K Flashcards

1
Q

1st question you ask when confronted with contract question

A

what law applies

1) common law
2) sale of goods (UCC)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

second question you ask when confronted w K question

A

was a contract formed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Contract needs:

A

mutual assent (offer +acceptance)

+ consideration
(- absence of defenses)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

types of contract

A

express: formed by words
implied: formed by conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

quasi contract remedy

A

restitution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A bilateral contract is one consisting of the exchange of mutual
promises; that is,

A

a promise for a promise. Each party is both a
promisor and a promisee.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A bilateral contract offer can be accepted
in

A

any reasonable way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A unilateral contract is one in which the offeror requests

A

performance
rather than a promise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A unilateral contract, which
requires full performance, occurs in only two situations:

A

(1) when the
offeror clearly (unambiguously) indicates that completion of performance is the only manner of acceptance; and (2) where there is an
offer to the public, such as a reward offer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

“Goods” are

A

all things movable at the time they are identified as the
items to be sold under the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Article 2 generally defines “merchant” as

A

one who regularly deals in goods of the kind sold or who otherwise
by their profession holds themselves out as having special knowledge or skills as to the practices or goods involved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A void contract is

A

one that is totally without any legal effect from the
beginning (for example, an agreement to commit a crime). It cannot
be enforced by either party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A voidable contract is one that

A

one or both parties may elect to
avoid, such as by raising a defense that makes it voidable, like
infancy or mental illness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

An unenforceable contract is

A

otherwise valid but isn’t enforceable
due to a defense, such as the statute of limitations or Statute of
Frauds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

For a communication to
be an offer, it must

A

create a reasonable expectation in the offeree
that the offeror is willing to enter into a contract on the basis of the
offered terms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In deciding whether a communication creates this
reasonable expectation, ask:

A

Was there an expression of a promise, undertaking, or commitment to enter into a contract?

Were there certainty and definiteness in the essential terms?

Was there communication of the above to the offeree?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Advertisements, catalogs, circular letters, and the like containing
price quotations are usually construed as

A

mere invitations for
offers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

An offer must be definite and certain in its terms. The basic inquiry is
whether

A

enough of the essential terms have been provided so that a
contract including them is capable of being enforced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

offers usually must include

A

offerees name, offers subj matter, price

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

land sale offers must include

A

1) price
2) description of land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

sale of goods offer must include:

A

quantity term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

requirements contract

A

Buyer promises to buy from seller all good buyer requires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

output contract

A

seller promises to sell to buyer all goods seller produces

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

employment contract; if the duration of the employment is not specified, the offer, if accepted, is

