Ch. 2 Research Flashcards

(23 cards)

1
Q

Confound

A

A factor other than the independent variable that varies between the conditions of an experiment, thereby calling into question what caused any effects on the dependent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Independent Variable

A

A factor that experimenters manipulate to see if it affects the dependent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dependent Variable

A

A factor that experimenters measure to see if it’s manipulated by the independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Subject Variable

A

A variable that characterizes preexisting differences among the participants in the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Control Group

A

A group that does not receive the treatment or manipulation and serves as a baseline for comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Random Assignment

A

A method of assigning participants to the various conditions of an experiment so that each participant has an equal chance of being in any of the conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Correlation Coefficient

A

A statistical measure of the strength and direction of the association between two variables (variable letter “r”, ranges from -1 to +1 where +1 is a positive relationship, 0 is no correlation, and -1 is a negative relationship)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Construct validity

A

The extent to which the measures used in a study measure the variables they were designed to measure and the manipulations in the experiment manipulate the variables they were designed to manipulate. (How well do job performance assessments evaluate employees’ job performance)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Internal validity

A

The degree of certainty that the independent variables caused the change in dependent variable in an experiment. (Lab experiment has high internal validity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

External validity

A

The degree to which there can be reasonable confidence that the results of a study would be obtained for other people in other situations (achieved thru mundane realism - how much an experiment can mirror a real-world environment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the two things needed to have a good experiment?

A
  • Must have control over events that occur
  • Participants must be randomly assigned to conditions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bogus pipeline technique

A

A procedure in which research participants are (falsely) led to believe that their responses will be verified by an an infallible lie detector.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Meta-analysis

A

A set of statistical procedures used to review a body of evidence by combining the results of individual studies to measure the overall reliability and the strength of particular effects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Experimenter expectancy effects

A

The effects produced when an experimenter’s expectations about the results of an experiment affect their behaviour towards a participant and thereby influence the participant’s behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Informed consent

A

An individual’s deliberate, voluntary decision to participate in research, based on the researcher’s description of what will be required during such participation. Participants are allowed to withdraw from the study at any point in time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Debriefing

A

Disclosure, made to participants after research procedures are completed, where the researcher explains the purpose of the research, attempts to resolve any negative feelings, and emphasizes the scientific contribution made by the participants’ involvement

17
Q

Stanford Prison Experiment (1971)

A

Big ethics violation.
People were randomly assigned to be either a prisoner or a guard in order to demonstrate conformity to assigned roles.
Study was meant to last for two weeks but was shut down after six days after guards began abusing the prisoners.
Extremely emotionally damaging for all involved

18
Q

Milgram Obedience Experiment (1961)

A

Ethics violation.
Participants were asked to deliver painful electric shocks to another person to demonstrate tendency to obey authorities. Many people continued to dutifully administer shocks, even if they believed they were harming another person.
Proves: people are highly likely to follow authority, even if it conflicts with personal morals

19
Q

Deception

A

A method of research that provides false information to the participants

20
Q

Confederates

A

An accomplice of an experimenter who, in dealing with real participants in an experiment, acts as if they are also a participant in the experiment

21
Q

Mundane Realism

A

The degree to which an experimental situation resembles places and events in the real world

22
Q

Experimental Realism

A

The degree to which experimental procedures are involving to participants and lead them to behave naturally or spontaneously

23
Q

Interrater Reliability

A

The degree to which different observers agree on their observations