Chapter 11 Flashcards
(51 cards)
Conflict
The process in which one party perceives that its interests are being opposed or negatively affected by another party – Based on perceptions; it exists whenever one party believes that another might obstruct its efforts, regardless of whether the other party actually
has those intentions
Interpersonal conflict
Between individuals
Intrapersonal conflict
Within individuals
Conflict-is-bad perspective
Emphasises that organisations work best through harmonious
relations and that conflict undermines organisational effectiveness
What are the consequences of the conflict is bad perspective
- Potentially reduces employee performance by consuming otherwise productive time
- Threatens personal needs and self-concept, which produces employee stress, reduces job satisfaction, and increases turnover
- Negative effect on information sharing
Optimal conflict perspective
Organisations are most effective when employees experience some level of conflict (Dewey)
What are the consequences of the ‘optimal conflict perspective’
- Potentially improves decision making – Energises people to debate issues and evaluate
alternatives more thoroughly - Prevent organisations from becoming nonresponsive to their external environment –
- Active thinking about customers, suppliers and other stakeholders
- In the case of external conflict: People tend to be more motivated to work together when faced with an external threat, which strengthens cohesion within the team
Task conflict /constructive conflict
Type of conflict in which people focus their discussion around the task, in which different viewpoints occur while showing respect for people involved in that disagreement
Relationship conflict
Type of conflict in which people focus their discussion on qualities of the people in the dispute
- Escalates more easily
- Dysfunctional as it threatens self-esteem, self-enhancement and self
verification processes - Triggers defence mechanisms and a competitive orientation between the parties
- Reduces mutual trust
Minimising relationship conflict during task conflict
- Emotional intelligence- Relationship conflict is less likely to occur, or is less likely to escalate when team members have high levels of emotional intelligence
- Team development – Encourages mutual understanding and team cohesion
- Adopting norms that support psychological safety (= a shared belief that it is safe to engage in interpersonal risk-taking) – Open-mindedness and tolerance
psychological safety
a shared belief that it is safe to engage in interpersonal risk taking; specifically, that presenting unusual ideas, constructively disagreeing with the majority, and experimenting with new work
behaviors will not result in coworkers posing a threat to
their self-concept, status, or career
According to the MODEL OF THE CONFLICT PROCESS the sources of conflict
- incompatible goals
- differentiation (Differences among people and work units regarding their beliefs, values and preferences (E.g.: generational diversity)
- interdependence (When one party perceives that its interests are being opposed or negatively affected by another party)
- scarce resources
- ambiguous rules (Uncertainty increases the risk that one party will interfere with the other party’s goals and encourages political tactics)
- poor communication
What is according to the conflict process model the ‘conflict perceptions’
Usually produce negative emotions, including feelings of stress, anxiety, fear, frustration and/or anger – Can be positive through cognitive reappraisal of the conflict
Manifest conflict /conflict episodes (conflict process model)
The stage where conflict becomes visible through behaviour –Represents each party’s decisions and behaviours towards the other
Interpersonal conflict-handling styles: Follett
- problem solving
- Forcing
- Avoiding
- Yielding
- Compromising
win–win orientation
the belief that conflicting parties will find a mutually beneficial solution to their disagreement
win–lose orientation
the belief that conflicting parties are drawing from a fixed pie, so the more one party receives, the less the other party will receive
Problem solving
Problem solving tries to find a solution that is beneficial for both
parties. This is known as the win–win orientation because people using this style believe the resources at stake are expandable rather than fixed if the parties work
together to find a creative solution
Forcing
Forcing tries to win the conflict at the other’s expense. People who use this style typically have a win–lose orientation—they believe the parties are drawing from a fixed pie, so the more one party receives, the less the other party will receive. Consequently, this style relies on “hard” influence tactics
NOTE: forcing is not always agressive, it can be speaking up and showing confiction
Avoiding
Avoiding tries to smooth over or evade conflict situations altogether. A common avoidance strategy is to steer clear of the coworkers associated with the conflict. Another action is to minimize discussion of the sensitive topic when interacting with the other person.
NOTE: they can be very concerned about one or both party’s interest. But conclude that avoidance is the best strategy.
Yielding
Yielding involves giving in completely to the other side’s wishes, or at least cooperating with little or no attention to your own interests.
Compromising
Compromising involves actively seeking a middle ground between
the interests of the two parties. This occurs by calculating losses from concessions with equally valued gains, or at least trying to achieve similar levels of how much value each party sacrifices to reach agreement.
What conflict-handling styles do people tend to choose?
They gravitate toward one or two conflict handling styles that match their personality, personal and cultural values and past experience
The best style depends on the situation
Research: People from high collectivism cultures are motivated to maintain harmonious relations and thus are more likely to manage disagreements through avoidance or problem solving → Too simplistic? – Collectivism motivates harmony within the group but not
necessarily with people outside the group