A

construed as
creating a contract terminable at the will of either party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
1) lapse of time
offer terminated if not accepted within reasonable time
26
2) rejection
offer terminates when the offeree rejects it
27
counter offer = mere bargaining = conditional acceptance=
rejection doesnt equal rejection rejection+ new offer
28
revocation
offeror's retraction of offer
29
offer revoked indirectly if
1) offeree receives correct info 2) from reliable source 3) of offeror's acts indicating revocation
30
revocations effective upon
receipt
31
option contract
offeree gives consideration for offeror to not revoke offer for period of time
32
merchants firm offer rule
merchant promises in signed writing to keep offer open for time stated or reasonable time ***enforceable for up to 3 months
33
detrimental reliance; When the offeror could reasonably expect that the offeree would rely to their detriment on the offer, and the offeree does so rely, the offer will be held
irrevocable as an option contract for a reasonable length of time.
34
start performance of unilateral contract offer=
irrevocable offer
35
mere preparation to perform does not equal
start of performance
36
The following events will terminate an offer by operation of law:
a. Death or insanity of either party (unless the offer is of a kind the offeror could not terminate, such as, an option supported by consideration). Death or insanity need not be communicated to the other party b. Destruction of the proposed contract’s subject matter OR c. Supervening illegality
37
A unilateral contract is not accepted until
performance is completed
38
improper shipment =
acceptance and breach
39
The shipment of nonconforming goods is an acceptance creating a bilateral contract as well as a breach of the contract unless
the seller seasonably notifies the buyer that a shipment of nonconforming goods is offered only as an accommodation
40
The buyer is not required to accept accommodation goods and may reject them. If the buyer rejects,
the shipper isn’t in breach and may reclaim the accommodation goods, because the tender does not constitute an acceptance of the buyer’s original offer.
41
Unless the offer provides otherwise, acceptance of an offer to enter into a bilateral contract must be
communicated to the offeror
42
silence
does not equal acceptance
43
acceptance must ____ offer terms at common law
mirror
44
article 2: offerees additional term not part of K UNLESS
1) both are merchants 2) its not material and 3) offeror doesnt object
45
no mirror image rule under
article 2
46
material change?
causes hardship or surprise
47
If both parties to the contract are merchants, additional terms in the acceptance will be included in the contract unless:
1) materially alter the original terms of the offer, 2) expressly limits acceptance to the terms of the offer OR 3) offeror has already objected to the particular terms, or objects within a reasonable time after notice of them is received
48
mailbox rule
acceptance is effective when sent
48
industry custom is
not a material change
49
mailbox rule applies unless
1) offer states otherwise 2) offer is irrevocable 3) rejection sent before acceptance
50
forbearance can constitute ___
consideration
51
A promise given in exchange for something already done
does not satisfy the bargain requirement
52
In general, courts ____ inquire into the adequacy or fairness of consideration
do not
53
if something is entirely devoid of value (token consideration),
it is insufficient.
54
preexisting legal duty rule
Traditionally, performing or promising to perform an existing legal duty is insufficient consideration.
55
The preexisting legal duty rule is riddled with exceptions. There is consideration if:
a) New or different consideration is promised; b) The promise is to ratify a voidable obligation (for example, a promise to ratify a minor’s contract after reaching majority or a promise to go through with a contract despite the other party’s fraud); c) The preexisting duty is owed to a third person rather than to the promisor; d) There is an honest dispute as to the duty; OR e) There are unforeseen circumstances sufficient to discharge a party (such as impracticability), or under the modern view, if the modification is fair and equitable in view of circumstances not anticipated when the contract was made.
56
a good faith agreement modifying a contract subject to the UCC needs____ to be binding.
no consideration
57
A debt can be discharged through an accord and satisfaction. In general, an accord must be supported by
consideration
58
Consideration is not necessary if the facts indicate that the promisor should be estopped from not performing. A promise is enforceable if necessary to prevent injustice if:
a. The promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance, and b. Such action or forbearance is in fact induced.
59
defendants w/o capacity can _____
disaffirm K
60
retaining benefits after gaining capacity =
implied affirmation
61
“Necessaries” are items necessary for subsistence, health, or education (including food, shelter, clothing, and medical care). A minor may disaffirm a contract for necessaries but will be liable in _______ for the value of benefits received.
restitution
62
Contracts induced by ________are voidable and may be rescinded as long as they are not affirmed.
duress or undue influence
63
If the contract includes a term with at least two possible meanings, the result depends on the parties’ awareness of the ambiguity: a. Neither party aware
no contract unless both parties intended the same meaning;
64
