Ch. 4 Perceiving Persons Flashcards
(52 cards)
*When are we accurate perceivers
- We are bad at determining personalities right away.
- Humans are good at guessing extraversion and narcissism.
- We can make assumptions based on spaces someone has “made their own”.
- We suck at guessing who is nice, trustworthy, intelligent
Social perception
A general term for the processes by which people come to understand one another.
First step of social perception
Recognition of other people’s actions. We have sharper perception if we are able to recognize larger groups of actions (running, jumping, cheering)
How do we form impressions of others
Humans make snapshot first impressions based on visual clues and surface level information
Todorov’s study states…
We assume people with an abundance of expressions and softer/more baby-like features are nicer people
Honor, Face, Dignity
Honor: Modesty and loyalty for women, defense against insult for men
Face: Respect of others’ social status, humility
Dignity: Equal value of each life at birth
Social setting/meaningful behavior
Our understanding of the social setting we are in helps us analyze others’ behavior. We understand a situation better if we break actions into more details.
Mind perception
The process by which people attribute humanlike mental states to various animate and inanimate objects, including other people
Non-verbal behavior
Behavior that reveals a person’s feelings without words, through facial expressions, body language, and vocal cues.
Human facial expressions are globally understood, and are a part of human constitution. We recognize expressions we are scared of better than others
Eyes
As social beings, people are highly attentive to eyes, often following the gaze of others.
Detecting truth vs deception
We notice deception thru observation of the body more than observation of the face. Facial expressions are easier to regulate.
Liars have a harder time doing effortful tasks while maintaining a lie (eye contact, adding detail to their story)
Attribution theory
Theory that describes how people explain the causes of behavior
Dispositional (internal attribution
internal characteristics of an actor, such as ability, personality, mood, or effort. (e.g. he’s just mean)
Situational (external) attribution
Attribution to factors external to an actor, such as the task, other people, or luck. (ex: his girlfriend dumped him)
Jones’s Correspondent inference Theory
People try to infer from an action whether the act corresponds to an enduring personal trait of the actor
Factors of the correspondent inference theory
Choice: Actions done freely rather than forcefully reveal their personality
Expectedness: Abnormal behaviors reveal their personality
Effects: The desired effects of one’s actions reveal their personality
Kelley’s Covariation principle
In order for something to be the cause of a behavior, it must be present when the behavior occurs and absent when it does not. (part of attribution theory)
Consensus information (in covariation principle)
How different people react to the same stimulus (high consensus: behavior matches the norm)
Distinctiveness information (covariation principle)
How one person reacts to different stimuli (high distinctiveness: behavior differs from this person’s typical behaviors)
Consistency information (covariation principle)
What happens when the same stimulus is presented at different times (high consistency: behavior remains the same at any time)
1st system of thought (System 1)
Quick, easy, automatic thinking (intuitive, uses cognitive heuristics or rules of thumb. error prone.)
2nr system of thinking (Systm 2)
Slow, controlled thinking, where attention is needed
Availability heuristic
The tendency to estimate the likelihood that an event will occur by how easily instances of it come to mind.
False-consensus effect
The tendency for people to overestimate the extent to which others share their opinions, attributes, and behaviors.