Catiline (Reset) Flashcards
(45 cards)
Who was L. Segius Catalina Catiline?
Dates: 108-62 BC
A popularis politician who came from the aristocracy. Failed to gain consulships in 63 and 62 BC on a policy of debt relief. He headed up a revoluntionary movement of thwarted politicians, debtors, veterans, and the poor. Died with his revolutionary army in 62 BC.
What was Catiline prosecuted for? Who had he served under prior to this sentencing? How connected was he in the Senate?
- Had served under Sulla and had been actively involved in the proscriptions,
- He was very well connected and seems to have taken a traditional path along the cursus honorum,
- Was prosecuted for provincial extortion upon his return from pro-praetorian governorship of Africa.
What happened in 66 BC? What does Sallust write Catiline of doing?
- Towards the end of the year, the consuls elect for 65 BC were prosecuted for electoral bribery,
- According to Sallust (Bellum Catilinae 18-19), Catiline was involved in an attempted assassination of their replacements, L. Aurelius Cotta and L. Manlius Torquatus,
- Catiline’s motivation was that he was prevented from standing as a replacement because of the pending court case,
- He apparently joined with one of those convicted of electoral bribery, P. Autronius Paetus, and together with a quaestor, Cn. Calpurnius Piso, plotted to murder the new consuls on the 1st January 65 BC, their first day of office.
What did Catiline plan to happen after the assassinations?
- That he and Autronius Paetus were to seize the consulships and Piso was to govern Spain.
How did the plot fail? What did they plan after?
- Rumours of the plot surfaced, a postponement occurred, and a fresh plan was hatched to extend the murder to include most of the Senate,
- This also failed,
- As an afterword, Piso, despite only being a quaestor, was sent to Spain with pro-praetorian imperium, either at Crassus’ order or that of the optimates, both groups seemingly wanted to set up an alternative power to Pompey.
How did Piso die?
- Pompey had strong client base in Spain after his years of war against Sertorius,
- Piso was killed by his own men.
What does Sallust say of his record of the Catilinarian conspiracy? Why is this so?
- Sallust gives a disclaimer that he cannot be certain about what happened,
- Although he was writing just 20 years later, much of the story may have been fabricated by Catiline’s detractors during and after the events of the conspiracy of 63BC
- Especially Cicero.
What does Cicero write/say of the first Catilinarian conspiracy?
- Within eighteen months of the supposed attempted assassination, Cicero gave a speech as consular candidate in which he made it clear that people now knew about the plot,
- It would, however, be prudent that a politician would obviously deride an opponent during an election campaign,
- Once Catiline had been clearly shown to be attempting revolution in 63, Cicero referred repeatedly to the First Catilarian Conspiracy as he tried to damage Catiline’s reputation,
- In 65, however, Cicero had actually considered defending Catiline against the charge of provincial extortion,
- We can conclude, thus, that whatever truth there was in Catiline and others seeking to kill the Consuls of 65, the story was at first unknown to Cicero; but by mid 64 sufficient rumours existed for Cicero to make political capital of it.
What happened to Catiline’s charges? What did he run for in 63?
Catiline was acquitted of his charge of provincial extortion and stood for election to the consulship of 63.
What did Catiline do in 63, according to Sallust?
- If Sallust is to be believed, Catiline corrupted the upper-class youth of Rome and incited them to usurp their fathers (Sallust, Bellum Catilinae 14-16),
- He had gathered a group of discontented second-rate politicians to support his bid for consulship,
- Their lack of political acumen and experience was one reason why he failed in his consulship bid and the subsequent attempted revolution.
Which speech of Catiline, recorded by Sallust, shows his motivation?
‘Because of this, all influence, power, rank, and wealth are in their hands, or whoever they wish them to be; to us they have left danger, defeat, prosecutions, and poverty… Use me either as your leader or as a soldier in the ranks; my soul and my body shall be at your service. These very schemes I hope to help you carry out as your consul…’ (Catiline Conspiracy 20)
Worth noting that Sallust invented this speech, he was not there and anyone there was subsequently killed.
What were Catiline’s main promises to his supporters?
- He promised magistracies, priesthoods, opportunities for plunder, and proscriptions, but all with him at the head of state,
- He also promised the cornerstone of his electoral campaign, a cancellation of debts or new tablets (novae tabulae),
- The wax tablets on which debts were recorded were to be smoothed over (Sallust, Bellum Catilinae 21).
Who were Catilinine’s promises likely to attract?
- The cancellation of debts was sure to attract the support of those members of the upper classes who had fallen into debt,
- And the masses.
What was happening in the 60s economically? Why?
- During the mid 60s there was a credit crisis in Italy,
- This was because, since Mithridates’ first uprising in 89, businessmen had been unwilling to invest in Asia; but with Pompey’s departure to the east, they expected stability to return,
- Money lenders who had been lending at lower rates to safer enterprises in Italy, including many landowners, both rich and poor, were now calling in their debts.
What was the problem with Catiline’s economic policy?
- Debts cannot simply be cancelled,
- If the debtors were not to pay back the money, then the money lenders would have been out of pocket,
- Hence the naivety of such a policy,
- This explains equestrian and optimate opposition to Catiline.
What does Cicero claim Catiline’s policy caused politically?
Cicero would later play on the agreement between Senate and equestrians at this time to produce what he ‘termed’ concordia ordinum, a harmony of the orders, which he would go on to champion at times of future discord.
What is the Commentariolum Petitionis?
- Authored by Quintus Cicero, the famous Cicero’s brother,
- Dates: c. 65-64 BC,
- Written to Cicero to advise him on his political campaign for consulship.
What did the Commentariolum Petitionis tell Cicero to do, relating to amicitiae?
- That he should follow a definite hierarchy in seeking them out: prioritising nobles, magistrates, especially the consuls, tribunes and other men of influence who can bring their clients with them,
- Cicero should seek out those he may have represented in court, or will represent in the future (Commentariolum Petitionis 13-24).
What letter from Cicero showcases the brevity of amicitiae?
- Writes a letter to Atticus where he apologies that he cannot support Atticus’ uncle, who was in conflict with an associate of the powerful noble L. Domitius Ahenobarbus,
- Cicero sought this noble’s favour (Cicero, Attacum 1.1).
What does the Commentariolum Petitionis tell us of voter integrity?
- (55) tells us that the bribery of voters was commonplace,
- Although there is no suggestion that Cicero should do so, simply that he should guard against it.
Who potentially supported Catiline in this election?
- Crassus and Caesar.
Why did the optimates turn to Cicero?
- Sallust reports that information concerning the conspirators’ willingness to go beyond legitimate means in order to seize power was already being leaked to the optimates,
- They were worried, and turned to Cicero. Despite his being a novus homo, he appeared a safe bet for the consulship,
- Plutarch reports that both the optimates and people were both happy to elect Cicero.
What did Cicero do upon taking the Consulship?
- Immediately made his allegiances known,
- He spoke against the proposed land bill of the tribune P. Servilius Rullus, which would have addressed the needs of the poor who were still gravitating towards Rome for hand-outs and work,
- Rullus’ proposals were wide-ranging: ager publicus in Italy was to be redistributed, while newly acquired land in the provinces would be sold to pay for this.
How did Cicero convince the people against Rullus?
- Played on the fears of the people and persuaded the audience that he was acting in their best interests,
- He was a ‘people’s consul’ guiding the plebs; the land bill was a piece of largesse that would have exhausted the treasury, and the people would all be poorer for it (Cicero, de lege agraria II.7-10),
- Amazingly, through his speech the people did not vote through Rullus’ bill.