If the contract includes a term with at least two possible meanings, the result depends on the parties’ awareness of the ambiguity: b. Both parties aware
no contract unless both parties intended the same meaning;
65
If the contract includes a term with at least two possible meanings, the result depends on the parties’ awareness of the ambiguity: c. One party aware
binding contract based on what the ignorant party reasonably believed to be the meaning of ambiguous words.
66
If both parties entering into a contract are mistaken about existing facts (not future happenings) relating to the agreement, the contract may be voidable by the adversely affected party if: (i) The mistake concerns a basic assumption on which the contract is made (for example, the parties think they are contracting for the sale of a diamond but in reality the stone is a cubic zirconia);
(i) The mistake concerns a basic assumption on which the contract is made (for example, the parties think they are contracting for the sale of a diamond but in reality the stone is a cubic zirconia); (ii) The mistake has a material effect on the agreed-upon exchange (for example, the cubic zirconia is worth only a hundredth of what a diamond is worth); AND (iii) The party seeking avoidance did not assume the risk of the mistake
67
If only one of the parties is mistaken about facts relating to the agreement, the mistake will not prevent formation of a contract. But, if the nonmistaken party knew or had reason to know of the mistake made by the other party, the contract is
voidable by the mistaken party. As with mutual mistake, the mistake must have a material effect on the agreed-upon exchange, and the mistaken party must not have borne the risk of the mistake.
68
The concept of ______allows a court to modify or refuse to enforce an entire contract or a provision in it to avoid “unfair” terms, usually due to some unfairness in the bargaining process (that is, procedural unconscionability). Unfair price alone is not a ground for _____
unconscionability
69
unconscionability test
unfair surprise and oppressive terms **tested when K formed
70
statute of frauds
when is writing reqd when is oral k not enough
71
statute of frauds categories
Marriage Year Land Sales Executors Goods for $500 Sureties (my legs)
72
marriage
k where marriage is consideration doesnt include promise to marry
73
K's impossible to complete in _____ subj to state of frauds
1 year **time of actual performance doesnt matter
74
A promise creating an interest in land must be evidenced by a writing. This includes not only agreements for the sale of real property, but also:
* Leases for more than one year * Easements of more than one year * Mortgages and most other security liens * Fixtures * Minerals (or the like) or structures if they are to be severed by the buyer
75
A promise by an executor or administrator to pay the estate’s debts out of _____ must be evidenced by a writing.
their own funds
76
A promise to answer for the debt or default of another must be evidenced by a writing. The promise may arise as a result of a tort or contract, but it must be collateral to another person’s promise to pay, and not a primary promise to pay. However, if the main purpose or leading object of the promisor is to serve a pecuniary interest of his own, the contract is
not within the Statute of Frauds even though the effect is still to pay the debt of another (for example, homeowner promises to pay contractor’s debt to building supplier if contractor does not pay, so contractor can obtain supplies to work on homeowner’s house).
77
modifications must be in writing only if
modified k within Statute
78
clauses prohibiting oral modification
unenforceable in common k's enforceable in art 2 k's
79
land sale exceptions
lease of less than or equal to 1 year part performance of real estate Ks -payment, possession, improvement -need 2 of 3
80
exception for service ks
full performance K satsifies statute of frauds **no part performance exception for service ks
81
sale of goods exception
goods accepted goods paid for substantial beginning on custom goods
82
judicial admissions exception
agreement admitted to under oath enforceable w/o writing
83
merchants confirmatory memo
merchants agree to K one party sends signed writing containing quantity terms no objection by recipient w/in 10 days
84
K for sale of goods $500+ must have
quantity term D's signature
85
k for services must include
all material terms D's signature
86
When the parties to a contract express their agreement in a writing with the intent that it embody the final expression of their bargain, the writing is an ________ ” Any other expressions—written or oral—made prior to the writing, as well as any oral expressions contemporaneous with the writing, are inadmissible to vary the terms of the writing.
the writing is an “integration.”
87
Is the Writing an “Integration”? There are two components:
(1) whether the writing was intended as the final expression of the agreement; and (2) whether the integration was intended to be complete or partial. Evidence is admissible to show the parties’ intent
88
exceptions to Parol Evidence Rule
partially integrated writing defense against formation explain vague term correct clerical error
89
course of perfromance
parties conduct under prior installments of current contract
90
course of dealing
parties conduct in prior contracts
91
trade usage
industry norms parties are aware of
92
any description of the goods, and any sample or model creates an _______if the statement, description, sample, or model is part of the basis of the bargain.
express warranty
93
implied warranty of merchantability
goods fit for ordinary forseeable purpose
94
