Chapter 2 Flashcards

(47 cards)

1
Q

prefrontal lobotomy

A

surgical procedure that severs fibres connecting the frontal lobes of the brain from the underlying thalamus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

heuristics

A

mental shortcuts
help us streamline thinking
& make sense of our world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

representativeness heuristic

A

judging the probability of an event by its superficial similarity to a prototype
aka - like goes with like

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

base rate

A

how common a characteristic/behaviour is in the general population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

availability heuristic

A

estimating the likelihood of an occurrence based on the ease it comes to mind
aka - off the top of my head

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

cognitive biases

A

systematic errors in thinking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

hindsight bias

A

tendency to overestimate how well we could have successfully forecasted known outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

overconfidence

A

tendency to overestimate our ability to make correct predictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

naturalistic observation

A

watching behaviour in real-world settings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

external validity

A

extent to which we can generalise findings to real-world settings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

interval validity

A

extent to which we can draw cause-and-effect inferences from a study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

case study

A

research design that examines one person or a small number of people in depth, often over an extended time period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

existence proofs

A

demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

correlational design

A

research design that examines the extent to which two variables are associated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

scatterplot

A

grouping of points on a two-dimensional graph in which each dot represents a single person’s data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

illusory correlation

A

perception of a statistical association between two variables where none exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

experiment

A

research design characterised by random assignment of participants to conditions and manipulation of an independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

random assignment

A

randomly assorting participants into two groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

experimental group

A

in an experiment, the group of participants that receives the manipulation

20
Q

control group

A

in an experiment, the group of participants that does not receive the manipulation

21
Q

independent variable

A

variable that an experimenter manipulates

22
Q

dependent variable

A

variable that an experimenter measures to see whether the manipulation has an effect

23
Q

confound

A

any difference between the experimental and control groups other than the independent variable

24
Q

placebo efect

A

improvement resulting from the mere expectation of improvement

25
meta-analysis
investigation of the consistency of patterns of results across large numbers of studies conducted in different laboratories
26
file drawer problem
tendency for negative findings to remain unpublished
27
blind
unaware if one is in the experimental group or the control group
28
nocebo effect
harm resulting from the mere expectation of harm
29
experimenter expectancy effect
phenomenon in which researchers' hypothesis lead them to unintentionally bias the outcome of a study
30
double-blind
when neither researchers nor participants are aware of who is in the control group
31
Hawthorne effect
phenomenon in which participants' knowledge that they are being studied can affect their behaviour aka reactivity
32
demand characteristics
cues that participants pick up from a study that allow them to generate guesses regarding the researcher's hypotheses
33
random selection
procedure that ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
34
reliability
consistency of measurement
35
validity
extent to which a measure assesses what it purports to measure
36
response sets
tendencies of research participants to distort their responses to questionnaire items
37
informed consent
informing research participants of what is involved in a study before asking them to participate
38
statistics
application of mathematics to describing and analysing data
39
descriptive statistics
numerical characterisations that describe data
40
central tendency
measure of the 'central' scores in a data set, or where the group tends to cluster
41
mean
average; a measure of central tendency
42
median
middle score in a data set; a measure of central tendency
43
mode
most frequent score in a data set; a measure of central tendency
44
dispersion
measure of how loosely or tightly bunched scores are
45
range
difference between the highest and lowest scores; a measure of dispersion
46
standard deviation
measure of dispersion that takes into account how far each data point is from the mean
47
inferential statistics
mathematical methods that allow us to determine whether we can generalise findings from our sample to the full population