C/P cont Flashcards
4th amendment
unreasonable search and seizure
5th amendment
privilege against compulsory self-incrimination
privilege against compulsory self-incrimination
6th amendment
speedy trial
public trial
trial by jury
confront witnesses
compulsory process for obtaining witnesses
assistance of counsel
8th amendment
prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment
prohibition against excessive fines
The right to indictment by a grand jury for capital and infamous
crimes has been held
not to be binding on the states.
The Fourth Amendment provides that people should be free from
unreasonable searches and seizures. _____by a
government agent over a person or thing is a seizure.
Governmental
seizures of persons, including arrests, are seizures within the scope of the Fourth Amendment and so must be reasonable.
Any exercise of control
A seizure occurs when
under the totality of the circumstances, a
reasonable person would feel that they were not free to decline the
officer’s requests or otherwise terminate the encounter
An arrest occurs when
the police take a person into custody against
their will for purposes of criminal prosecution or interrogation
An arrest must be based on probable cause—that is,
trustworthy
facts or knowledge sufficient for a reasonable person to believe that
the suspect has committed or is committing a crime for which arrest
is authorized by law. Probable cause is based on the totality of the
circumstances.
A warrant generally is not required before arresting a person in
a public place. However, police generally ___
must have a warrant to
effect a nonemergency arrest of a person in their home. The officers
executing the warrant may enter the suspect’s home only if there is
reason to believe the suspect is within it
Police must _____to bring a suspect to
the station for questioning or fingerprinting against the person’s will.
have full probable cause for arrest
An _____, by itself, has no impact on any subsequent
criminal prosecution.
unlawful arrest
The police have the authority to briefly detain a person even if they lack probable cause to arrest. If the police have a ______ of criminal activity or involvement in a completed crime,
supported by _____(that is, not merely a hunch), they may
detain a person for investigative purposes. If the police also have
reasonable suspicion that the detainee is_____,
they may frisk the detainee for weapons.
reasonable suspicion
articulable facts
armed and dangerous
Reasonable suspicion is
more than just vague suspicion but is less
than probable cause.
Whether the police have reasonable suspicion
depends on
the totality of the circumstances.
When reasonable suspicion is based on an informant’s tip, there must
be
an indicia of reliability (including predictive information) to be
sufficient.
Investigatory stops are not subject to a specific time limit. The police
must act in a
diligent and reasonable manner in confirming or
dispelling their suspicions. The police may ask the detained person
to identify themself (that is, state their name) and generally may arrest
the detainee for failure to comply with such a request. The detention
will also turn into an arrest if during the detention other probable
cause for arrest arises.
Brief property seizures are similarly valid if based on
reasonable
suspicion.
Generally, police officers may stop a car if they have
at least reasonable suspicion to believe that a law has been violated.
During routine traffic stops,_______, so long
as the police do not extend the stop beyond the time needed to
issue a ticket or conduct normal inquiries.
Moreover, in 2013 the
Supreme Court held that during such a traffic stop, a dog “alert” to the presence of drugs can form the basis for probable cause for a search.
**But note: In 2013, the Supreme Court also held that the police
(without probable cause) cannot use a drug sniffing dog outside of
the home of a suspected drug dealer.
a dog sniff is not a search
A police officer’s mistake of law (for example, mistakenly believing that a vehicle must have two working brake lights) does not invalidate
a seizure as long as the mistake was
reasonable.
An automobile stop constitutes a seizure not only of the automobile’s
driver, but also of any passengers as well. Thus,
passengers have
standing to raise a wrongful stop as a reason to exclude evidence
found during the stop
If the police set up a roadblock for purposes other than seeking
incriminating information about the drivers stopped, the roadblock
will be constitutional. If special law enforcement needs are involved,
the Supreme Court allows police officers to set up roadblocks to stop
cars without individualized suspicion that the driver violated some
law. To be valid, the roadblock must
- Stop cars on the basis of some neutral, articulable standard (for
example, every car) and - Be designed to serve purposes closely related to a particular
problem pertaining to automobiles and their mobility
After lawfully stopping a vehicle, in the interest of officer safety, the
officer may
order the occupants of the vehicle to get out.
Moreover,
if the officer reasonably believes the detainees are armed, the officer
may frisk the occupants and search the passenger compartment for
weapons, even after the officer has ordered the occupants out