Chapter 4 Attention Flashcards

(40 cards)

1
Q

Paying Attention

A

a process- deciphering a specific target

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Can we pay attention with all our senses?

A

Yes- sight, smell, taste, touch, auditory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

attention

A

concentrating effort on a mental or environmental stimulus or event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

4 meanings of attention

A
  1. Alertness and Arousal
  2. Orienting and searching
  3. Filtering and selecting
  4. mental resources and conscious processing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can we control our attention?

A

NO- there is automatic processing that happens

-we pay attention to what is important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Attention and focus for learning is in what part of the brain?

A

Frontal lobe when being learned but after you learn it the basal ganglia lights up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Atkinson and Shiffrin Model

A
  • suggested 3 boxes that respreset memory
    1. Sensory Memory
    2. Short Term Memory
    3. Long Term Memory
  • box and arrow model
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What type of information do we deal with best?

A

Positive information (answers that are YES)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Types of dependant variables

A

Reaction Time

Accuracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Types of Attention Tasks

A
  1. Selective Attention- require subject to focus on a target & ignore other stimuli occurring (distractor task)
  2. Divided Attention- ask participant to do at least two tasks at once
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Divided Attention Tasks

A

Performance suffers greatly when attention is divided.

Grad student in Portland juggling and riding a unicycle people on cell phones did not see it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Edward C. Tolman

A

Developed concept of a cognitive map

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

General attention themes

A
  • always more information than we can pay attention to
  • serious limitation in our attention capacity
  • we can perform learned skills with no attention
  • practice allows us to pay less and less attention to a given task
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

HOw do we focus or shift attention?

A
  • ask someone to pay attention

- reflexive shifting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Reflexive shifting

A

signal that you react to causing you to shift attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Priming and attention

A

Brain has a tendency to create other things that were not there ex) word list, seeing the cow after MOO being written on the board)
Powerful way to help understand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Visual Orienting

A
Diagram 
Exogenous-  bottom up (reflexive)
Endogenous- top down (voluntary) 
Overt Gaze Shift (eye movement) 
Covert Attention Shift (attention)
18
Q

Reflexive Control Task

A

DV- RT of valid neutral or invalid decision
Results- RT lower for valid trials than invalid
Deal with Positive information better than negative
(boxes lighting up/arrow)

19
Q

Triesman & Gelade 1980

A
-search for shapes or colours 
Varied number of items in the display 
What happens to reaction time as # of items in the display increases?
(1,,5,15,30) 
IV1- 2 levels 
disjunctive (find shape OR colour) 
conjunctive (item must have BOTH) 
IV2- 4 levels #of items 
1 5 15 30 
Results- 
Disjunctive- Negative trial when object is not there (much longer) 
Conjunctive- #of items does have an effect on reaction time especially long if target is not there
20
Q

Selective Attention

A

trying to pick out the target

21
Q

Dichotic Listening Task Study

A

DV- are the people able to shadow the target message ie-repeat it as you hear it
Accuracy
IV- different distractor messages
-recall something from distractor message?
4 levels:
1. Control male voice only no distractor
2. Same voice in both channels- diff distractor
3. same voice in both channels- similar distractor
4. different voice different message

22
Q

Results of Dichotic Listening Task

A

-shadowing was possible
Order of difficulty
1. Same voice- same message (HARD)
2. Same voice- different message
3. Different voice- different message (EASY)
-could not remember anything about the message

23
Q

Further Dichotic Listening Task

A
Vary middle segment of distractor 
4 IV's 
1. Control: male voice no change 
2. Female voice: english words 
3. Male Voice- reversed speech 
4. 400Hz 
RESULTS- could identify change from male to female, tone stimulus 
-no recall of any information
24
Q

Further Dichotic Listening Task led to..

A

A proposed filter model (information is filtered at some stage)

  • both messages get into sensory register, sound is processed but not content
  • only one message get processed through for a response.
25
Sequence of Shadowing Task
Incoming msg-> sensory analysis (physical processing-> Gramatical & semantic analysis-> awareness-> response
26
Moray Experiment
Repeat same word 35 times- poor recall | Subjects could recall their own name though
27
Triesman Study
Dichotic listening task sentence switched ears and the subject switched ears as well Therefore there is evidence of semantic processing and the original filter model must be tossed out
28
Corteen and Wood (Clever Methodology) | Phase 1
Test to see if distractor is processed Phase 1: Classical Conditioning- mild shock when a city name is heard CS (cityname) + US (shock) DV- skin response (can record changes in how much electricity you conduct, EDR=electrodermal skin response)
29
Cotreen and Wood Phase 2
Dichotic Task- present city names in both messages do they show a skin response?
30
Corteen and Wood Results
EDR was equal in both messages Conclusion: must be processing distractor message to a semantic level -could not remember the city names were in the distractor -means there is automatic processing for auditory stimulus to the level of its meaning
31
Mackay 1973
Subjects shadow ambiguous sentences ex) she threw stones at the bank -distractor message resolved ambiguity Memory Task- recognize target sentences that included correct or incorrect definition that they had received in the distractor message Distractor Message=priming tesll us information in distractor message is being processed Therefore filtering occurs later in the process
32
Pertinence Model
- no early filter - example of alte selection model - selection happens late in the processing - move away from idea of sequential processing
33
Kahneman's 1973 Model of attention and effort
Switch from box to processing model - resources allocation model - attention requires resources - no specific sequence
34
COST/Benefit analysis of early processing
COST- loss of information that could be useful | B- reduces amount of processing that you have to do (speed vs. accuracy trade off)
35
Cost/Benefit analysis of late processing
C- increased processing demands -process more information B- more information to guide your choice
36
Is late or early processing better?
- ^ processing demands are minimal - late is kind we want to have - no need to specify when it happens more important to pick what we remember and what to pay attention to
37
Limited Resources
- if capacity not exceeded we can perform 2 or more tasks at once - if exceeded then at least one task will suffer - we can consciously allocate resources
38
Posner & Boies 1971 Method
2 tasks at once Primary letter-black-letter (match yes/no) Secondary- tone press button when hear a tone
39
Results
- not much attention demand for reading 1st letter - huge cost in reaction time when attention capacity is exceeded ex) driving and come to after a short period of not knowing what happened
40
Strayer and Johnson (2001)
Hyp- distracted drivers miss stimuli while talking on a cell phone higher processing resources needed for cellphone use than listening to the radio Method- used a driving simulation computer program with a joystick