Chapter 2 Global theory of curves Flashcards

(121 cards)

1
Q

smooth

A

A vector funct is smooth on I if it extends to an infinitely differentiable vector function defined on open interval J containing I

e.g I=(a,b) inff diff on x
I=[a,b]-smooth funct on I extends to smooth funct on (a-e,b+e) e>0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

PARAMETRISED CURVE

A

A PARAMETRISED CURVE is a SMOOTH vector function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

REGULAR

A

if γ’(t) =/ 0 for all t in I

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

VELOCITY

A

γ’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

SPEED

A

|γ’|

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

e.g of parametrised curves
simple circular curve

when is it regular

A

parametrised plane curve
γ:R to R^n
γ(t) = (rcos 2πt, rsin 2πt) r>0

regular
γ’(t) =(-2πr sin2πt, 2πr cos 2πt)
|γ’(t)| =2πr>0 never 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

e.g of parametrised curve
is it regular
γ:R to R^3
γ(t) = (t^3,t^2)

A

γ’(t) =(3t^2,2t)
=(0,0) for t=0
not regular

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

ACCELERATION

A

γ’’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

LENGTH

A

L(γ) = Integral_[a,b] |γ’(t)|.dt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

e.g of parametrised curves
straight line

when is it regular

give another repara

A

γ:R to R^n
γ(t) =a+tv a,v in R^n
regular when γ’(t) =v iff v=\0

γ~(𝜏)= a+ (tan𝜏)v
𝜏 in J=(-pi/2,pi/2) is a reparameterization of γ
φ(𝜏) = tan𝜏 regular
but
𝜏^3 wouldnt be regular
-𝜏 would be traversed in opposite direction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

circular helix
is it regular?

A

γ(t) = (rcost,rsint,ht) r>0

regular
RPC:
for any h in R
γ’(t)=(-rsint,rcost,t)
if h=0 but periodic so never equal to 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

DEF
RE-PARAMETRISATION

A

of a parametrised curve
γ:I to R^n
is another parametrised curve
γ~ : J to R^n s.t

γ~= γ∘φ
where
φ:J to I is a SMOOTH SURJECTIVE funct s.t φ’(t)>0 for any t in J (strictly increasing)

RETAINS IMAGE, DIRECTION TRAVERSED, #TIMES IF CLOSED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

γ~= γ∘φ
where
φ:J to I is a SMOOTH SURJECTIVE funct s.t φ’(t)>0 for any t in J (strictly increasing)J to I is a SMOOTH SURJECTIVE funct s.t φ’(t)>0 for any t in J (strictly increasing)

A

φ
is called the parameter transform
allows us to evaluate original PC using different input φ(t) for t in J

and is a BIJECTION
as injective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

γ~= γ∘φ

A

used to reparametrise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

consider
γ(t) = (a + t(b-a)) t in [0,1]

A

thus we can always define a PC on [0,1] from [a,b]
using the reparametrisation
φ’(t)>0

φ(t) = a +t(b-a)
φ(0)=a
φ(1)=b
can be used for smooth surjective funct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

PROPN 2.1
which re-parametrisations of regular closed curves are RPC

A

EVERY re-para of an RPC is an RPC

proof:
by chain rule
γ~’(𝜏)= (γ∘φ)’(𝜏)
= φ’(𝜏) γ’(φ(𝜏) =/0
we know
φ’(𝜏)>0 for all 𝜏 in J
γ’(t) =/0 for all t in I
thus PC γ~ is
REGULAR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

length of arc

A

Let γ : I → R
n be a PC. For a closed interval [t_0, t_1] ⊂ I the quantity
L(γ| [t_0, t_1]) =
integral_[t_0,t_1]
|γ’(t)| dt

is called the length of the arc
γ| [t_0, t_1].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

arc length for repara
prop 2.2

A

The length of an arc does not change under a re-parametrisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

proof: prop 2.2

The length of an arc does not change under a re-parametrisation

A

Let ˜γ : J → R^n be a re-parametrisation of a PC γ : I → R^n, that is ˜γ = γ ◦ϕ, where ϕ : J → I is a function that satisfies the hypotheses of Definition II.3. Suppose that ϕ maps [τ_0, τ_1] → [t_0, t_1] bijectively. Then by the change of variables formula, we obtain
L( ˜γ| [τ0, τ1]) =
{τ_0,τ_1] |γ˜’(τ )| dτ =
{τ_0,τ_1] |γ’(ϕ(τ ))| ϕ’(τ )dτ =
∫_{t_0,_1] |γ’(t)| dt
= L(γ| [t_0, t_1]),
ϕ’(τ ) > 0 t_0 = ϕ(τ_0), t_1 = ϕ(τ_1).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

change of vars integral fromula

A

{a,b] f(x).dx = ∫{c,d} f(g(t__g’(t).dt

g([c,d]) to [a,b]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

example: considering PCS
γ_ℓ:R to R^2
γ_ℓ (t)=(cos2πℓ, sin2πℓ)

γ_1(t)=(cos2π, sin2π)

are they reparametrisations?

