Chapter 4 - 5: Social Perception & The Self Flashcards

(72 cards)

1
Q

Self-Enhancement Bias - Case Study, Miller & McFarland

A

When rating themselves vs. others (e.g., best friends/roommates), people tend to rate themselves more positively

Results: People often rate themselves more favourably than they rate others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Weighted Averaging Model - Case Study, Anderson

A

Combined information about others by averaging traits, but we give more importance to traits that matter most to us

E.g., John
Unweighted:
- John is rated 8/10 for being smart and 4/10 for being attractive. The average score is 6/10

Weighted:
- If we care more about intelligence, we give it more weight. So even if John is rated 4/10 for being attractive, his overall rating might be lower than 6/10 because we value intelligence more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is discounting principle?

A

When people focus on the most likely cause of behaviour and ignore other possible reasons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is augmentation principle?

A

If there is both an inhibitory (-) and facilitative (+) cause for behaviour, the role of the facilitative cause is deemed greater (now ++)

Inhibitory - stops or reduce behaviour
Facilitative - helps or encourages behaviour

E.g., You’re studying for a test:
- Inhibitory: you’re tired, making it harder to focus
- Facilitative: you have a quiet place to study, which helps you focus

Even if you’re tired, the quiet space makes you focus more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Augmentation Principle - Case Study, Olson & Roese

A

Participants told that the room inhibited laughter rated jokes as funnier. They reasoned that if they laughed in such a dull room, the joke must be really funny

Results: when both inhibitory and facilitative causes are present, we give more weight to the facilitative cause (the funny joke)

Take home message: when both positive and negative factors affect behaviour, we give more weight to the positive factor. In this case, the dull room (negative) was “discounted,” and the funny jokes (positive) were “augmented”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Car in Ditch (Discounting vs. Augmentation) - Case Study, Olson et al.

A

Car in Ditch: Is there ice on the road?
Yes -> Accident caused by poor driving conditions (discounting principle)

No -> Accident caused by poor driving skills

No, and the road was straight -> Extremely poor driving skills caused the accident (augmentation principle)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is covariation model?

A

A way of figuring out why someone behaves a certain way by checking if the behaviour happens consistently, in different situations, and if others do the same thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

ANOVA Model (3 factors)

A

The Actor: who is doing the behaviour (e.g., Suzie or basketball player)

Entity: who/what the behaviour is directed toward

Situation: the context or environment of the behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Kelly’s Theory of Attributions (3 concepts)

A
  1. Consistency - does the person usually behave this way in this situation?
    Yes -> we look for an explanation (tendency to overplay consistency)
  2. Distinctiveness - does the person behave differently in different situations?
    No -> internal attribution (e.g., personality)
    Yes -> external attribution (e.g., the situation)
  3. Consensus - do others behave similarly in this situation?
    No -> internal attribution (e.g., personality)
    Yes -> external attribution (e.g., the situation/environment)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Quiz Game Experiment - Case Study, Ross et al.

A

Host, contestant, and audience participate in a quiz game

Results:
- Participants answered 4/10 questions correctly
- Host realized they weren’t smarter than the contestant
- Contestants downplayed the host’s intelligence despite choosing the questions

Take home message: People tend to downplay others’ abilities that make others look better than them to avoid feeling less competent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the two-Step process of attribution?

A

Step 1: We automatically assume someone’s behaviour is caused by their personality (internal)

Step 2: We consider if the situation might have influenced their behaviour and adjust our judgment accordingly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the Ultimate Attribution Error?

A

When people from other groups (outgroups) do something bad, we think it’s because of who they are (their personality).

If they do something good, we say it’s because of luck.

For people in our own group (ingroup), we do the opposite:
we think good things they do are because of their personality and bad things are because of the situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Quiz Show - Case Study, Pettigrew & Martin

A

White observers blamed their own group’s (whites’) poor performance on situations (like tough questions), but blamed the other group’s (blacks’) poor performance on their abilities (personal traits)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Linguistic Intergroup Bias?

A

Abstract language = permanent traits (used for ingroup’s positive and outgroup’s negative behaviour)

Concrete language = temporary situations (used for ingroup’s negative and outgroup’s positive behaviour)

Abstract for ingroup (permanent): “our team is always hardworking”

Concrete for ingroup (temporary):
“our team lost because of the weather”

Abstract for outgroup (permanent):
“the other team is lazy”

Concrete for outgroup (temporary):
“the other team lost because of the crowd”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is illusions of control & belief in a just world?

A

People believe they can control random events (e.g., lottery tickets, gambling)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Illusions of Control - Case Study, Knox & Inkster

A

Vancouver race rack - participants rated their horse’s chance of winning

Before placing bet: rated chances lower

After placing bet: rated chances higher (illusion of control over outcome)

Results:
People feel more confident about their choice after they make a decision. After placing the bet, people think their chosen horse has a better chance of winning, even though nothing about the situation has changed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the upside and downside of belief in a just world?

