Chapter 15 Flashcards
force field analysis
Kurt Lewin’s model of systemwide change that helps change agents diagnose the forces that drive and restrain proposed organizational change
unfreezing
the first part of the change process, in which the change agent produces disequilibrium between the driving and restraining forces
refreezing
The latter part of the change process, in which systems and structures are introduced that reinforce and maintain the desired behaviors
Rather than resisting change employees in succesful companies need to….
embrace these ongoing changes as an integral part of organizational life
Psychologist Kurt Lewin developed a model, what does this model do?
a model to describe the process of interplay between forces on individuals, team and work units. He used this model to describe this process using the metaphor of a force field
force field analysis
Kurt Lewin’s model of systemwide change that helps change agents diagnose the forces that drive and restrain proposed organizational change
In the model there are two main forces - what are these?
- driving forces: push organizations toward a new state of affairs. (new technolohy, evolving client expectations, environmental changes)
- Restraining forces: maintain the status quo. They appear to block the change process.
unfreezing
the first part of the change process, in which the change agent produces disequilibrium between the driving and restraining forces
refreezing
the latter part of the change process, in which systems and structures are introduced that reinforce and maintain the desired behaviors
Kurt lewin describes how systems have transitions between periods of stability and instability. Eventhough he never labeled those, how do refer to these transitions now?
Unfreezing and refreezing
resistance to change
Change resistance takes many forms, ranging from overt work stoppages to subtle attempts to continue the old ways.
What happened when the employees complied with the planned agents
They still showed resistance by performing the new task while letting customers know that they dissapproved of these changes forced on them
You can perceive resistance as a relationship conflict, and change agents attack the competence of those who resist the change in this case.
What is a more productive approach to view resistance?
To view it as a task conflict.
Because they might lack confidence to change or believe the change will make them worse off than the current situation
Resistance is also a form of…
Voice. An opportunity to discuss their concers.
And motivated behavior (engages employees to think more carefully about the change strategy and process)
- Potentially improves procedural justice
- Potentially improve the quality of decision making about the change.
An employee’s readiness for change depends on what model?
Can depend on ALL four elements of the mars model
6 most commonly cited reasons why people resist change:
- negative valence of change
- Fear of the unknown
- Not-invented-here syndrome
- Breaking routines
- Incongruent team dynamics
- Incongruent organizational systems and structures
Negative valence of change
When they believe that the post-change situation will have more negative than positive outcomes.
They apply the rational choice decision making model (almost imperfectly)
Does the person see the change as a personal loss? → Negative Valence of Change
Fear of the unknown
Change has always some degree of uncertainty. People tend to assume the worst when they are unsure whether the change will have good or bad outcomes.
- uncertainty is also associated with lack of personal control.
So the uncertainty is less desirable than the relative certainty of the status quo
Are they unsure about the change and assuming the worst? → Fear of the Unknown
Not-invented-here syndrome
is the tendency of individuals or groups to reject ideas, innovations, or solutions that originate from outside their own team, department, or organization.
🔹Resistance to External Ideas – Employees dismiss changes suggested by other teams, even if they are beneficial.
🔹 Self-Worth Protection – People resist acknowledging that another group may have better expertise in their domain.
🔹 Exaggeration of Problems – Some employees may overstate issues with external ideas to discredit them.
🔹 Common in Knowledge-Based Roles – Especially seen in teams responsible for specialized knowledge, like IT, R&D, or engineering.
Breaking routines
Are they struggling because they have to unlearn old habits?
People are creatures of habit, and breaking routines can be challenging. Employees often resist change because it requires them to step out of their comfort zones, adopt new behaviors, and develop new skills.
🔹 Comfort & Familiarity – Routines provide a sense of stability and predictability.
🔹 Cognitive Load – Learning new processes requires extra mental effort.
🔹 Fear of Failure – Employees may worry about struggling with new tasks.
🔹 Lack of Reinforcement – If new behaviors aren’t supported, employees revert to old habits.
Incongruent Team Dynamics
Is their team pressuring them to resist? → Incongruent Team Dynamics
Teams create and enforce norms that shape employee behavior. However, these norms can become barriers to organizational change when they conflict with new initiatives.
🔹Group Conformity – Employees follow established norms to maintain team cohesion.
🔹 Peer Pressure – Even if individuals support change, social pressure may prevent them from acting on it.
🔹 Norms vs. Organizational Goals – Some team norms contradict company-wide improvements.
Incongruent Organizational Systems
Are company policies or structures working against the change? → Incongruent Organizational Systems
Organizational systems—such as rewards, authority structures, career paths, and selection criteria—can either support or hinder change. When these systems are not aligned with the new direction, they create resistance by reinforcing old behaviors.
🔹 Contradictory Incentives – Employees follow what is rewarded, so if old behaviors are still incentivized, change efforts fail.
🔹 Structural Barriers – Rigid hierarchies, outdated policies, or slow decision-making processes make change difficult.
🔹 Lack of Support Mechanisms – Without updated training, tools, or resources, employees struggle to adapt.
🔹 Disillusionment – Even enthusiastic employees lose motivation when they hit systemic roadblocks.
What is the preferred option for making change?
Increasing the driving forces as well as reducing or removing the restraining forces
Creating an Urgency for Change Without External Forces
- Urgency for change is harder to create when the company is successful.
- Market leaders may become complacent and resistant to change.
- Persuasive influence helps employees visualize future threats and shifts.
- Avoid manipulative tactics that create cynicism and distrust.
- A compelling vision of a better future can be a strong motivator.
- Aligning the vision with employee values and needs makes change more appealing.