A

γ_1 =γ_ℓ ◦ϕ
ϕ(t)= ℓt
t to ℓt
but
NO: check ARC LENGTH
|γ_ℓ ‘(t)| = 2πℓ
L(γ_ℓ|[0,1]) = ∫_{0,1} 2πℓ .dt
=2πℓ

|γ_1 ‘(t)| = 2π
L(γ_1|[0,1]) = ∫_{0,1} 2π .dt
=2π
not the same

note their image looks the same!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

UNIT SPEED CURVE

A

A PC γ : I → R^n is called a unit speed curve (USC) if |γ’(t)| = 1 for any t ∈ I.

MAKES IT EASIER TO FIND LENGTH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

PROPN 2.3 USC exist?

A

Let γ : I → R^n be an RPC. Then there exists a re-parametrisation γ˜ of γ that has unit speed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

PROOF:
Let γ : I → R^n be an RPC. Then there exists a re-parametrisation γ˜ of γ that has unit speed.

A

Proof. Pick a point t0 ∈ I and consider the arc-length function
s(t) = integral_[t_0,t] |γ’(τ )| dτ.

Clearly, s : I → R is a smooth function, and s’(t) = |γ’(t)| > 0. Denote by J the image of s; it
is an interval in R . Then s : I → J is bijective, and there is an
inverse function
ϕ = s−1: J → I.
By the inverse function theorem, ϕ is smooth,
ϕ’(τ ) =
(1/s’(ϕ(τ ))) > 0.