implied warranty of fitness for particular purpose
buyer comes in w special purpose seller knows of special purpose sellers picks out goods fit for buyers special purpose
95
as is or with all faults serve to
disclaim all implied warranties
96
Parties may include in their contract a clause limiting the damages available in the case of breach of warranty (for example, “remedy for breach of warranty is limited to repair or replacement of the defective goods”). However, such a limitation won’t be upheld if it’s ______
unconscionable
97
If the buyer has a right to reject the goods, the risk of loss doesn’t pass to the buyer until
the defects are cured or the buyer accepts the goods in spite of their defect
98
All contracts for the sale of goods require delivery of the goods. A contract’s delivery terms are important because they determine
when risk of loss passes from the seller to the buyer if the goods are damaged or destroyed
99
(common carrier) risk of loss shifts from seller to buyer when _____
seller completes its delivery obligations
100
shipment contract. (assume this)
seller delivers goods to common carrier arranges for delivery and notifies buyer risk of loss passes to buyer on delivery to carrier
101
destination k
seller must deliver goods to buyers location
102
common law k
substantial performance is enough, meets k's essential purpose
103
Article 2 generally requires____—the delivery and condition of the goods must be exactly as promised in the contract.
a perfect tender
104
installment ks
req delievry of goods in sep installments over specified period
105
The buyer has a right to inspect the goods before they pay unless
the contract provides for payment C.O.D. or otherwise indicates that the buyer has promised to pay without inspecting the goods.
106
A contract may provide that a party does not have a duty to perform unless some condition is fulfilled. In that case, the party’s failure to perform is justified if
the condition was not fulfilled.
107
express conditions must be
perfectly satisfied
108
f the contract involves personal taste or personal judgment (for example, portraits, dental work), a condition of satisfaction is fulfilled only if the promisor is personally satisfied. But note:
Even if a condition requires personal satisfaction, a promisor’s lack of satisfaction must be honest and in good faith.
109
A condition precedent is one that must occur____ an absolute duty of immediate performance arises in the other party.
before
110
conditions subsequent
events after performance that could terminate duty to pay
111
if a party having a duty of performance that is subject to a condition (that is, the party protected by the condition) prevents the condition from occurring, the condition will be excused if
the prevention is wrongful (meaning, the other party would not have reasonably contemplated or assumed the risk of this type of conduct).
112
waiver of condition
voluntary giving up of conditions protection
113
anticipatory repudiation
early statement of non performance
114
repudiations can be ____ if not relied on
retracted
115
failure to give adequate assurances
party may ask for assurance other party will perform if assurance not received= anticipatory repudiation
116
cannot use adequate assurance provision to rewrite K or demand certain assurance only entitled to
adequate assurance
117
rescission
partys mutual agreement to cancel k each party must have some performance remaining for effective recession
118
modification
replace existing k terms w new terms immediately tip: debt excused immediately
119
accord and satisfaction
agreement to accept different performance to satisfy existing duty tip: debt excused later
120
novation
agreement to substitute new party for existing party
121
delegation
one party finds replacement party to perform original partys obligations not excused
122
impossibility/ impracticability
later unforeseen event makes partys performance impossible
123
death or incapacity of essential person to K ___
excuses performance
124
if performance made illegal by subsequent govt regulation ____
performance excused
125
destruction of K's subj matter
excuses performance
126
frustration of purpose
both parties understood the central purpose performance excused if k;s essential purpose undermined
127
A novation will serve to discharge the old contract. The elements for a valid novation are:
(1) a previous valid contract; (2) an agreement among all parties, including the new party (or parties) to the new contract; (3) the immediate extinguishment of contractual duties as between the original contracting parties; and (4) a valid and enforceable new contract
128
when does a breach occur
If it is found that (1) the promisor is under an absolute duty to perform, and (2) this absolute duty of performance has not been discharged, then this failure to perform in accordance with contractual terms will amount to a breach of the contract.
129
If the obligee does not receive the substantial benefit of their bargain, the breach is considered material. If the breach is material, the nonbreaching party
(1) may treat the contract as at an end; that is, any duty of counterperformance owed by them will be discharged, and (2) will have an immediate right to all remedies for breach of the entire contract, including total damages
130
In determining whether a breach is material or minor, courts look at:
a. The amount of benefit received by the nonbreaching party b. The adequacy of compensation for damages to the injured party c. The extent of part performance by the breaching party d. Hardship to the breaching party e. Negligent or willful behavior of the breaching party AND f. The likelihood that the breaching party will perform the remainder of the contract
