Chapter 6 Long Term Memory Flashcards

(31 cards)

1
Q

Divisions of Memory

A

Declarative (explicit)

Nondeclarative (implicit)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Declarative

A

facts (declare facts

Events (personal things/things only you would know)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Nondeclarative

A

-skills (don’t have concious access)
habits-
priming-
simple classical conditioning- (distractor message cotrin and wood study)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

episode

A

some event that is time tagged with personal cues, emotional and basic connection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

amnesia

A

lack of memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

retrograde amnesia

A

can’t remember things from the past

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

anterograde amnesia

A

trouble storing new information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

encephalitis

A

severe form of anterograde amnesia, damage to frontal lobe, in the moment perfectly fine but can’t place
-life is an ever repeating moment of first awakenings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Episodic vs. Semantic Memory

A

see ppt slide #2

-semantic is more usefull

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

LTM Process

A

Encoding- how do we deal with it when it is coming in? ex) pairing words via diagram
Storage- STM to LTM
Retrieval- need to be able to retrive information to answer a question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Metamemory

A

awareness of what is in our memory and what is not (know what is there but sometimes have trouble retrieving)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bower and Whimzen

A

repeat pairs of words vs. picture image of the two words

-image was much more successful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Palmere et al.

A

subjects given 16 paragraphs to remember, the paragraphs with more specific examples were remembered better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Bower, Clark, Lesgold, Winzenz 1969

A
2 groups 
1. Words in hierarchy 
2. Same words but random order 
better recall in group 1, remember better when organized into categories or hierarchically 
4 trials to get it right 
group 1=100% on 4th trial 
group 2=62% on 4th trial
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Levels of Processing IV

A

2 phases in experiment
present list of words with varying instructions
IV=orienting task/instructions
subjects ascted to answer questions about each word then asked to recall the words later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Level of Processing

A

Structural- is the words in capital letters?
Phonemic- does the word rhyme with weight
Category/Semantic- ist the word a type of fish?
Sentence/Semantic- He met a _____ in the street (does the word fit in the sentence)
-remember better with semantic processing

17
Q

INcidental

A

learn you have to recall the words just before recall

18
Q

Intentional

A

instructions before you do anything you know it will be a memory task

19
Q

Incidental and Intentional are…

A

explicit versions of the same task (both asking to remember the episode of reading the list of words)

20
Q

Results of Incidental vs. intentional

A

Count letters- Inc- 9.9 Int-12.4
Letter E- Inc-9.4 Int- 10.9
Pleasantness (semantic)-16.3 for both

21
Q

Inc and int conclusion

A

knowing b/f=no difference @semantic level

knowing b/f= difference @ structural level

22
Q

Processing on semantic level

A
  • if you can relate a word to your situation you remember it better because you process it on a semantic level and process it further
  • at this level it takes longer to process the task as well thus MORE processing happens because it takes longer to decide
23
Q

Bower and Karlin (image study)

A

Rated by honesty likeableness and gender, knowing gender does not take as long to process as the other 2 characteristics thus we also show the levels of processing effect with images

24
Q

Jacoby and Crain

A

Similar pairs vs. Very different pairs
DV- how different the pairs of objects are (incidental task)
similar pairs pictures recalled better because more processing happens to determine if they are different

25
Craik & Tulving 1975 IVs & levels
Levels prediction- semantic processing will produce equal recall 3 IV's 1) orienting task (does the word fit into the sentence) simple, med, compelx 2) positive or negative (yes or no) 3) Cued or non-cued (sentence given at re-call)
26
Craik & Tulving Results
significant effect with more complex sentence type - better at remembering words that fit into sentences (YES) - cued response increase when the word fit into the sentence no advantage with cued recall and word that did not fit the sentence
27
Tulving and Osler
``` List of 24 words- Group 1- given low associate word Group 2- no cue At recall- 1/2 of each group given cue 1/2 of each group not given cue demonstrates Encoding Specificity Effect ```
28
Encoding Specificity Effect
a cue available during encoding will aid recall best if it is also available during retrieval -do not need to be aware of this effect
29
Examples of encoding specificity effect studies
female voice/male voice underwater/on land happy/sad *always produces High Low Low High bar graph
30
Outshining effect
the more well learned something is no matter where you are you can always retrieve it -well known material is NOT subjected to the encoding specificity effect
31
Typical memory task is...
episodic- recall the words ont eh list during the episode/ when in your life did you last hear these words)