Chapter 13 Flashcards
(30 cards)
Obscenity is ______ protected by the first amendment
Not
what are the key challenges in obscenity law?
- Subjectivity in what’s considered obscene
- Technological advancements have increased access to adult content.
- Ethical and legal debates about regulating consensual adult expression.
Hicklin rule (pre-1957)
Focus on whether material might corrupt the most vulnerable
Roth-Memoirs Test (1957)
Material must:
1. Appeal to purient interest.
2. Be patently offensive.
3. Be utterly without redeeming social value.
- The Miller test (1973)
A work is obscene if:
1. An average person applying contemporary local community standards finds it appeals to the prurient interest
2. It depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way as defined by state law.
3. It lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
Prurient interest.
Shameful/morbid interest in sex, nudity, or excretion
community standards
Typically interpreted as statewide standards
patent offensiveness
Only hard-core sexual content qualifies
serious value
Judged by a reasonable person, not community norms
variable obscenity
Different standards for adult vs. minor access.
Child pornography
Not protected, even if it doesn’t meet the Miller test
PROTECT Act (2003)
Upheld limits on promoting child pornography
Sexting Laws
Many states have reduced penalties for consensual youth sexting
some feminist argue pornography __________
degrades women and fosters violence
Sexually orientated businesses (SOBs)
Like Strip clubs and adult theatres face:
- zoning laws: limit locations
- conduct regulations: distance between dancers and patrons, lighting, etc.
Communications Decency Act (1996)
Struck down by SCOTUS in 1997
Child Online Protection Act (COPA)
Also struck down: deemed too broad
Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA, 2001)
Upheld; libraries must use filters
FOSTA (2018)
target online platforms facilitating sex trafficking
Nonconsensual Pornography “revenge Porn”
Criminalised in most states
Sex offenders and speech
Packingham v. North Carolina struck down blanket bans on accessing social media.
Miller v. California. (1973)
Established current three-part obscenity test
Roth v. United States (1957)
First major obscenity ruling post-Hicklin
Ginsberg v. New York (1968.)
Upheld variable obscenity for minors