Chapter 15 - Environment Flashcards
“Anthropocene” period
A new geological era characterized by human impacts on the planet
How sociologists view the environment
As a social problem threatening our current forms of social organization
saving ourselves by addressing environmental degradation
Environmental problems are the consequences of larger social forces and social organizations.
We need to address the way we collectively structure our lives.
Sustainable Development
As defined by the United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development
“development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”
Environmental Sociology
Focuses on the interaction between the social and the natural systems, provides many useful insights to guide us toward sustainability
Ecological footprint
Indicator as a yardstick to assess sustainability. Represents the productive area - expressed in number of “planet Earths” required to provide the resources humanity is using and to absorb its waste.
According to the calculation, we need 1.5 Earths to sustain our current consumption level.
If everyone lived like the average U.S resident we would need 5 earths.
Overshoot situation
using resources at a pace more than the earth’s regenerative capacity
Overall recourse use
Happens in the “background” - infrastructure, power generation, agriculture - beyond individual control
We need to be thinking about larger social forces that shape environmental outcomes and facilitate changes in our communities as well as changing individual behavior
Social Construction of Nature
A category (natural or artificial) or phenomenon (climate change or biodiversity) is understood to have certain characteristics because we agree they do.
Constructivist analysis of the environment
Focuses on the role of ideology and knowledge in understanding our environmental conditions.
Wilderness
Environmental historian Bill Cronon famously traced the concept.
We tend to think of wilderness as the highest idea of nature: pristine, pure, and untouched by humans.
A product of America’s frontier mentality, in which people romanticized the vast and supposedly untrammeled landscape
This understanding of nature is a social construction and a product of North American cultural and historical contexts.
China’s great leap forward
Another example if the social construction of nature.
Environmental disasters that occurred in revolutionary China during the 1950s.
Threatened by Western powers and driven by Marxist ideology, Chinese leader Mao Zedong took an adversarial and extreme stance toward the natural world.
Viewed humans as distinctly separated from nature.
Humans must “conquer” and “defeat” nature to achieve the modernist ideal
Philosophy represented a sharp break from the traditional Chinese emphasis on harmony between humans and nature
Consequence was large-scale environmental and social disasters
Mao encouraged every commune or neighborhood to build furnaces in their backyards to produce steal and to fuel these there was massive deforestation
Championed unscientific agricultural practices including eradicating sparrows - birds that eat grain - and overusing fertilizer resulting in famine and irreversible ecological damage to Chinese soil
Constructing environmental problems
a social constructivist approach
Constructing Environmental Problems
A social constructivist approach.
Examines how we come to perceive and define certain issues such as air pollution, the ozone hole and climate change as environmental problems.
Ex. Ozone hole rather than ozone thinning or depletion
Ozone hole
ozone layer is a lot thinner
metaphor is a powerful representation of the problem - that hydrofluorocarbons from aurosol sprays, refrigerants and so on were severely thinning the ozone layer that protects us from the sun’s harmful ultraviolet rays.
“Ozone hole” caught many peoples attention
Montreal Protocol
limits ozone-depleting substances
widely recognized as the most successful international environmental agreement and effectively phases out the ozone depleting substances
Paris Agreement
2015
UN - nations across the globe agreed to work to limit further warming of the world to within 2 degrees celsius
In 2017 Trump said he would pull US out
Paradigm shift theory
sociologists Riley Dunlap, William Catton, and their colleagues have come up with.
Distinguish two sets of worldviews
The old “human exemptionist” paradigm (HEP) - reflect an anthopocentric, human-centered relationship with the environment
The “new environmental paradigm” (NEP) - views humans as only part of the complex ecosystem and subject to ecological limits
Environmental issues tend to be an elite concern. Women and minority groups rate higher concern.
People in more dominant positions tend to have better resources to protect themselves from environmental risk and thus may care less about the environment.
Risk perception
the tendency to evaluate the danger of a situation not in purely rational terms nut through the lens of individual biases and cultures
ex. fear of flying when car crashes are more common
Attitude-behavior split
When we think one way and act another, does not mean that we are hypocrites.
It does reveal that we live in a society and do not have compete control over the everyday choices we are offered.
Many environmentally significant decisions, such as fuel economy standards, food safety regulations, and city planning, happen at the societal level. As individuals, we can only control a small part of our environmental impacts.
An Essay on the Principle of Population
Essay by English philosopher Thomas Robert Malthus. Malthus ([1798] 2007) noted that populations tend to grow exponentially—that is, more and more rapidly—while food supply only increases linearly—that is, at a steady rate. If population growth is left unchecked, he predicted that society will end up with misery, starvation, and resource scarcity. This is the so-called Malthusian catastrophe.
proved largely incorrect. Yet his ideas never faded away completely.
As the ecological economist Herman Daly said, “Malthus has been buried many times…anyone who has been buried so often cannot be entirely dead”
The blind spot of Malthusianism lies in its overly deterministic view on population and the environment. Human interaction with the environment is mediated through technologies that change constantly. Malthus failed to foresee the tremendous productivity growth in agriculture that supports an ever growing number of people.
Demographic transition
Malthusians overlook
associated with modernization
Looking at population growth trends, demographics have noticed that in traditional societies, the birth rate (number of births per 1,000 people per year) and death rate (number of deaths per 1,000 people per year) are both high causing the pop to stay in a stable state. As societies go through industrialization, the death rate tends to drop before the birth rate bc of improvements in health and increases in food supply. As the birth rate is higher than death rate the pop increases
In the last stage of economic development, social norms finally catch up with the improved standard of living, causing the birth rate to drop to a level similar to the death rate. The population thus stabilizes again. Some scholars optimistically predict that the global population will cease growing by 2050.
One lesson is particularly worth mentioning: scholars consistently find that the status of women is the best predictor of the fertility rate. The more power women have in society, the fewer children they tend to have. Therefore, women’s empowerment is not only a gender issue but also an environmental issue.
Production and the Environment
To sociologists, environmental degradation is not a result of too many people in the world, nor is it due to individuals’ bad intentions or technological failures. Instead, it is a product of our unsustainable economic system.
Externalities
are all the side effects—things people fail to incorporate in their decision-making—of economic activities. Externalities can be both positive and negative
Ex. Positive - flowers outside your home. Negative - pollution
Capitalism
has an ecologically destructive tendency. In the capitalist system, firms do not simply produce goods and services; they try to maximize profits. To do so, they have incentives to externalize the costs
Many other schools of Marxist-inspired analysis have reached the same overall conclusion—capitalism is the ultimate cause of our ecological crisis. According to capitalist logic, the system must continue to grow, seeking to secure raw materials, cheap labor, and new markets. The mantra of growth and accumulation inevitably will run into the physical limit of finite natural resources
.