131
If a minor breach is coupled with an anticipatory repudiation (see 6.4.6), the nonbreaching party may treat it as a material breach; that is, they may
sue immediately for total damages and are permanently discharged from any duty of further performance. The UCC modifies this to permit a party to complete the manufacture of goods to avoid having to sell unfinished goods at the lower salvage value.
132
Failure to perform by the time stated in the contract is generally not a material breach if performance is rendered within a reasonable time. However, if the nature of the contract makes timely performance essential, or if the contract expressly provides that time is of the essence, then failure to perform on time is
usually a material breach.
133
Article 2 generally doesn’t follow the common law substantial performance doctrine. Instead, it follows the perfect tender rule—if goods or their delivery fail to conform to the contract in any way, the buyer generally may
reject all, accept all, or accept any commercial units and reject the rest.
134
A buyer’s right to reject under the perfect tender doctrine generally is cut off by acceptance. Under Article 2, a buyer accepts when:
After a reasonable opportunity to inspect the goods, they indicate to the seller that the goods conform to requirements or that they will keep the goods even though they fail to conform; They fail to reject within a reasonable time after tender or delivery of the goods or fail to seasonably notify the seller of their rejection; OR They do any act inconsistent with the seller’s ownership.
135
The buyer may revoke their acceptance if the goods have a defect that substantially impairs their value to the buyer and:
They accepted the goods on the reasonable belief that the defect would be cured and it has not been OR They accepted the goods because of the difficulty of discovering the defects or because of the seller’s assurance that the goods conformed to the contract.
136
Revocation of acceptance must occur:
(1) within a reasonable time after the buyer discovers or should have discovered the defects; and (2) before any substantial change in the goods occurs that is not caused by a defect present at the time the seller relinquished possession
137
If the buyer has rejected goods because of defects, the seller may within the time originally provided for performance “cure” by
giving reasonable notice of their intention to do so and making a new tender of conforming goods that the buyer must then accept.
138
If the legal remedy (that is, money damages) is inadequate, the nonbreaching party may seek
specific performance, which is an order from the court to the breaching party to perform or face contempt of court charges.
139
Specific performance is always available for land sale contracts, because
all land is unique
140
Most courts will grant an order of specific performance to enforce a contract not to compete if:
(1) the services to be performed are unique (thus rendering money damages inadequate); and (2) the covenant is reasonable.
141
for covenant not to compete to be reasonable...
The covenant must be reasonably necessary to protect a legitimate interest of the person benefited by the covenant (that is, an employer or the purchaser of the covenantor’s business); The covenant must be reasonable as to its geographic scope and duration (meaning, it cannot be broader than the benefited person’s customer base and typically cannot be longer than one or two years); and The covenant must not harm the public.
142
In addition to standard contract defenses, an action for specific performance is subject to the equitable defenses of:
Laches—a claim that the plaintiff has delayed bringing the action and that the delay has prejudiced the defendant; Unclean hands—a claim that the party seeking specific performance is guilty of wrongdoing in the transaction being sued upon; and Sale to a bona fide purchaser—a claim that the subject matter has been sold to a person who purchased for value and in good faith.
143
If a buyer has made at least part payment of the purchase price of goods that have been identified under a contract and the seller has not delivered the goods, the buyer may replevy the goods from the seller in two circumstances:
(i) The seller becomes insolvent within 10 days after receiving the buyer’s first payment; or (ii) The goods were purchased for personal, family, or household purposes. In either case, the buyer must tender any unpaid portion of the purchase price to the seller.
144
In addition, the buyer may replevy undelivered, identified goods from the seller if the buyer, after reasonable effort, is
unable to secure adequate substitute goods (that is, cover).
145
A right closely related to the buyer’s right to replevy is the right to specific performance “where the goods are unique or in other proper circumstances.” The court may order specific performance even where
the goods have not yet been identified to the contract by the seller
146
If a seller learns that a buyer has received delivery of goods on credit while insolvent, the seller may reclaim the goods upon demand made within
10 days after the buyer’s receipt of the goods. However, the 10-day limitation does not apply if a misrepresentation of solvency has been made in writing to the particular seller within 3 months before delivery.
147
Actions or circumstances that increase the risk of nonperformance by a party to a contract but don’t clearly indicate that performance will not be forthcoming may not be treated immediately as an anticipatory repudiation (see 8.2.2.b. below). Instead, if there are reasonable grounds for insecurity with respect to a party’s performance, the other party may
