whereas men = less in tune with their bodily symptoms, they're also stubborn and dumb = tend not to seek medical attention when it is actually needed and this could be attributed to this macho, ego driven sense of self they have
27
Factors affecting illness reporting/noticing
- Attention: ✳︎ INTERNAL FOCUS (IF): -People who are socially isolated/bored -Socially isolating jobs -More likely to notice illness, and to report it -Sensitizers, those who, when then they realise they are ill, seek out information about the illness, and report side effects ✳︎ EXTERNAL FOCUS (EF): -People with active lives (e.g., friends, work) -Focus on the environment -Less likely to notice illness, and to report it -Repressors, those who ignore symptoms and health related information, and blunt their reactions to illness - Mood: positive mood tends to be associated with fewer illness manifestations, or reports of illness
28
Mis(use) of the health service
Most people use the health service normally, but for those who don’t can, broadly speaking, be divided into TWO CATEGORIES: Delayers and Overusers
29
Delay behaviour
- Appraisal delay: time for an individual to decide they are ill - Illness delay: time between recognising symptoms as illness and deciding to seek treatment - Utilisation delay: time between deciding to seek medical advice and actually doing it - Scheduling delay: time between making appointment and receiving treatment - Appointment delay: time between turning up for appointment and being seen by practitioner
30
Overuse of HCS
1. MALINGERING: Making believe one is ill for secondary gains (rewards), including: -EMOTIONAL GAINS: Increased attention (Munchausen's Syndrome/MSBP) -PRACTICAL GAINS: --Access to controlled medication --Free from responsibility (sick note) --Financial gains (disability benefit, sick leave) 2. EMOTIONAL PROBLEMS: Stress causes changes in biological systems such as increased heart rate, which is often mistaken for illness ✳︎ Physicians estimate that 2/3 of their time taken up by people with insignificant medical problems or emotional disturbances (Miranda et al., 1991)
31
Beyond lay consultations: what factors encourage us to visit a practitioner?
- PERSISTENCE OF SYMPTOMS: If symptoms last longer than expected, e.g., a cough that lasts longer than it should - CRITICAL INCIDENT: A sudden change in symptoms/signs e.g., sudden pain, noticing a lump - TREATMENT EXPECTATIONS: We decide that GP can make a difference, e.g., prescribe medication not available over the counter, like antibiotics
32
Type of consultation: Dr centred vs Patient centred
- Dr centred: dominant, asks closed/direct questions, concerned only with medical facts, Dr makes decisions, Instructs patient on what to do, patient is passive, asks few questions and takes Dr advice - Patient centred: makes observations, seeks patient's ideas and actively listens, involves patient, joint decision making based on Dr's advice and patient views, patient is active and encouraged to ask questions
33
Which style of consultation would you prefer?
= it seems to depend on the illness - Beaver et al (1996): Breast Cancer Patients: -Benign Tumour - Most preferred collaborative, decision making (patient centred) -Malignant Tumour - Most wanted GP to make the decision (doctor centred) = WHY? - -Doctor Knows Best: Maximise chance of correct decision by leaving to expert -Avoid Responsibility: Less guilt if wrong decision is made
34
Confidence in the GP and Consultation Success: The Role of Nonverbal Factors
``` - McInstry et al, 1991 ► Showed participants images of the same doctor, in this case a male doctor, dressed in various ways, and asked how much confidence they'd have in this person, and to what extent they’d think, if they got this doctor, the consultation would be a success = Traditionally dressed doctors were rated most highly, especially by older & professional-class patients = A male Dr SHOULD WEAR: ∙ White coat: 15% ∙ Suit: 44% ∙ Tie: 67% = A male Dr SHOULD NOT: ∙ Wear Jeans: 59% ∙ Have an earring: 55% ∙ Have long hair: 46% = Results indicated that patients rated formally dressed doctors, such as those in suits and ties, most highly, and were less likely to have confidence in doctors that wore white coats. Over half of those surveyed indicated that doctors should not wear jeans or have long hair. ```
35
Confidence in the GP and Consultation Success: The Role of Nonverbal Factors; Things have changed? - Rehman et al (2005)
- 77% of patients, when presented with a GP wearing a white coat, formal dress (suit and tie), surgical scrubs and casual dress (jeans and shirt), preferred the GP wearing the white coat. Trust and confidence were also greater for GPs wearing white coats, and patients reported being more likely to divulge sensitive information to GPs wearing white coats
36
Confidence in the GP and Consultation Success: The Role of Other Nonverbal Factors
✳︎ Other non-verbal behaviours: →Eye contact →Age →Tone of voice →Gender →Situational factors, like items in the surgery ✳︎ Argyle (1975): ∙ 4x as powerful/effective as verbal communication ∙ Different types of non-verbal behaviours INTERACT to affect perceived consultation success
37
Making a Diagnosis: Factors that affect making successful diagnosis
►PRIMACY EFFECT: - Extra importance given to the first bit of information heard by the physician, e.g., ‘high blood glucose’ - HCP can ignore/distort the interpretation of later information to fit with immediate diagnosis ►PATIENT KNOWLEDGE: - Frequency of GP visits ........... KNOWN MALINGERER? ►SELF-REPORT: - In the absence of obvious symptoms, Dr must rely on what patient says… - Can patients always articulate the problem? - Is what the patient says reliable (do we always disclose everything)?
38
Advantages of computers: people may not seek medical help due to embarrassing symptoms
►Robinson & West (1992): - Assessed patients visiting urino-genital clinic - Self-disclosure of ‘sensitive data’ to doctor or to a computer = Found that patients were more likely to disclose sensitive information online than in the doctors office. More likely to disclose information online due to the anonymity of the computer and impersonal nature. Less worried about being socially scrutinised. = Information provided in the doctors office not always reliable.
39
Medical non-adherence - problem?
►Donovan & Blake (1992): - Rates of patient non-adherence range between… 15-93% - Adherence tends to be higher among individuals experiencing more severe illness symptoms - NOT ALWAYS...Terminal cases?
40
Non-adherence: If we take one of the more common medical directives, of taking tablets/pills, non-adherence can manifests in a number of ways
- Taking sporadically (e. g., meant to be daily, but taking every other day, every two days) - Skipping doses (e.g., meant to take two, twice a day, but only taking one) - Purposely altering the plan (e.g., to fit with lifestyle) - Alternating between periods of adherence and non-adherence (is it still there?) - In the case of multiple medications, skipping one and not the other - Not adhering to food/drink/rest recommendations
41
Can we measure non-adherence?
1. Self-report: Ask the patient 2. Therapeutic outcome: Is the patient getting better? 3. Health worker estimates: Ask the HCP 4. Pill count: Have the correct number of pills been used? 5. Electronic methods: Data recorders in pill bottles 6. Biochemical tests: Blood & urine tests ►Problems: 1. Would you admit non-adherence? 2. Even non-adherers get better 3. Dr’s incorrectly predicted adherence 41% of the time (Paterson et al., 2000) 4. Just because pill is gone doesn’t mean it was consumed 5. Expensive & should be reliable, BUT patient can remove pill & not consume 6. Time consuming/expensive and lots of confounds