Chapter 5: Competitive Rivalry & Dynamics Flashcards

(29 cards)

1
Q

rivalry suggests

A
  1. firms = mutually interdependent
  2. affected by each other’s actions/responses
  3. marketplace success = function of individ strats. & consequences of their use
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

rivalry can have a major effect on

A
  1. financial performance (profitability)
  2. market position
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

competitor analysis: 2 dimensions of competition determine the extent to which firms are competitors

A
  1. market commonality

=>multimarket = decr comp; decr P(inititate)

  1. resource similarity => sw, strat, op.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

comp rivalry: likelihood of attack

A
  1. first mover benefits
  2. org size
  3. quality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

comp rivalry: likelihood of attack: first mover benefits:

3 risks

A
  1. difficult to accurately estimate returns from product innovations
  2. cost to develop = substantial => reducing available slack
  3. lack of product acceptance over course of innovations => less willingness in the future to accept risks of being a first mover
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

comp rivalry: likelihood of attack: first mover benefits: 2nd mover

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

comp rivalry: likelihood of attack: first mover benefits: late mover

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

comp rivalry: likelihood of attack: org size

A

large: likely to initiate more (strategic) actions during given period
small: more likely to launch actions & do so more quickly => speed & surprise => variety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

comp rivalry: likelihood of attack: quality:

8 product quality dimensions

A
  1. performance
  2. features
  3. flexibility
  4. durability
  5. conformance
  6. serviceability
  7. aesthetics
  8. perceived quality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

8 product quality dimensions: performance

A

operating characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

8 product quality dimensions: features

A

important special characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

8 product quality dimensions: flexibility

A

meeting operating specifications over a period of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

8 product quality dimensions: durability

A

amount of use before performance deteriorates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

8 product quality dimensions: conformance

A

match with pre-estabilished standards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

8 product quality dimensions: serviceability

A

ease and speed of repair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

8 product quality dimensions: aesthetics

A

how a product looks and feels

17
Q

8 product quality dimensions: perceived quality

A

subjective assessment of characteristics (product image)

18
Q

comp rivalry: first mover benefits: quality: 6 service quality dimensions

A
  1. timeliness
  2. courtesy
  3. consistency
  4. convenience
  5. completeness
  6. accuracy
19
Q

6 service quality dimensions: timeliness

A

performed in the promised period of time

20
Q

6 service quality dimensions: courtesy

A

performed cheerfully

21
Q

6 service quality dimensions: consistency

A

giving all customers similar experiences each time

22
Q

6 service quality dimensions: convenience

A

accessibility to customers

23
Q

6 service quality dimensions: completeness

A

fully serviced, as required

24
Q

6 service quality dimensions: accuracy

A

performed correctly each time

25
comp rivalry: likelihood of response: evaluate 3 factors
1. type of action 2. actor's reputation 3. market dependence
26
competitive dynamics: varying rates of competitive speed in markets
1. slow-cycle 2. fast-cycle 3. standard-cycle
27
competitive dynamics: slow-cycle
- comp adv. = sustainable over longer periods of time (diff to understand) - capability = unique & proprietary - actions/responses: protect, maintain, extend - ex: disney, drugs (pfizer & lipitor), copyrights, patents
28
competitive dynamics: fast-cycle
- comp adv. not sustainable - tech based & much comp. - complex decisions: speed & comprehensive - reverse engineer & % of tech diffusion =\> rapid imitation - volatile =\> innovation = engine of growth - firm avoids loyalty - cannibalize own/upgrade - stretegic alliances
29
competitive dynamics: standard-cycle
- seek large market share & loyalty (brand) & controlled ops. - economies of scale - intense comp bc of: 1) lg volumes 2) mass mkt size 3) scale economies - CCs = less specialized - imitation comes less quickly and is more expensive - innovation = incremental