Chapter 4- Approaches Flashcards
(49 cards)
Describe Wundt’s contribution to behavioural psychology:
- Wundt is known as father of psychology - moved from philosophical roots to controlled research
- Set up first psychology lab in Liepzig, Germany in 1870s
- Promoted the use of introspection as a way of studying mental processes.
- **Introspection = ** systematic analysis of own conscious experiment of a stimulus
- An experience was analysed in temrs of its component parts, e.g. sensations, emotional reaction
- His work paved the way for later controlled research and study of mental processes.
Outline Wundt’s scientific method to investigate the human mind.
- First to open lab designated to scientific study of psychological enquiry under controlled conditions
- = accurate measurements and replication
- focus was trying to understand psychological processes than philosophical/biological processes.
- later realised that higher mental processes were difficult to study using his procedures
- ….. encouraged others to pave new ways of approaching them, e.g. scanning
- introspection is commonly used today, e.g. therapy and studying emotional states
Evaluate Wundt’s scientific method to investigate the human mind:
One strength of Wundt’s work is that some of his methods were systematic and well-controlled.
All introspections were recorded in the controlled environment of the lab, ensuring that possible
extraneous variables were not a factor. Procedures and instructions were standardised so all participants received same information and were tested in same way.
This suggests that Wundt’s research can be considered crucial to later scientific approaches in psychology, such as the behaviourist approach.
One limitation is that other aspects of Wundt’s research would be considered unscientific today.
Wundt relied on participants self-reporting their mental processes. Such data is subjective (influenced by a personal perspective). Also participants may have hidden some of their thoughts. It is difficult to establish meaningful ‘laws of behaviour’ from such data. And general laws are useful to predict future behaviour, one of the aims of science.
This suggests that some of Wundt’s early efforts to study the mind were flawed and would not meet the criteria of scientific enquiry.
Outline the ‘scientific method’:
- Step 1: ask a Q
- Step 2: state a hypothesis
- Step 3: conduct an experiment
- Step 4: analyse results
- Step 5: Make conclusion
- Focus on being objective
- Reflection on sensations, feeling, images
- Wundt would ask people to focus on everyday object + look inwards noticing sensations and feelings and images
- breaking thoughts about object down to separate elements
- systematic reporting of experience of object
- specific examples, e.g. metronome.
What are some weaknesses of introspection?
- Behaviourist psychologists such as Watson questioned scientific status of introspection as it produced subjective data. The PPs were recalling their own conscious thoughts meaning results vary from PP to PP.
- Conscious thoughts are mental processes that cannot be observed and measured. A truly scientific psychology should be focussing on phenomenon that can be observed and measured. = empirical methods
Evaluate the ‘Scientific Method’:
- Strength: knowledge acquired is accurate and produces facts due to controlled studies. Once cause is established, treatments can develop.
- Strength: allows the causes of behaviour to be established and theories developed - these can be tested and modified
- Weakness: focusses on being objective and conducting research in highly controlled environments, lacks mundane realism, can findings be generalised to everyday life?
- Weakness: Certain areas of mind cannot be observed therefore cannot be measured using scientific method. Tells us little about how people behave in natural environment. Limited method.
What is structuralism?
Wilhelm Wundt developed the idea that the structure of the human mind was to be studied by breaking down behaviours into basic elements.
What IS introspection?
PPs asked to reflect on their own cognitive processes and describe them.
Describe the origins of psychology from 1879 to 1900s:
Describe the origins of psychology from 1913 to 1950s:
Describe the origins of psychology from 1960s to the 1980s:
Behavioural Approach: who came up with classical conditioning and outline it, with example:
Pavlov
2 previously unconnected stimuli paired together repeatedly. One called UCS - provokes unlearned response, other called NS, which provokes no response.
Learing occurs when 2 stimuli are associated with each other. Eventually, NS alone will produce same behavioural response as UCS.
= CS ——-> CR
Behavioural Approach: who came up with Operant Conditioning and outline it.
Evaluate behaviourist approach:
Outline B.F. Skinner’s expt:
Skinner conducted experiments with rats, and sometimes pigeons, in specially designed cages called Skinner boxes.
Every time the rat activated a lever (or pecked a disc in the case of the pigeon) within the box it was rewarded with a food pellet. From then on the animal would continue to perform the behaviour.
(B) Skinner also showed how rats and pigeons could be conditioned to perform the same behaviour to avoid an unpleasant stimulus, for example an electric shock.
Outline Ivan Pavlov’s experiment:
Pavlov showed how dogs could be conditioned to salivate to the sound of a bell if that sound was repeatedly presented at the same time as they were given food.
Gradually, Pavlov’s dogs learned to associate the sound of the bell (a stimulus) with the food (another stimulus) and would produce the salivation response every time they heard the sound.
Thus, Pavlov was able to show how a neutral stimulus, in this case a bell, can come to elicit a new learned response (conditioned response) through association.
SLT: who came up with theory, briefly outline the theory and describe the 4 mediational processes:
SLT: what is identification?
SLT: Outline Bandura’s BOBO doll expt:
Bandura (1961)
recorded behaviour of young children who watched an Adult behave in aggressive way towards Bobo doll. Adult hit hammer at Bobo doll and shouted abuse to it.
Later, children observed interacting with Bobo Doll + found to act more aggressively towards Doll than children who observed non-aggressive adult.
Imitation + motor reproduction + identification + role models
Evaluate SLT by Bandura:
- Strength: Cognitive Factors accounted; neither CC or OpC can offer adequate account of learning processes of individuals (free will). SLT suggests that humans + animals store info about behaviour of others and use this to make judgement about when it is appropraite to perform certain actions = non-reductionist approach. NOT LIKE A MACHINE (non-machine-reductionist approach). *Bandura says that learning would be hazardous if people relied solely on the effects of their own actions to inform them what to do. From observing others, people form idea of how to do new behaviour = guide for action. *
- COUNTERPOINT!: Weakness: too little reference of influence of biological factors in SLT. Bandura thought learning dependent on environmental stimuli. Recent studies suggest observational learning is result or mirror neurons in brain. THEREFORE, biological processes deeply under emphasised in SLT.
- ISSUES WITH BOBO DOLL study - similar to that of behavioural approach. SLT evidence gathered through Lab Expts. Many of Bandura’s ideas developed through observation of young children in lab = contrived nature = demand char + lack of mundane realism (therefore lower internal and external validity)
- Explained = main purpose of bobo doll is to hit it (it was a punchbag), children behaved in way they thought was expected of them. THEREFORE, research tells us little about how children actually learn aggression in everyday life.
- Strength: SLT principles applied to real life behaviours. SLT has advantage of being able to explain cultural differences in behaviour. SLT principles (modelling, imitation, reinforcement) can account for how children learn from other around them, including media. E.g. gender role, boys = blue, girls = pink. THEREFORE, increases value of approach and accounts for real-world behaviour.
Cog Approach: What is MRI?
Cog Approach: What is fMRI?
Cog Approach: What is a PET scan?
Cog Approach: What is an EEG?