cerebral palsy Flashcards

(75 cards)

1
Q

def of Cerebral Palsy

A
  • non-progressive lesion of the brain resulting in disorder of posture and voluntary movement
  • occur during fetal development of first year of life.
  • progressive musculoskeletal impairment seen in most children
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

CP etiology

A
  • Prenatal, pernatal, or postnatal
  • hypoxic, ischemic, infection, congenital or traumatic
  • MRI studies (Time of insult) - prenatal (75%), Perinatal 6-8%, postnatal 10-18%
  • CVA
  • Maternal infection
  • prematurity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Role of the PT in diagnosis of CP

A
  • assessing asymmetry, involuntary movement, abnormal reflexes and delayed postural reactions
  • may use predictive and discriminative infant neuromotor tests to assist in prediction and ID
  • -Alberta infant motor scales (AIMS)
  • -test of infant motor performace (TIMP)
    • Precht’l assessment of general movements (GM) has the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for predicting CP in early months

**AIMS and NSDMA are better in older infants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

behavioral issues in CP

A
  • 25% of children with CP have behavioral issues

–5x> than typical children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Quadriplegia

A
  • all four limbs are involved
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

diplegia

A
  • all four limbs are involved. both legs are more severely affected than the arms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

hemiplegia

A
  • one side of the body is affected. the arm is usually more involved than the leg
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Triplegia

A
  • three limbs are involved, usually both arms and a leg
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

monoplegia

A
  • only one limb is affected, usually an arm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

classification motor differences

A
  • spastic- motor cortex
  • dyskinesia- basal ganglia
  • ataxic- cerebellar lesion
  • mixed- spastic and dyskinesia
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

gross motor function classification system (GFMCS)

A
  • five level classification system
  • categorized in age bands (<2, 2-4, 4-6, 6-12,12-18)
  • based on self-initiated movements. emphasis on sitting, transfers and mobility. need for hand held mobility devices or wheeled mobility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

GMFCS levels

-general heading

A

Level 1- walks w/o limitations
Level 2- walks with limitations
Level 3- walks using a hand-held mobility device
-Level 4- self mobility with limitations, may use powered mobility
-Level 5- transported in a manual wheel chair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Before 2nd birthday

GMFCS Level 1

A
  • move in and out of sitting and floor sit with both hands free to manipulate objects
  • creep, pull to stand and walk holding onto furniture
  • 18 mo -2 years walk w/o assistive device
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Before 2nd birthday

GMFCS level 2

A
  • may require use of hands in sitting
  • combat crawl or creep
  • may pull to stand and walk holding onto furniture
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Before 2nd birthday

GMFCS Level 3

A
  • sit with low back supported

- roll and combat crawl

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Before 2nd birthday

GMFCS level 4

A
  • require trunk support for sitting, able to control head

- roll to supine and may roll to prone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Before 2nd birthday

GMFCS level 5

A
  • unable to maintain antigravity head and trunk postures in prone and sitting
  • require assistance to roll
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

2nd to 4th birthday

GMFCS Level 1

A
  • transition in and out of sitting and standing w/o assistance
  • walks as primary mobility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

2nd to 4th birthday

GMFCS Level 2

A
  • pull to stand at surface
  • creep with reciprocal pattern and cruise
  • walk with assistive device. preferred mobility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

2nd to 4th birthday

GMFCS Level 3

A
  • frequent “W” sit
  • combat crawl or creep as primary mobility
  • walk short distance indoors with walker and adult assistance for steering
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

2nd to 4th birthday

GMFCS Level 4

A
  • adaptive equipment for sitting and standing

- self mobility limited to short distance: creep, crawl, roll

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

2nd to 4th birthday

GMFCS level 5

A
  • no means of independent movement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

4th to 6th birthday

GMFCS level 1

A
  • walk indoors and outdoors
  • climb stairs
  • emerging run and jump
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