A

Upside:
- invest in long-term goal (e.g., study more for a test)
- accept and learn from negative feedback (e.g., improve after criticism)

Downside:
- higher depression and stress
- blaming innocent victims

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Belief in Just World - Meta-analysis, Kong et al.

A
  • Nicer people score higher on Belief in a Just World
  • More agreeable people blame victims more
  • Believe they have control over outcomes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Social Comparison Theory (upward & downward comparison)

A

Social comparison: we learn about ourselves by comparing with others

Upward comparison: compare to people better than us to improve

Downward comparison: compare to people worse than us to feel better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is social perception?

A

How we form impressions of other people and make conclusions about them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is nonverbal communication?

A

How we communicate without words, using facial expressions, tone of voice, gestures, body language, touch, and eye contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is encode?

A

Express or show nonverbal behaviour

e.g., smiling or patting someone on the back

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is decode?

A

Interpret the meaning of others’ nonverbal behaviour

e.g., someone crossing their arms and frowns, we decode it as them being upset, not just cold

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is affect blend?

A

When different parts of the face show different emotions at the same time

e.g., someone might smile with their mouth but look angry with their eyes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
What are display rules?
Determine which emotions are appropriate to show in different situations e.g., in some cultures, it's not acceptable to show anger in public
26
What are emblems?
Nonverbal gestures with specific meanings in a culture, often with direct verbal translations e.g., "okay" sign made with the hand
27
What is implicit personality theory?
Type of schema where people link certain traits together e.g., if someone is kind, they may also be seen as generous
28
What is attribution theory?
Study of how people explain the causes of their own and others' behaviour
29
What is internal attribution?
When we believe a person is behaving a certain way because of something about them, like their attitude, character, or personality
30
What is external attribution?
When we believe a person's behaviour is due to the situation they are in, assuming most people would react the same way in that situation
31
What is perceptual salience?
Information that grabs people's attention. We tend to think it's more important or causes behaviour just because it's the focus of our attention
32
What is the two-step process of attribution?
1. We automatically assume someone
33
What is actor/observer difference?
When others act a certain way, we think it's because of who they are When we act the same way, we blame the situation instead
34
What are self-serving attributions?
When we succeed, we credit ourselves (internal reasons), but when we fail, we blame the situation (external reasons)
35
What are defensive attributions?
Explanations we give for behaviour to protect ourselves or make us less worried about bad things happening to us
36
Schematics vs. Aschematics - Case Study, Markus et al.
Watched video behaviour of man in dorm room Part 1: irrelevant (e.g., eat apple) Part 2: masculine (e.g., lifting weights) Schematics (men with masculine self-schemas) viewed masculine behaviour in larger chunks (e.g., lifting weights as one big action), while aschematics saw it as smaller number of units, chunk larger units
37
What is the working self-concept?
The version of ourselves that we show in different situations (e.g., work, school, with friends), it can change depending on the context
38
What is stability?
Parts of who we are that stay the same over time e.g., always thinking of yourself as a kind person, even if you are in different situations. This quality of kindness stays constant
39
What is malleability?
You act differently in different situations e.g., you might be serious at work, but more fun with friends
40
What is self serving biases?
Seeing yourself in a positive way, often giving yourself credit for good things and blaming others or situations for bad things
41
How do we explain successes and failures for ourselves and our groups?
We credit ourselves for successes and blame external factors for failures. The same goes for our groups, like giving the team credit for wins
42
What is the better-than-average effect (BTAE)?
We tend to think we're better than most people in things like intelligence, appearance, or driving e.g., many people rate themselves higher than their peers
43
Better-Than-Average Effect - Case Study, Cross
US professors rated themselves as better than average When rating: Objective traits (like height) -> less bias Subjective traits (like character) -> more bias
44
Narcissism - Meta-Analysis, Twenge et al.
Scores on the Narcissistic Personality Inventory increased over time, showing that college students have become more narcissistic over the years
45
What is false consensus
Overestimate how much bothers share our attitudes and behaviours e.g., climate change, we may assume everyone shares our views
46
Self-Perceptions of Bias - Case Study, Hodson et al.
"Do you consider yourself biased against Blacks?" (yes/no response) Results: People who acknowledged bias perceived others, including fellow whites and blacks, as more prejudiced Non-prejudiced individuals tend to believe others were not biased either
47
What is false uniqueness?
Underestimate how much others share our attitudes and behaviours e.g., if someone dislikes a popular TV show, they may assume that very few people feel the same, even though many others might share the same opinion
48
Self-Discrepancies - Meta-Analysis, Mason et al.
Found that more self-discrepancies lead to more negative emotions. Not meeting your ideal self causes stronger negative effects than not meeting your ought self e.g., if you want to be a successful scientist (ideal self), but aren't, it may cause more stress than just feeling like you should be successful (ought self)
49
Self-Discrepancies: Japanese vs. American - Case Study, Heine et al.
Found that a mirror affect behaviour differently for Japanese and American students Results: Americans with a mirror - expressed more self-discrepancy Japanese with a mirror - reduced it slightly Japanese without a mirror - expressed more self-discrepancy