demand in writing assurances that the performance will be forthcoming at the proper time. Until they receive adequate assurances, the party may suspend their own performance. If the proper assurances are not given within a reasonable time (that is, within 30 days after a justified demand for assurances), they may then treat the contract as repudiated.
148
Reliance damages award the plaintiff the cost of their performance; that is, they are designed to
put the plaintiff in the position that would have been in had the contract never been formed.
149
Compensatory damages may also include incidental damages. Incidental damages are most commonly associated with contracts for the sale of goods and typically include
expenses reasonably incurred by a buyer in inspection, receipt, transportation, care, and custody of goods rightfully rejected and other expenses reasonably incident to the seller’s breach, and by the seller in storing, shipping, returning, and reselling the goods as a result of the buyer’s breach.
150
Consequential damages are special damages and reflect losses over and above standard expectation damages. They arise because of the nonbreaching party’s particular circumstances, and most often they consist of lost profits. These damages may be recovered only if, at the time the contract was made,
a reasonable person would have foreseen the damages as a probable result of a breach. Foreseeability is the key issue for consequential damages. To recover consequential damages, the breaching party must have known or had reason to know of the special circumstances giving rise to the damages. Note that in contracts for the sale of goods, only a buyer may recover consequential damages.
151
The parties to a contract may stipulate what damages are to be paid in the event of a breach. These liquidated damages must be
in an amount that is reasonable in view of the actual or anticipated harm caused by the breach
152
Liquidated damage clauses will be enforceable if the following two requirements are met:
a) Damages for contractual breach are difficult to estimate or ascertain at the time the contract is formed; and b) The amount agreed on is a reasonable forecast of compensatory damages in the case of breach. The test for reasonableness is a comparison between the amount of damages prospectively probable at the time of contract formation and the liquidated damages figure. If the liquidated damages amount is unreasonable, the courts will construe this as a penalty and will not enforce the provision.
153
If the seller doesn’t deliver, or the buyer properly rejects the goods or revokes acceptance of the goods, the buyer’s basic damages consist of the difference between the contract price and either:
(1) the market price or (2) the cost of buying replacement goods (cover), plus incidental and consequential damages, if any, less expenses saved as a result of the seller’s breach.
154
If the buyer measures damages by the difference between contract price and market price, market price usually is determined as of
the time the buyer learns of the breach and at the place of tender.
155
If the buyer accepts goods that breach one of the seller’s warranties, the buyer may recover as damages “loss resulting in the normal course of events from the breach.” The basic measure of damages in such a case is
the difference between the value of the goods as delivered and the value they would have had if they had been according to contract, plus incidental and consequential damages.
156
To recover damages for any defect as to accepted goods, the buyer must,
within a reasonable time after they discover or should have discovered the defect, notify the seller of the defect. If they do not notify the seller within a reasonable time, they lose their right to sue. “Reasonable time” is, of course, a flexible standard
157
The measure of damages when the seller anticipatorily breaches the contract is the difference between
the market price at the time the buyer learned of the breach and the contract price.
158
As noted above, a seller is liable for consequential damages arising from their breach if:
(1) they had reason to know of the buyer’s general or particular requirements, and (2) the subsequent loss resulting from those needs could not reasonably be prevented by cover. Particular needs must be made known to the seller, but general requirements usually need not be.
158
The Code provides three measures for damages for when the buyer wrongfully repudiates or refuses to accept conforming goods. In addition to incidental damages (for example, costs of storing, shipping, reselling), the seller can:
(i) Resell the goods and recover the difference between the contract price and the resale price (ii) Recover the difference between the market price (measured as of the time and at the place of delivery) and the contract price, or (iii) If the above measures are inadequate because the seller could have made an additional sale, recover under a “lost profits” measure the difference between the contract price and the cost to the seller.
159
If the buyer has accepted the goods and has not paid, or has not accepted the goods, and the seller is unable to resell them at any reasonable price, or if the goods have been lost or damaged at a time the risk of loss was on the buyer, the seller may
maintain an action against the buyer for the full contract price.
160
The standard measure of damages for breach of land sale contracts is the difference between the
contract price and the fair market value of the land.