4th to 6th birthday

GMFCS level 2

A
  • short indoor walking without mobility device: outdoor on level surface
  • climb stairs with rail
  • unable to jump or run
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
4th to 6th birthday | GMFCS level 3
- walk with handheld mobility device on level surface - require assistance to climb stairs - frequently transported long distances
26
4th to 6th birthday | GMFCS level 4
- self mobility possible with powered WC | - transported in community
27
4th to 6th birthday | GMFCS level 5
- no independent movement
28
6Prognosis and outcome based on cognitive function
- cognitive function is the strongest predictor of walking ability in all types of CP
29
Prognosis and outcome based on independent sitting
- independent sitting by 24 months is best predictor for ambulation of 15+ meters by age 8 (with or w/o device) - if independent sitting is not obtained by age 3, likelihood of functional walking is very low
30
GMFM-66
- based on data, most children with CP reach 90% of motor potential before age 3 for most severe and by age 5 for least involved
31
Common impairments- Muscle tone and extensibility
- hypertonia and hypoextensibility - contracture: - most common: shoulder adductors, elbow, wrist and finger flexors, hip flexors and adductors, knee flexors, ankle plantar flexors
32
common imapirments- muscle strength
- diminished force production capability- primary impairment - low EMG activity - greater weakness: distal>proximal, conc> eccentric, fast>slow speeds of movement - contributes to bone deformity
33
common impairments- skeletal structure
- torsion of long bones, joint instability and premature degenerative changes in WB joints - scoliosis rate 15-61%. increases with age and GMFCS level - hip sublaxation and dislocation 35. 3% have migration of greater than 30% of femoral head
34
common impairments- selective control
- isolated muscle activation in selected pattern in response to voluntary posture - poor selective control contributes to impaired motor function
35
common impairments - postural control
- difficulty responding to challenges and fine tuning postural activity
36
common impairments- motor learning
- difficulty analyzing their own movements and using feedback to improve performance - motor memory often impaired
37
common impairments- pain
- 61% of ambulatory children | - -50% of parents felt it interfered with ADLs
38
common impairments - activity and participation
- opportunities for participation in home, school and community are increasing. technology and social attitudes/policies - participation restriction in social and intimate relationships and paid employment continue in adulthood
39
examination of muscle tone and extensibility
- modified ashworth: low reliability with CP - modified tardieu: measures point of "catch" to a rapid movement. mechanical resistance to slow stretch indicates muscle length. difference between catch and mechanical resistance. - -large difference indicates large reflexive component to motion limitation. small difference indicates a more fixed contracture
40
examination of strength
- MMT - Functional - endurance and efficiency of movement
41
examination of selective control, postural control and motor learning
- selective control assessment of the lower extremity (SCALE) - observation of sway or response to perturbation - segmental assessment of trunk control (SATCo)
42
examination of pain
- assess frequently regardless of cognitive level and communication ability - pain assessment instrument for cerebral palsy. Range of potentially painful activities
43
examination of activity and participation
- therapist to differentiate between: capacity, performance, motivation - several assessment tools
44
examination consideration of infancy
- consider infant's temperament, state of regulation and handling tolerance - provides baseline for monitoring
45
examination consideration pre school aged
- require more frequent reassessment
46
muscle strengthening in CP
- using both concentric and eccentric muscl eforce | - transitions against gravity, ball activities, treadmill, tricycle, and stair negotiation
47
progressive resistance training in CP
- 4-12 week duration - 3x/week - 80-90% max load - lower resistance and increased reps for endurance - use of free weight, elastic bands, isokinetic equipment and functional movements
48
cardiovascular endurance in CP
- energy expenditure in walking can be up to 3x greater for children with CP - promote physical activity. GMFCS level 1 and 2 respond well to specific training. swimming programs for all levels
49
therapeutic interventions sensory intergration
- arousal or calming | - proprioception, vestibular, tactile
50
therapeutic interventions- modified constraint induced movement therapy