50
What is self-handicapping?
Someone creates an excuse for potential failure to protect their self-image e.g., "I didn't do well because I went partying before the exam"
51
Self-handicapping - Major Methods,
1. Creating obstacles (e.g., getting drunk) 2. Making excuses (e.g., "I'm not feeling well") Research findings: - Men tend to self-handicap more than women, often using drugs or alcohol - Women are more likely to claim physical illness or stress as an excuse
52
How do self-presentation strategies differ across cultures?
Eastern cultures: focus on "saving face" and avoiding public embarrassment (e.g., renting guests for weddings or funerals in Japan) Western cultures: person might carefully craft their LinkedIn profile to highlight achievements and skills to create a professional image, aiming for career advancement
53
Humble bragging - Case Study, Sezer et al.
When someone masks bragging with a complaint or humility to elicit sympathy and impress others e.g., "I can't believe they nominated me for this aware, and now want me to give a talk in front of thousands" Findings: Humble bragging is less effective than simple bragging, leading to reduced liking, perceived competence, compliance with requests, and financial generosity
54
What is self-esteem? How does it differ at high and low levels?
It is your overall self-evaluation or sense of self-worth, essentially how much you like yourself High self-esteem: you regard yourself highly, feel proud, and are satisfied with your attributes and performance (can be linked to aggression or bullying) Low self-esteem: you view yourself as a failure, feel useless, have little self-respect, and are generally dissatisfied with yourself
55
Threat: Romantic vs. Intelligence - Case Study, Murray et al.
High self-esteem: after threats, people enhanced their view of the relationship, using it to boost self-worth Low self-esteem: after threats, people doubted their partner's positive feelings and distanced themselves
56
Self-esteem - Case Study, Swim & Hyers
Study 1: - Female participants worked with confederates (mostly men) and selected people for desert island survival - Some confederates made sexist comments, such as "we need to keep the women in shape" or "we need more women to keep the men satisfied" Study 2: - Women were asked how they would respond to sexism in such situations - Very few confronted the sexist comments even though many claimed they would take action
57
What are self-schemas?
Ideas we have about ourselves (like our traits and preferences). They help us remember and think about who we are
58
What is an independent view of the self?
Defining yourself by your own thoughts, feelings, and actions, rather than by how others think, feel, or act e.g., a person who values their personal opinions and decisions, regardless of what their friends or family think, is using an independent view of the self
59
What is interdependent view?
Defining yourself based on your relationships with others, recognizing that your behaviour is influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and actions of those around you e.g., a person who makes decisions based on how their family or friends feel about them
60
What is introspection?
Process of looking inward and examining your own thoughts, feelings, and motives e.g., when you take time to reflect on why you feel nervous before a big presentation
61
What is self-awareness theory?
When people focus on themselves, they evaluate and compare their behaviour to the internal standards and values e.g., when you look in a mirror before an important meeting and think about whether your actions align with your personal values, you're experiencing self-awareness
62
What are casual theories?
Ideas about the causes of our own feelings and behaviours, often learned from culture (e.g., "absence makes the heart grow fonder" meaning you feel more affection for those you love when parted from them) e.g., believing that feeling nervous before a big event means you care about it deeply, based on cultural ideas about emotions
63
What is self-perception theory?
When we're unsure about our attitudes or feelings, we figure them out by observing our behaviour and the situation around us e.g., if you find yourself laughing at a comedy show, you might conclude that you enjoy it, even if you didn't feel strongly about it before
64
What is intrinsic motivation?
Desire to do something because you enjoy it or find it interesting, not because of external rewards or pressures e.g., Reading a book simply because you love the story, not because you're being graded or rewarded
65
What is extrinsic motivation?
The desire to do something because of external rewards or pressures, not because you enjoy the task e.g., studying for a test to get a good grade rather than because you find the subject interesting
66
What is the overjustification effect?
When people think their behaviour is driven by external rewards, making them underestimate how much they did it because they genuinely enjoyed it e.g., if you love drawing and then start getting paid for it, you may start to think you only draw for the money, not because you enjoy it
67
What are task-contingent rewards?
Given for completing a task, regardless of how well it is done e.g., receiving a certificate just for participating in a race, no matter where you finish
68
What are performance-contingent rewards?
Given based on how well we perform a task e.g., earning a bonus at work for meeting a sales target
69
What is the looking-glass self?
Idea that we see ourselves through the eyes of others and incorporate their views into our self-concept e.g., if others praise you for being kind, you may start to see yourself as a kind person
70
What is sociometer theory?
Self-esteem acts as a measure, monitoring how accepted or rejected we are by others e.g., if you feel left out of a social group, your self-esteem might drop as a sign of being socially rejected
71
What is self-enhancement?
Having an unrealistically positive view of oneself e.g., believing you're always the best at everything. eve when others outperform you
72
What is self-verification theory?
People seek confirmation of their self-concept whether it's positive or negative. This desire can sometimes conflict with the need to maintain a positive self-view e.g., if you think of yourself as shy, you may seek out situations or feedback that confirm this, even if it hurts your self-esteem