Booklet 2- Relationships and connections Flashcards
(24 cards)
what is meant by continuity and change?
- places = constantly changing
- past places more shaped by endogenous factors (socio economic , demographics, physical factors etc)
- now exogenous factors (people, money, ideas etc) have increased due to flows and globalisation
- some places change more than others, evidence of continuity (characteristics stay same) in Reigate (e.g. town hall, market place, economic function etc)
- changes often caused by actors/factors —> Reigate change e.g. types of businesses changed, flow of traffic
factors vs actors - what is a factor (examples)?
e.g. war, natural disaster, events , characteristics of places which influence change or continuity, political change, migration, gentrification, urbanisation, conflict/terrorism, major sporting events, globalisation
factors vs actors what is a actor (examples)?
government, TNCs, IGOs, NGOs, developers, protestors, community, religious groups, residents etc
factors vs actors what they can do?
- can destroy or built buildings, increase investment, destroy memory, lossof jobs, change demographic, culture, wealth, transport/infrastructure, economic characteristics, culture beliefs, traditions, reduce poverty, stability, regeneration schemes, tariffs etc
factors vs actors examples?
- wildfires affecting Paradise, California —> displacement, long term trauma, community lost, jobs etc lost, health issues from smoke, ppl that returned= community bonds, infrastructure etc destroyed and upgraded after, vegetation managements now
- New York 911
- Stratford, East London 2012 Olympic games
- COVID
How external forces cause change and shape places?
Government policies (only one RGS focuses on in course)
- e.g. regeneration schemes , financial incentives for industries (subsidies, tax breaks, enterprise zones —> attract businesses, positive multiplier effect, reverse deindustrialisation etc
- govts can directly affect demographic characteristics of places e.g. china one child policy to control population
- govts affect cultural characteristics e.g. controlling immigration
—> Germany 1960s invited Turkish ppl to Germany = aspects Turkish culture such as fast food and language now part of Germany
what is your case study for external forces (government policies)?
Medellin Colombia
Shifting flows affecting economic change- flows of money and investment?
- positive or negative effect
—> reduced investment and comp from global markets = loss in primary industries = deindustrialisation
e.g. South wales thousands jobs lost when coal mines closed 1950s
—> more investment = positive e.g. London finance industries = high value service sector jobs = wealth
Shifting flows affecting economic change- flows of resources?
- outward flow of local products /natural resources= impact local economies -> products consumed locally now sold to international exports = brings employment money e.g. Scotland (Scottish Whisky industry has grown)
Shifting flows affecting economic change- flows of people?
ppl visiting changes characteristics
e.g. St Ives Cornwall used to be fishing settlement and is now a tourist destination = changes job types available
—> now more service based
Shifting flows affecting economic change- Reigate?
more migration = up house demand and prices, easier access to global products (online shopping etc) BUT small businesses can’t compete with chain stores
Investment = attracts wealthy
faster internet and global connectivity = remote work
Shifting flows affecting place demographics - flows of ideas and resources?
e.g. use of birth control = reduce birth rate = down population
—> LICs less likely to have birth control so fast population growth
United Nationa population fund —> spreads knowledge and ideas on birth control and supplies condoms etc to aid birth control
Shifting flows affecting place demographics - flows of money and investment?
govts and businesses
e.g. invest money in specific places to attract ppl to live there (London Docklands Development etc) = improved economy and built environment = increase population in area
Shifting flows affecting place demographics - flows of people?
can change age, gender balance etc
e.g. Local ppl leaving /moving away (younger) as can’t afford house in areas = leaves old ppl
e.g. International scale- migration Africa to Europe alters gender balance (now more males)
Shifting flows affecting place demographics - Reigate?
young commuters, urban spread change (more ethnic diversity) etc
Shifting flows affecting cultural characteristics - flows of money and investment?
- new cultural ideas e.g. fast food companies USA (Mcdonald’s) = opened restaurants in China 1980s =33 mins changed eating habits
Shifting flows affecting cultural characteristics- flows of people
new ppl moving to place/visiting it bringing their culture can change place
—> UK 20th century = mass international migration =multi ethnic communities and more language spoken , food, traditions, religions etc
Shifting flows affecting cultural characteristics- Reigate?
new traditions, festivals etc , media and info flows influenced music, fashion etc, more chain stores etc
shifting flows cause social inequality - flows of people ?
regional migration (rural—> urban) in poor countries = change social characteristics
—> large scale rural-urban in India= slums developing (Mumbai)= low quality of life compared to wealthy residents= widening the gap
shifting flows cause social inequality- flows of resources ?
outward flow natural resources from poor countries can change inequality —> e.g. Nigeria oil extractor exported around world BUT most wealth generated given to few individuals with high quality of life while many remain in poverty
shifting flows cause social inequality- flows of money and investment?
- gentrification improves social characteristics BUT also increases inequalities
—> Notting hill was one of most deprived areas now less deprivation BUT now social inequality between newcomers and existing poor residents
shifting flows cause social inequality- Reigate?
- wealthier ppl entering = old residents struggle , new businesses target wealthy as goods etc more expensive = ignores poorer. Companies and shops cater to higher end tastes = less choice and essentials are more expensive
examples of gentrification?
(where wealthier ppl move into an area displacing low-income existing residents)
- Brixton
- Elephant and Castle
(Heygate estate)- social houses replaced with private etc
- Silicon Roundabout, Shoreditch
past and present connections/developments can shape places
e.g. connected through transport etc
- industrial revolution = large cities connected = migration (rural—> urban for work etc )
- deindustrialisation = closed factories etc, more labour moved abroad = some places shut etc
= social and economic decline
- UK now finance industry etc
—> study example = liverpool