ϕ can be used as a parameter transformation

γ˜’(τ ) = γ’(ϕ(τ ))ϕ’(τ ) chain rule
= γ’(ϕ(τ ))/s’(ϕ(τ ))
= γ(ϕ(τ ))/ |γ’(ϕ(τ ))| ,
thus USC
|γ˜’(τ )| = 1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
DEFN normal component of acceleration
γₙ''(t) found by [γ''(t)- [γ''(t) *γ'(t)]\[|γ'(t)|²] γ'(t) ]
26
CURVATURE VECTOR OF γ
k(t) = (1/|γ'(t)|²) [γ''(t)- [γ''(t) *γ'(t)]\[|γ'(t)|²] γ'(t) ] =γₙ''(t) /|γ'(t)|² RECALL IN EXAM
27
diagrams for acceleration, velocity vectors
For a curve compute acceleration and velocity taking projection of acceleration on velocity v =γ'(t)/|γ'(t)| taking orthogonal component and γ'' prokected onto notmal ie γ'' projected onto γ'
28
true or false the curvature vector orthogonal to velocity?
true always k(t) *γ'(t) = (1/|γ'(t)|²) [γ''(t)*γ'(t) - [γ''(t) *γ'(t)]\[|γ'(t)|²] γ'(t)*γ'(t) ] =0??
29
true or false reparametrisation keeps arc length
true, it will have same properties, if we find a phi s,t it doesnt clearly this isnt a repara
30
PROP 2.4 curvature vector how does is change under re-parametrisation?
The curvature vector is unchanged under a re-parametrisation, that is if γ˜ : J → R^n is a re-parametrisation of an RPC γ : I → R^n, then ˜k(t) = k(ϕ(t)) for any t ∈ J, where γ˜ = γ ◦ ϕ, ˜k is the curvature vector of γ˜, and k is the curvature vector of γ
31
if USC dot prod γ' * γ'= γ'' * γ'
=1 =0 as if USC velocity orthogonal to acceleration
32
if our curve isnt USC?
we can always reparameterise into a USC preserving image traversed in same direction same #times regularity length and curvature preserved
33
EXAM EXAMPLE given a curve check its regular: Given 2 parametrised curves determine whether related by parametrisation or not γ_1(t)= a+tv line in R^n γ_2(t) = r(cos 2pit, sin2pit) γ_3(t) = a +t^3v
circle take line and wrap around circle 1 &3: 1 regular 3 not regular as γ'_3(0)=0 so not 1 and 2: straight line has curvature k(t)=0 so cant be repara of a circel as regions where curvature never equals 0
34
Given 2 parametrised curves determine whether related by parametrisation or not γ_2(t) = r(cos 2pit, sin2pit) defined for [0,1] γ_4(t) = r(cos 4pit, sin4pit)
both regular velocity >0 γ'_4(t) = 2γ'_2(t) length preserved? |γ'_2| = 2pi*r |γ'_4| = 4pi*r length arc different so not repara integrating over [0,1] gives double
35
CLOSED CURVES
DEFORMATIONS OF A CIRCLE e.g point end at same place
36
SPHERE IN R^3
2 parameters 2D object in R^3,R^4,..
37
def T-Periodic
A vector-function f : R → R^n is called T-periodic (or periodic with period T > 0) if f(t + T) = f(t) for any t ∈ R.
38
e.g periodicity of f(t) = sin(2πt) g(x) = sin (x ) h(t) = t^2
f(t) = sin(2πt) 1-periodic smooth function, g(x) = sin x 2π-periodic smooth function. On the other hand, any unbounded continuous function h : R → R (e.g. h(t) = t) can not be T-periodic with T > 0
39
continuous funct on closed interval period?
are bounded, may be periodic
40
PROPN 2.5 when do we have a periodic extension
A smooth function γ : [a, b] → R^n has a **smooth (b − a)-periodic extension** IFF all derivatives at the ends coincide γ⁽ᵐ⁾(a) = γ⁽ᵐ⁾(b) for any non-negative integer m.
41
L5 PROOF A smooth function γ : [a, b] → R^n has a **smooth (b − a)-periodic extension** IFF all derivatives at the ends coincide γ⁽ᵐ⁾(a) = γ⁽ᵐ⁾(b) for any non-negative integer m.
LONG SUMMARISE?? uses that ends coincide then periodic can be shown as adding f(a+T) =f(b)?
42
(T₁, T₂)-equivariant
A real-valued function ϕ : R → R is called (T₁, T₂)-equivariant for given positive real numbers T₁& T₂ , if ϕ(t + T₂) = ϕ(t) + T₁ for any t ∈ R. ie evaluated at t + T₂ same as evaluating at t and adding T₁ diagram 2T_2 for 2T_1 increments
43
example ϕ(t) = 2πt (T₁, T₂)-equivariant
( 2π, 1)-equivariant for any t in R ϕ(t + 1) = 2π(t + 1) = 2πt + 2π = ϕ(t) + 2π.
44
how are T periodic functs and (t_1,t_2) equivariant functs linked
*any T-periodic function is (0, T)-equivariant function. * derivative of a (T_1, T_2)-equivariant function is a T_2-periodic function. *equivariant functions often occur as integrals of periodic functions
45
L5: Let f : R → R be a T2-periodic function. Can you show that the function ϕ, defined below, is (T1, T2)-periodic: ϕ(t) = ∫_{0,t} f(s)ds, where T1 =∫_{0,T_2} f(s)ds
ϕ(t +T_2) = ∫_{0,t+T_2} f(s)ds using change of vars 𝜏=s-T_2 d𝜏/ds =1 𝜏_1= s_1-T_2=0 𝜏_2 =s-T_2 -t = ? = ∫_{0,T_2} f(s)ds + ∫_{T_2,t+T_2} f(s)ds = T_1 + ∫_{0,t+T_2} f(s)ds = T_1 +ϕ(t)