- useful with hemiplegia - constraining unaffected UE - mass practiced with affected UE
51
therapeutic interventions- treadmill training
- partial weight bearing options | - task specific motor learning
52
therapeutic interventions- e-stim
- pain control - muscle strengthening - NDT
53
spasticity management
- interventions used if spasticity is interfering with function or comfort - passive stretching- short term, minor effects - selective dorsal rhizotomy - botox - baclofen- oral or intrathecal
54
intervention for muscle length
- best maintained through active movement in lengthened position - tardieu study showed prevention of plantar flexor contractures with stretch beyond threshold for at least 6 hours during daily activity - sustained passive stretching: casting- single or serial, orthoses, positioning
55
Goals of LE orthoses
- limit inappropriate joint movements and alignment - prevent contracture, hyperextensibility and deformity - enhance postural control and balance - reduce energy cost of walking - provide post-op protection to soft tissues
56
Solid AFOs
- maximum restriction of ankle movement
57
hinged orthoses
- permits DF or whatever movement we want to be blocked
58
dynamic or posterior leaf spring orthoses
- reduce equinus in swing - permit ankle DF in stance - absorb more energy in midtance - reduce desirable power generation at push off
59
SMOs orthoses
- for pronation
60
Orthotic management (Morris)- GMFCS level 1-3
- used to allow for more efficient gait and prevent deformity
61
Orthotic management GMFCS levels 4-5
- preventing deformities even if they at enot walking - may allow child to be positioned in standing for physiological and physcosocial benefits -families should understand how to use and how lng each day, as well as the resoning for usage
62
effects of AFOs on gait in children with CP
- increased velocity, reduced cadence, increased step length and stride length, increased duration of single leg support - improved energy efficiency and possible decreased O2 consumption
63
orthotic management for muscle lengthening
- minimum of 6 hours per day | - may decreased need for Achilles tendon surgery
64
orthotic management effects on sit to stand
- solid AFO may impede transition unless it is positioned with a forward inclination
65
positioning of GMFCS level 4 and 5
- should have an individualized postural management program - prevention positional contrcatures and deformity - prevent skin breakdown - facilitate function and participation - promote safe, comfortable and biomechanically optimal sleep positions
66
positioning of GMFCS level 1-3
- emphasize activity - may require adaptive seating - WB programs. increase/maintain bone mineral density - maintain LE muscel extensibility, promote acetabular development -may initiate use of stander at age 1
67
CP mobility with posterior walker
- posterior walkers improve posture and gait pattern - decrease energy expensiture versus anterior walker -safe and effective mobility in power wheelchairs can be achieved as early as 17 mo of age. treadmill training with body weight supported
68
establishing goals for CP kids
- individualized, criterion referenced measured of change | - defining a set of unique goals for a client, and then specifying a range of outcomes
69
perceived efficacy and goal setting (PEGS)
- 2nd ages 5-9 - pictures of tasks - allows child to self report perceived competence in every day activities and set goals for intervention - parallel questionnaires for caregivers and educators
70
GAS 5-Point scale
-2 - much less than expected outcome -1- less than expected outcome 0 expected outcome after intervention +1 - greater than expected outcome +2 - much greater than expected outcome
71
developing ambulation skills with direct intervention
- therapeutic exercise - functional training in self-care and home management - manual therapy - modalities - assistive devices, orthotics, adaptive equipment
72
intervention for Level 3 - upright posture and stability
- ABC's of posture - using assistive device and orthotics - developing strategies to control weight shift of COM - strengthening postural muslces
73
intevrnetion for level 3- developing forward progression
- forward progression of COM with less lateral - facilitating proximal co-contraction with axial rotation - work in and out of orthotics - isolated control between and within LEs
74
intervention for level 3 shock absorption
- diligent monitoring between and within LEs
75
-developing ambulation levels 1 and 2
- ongoing analysis of posture and stability as child ambulates in different environements and in varying functional activities - regular evaluation of orthotic fit and function. - monitor gait efficiency - fitness program within the community