Chapter 5- Psychopathology Flashcards
(46 cards)
What is Statistical Infrequency as a definition of abnormality?
What is Deviation from Social Norms as a definition of abnormality?
What is Failure to Function as a definition of abnormality?
What is Deviation from ideal mental health as a definition of abnormality?
Evaluate Statistical Infrequency as a definition of abnormality..?
Positives:
- Real World Application: used in clinical practise (formal diagnosis + assessment of severity of symptoms). E.g. IQ and BDI (Beck’s Depression Inventory). Shows value of statistical infrequency criterion in diagnostic processes.
Negatives:
- Infrequent characteristics can be positive as well as negative. E.g. having an IQ above 130 is ‘genius’ level and statistically infrequent. But this doesn’t make a person ‘abnormal’, therefore, although S.I. is part of diagnostic processes, it is never sufficient as a sole tool for defining abnormality.
- Social Stigma- negatively impacts someone e.g. low IQ as they will be labelled for the rest of their lives.
Evaluate Deviation from social norms as a definition of abnormality..?
Strength:
- Real World Application- used in clinical practise. Symptoms that deviate from social norms are often indicators of abnormality, such as Antisocial Personality Disorder, and Schizoptypal Personality Disorder. Shows value in psychiatry.
Weakness:
- Variability of social norms between cultures- one thing regarded as abnormal in western society (e.g. hearing voices) may be seen as normal in other cultures. Difficult to judge deviation from social norms across different situations + cultures.
- Unfair labelling + leaving them open to human rights abuses, destroy livelihood- can be used to control people e.g. nymphomania. BUT on the other hand it is useful for diagnosing conditions.
Evaluate Failure to function adequately as a definition of abnormality..?
Strength:
- F.T.F.A represents sensible threshold for people who need help. This criterion means treatment + services can be targeted to those who need them most.
Weakness:
- F.T.F.A makes it easy to label non-standard lifestyle choices as abnormal. Hard to say someone is failing to function if they chose to deviate from social norm. E.g. not having a job can be seen as Failing to Function, but people who choose to live without one may be inaccurately be called abnormal. Their freedom of choice might be restricted.
- It may be normal to fail to function once in a while, e.g. during abuse and bereavement. So is it really abnormal during distressing circumstances or is it actually normal?
Evaluate Deviation from ideal mental health as a definition of abnormality..?
Positive:
- Jahoda made ‘ideal mental health’ really comprehensive range of criteria for distinguishing mental health from illness. Criteria can be used meaningfully with healthcare professionals who have different theoretical views. (Medically trained look for symptoms, humanistic trained looks at self-actualisation). Therefore. Jahoda’s concept allows for a stringent check against a detailed criterion to help diagnose potential psychological problems.
Negative:
- Culture Bound- some elements of Jahoda’s criterion is not applicable to ALL cultures. Jahoda’s concepts follow western society expectations. Differences both within and outside of culture, e.g. idea of self-actualisation can be seen as both beneficial to mental health but also self-indulgent. Therefore, difficult to apply concept of I.M.H from one culture to another, difficult to make comparisons cross-culturally.
- Extremely high standards (unrealistic)- impossible to achieve all criteria at same time/ for long durations = disheartening to see impossible standards. BUT it is good for someone looking for a correct ideal mental health criteria that is beneficial.
What are the 3 types of Phobias?
- Specific Phobia- phobia of object/situation
- Social Phobia- phobia of social situation
- Agoraphobia- phobia of being outside/public place.
Name some examples of Phobias
Anything that u google and is correct. But here are some suggestions….:
- Arachnophobia- fear of spiders
- Nosophobia- fear of developing disease
- Hemophobia- fear of blood
- Necrophobia- fear of death/dead things
- Gynophobia- fear of women
- Trypophobia- fear of closely packed holes.
What are the Behavioural Clinical Characteristics of Phobias
What are the Emotional Clinical Characteristics of Phobias
What are the Cognitive Clinical Characteristics of Phobias
What is OCD and give three examples of OCD:
What are the Behavioural Clinical Characteristics of OCD?
What are the Emotional Clinical Characteristics of OCD?
What are the Cognitive Clinical Characteristics of OCD?
What is Depression and give some examples of Depression Disorders:
What are the Behavioural Clinical Characteristics of Depression?
What are the Emotional Clinical Characteristics of Depression?
What are the Cognitive Clinical Characteristics of Depression?
Describe the Behavioural Approach to explain Phobias:
“2-process model” used to explain Phobias- proposed by Mowrer (1960)
- Phobia is first acquired by Classical Conditioning (CC) and then phobias continue due to Operant Conditioning (OC).
Step 1: C.C. (Pavlov first proposed):
Object of NO fear (NS) associated with object with fear response (UCS).
Step 2: O.C. (Skinner first proposed):
Responses to CC often short-lived.
BUT phobias are long-lasting.
Mowrer says that there is an O.C. element to phobias.
Theory of **O.C. says that behaviour is either +/- reinforced/punished. **
+/- reinforcement of behaviour increases frequency of it.
Mowrer says when phobia is avoided, fear is successfully escaped, type of negative reinforcement.
Reduction in fear reinforces avoidance behaviour and phobia is maintained.
What are strengths of the 2-process model of explaining phobias?
- Real World Application- ‘exposure therapies’ (systematic desensitisation)
idea that phobias are maintained by avoidance of phobic stimulus explains why phobic people benefit from being exposed to phobic stimulus.
1. Avoidance Behaviour is prevented
2. Ceases to reinforce by experience of anxiety reduction
3. Avoidance declines (….cured phobia)
Therefore, the 2-process-model very valuable in improving people’s health/lifestyle. - There is evidence for link between bad experience+phobia
‘Little Albert’ study by Watson and Rayner (made non-phobic baby become phobic of white furry objects due to CC (sees rat and hears loud noise))
is evidence that scary event with stimulus can lead to phobic response of that stimulus.
Ad De Jongh et al (2006) found 73% of people with fear of dental treatment had previous traumatic experience with dentistry- compared to a control group with little dental anxiety, oly 21% had experienced traumatic event.
This confirms association between stimulus and UCR leads to development of phobia.
What are weakness of the 2-process model to explain phobias?
- Not all phobias appear after a bad experience
DiNardo et al (1988) found that 50% of healthy non-phobic individuals had anxious encounter with dogs - didn’t lead to dog phobia.
e.g. snake phobias are common in places where people haven’t encountered at all snakes.
THEREFORE, association between phobias and traumatic events isnt as strong as behavioural theorists suggest. Incomplete explanation. - 2-process model doesnt account for cognitive aspect of phobias. Model is only geared towards avoidance behaviour- whereas phobias are more than avoidance responses, they are irrational cognitions too.
Therefore, incomplete explanation- other factors. - Biological Preparedness, alternate approach
innate predisposition to acquire certain fears that has been passed through evolution. are phobias of e.g. snakes, irrational or are we evolved to be cautious.