46
PROPN 2.6 equivariant function composed with periodic function gives
Let ϕ : R → R be a (T1, T2)-equivariant function. Then for any T1-periodic vector-function f : R → R^n the composition f ◦ ϕ is a T_2-periodic vector function. proof: For any t ∈ R f ◦ ϕ(t + T2) = f(ϕ(t + T2)) = f(ϕ(t) + T1) = f(ϕ(t)) = f ◦ ϕ(t), where in the second relation we used equivariance of ϕ, and in the third – the periodicity of f.
47
PROP 2.7 when to we have a (T_1,T_2) equivariant extension
Let ϕ : [c, d] → [a, b] be a surjective smooth function. Then it has a smooth (T1, T2)-equivariant extension ϕ¯ : R → R with T_1 = (b − a) and T_2 = (d − c) IFF ϕ(c) = a, ϕ(d) = b, and ϕ⁽ᵐ⁾(c) = ϕ⁽ᵐ⁾(d) for any integer m > 0. Proof. (For MATH5113M only.) The proof follows an argument similar to the one in the proof of Proposition II.5.
48
CLOSED PARAMETRISED CURVE
A vector-function γ : [a, b] → R n is called a closed parameterised curve (CPC) if it has a **(b − a)-periodic extension ¯γ : R → R^n that is a smooth map**. "no distinguished start /end"
49
when is a closed parametrised curve regular
A closed parameterised curve γ is called regular (RCPC), if its periodic extension ¯γ is regular
50
simple circular curve
an example of a closed regular curve γ : [0, 1] → R^2 γ(t) = (cos(2πt),sin(2πt)).
51
example: is this a closed parametrised curve Consider a PC γ : [0, 1] → R 2 given by γ(t) = (t^2 − t, sin 2πt)
γ(0) = γ(1) but not a CPC If γ would have a smooth periodic extension, then γ'(0) = γ'(1). but γ'(t) = (2t − 1, 2π cos 2πt) ⇒ γ'(0) = (−1, 2π) /= (1, 2π) = γ'(1)
52
γ_0(t)=(cos(2pi*t), sin(4pi*t)) t in [0,1] is this a RCPC
REGULAR CLOSED PC? has extension γ¬(t) = (cos(2pi*t, sin4pi*t) t in R γ_0(t)=2pi(-sin(2pi*t), 2cos(4pi*t)) periodic function in [0,o.5] will vanish when both sin cos =0 but =/0
53
is this a closed PC? γ:[0,1] to R^2 γ_0(t)= (t^2-t, sin2pi*t)
no because if it was a CPC it would have a smooth periodic extension and γ'(0)=γ'(1) at end points but these arent equal γ'(0)= (-1, 2pi) =/ (1, 2,pi) = γ'(1)
54
FOR A SMOOTH PERIODIC EXTENSION TO EXIST
MUST HAVE DERIVS PERIODIC AND COINCIDE AT a and b end points
55
when is a CPC a reparameterization
A CPC ˜γ : [c, d] → R^n is called the re-parametrisation of a CPC γ : [a, b] → R^n if there exists a surjective map ϕ : [c, d] → [a, b] that has a (T_1, T_2)-equivariant extension ¯ϕ : R → R with T1 = b − a and T2 = d − c s.t ¯ϕ is smooth, ¯ϕ'(t) > 0 for any t ∈ R, and γ¯˜ = ¯γ ◦ ϕ¯, where γ¯˜ and ¯γ are periodic extensions of ˜γ and γ respectively.
56
where does a CPC repara come from
We know any PC γ:[a,b] to R^n can be reparametrised to a PC defined on [0,1] γ~(t)= γ(a+t(b-a)) t in [0,1] if γ is a CPC then PC γ~ defined is also a CPC can use the above repara parameter as it is a ((b-a),1) equivariant extension with deriv >0
57
SIMPLE
A closed parametrised curve (CPC) γ : [a, b] → R^n is called simple if the restricted map γ| [a, b) is injective no self intersects
58
e.g is this simple? CPC γ` : [0, 1] → R^2 γ_ℓ(t) = (cos 2πℓt ,sin 2πℓt), where ℓ is an integer
is simple if and only if ℓ = 1 or = −1. Geometrically γ_ℓ wraps around γ_1 ` ℓ times; if ℓ > 0 it is traversed in the same direction, while if ℓ < 0 – in the opposite. 0/w self intersects and loops
59
true or false being SIMPLE depends on the parametrisation
false SIMPLE doensnt dep on repara as for each point there is a unique t in [a,b] meaning unique tau in [alpha,beta]
60
HOMOTOPY OF CLOSED CURVES
space of all paths joining points
61
DEF REGULAR HOMOTOPY
A regular homotopy from a closed curve α : [0, 1] → R^ n to a closed curve β : [0, 1] → R ^n is a continuous map F : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → R^ n that satisfies the following properties: (i) α(t) = F(0, t), β(t) = F(1, t) for any t ∈ [0, 1], and for any fixed τ ∈ [0, 1] the map[ t in [0, 1] t → F(τ, t) ∈ R^n is an RCPC. (ii) For any integer k > 0 the derivatives (∂k/∂tkF(τ, t)) are continuous in τ i idea of deformation ii ensures curvature change continuously under deformation
62
regular homotopy key points
*MAP will be a FAMILY OF CLOSED CURVES each value of tai smooth derivatives deformations change alpha(t) F(0,t) beta(t) F(1,t) F(tau,t) some other closed curve derivative property ensures curve geometry affected, acceleration and velocity affect curvature
63
in exam will need to know
