Chapter 4 - 5: Social Perception & The Self Flashcards
(72 cards)
Self-Enhancement Bias - Case Study, Miller & McFarland
When rating themselves vs. others (e.g., best friends/roommates), people tend to rate themselves more positively
Results: People often rate themselves more favourably than they rate others
Weighted Averaging Model - Case Study, Anderson
Combined information about others by averaging traits, but we give more importance to traits that matter most to us
E.g., John
Unweighted:
- John is rated 8/10 for being smart and 4/10 for being attractive. The average score is 6/10
Weighted:
- If we care more about intelligence, we give it more weight. So even if John is rated 4/10 for being attractive, his overall rating might be lower than 6/10 because we value intelligence more
What is discounting principle?
When people focus on the most likely cause of behaviour and ignore other possible reasons
What is augmentation principle?
If there is both an inhibitory (-) and facilitative (+) cause for behaviour, the role of the facilitative cause is deemed greater (now ++)
Inhibitory - stops or reduce behaviour
Facilitative - helps or encourages behaviour
E.g., You’re studying for a test:
- Inhibitory: you’re tired, making it harder to focus
- Facilitative: you have a quiet place to study, which helps you focus
Even if you’re tired, the quiet space makes you focus more
Augmentation Principle - Case Study, Olson & Roese
Participants told that the room inhibited laughter rated jokes as funnier. They reasoned that if they laughed in such a dull room, the joke must be really funny
Results: when both inhibitory and facilitative causes are present, we give more weight to the facilitative cause (the funny joke)
Take home message: when both positive and negative factors affect behaviour, we give more weight to the positive factor. In this case, the dull room (negative) was “discounted,” and the funny jokes (positive) were “augmented”
Car in Ditch (Discounting vs. Augmentation) - Case Study, Olson et al.
Car in Ditch: Is there ice on the road?
Yes -> Accident caused by poor driving conditions (discounting principle)
No -> Accident caused by poor driving skills
No, and the road was straight -> Extremely poor driving skills caused the accident (augmentation principle)
What is covariation model?
A way of figuring out why someone behaves a certain way by checking if the behaviour happens consistently, in different situations, and if others do the same thing
ANOVA Model (3 factors)
The Actor: who is doing the behaviour (e.g., Suzie or basketball player)
Entity: who/what the behaviour is directed toward
Situation: the context or environment of the behaviour
Kelly’s Theory of Attributions (3 concepts)
- Consistency - does the person usually behave this way in this situation?
Yes -> we look for an explanation (tendency to overplay consistency) - Distinctiveness - does the person behave differently in different situations?
No -> internal attribution (e.g., personality)
Yes -> external attribution (e.g., the situation) - Consensus - do others behave similarly in this situation?
No -> internal attribution (e.g., personality)
Yes -> external attribution (e.g., the situation/environment)
Quiz Game Experiment - Case Study, Ross et al.
Host, contestant, and audience participate in a quiz game
Results:
- Participants answered 4/10 questions correctly
- Host realized they weren’t smarter than the contestant
- Contestants downplayed the host’s intelligence despite choosing the questions
Take home message: People tend to downplay others’ abilities that make others look better than them to avoid feeling less competent
What is the two-Step process of attribution?
Step 1: We automatically assume someone’s behaviour is caused by their personality (internal)
Step 2: We consider if the situation might have influenced their behaviour and adjust our judgment accordingly
What is the Ultimate Attribution Error?
When people from other groups (outgroups) do something bad, we think it’s because of who they are (their personality).
If they do something good, we say it’s because of luck.
For people in our own group (ingroup), we do the opposite:
we think good things they do are because of their personality and bad things are because of the situation
Quiz Show - Case Study, Pettigrew & Martin
White observers blamed their own group’s (whites’) poor performance on situations (like tough questions), but blamed the other group’s (blacks’) poor performance on their abilities (personal traits)
What is Linguistic Intergroup Bias?
Abstract language = permanent traits (used for ingroup’s positive and outgroup’s negative behaviour)
Concrete language = temporary situations (used for ingroup’s negative and outgroup’s positive behaviour)
Abstract for ingroup (permanent): “our team is always hardworking”
Concrete for ingroup (temporary):
“our team lost because of the weather”
Abstract for outgroup (permanent):
“the other team is lazy”
Concrete for outgroup (temporary):
“the other team lost because of the crowd”
What is illusions of control & belief in a just world?
People believe they can control random events (e.g., lottery tickets, gambling)
Illusions of Control - Case Study, Knox & Inkster
Vancouver race rack - participants rated their horse’s chance of winning
Before placing bet: rated chances lower
After placing bet: rated chances higher (illusion of control over outcome)
Results:
People feel more confident about their choice after they make a decision. After placing the bet, people think their chosen horse has a better chance of winning, even though nothing about the situation has changed.
What is the upside and downside of belief in a just world?
Upside:
- invest in long-term goal (e.g., study more for a test)
- accept and learn from negative feedback (e.g., improve after criticism)
Downside:
- higher depression and stress
- blaming innocent victims
Belief in Just World - Meta-analysis, Kong et al.
- Nicer people score higher on Belief in a Just World
- More agreeable people blame victims more
- Believe they have control over outcomes
Social Comparison Theory (upward & downward comparison)
Social comparison: we learn about ourselves by comparing with others
Upward comparison: compare to people better than us to improve
Downward comparison: compare to people worse than us to feel better
What is social perception?
How we form impressions of other people and make conclusions about them
What is nonverbal communication?
How we communicate without words, using facial expressions, tone of voice, gestures, body language, touch, and eye contact
What is encode?
Express or show nonverbal behaviour
e.g., smiling or patting someone on the back
What is decode?
Interpret the meaning of others’ nonverbal behaviour
e.g., someone crossing their arms and frowns, we decode it as them being upset, not just cold
What is affect blend?
When different parts of the face show different emotions at the same time
e.g., someone might smile with their mouth but look angry with their eyes