Chapter 2 - Where to Start Flashcards

1
Q

Pseudoscience

A

A system of theories and methods that has some resemblance to a genuine science but that cannot be considered such

  • Various criteria for distinguishing pseudosciences from true sciences have been proposed, one of the most influential being that of falsifiability
  • On this basis, certain approaches to psychology and psychoanalysis have sometimes been criticized as pseudoscientific, as they involve theories or other constructs that cannot be directly or definitively tested by observation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Skepticism

A

The position that certainty in knowledge can never be achieved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Scientific Skepticism

A

Not accepting something as true unthinkingly, but rather seeking out and evaluating the relevant evidence to shape our beliefs about what might be true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Scientific Rationality

A

The qualities of reason and logic that characterize, or ought to characterize, scientific inquiry

  • For many, science is the epitome of rationality because of its adherence to the rules of logic and evidence, its rejection of supernatural explanations, its devotion of objectivity, and its careful public testing of hypotheses
  • A commitment to standards and procedures of this kind is usually taken to be the criterion by which a discipline, such as psychology, may be judged to be a science
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Scientific Method

A

A set of procedures, guidelines, assumptions, and attitudes required for the organized and systematic collection, interpretation, and verification of data and the discovery of reproducible evidence, enabling laws and principles to be stated or modified.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Literature Reviews

A

Narrative summary of the past research conducted on a particular topic.

The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings.

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was developed to facilitate transparent and complete reporting of systematic reviews.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Meta-Analyses

A

A quantitative technique for synthesizing the results of multiple studies of a phenomenon into a single result by combining the effect size estimates from each study into a single estimate of the combined effect size or into a distribution of effect sizes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Developing Hypotheses and Predictions

A
  1. Theories
  2. Hypotheses
  3. Predictions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Scientific Reasoning

A

A type of reasoning that involves the generation of hypotheses and the systematic testing of those hypotheses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Theories

A

A principle or body of interrelated principles that purports to explain or predict a number of interrelated phenomena.

In the philosophy of science, a set of logically related explanatory hypotheses that are consistent with a body of empirical facts and that may suggest more empirical relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hypotheses

A

An empirically testable proposition about some fact, behaviour, relationship, or the like, usually based on theory, that states an expected outcome resulting from specific conditions or assumptions.

Hypotheses state conceptual relations between variables.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Predictions

A

Predictions: an attempt to foretell what will happen in a particular case, generally on the basis of past instances or accepted principles.

A theoretical prediction gives the expected results of an experiment or controlled observation in accordance with the logic of a particular theory.

Predictions state relations between variables that have been operationalized.

In science, the use of prediction and observation to test hypotheses is a cornerstone of the empirical method.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

inductive vs. deductive reasoning

A

Inductive: Developing generalizations from specific observations

Deductive: Developing specific predictions from general principles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Law of Parsimony (Occam’s Razor)

A

The principle that the simplest explanation of an event or observation is the preferred explanation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Parsimony

A

The scientific principle of parsimony dictates that the least complex theory is the most desirable, because it is the easiest to falsify

If the less parsimonious theory explains the data substantially better, then choose the less parsimonious theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Falsifiability

A

The condition of admitting falsification: the logical possibility that an assertion, hypothesis, or theory can be shown to be false by an observation or experiment.

17
Q

Good vs bad hypotheses

A

Good:
- Make predictions that expose themselves to falsification
- Make specific predictions = strong support

Bad:
- Make predictions that are difficult to falsify
- Make general predictions = weak support

18
Q

Parsimony and Falsifiability

A

Fewer conceptual relationships (assumptions) = less data required to counter a theory

Fewer adjustments to established relationships in science = less data required to test adjustments