definitions of curvature regular homotopy stating these given two curves alpha and beta, asked to prove RH by checking conditions and give formula for F
64
EXAM EXAMPLE Γ _1(t)=(cos 2πt,sin 2πt) t in [0.5,3/2]
Γ _1(t)_overline = overlineγ_1(t) periodic extension same as (cos 2pi*t, sin 2pi*t) so φ_overline : R to R φ_overline (t) = t -0.5 φ(t) =t -0.5 for [0.5,3/2] φ_overline (t+1) = φ_overline (t) +1 LHS: t +1 -0.5 = t -0.5+1 = RHS γ:[a,b] to R^n is a CPC overlineγ :R to R^n a (b-a) periodic extension φ:[0,1] to [a,b] φ(t)=a+t)b-a) φ'(t)=b-a>0 φ(t+1) = a+(t+1)(b-a) = overline_φ(t) + (b-a) and thusφ overline is (b-a,1) equivariant and this we have γ~ using this as a repara parameter is a repara of γ note arc lengths are the same for γ and overline_γ for a closed curve HOMOTOPY CAN CHANGE GEOMETRY OF THE CURVE
65
EXAM EXAMPLE check that the simple circle α(t) = (cos 2πt,sin 2πt) is regularly homotopic to the ellipse β(t) = (2 cos 2πt,sin 2πt), where t ∈ [0, 1].
F(τ, t) = ((1 + τ ) cos 2πt,sin 2πt), where τ, t ∈ [0, 1], CONDITIONS 1) F(0,t)= α(t) & F(1,t)= β(t) fix 𝜏 in [0,1] Show F(𝜏,t) is an RCPC F_𝜏: t to F(𝜏,t): check if **periodic extension is regular** OVERLINE_F_𝜏: R to R^2 F‾_𝜏(t) = ((1+𝜏)cos2pi*t, sin 2pi*t) is a smooth 1-perioduc funct deriv ert t=/0 checked >= 4pi^2(s^2+c^2) = 4pi^2 >0 2) kth derivatives wrt t of F(𝜏,t) = ((1+𝜏) ∂ᵏ/∂tᵏ cos2pi*t, ∂ᵏ/∂tᵏ sin2pi*t) 1+𝜏 depends on tau continuously (polynomial of first order)
66
deforming by homotopy methods
we can deform for example by horizontal lines or rays from the origin check velocity o this extension has no 0's ie never equal to 0 a periodic is easier to check for intervals
67
For example consider Γ _1(s)=(cos 2πs,sin 2πs) t in [0.5,3/2] same image as [ Γ _2(t)=(-cos 2πt,-sin 2πt) t in [0,1] homotopy?
same image as Γ _2(t)=(-cos 2πt,-sin 2πt) t in [0,1] by repara change of vars t=s-0.5 F(tau,t)= [cos pi𝜏, -sin pi𝜏] [sin pi𝜏 cos pi𝜏] * [cos 2pi*t] [sin 2pi*t] dep continuously on tai rank 1 rotation fraction tau/pi if tau=1 angle is pi [-1 0] [0 -1]
68
closed curves for integer vales of ℓ gamma_ℓ are these regularly homotopic
no
69
recall in exam regularly homotopic property PROP 2.8
The relation of being regularly homotopic is an equivalence relation on the set of closed regular curves (1) reflexivity α ∼ α, RH to itself (2) symmetry α ∼ β =⇒ β ∼ α, (3) transitivity α ∼ β and β ∼ γ =⇒ α ∼ γ.
70
proof The relation of being regularly homotopic is an equivalence relation on the set of closed regular curves (1) reflexivity α ∼ α, RH to itself (2) symmetry α ∼ β =⇒ β ∼ α, (3) transitivity α ∼ β and β ∼ γ =⇒ α ∼ γ.
(1) For any RCPC α : [0, 1] → R^n we define F(τ, t) = α(t). satisfied. (2) Let α and β : [0, 1] → R n be two RCPC for exists a regular homotopy from α to β, F : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → R^n ,F(0, t) = α(t), F(1, t) = β(t). Then the map G(τ, t) := F(1 − τ, t), where τ, t ∈ [0, 1] defines a regular homotopy from β to α, that is G(0, t) = β(t) and G(1, t) = α(t). The conditions in Definition II.18 for G follow from similar conditions for F. For example, for any fixed τ the map t 7−→ G(τ, t) is an RCPC, since G(τ, t) = F(1 − τ, t) and t 7−→ F(1 − τ, t) is an RCPC. We also see that for any k > 0 the derivative ∂^k/∂tk G(τ, t) = ∂ k/ ∂tk F(1 − τ, t) is continuous in τ , as a composition of continuous maps. (3) Suppose that α is regularly homotopic to β via a regular homotopy F, and β is regularly homotopic to γ via G. Consider the map H : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → R^n , H(τ, t) = {F(2τ, t), τ ∈ [0, 1/2]; {G(2τ − 1, t), τ ∈ [1/2, 1]. H satisfies condition a regular homotopy from α to γ
71
PROP 2.9 Every RCPC is regularly homotopic to
Every RCPC is regularly homotopic to an RCPC of unit length. proof: uses map F:[0,1] x [0,1' to R^m F(tau,t) = (1-tau + tau/L) gamma (t) and verifies conditions
72
Proposition II.10. Let γ˜ : [0, 1] → R^n be a re-parametrisation of an RCPC γ : [0, 1] → R^n. Then
Proposition II.10. Let γ˜ : [0, 1] → R^ n be a re-parametrisation of an RCPC γ : [0, 1] → R^n. Then γ and γ˜ are regularly homotopic.
73
PROOF Proposition II.10. Let γ˜ : [0, 1] → R^ n be a re-parametrisation of an RCPC γ : [0, 1] → R^n. Then γ and γ˜ are regularly homotopic.
