Chapter 3 Crime

Question 1

Pennington and Hastie method and sample

Answer 1

Lab experiment

130 students mock jury northwestern and Chicago uni

Question 2

Procedure for Pennington and Hastie

Answer 2

Listened to tape recording then responded to written questions
Guilty 1 not guilty 5 rated confidence on scale
A story order both
B witness order both
C defence story and prosecution witness
D defence witness prosecution story
C 31% D 78% guilty

Question 3

Effect of order of testimony background

Answer 3

Defence work interest of client
Prosecution
Primary recency effect
Reconstructive memory barlett

Question 4

Background study for Cramer

Answer 4

Korera et al 
Ivs 
No expert witness
Repetitive (science, example no link)
Concrete (science and link to case)
Standard expert ( science no example)

Question 5

Describe procedure of kassin and sommers

Answer 5

Videotape of transcript - man accused of murdering wife and neighbour
Control - heard case without further evidence
Experimental
Admissible - wiretap evidence allowed
Due process - ignore no warrant
Unreliable - difficult to hear