Since ˜γ is a re-parametrisation of γ there exists a smooth function ¯ϕ : R → R such that: * ϕ¯(0) = 0, ¯ϕ(1) = 1, and ¯ϕ'(t) > 0 for any t ∈ R; * ϕ¯(t + 1) = ¯ϕ(t) + 1 for any t ∈ R; * γ¯˜ = ¯γ ◦ ϕ¯, where γ¯˜ and ¯γ are 1-periodic extensions of ˜γ and γ respectively. We define a map F¯ : [0, 1] × R → R n by setting F¯(τ, t) = ¯γ(τϕ¯(t) + (1 − τ )t). We claim that for any τ ∈ [0, 1] the map F¯_τ : t 7→ F¯(τ, t) is smooth, 1-periodic, and has non-vanishing derivative. Indeed, it is smooth as a composition of smooth functions. To verify 1-periodicity, we write F¯_τ (t + 1) = ¯γ(τϕ¯(t + 1) + (1 − τ )(t + 1)) = ¯γ(τϕ¯(t) + τ + (1 − τ )t + (1 − τ )) = γ¯(τϕ¯(t) + (1 − τ )t + 1) = ¯γ(τϕ¯(t) + (1 − τ )t) = F¯τ (t). Finally, computing the derivative we obtain F¯'τ (t) = ∂/∂tF¯(τ, t) = ¯γ'(τϕ¯(t) + (1 − τ )t)(τϕ¯'(t) + (1 − τ )). Since ¯γ' /= 0, we obtain that for any τ ∈ [0, 1] the derivative F¯' τ(t) 6= 0. These properties show that for any τ ∈ [0, 1] the restriction of F¯ τ to [0, 1] defines an RCPC. Now we define the homotopy F between γ and ˜γ by setting F(τ, t) := γ(τϕ(t) + (1 − τ )t). Clearly, F(0, t) = γ(t) and F(1, t) = γ(ϕ(t)) = ˜γ(t). We verify that the conditions of Definition II.18 hold. For any fixed τ ∈ [0, 1] the RPC F¯_τ is an 1-periodic extension of t → F(τ, t), and hence, the latter is an RCPC. To verify the second condition of Definition II.18 we should show that the derivative ∂^kF¯(τ, t)/∂t^k is continuous in τ for any t ∈ R. The latter is a consequence of the fact that F¯(τ, t) is defined as a composition of the maps whose all derivatives are continuous in τ .
74
to save time: notes from now on only thms and statements examples in written notes!
:(
75
Corollary II.11. Every RCPC γ is regularly homotopic to
Every RCPC γ is regularly homotopic to an RCPC of constant speed L, where L is the length of γ
76
Corollary II.12. Every RCPC γ is regularly homotopic to
Corollary II.12. Every RCPC γ is regularly homotopic to an RCPC of unit speed. Proof. The statement is direct consequence of Proposition II.9 and Corollary II.11
77
UNIT TANGENT VECTOR
v(t) = γ'(t)/ |γ'(t)|
78
unit normal vector
uses components of unit tangent vector n(t) := (−v2(t), v1(t)). like rotation 90 degrees
79
unit normal and unit tangent vector
vectors v(t) and n(t) are orthogonal and form a positively oriented basis of R
80
signed curvature
k(t) be a curvature vector to γ. As we know, it is orthogonal to v(t), and since γ is a plane curve, we conclude that k(t) = κ(t)n(t) for some real-valued function κ(t). The function κ(t) is called the signed curvature of γ
81
signed curvature and curvature
t |κ(t)| = |k(t)|.
82
Geometrically the signed curvature function κ(t)
measures the rate of change of a tangent line direction: when κ > 0 the curve is bending towards the unit normal, while when κ < 0 it is bending away from the normal. diagram of smother version of a kink ___B__ | | ----A-| |-------- signed curvature positive A curve bends towards unit normal points up ish signed curvature negative B curve bends away from unit normal points upish
83
left for readin: THM 2.13 Fundamental thm of plane curves
Given a smooth real-valued function κ : [a, b] → R, a point t0 ∈ [a, b], and vectors γ0, v0 ∈ R^2 such that |v_0| = 1, there exists a unique unit speed parametrised curve γ : [a, b] → R^2 whose signed curvature equals κ(t) and γ(t0) = γ0, γ'(t_0) = v_0.
84
Lemma θ function
Let γ : [a, b] → R^2 be a regular parametrised curve. Then there exists a smooth function θ : [a, b] → R such that the unit tangent vector v(t) satisfies the relation v(t) = (cos θ(t),sin θ(t)). If θ1 and θ2 are two such functions, then they differ only by an integer multiple of 2π, that is θ1(t) = θ2(t) + 2πm, where m ∈ Z is a constant. In particular, the quantity θ(b) − θ(a) uniquely determined by PC
85
angle parametrisation for unit tangent vector
v(t)= (Cos(θ(t), sinθ(t))
86
ROTATION INDEX for an RCPC
r(γ) := (1/2π)(θ(1) − θ(0)) ∈ Z is called the rotation index of γ. #times unit tangent vector v(t) winds around the unit circle S^1 anticlockwise counting positively angle is from 0 anticlockwise
87
e.g draw plane RCPC given γ1(t) = (cos(2πt),sin(2πt)) and γ2(t) = (cos(2πt),sin(4πt)), where t ∈ [0, 1]. Compute (analytically or visually) how many times the unit tangent vector winds around the unit circle S^1 for each curve.
circle anticlockwise curvature 1 derivative used in formula for rotation index =1 v(t)=(1/2pi)(deriv) used to find theta functs figure 8 curvature =0 never makes full turn unit tangent vector: γ'(t)=(-2pisin(2pit), 4picos(4pi*t)) v(t)= (-sin(2pi*t, 2cos(4pi*t) =(cos(θ(t), sin(θ(t)) cos(2pi*t + (pi/2)) = cos(pi/2)cos(2pi*t) - sin(pi/2)sin(2pi*t) =-sin2pi*t .....difficult analytically starts clockiwise turns anti but never makes full #turns so 0
88
θ for γ _ℓ(t)
rotation index = ℓ θ(t) = (pi/2) + 2*pi*ℓ*t
89
PROP 2.15 rotation index geoemtric formula
Let γ : [0, 1] → R^2 be a plane RCPC. Then its rotation index satisfies the relation r(γ) = (1/2π) integral_{0,1} κ(t)|γ(t)| dt, where κ is the signed curvature of γ proof: we know smooth theta exists s.t we can write the unit tangent vector. our first deriv will be multiple of this( modulus of first deriv) then subbin into formula
90
PROP 2.16 regularly homotopic does rotation index change
Regularly homotopic RCPCs have the same rotation index proof: defining a regular homotopy the rotation index defined as a formula for any curve in the homotopy takes integer values so must be constant by IVT
91
important thme WHITNEY GRAUSTEIN
Two regular closed plane curves are regularly homotopic if and only if they have the same rotation index
92
thm 2.18 Hopf
Let γ be a simple regular closed plane curve. Then its rotation index r(γ) equals either 1 or −1.
93
corollary 2.19 for simple regular closed plane curves regularly homotopic to
Any simple regular closed plane curve is regularly homotopic either to the standard circle [0, 1] t → (cos(2πt),sin(2πt)) or to the reversed standard circle [0, 1] t→ (cos(2πt), − sin(2πt)).
94
Corollary II.20. For any simple plane RCPC integral_[0,1] |κ(t)| |γ'(t)| dt > 2π
Corollary II.20. For any simple plane RCPC γ : [0, 1] → R^2 the following relation holds integral_[0,1] |κ(t)| |γ'(t)| dt > 2π; the equality occurs IFF κ(t) does not change sign (that is, κ(t) > 0 everywhere or κ(t)<=0 everywhere). proof in notes
95
if rotation index differs
curves arent RH to each other
96
circular curve cant be deformed to curve of length 2pi st signed curvature (t) >1
changing curvature changes length everywhere 1=r(gamma)=r(gamma~) if deformed same length contradiction as r(gamma~) = fromula using signed curvatiure > 1
97
if we have a closed curve with RI ℓ then its homotopic to
curve with RI ℓ so given a curve we cab either find the integral formula fro RI or guess and prove by constructng a regular homotopy applying whitney graustein thm
98
TOPOLOGICAL DEGREE METHOD
for RI counts #pre-images with signs 1) fix direction curve traversed tangent traverses anticlockwise for t in [0,1] 2) find points with same curvature signs will show curvature drawn a sketch chosen all points with same tangent/direction upwards curvature at 90 degrees anticlockwise to this drawn fixed unit bector signed curvature positive if points into a curve negative if points out of a curve added in exam we can do this or cumpute by constructing RH
99
cos 2pi*t, -sin2pit)
complicated drawing is actually regularly homotopic to circle traversed once clockwise
100
L5: when does a periodic extension exist?
when we have closed curves any closed curve can be parametrised to USC
101
L5: Bounded domain Ω
subset in R^2 open subset bounded by a SIMPLE REGULAR CLOSED PC image of surrounds it as a boundary
102
an example γ[0,1] to R^2 simple
restriction part injective with no self intersection until 0,1 restrict to [0,1) so we can use
103
common qs L5
among all domains in R^3 of a given area A find boundary with least length among all simple regular closed curves of given length L find a curve that encloses a domain of greatest area find a region of greatest area bounded by a straight line aand a curve of a fixed lengthwhose ends lie on the line (answer disk part of circle)
104
ISOPERIMETRIC INEQUALITY
Let Ω ⊂ R^2 be a domain bounded by a simple regular closed parametrised curve γ : [0, 1] → R^2 . Let A be the area of Ω, and L be the length of γ. Then the inequality 4πA <= L^2 holds, and the equality is achieved if and only if Ω is a disk.
105
Lemma II.2 (Green’s formula).
Let P(x, y) and Q(x, y) be two smooth real-valued functions defined on a domain Ω. Then the following relation holds: ∫∫_Ω [∂P/∂x + ∂Q/∂y]dxdy = ∫_γ (P dy − Qdx), where the right hand-side above is the anti-clockwise integral along the boundary curve γ = ∂Ω.
106
example
Let Ω ⊂ R^2 be a domain bounded by a simple regular closed unit speed curve γ : [0, L] → R^2 ; that is |γ'(t)| = 1 for any t ∈ [0, 1], and hence, L equals to the length of γ L(γ) = ∫_[0,L] |γ'(t)| dt = ∫_[0,L] 1dt = L Let n(t) be a unit normal vector to γ such that det(γ'(t), n(t)) = 1 for any t ∈ [0, L]. In other words, if γ'(t) has coordinates (x'(t), y'(t)), then n(t) = (−y'(t), x'(t)). We claim that the area A of the domain Ω satisfies the following relation: 2A = −∫_[0.L] (γ(t) · n(t))dt. Indeed, choosing P(x, y) = x and Q(x, y) = y, by Green’s formula we obtain 2A = 2∫∫_Ωdxdy = ∫∫_Ω (∂P/∂x + ∂Q/∂y) dxdy = ∫_γ (xdy − ydx) = ∫_[0,L] (xy' − yx')(t)dt = − ∫_[0,L] (γ(t) · n(t))dt.
107
WIRTINGERS INEQUALITY
Let f : R → R be a smooth L-periodic function such that ∫_[0,L] f(t)dt = 0. Then the following inequality holds ∫_[0,L] f^2(t)dt <= (L^2/4π^2) ∫_[0,L] (f'(t))^dt; the equality occurs if and only if f(t) = a cos(2πt/L) + b sin(2πt/L) for some a, b ∈ R. REMEMBER THE NAME? integral over period =0 tranlation left
108
curvature total curvature
For a given RCPC γ : [0, 1] → R n the quantity µ(γ) = integral_{0,1} |k(t)| |γ'(t)| dt, where k(t) is the curvature vector, is called the total curvature of γ
109
propn 2.4 for total curvature
Proposition II.4. Let γ˜ : [0, 1] → R n be a re-parametrisation of an RCPC γ : [0, 1] → R^n. Then the total curvatures of γ˜ and γ are equal, µ(˜γ) = µ(γ).
110
Theorem II.5 (Fenchel-Borsuk).
Let γ : [0, 1] → Rn be a simple regular closed parametrised curve. Then its total curvature µ(γ) is at least 2π, and it equals 2π if and only if the curve lies in an affine 2-plane and its signed curvature does not change sign. The statement above is a special property of closed curves. Simple examples show that the total curvature is not a topological invariant, that is it changes under the deformations of a curve.
111
isotopy
An isotopy of R^n is a continuous map Φ : [0, 1] × R^n → R^n such that for any fixed τ ∈ [0, 1] the map R^n x→ Φ(τ, x) ∈ R^ n is a homeomorphism, that is bijective, continuous, and the inverse map is also continuous
112
ambient isotopic l5
Definition II.3. Two simple RCPCs α : [0, 1] → Rn and β : [0, 1] → R n are called ambient isotopic if there exists an isotopy of Rn such that: * Φ(0, x) = x for any x ∈ Rn; * Φ(1, α(t)) = β(t) for any t ∈ [0, 1].
113
knotted
A simple RCPC is called unknotted if it is ambient isotopic to a plane circle. Otherwise, it is called knotted.
114
Theorem II.6 (F´ary-Milnor).
Let γ be a knotted simple RCPC. Then its total curvature is at least 4π, that is µ(γ) > 4π.
115
note l5
Tangent indicatrix. Let γ : [0, 1] → R n be an RCPC, and v(t) = γ'(t)/ |γ'(t)| be its unit tangent vector. In the sequel we use the notation S^{n−1} for a unit (n − 1)-dimensional sphere centred at the origin in the Euclidean space R^n S^{n−1} = {(x1, . . . , xn) ∈ R^n : x^2_1 + . . . + x^2_n = 1}.
116
tangent indicatrix
For a given RCPC γ : [0, 1] → R n the parametrised curve Γ : [0, 1] → S^{n−1} ⊂ R^n Γ(t) = v(t) = γ'(t)/|γ'(t)| is called the tangent indicatrix of γ
117
Proposition II.7. The total curvature and tangent indicatrix
Proposition II.7. The total curvature of an RCPC γ : [0, 1] → R^n is equal to the length of the tangent indicatrix Γ of γ, that is L(Γ) = µ(γ)
118
great circle
A great circle, or equator, in a unit sphere S n−1 is an RCPC γ : [0, 1] → R n of the form γ(t) = cos(2πt)e1 + sin(2πt)e2, where e1 and e2 are orthonormal vectors
119
Fact II.1. For any two different points p and q in a sphere S n−1 there exists a great circle γ that passes through p and q. Moreover, if p and q are not anti-podal, p /= −q, then such a great circle is unique.
Suppose that given points p and q ∈ S n−1 lie in a great circle γ. Then they divide it into two arcs γ1 and γ2, and we define the spherical distance between p and q by setting distS(p, q) = min{L(γ1), L(γ2)}. Note that distS(p, q) 6 π for any points p and q, and the equality occurs if and only if p and q are anti-podal, that is p = −q. Besides, distS(p, q) = 0 if and only if p = q. Note also that distS(p, q) = π/2 if and only if the points p and q, viewed as vectors in R n, are orthogonal.
120
Fact II.2. Let γ : [0, 1] → S n−1 ⊂ R n be a PC such that γ(0) = p and γ(1) = q. Then the spherical distance is not greater that the length of γ, that is distS(p, q) 6 L(γ). Moreover, the equality is achieved if and only if γ is an arc of a great circl
121
Exercise II.7. Check that the distance function distS(p, q) satisfies the triangle inequality
distS(p, q) 6 distS(p, z) + distS(z, q) for any points p, q, and z ∈ S n−1